- Joined
- Aug 4, 2019
Being a lifelong FFWBT, even before those titties and that gunt grew so large, that probably helps.
I Know Why the Closeted Fat Man Oinks by Brian Keene, 2026.
Last edited:
Patrick Sean Tomlinson / @stealthygeek / "Torque Wheeler" / @RealAutomanic / Kempesh / Padawan v2.5 - "Conservative" sci-fi author with TDS, armed "drunk with anger management issues" and terminated parental rights, actual tough guy, obese, paid Quasi, paid thousands to be repeatedly unbanned from Twitter
- Thread starter Caverlock
- Start date
- Joined
- May 31, 2024
I agree, but the only way I can see this anger overcoming his cowardice is if he did it in a way he was absolutely sure there would be no conflict, like through poisoning or shooting Boomia in the back for instance.
I would say he is a complete woman even when it comes to killing, but I know some women who are not pussies. So I won't.
- Joined
- May 31, 2021
I agree.
I was only semi joking with the Anti Dexter nonsense.
His known to him enemies are actually lucky that he is a fat coward and nowhere near as competent in violence or a real life tough guy as he believes himself to be.
If he even had the audacity of someone like Charlie Zelinov, then I am sure he would have seriously injured someone by now at a minimum.
Obviously the Milwaukee police don’t agree, but I do think he is a credible suspect for Bernie Trammel.
I absolutely could imagine him feeling slighted by Trammel, then returning later to shoot Trammel in the back, if he thought he could get away with it.
That guy who showed up in Hooligans and ended up being taken to court by Pat?
Even Pat must have realized that if he had waited in the shadows and shot the guy as he left Hooligans, then the police would put two and two together and arrested him.
The guy was a stranger to the area but had made it publicly clear he intended to meet and possibly fight Pat, so even the dumbest, most donut filled copper would consider Patrick a prime suspect.
So obviously Patrick just had to settle for trying to get the guy imprisoned for life on charges of felonious going to a bar.
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2022
7 years of childing stalkers but they will still be enjoying prison
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2024
Confusion megathread here:
Includes email chain with Diaper Dan, Boq Precision's boss, Fatrick, and the entire convention staff.
Includes email chain with Diaper Dan, Boq Precision's boss, Fatrick, and the entire convention staff.
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2019
He whom the gods would bring low first raise up high so the fall is that much greater. Ghetto rich Piggy would be a thing to behold. How would he squander the settlement? Remember his gloating after his "wins" in removing the subreddits? A lawsuit win would create an entirely new field of rakes for Piggy to dance through. And dance he will.
A jury of Blacks would hate him. They would see a petulant man-child who threw nasty tantrums at the police, and suffered no consequences for it. Such privilege. They may award him damages, but it would be a token amount, say US $1.00. The defense should have no trouble making any jury hate Piggy. He'll do most of the work for the defense.
There is no way he avoids a deposition, and he will lie, lie and lie. We've seen him try to deceive the court before, with the Nadolski TRO fiasco. He'll try again. The defense will let him think he got away with it. Then his lies will come back to doom him. We may never see the deposition, which is a bummer.
Don't take the predictions and speculations too seriously. There are facts to this case that we do not know because the information is sealed. The defense thinks they can prevail. Piggy thinks that he can prevail. No matter the outcome, the milk will flow. Piggy has something incredibly stupid in the works.
A jury of Blacks would hate him. They would see a petulant man-child who threw nasty tantrums at the police, and suffered no consequences for it. Such privilege. They may award him damages, but it would be a token amount, say US $1.00. The defense should have no trouble making any jury hate Piggy. He'll do most of the work for the defense.
There is no way he avoids a deposition, and he will lie, lie and lie. We've seen him try to deceive the court before, with the Nadolski TRO fiasco. He'll try again. The defense will let him think he got away with it. Then his lies will come back to doom him. We may never see the deposition, which is a bummer.
Don't take the predictions and speculations too seriously. There are facts to this case that we do not know because the information is sealed. The defense thinks they can prevail. Piggy thinks that he can prevail. No matter the outcome, the milk will flow. Piggy has something incredibly stupid in the works.
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2020
Shows what you know, child, when he's wearing a pink shirt and is around fat white women he's even able to gaily lisp at people without even pissing himself in fear, that is until he notices they went elsewhere anyway that is. Truly the courage of pig knows no bounds!
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
What I'm not seeing is the "clearly established law" at issue here. There's virtually no case law on the context of 1983 relating to swattings, much less "clearly established law."
I hope Pat wins on there having been a violation of Fourth Amendment or other rights here, but that since it wasn't "clearly established" at the time, Pat still loses. That way the public benefits from the new precedent but Pat still doesn't get dick.
Anasûrimbor Kellhus
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 9, 2022
A bunch of pests should show up to the con in “prison enjoyer” costumes of some sort.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
If he refuses to answer questions under deposition, and the city has to move to compel him to answer under threat of contempt, attorney fees will be automatically assessed against him, whether he wins or loses the case. These kinds of sanctions can be huge (like they were in Quasi's civil case when he was also on the losing end of a discovery dispute but in his case attempting to enforce a subpoena).
You can easily "win" your suit but have your "win" wiped out by the amount of the discovery sanctions and even end up in the hole.
I can easily see Fatty fucking himself like that, especially because while he knows to be meeker when there's a judge in the room who can just immediately chuck his fat ass in jail if he mouths off, the judge is not going to be there at a deposition.
Also Pat is a flabbergastingly contrary retard. I wouldn't be surprised if a good defense lawyer could get him to angrily deny some necessary part of his own case just by asking him about it.
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2019
“We award the FFWBT a million dollars, which after discovery sanction costs comes to … owing MPD $83,736.99”
That also explains his lawsuit cope - he didn’t lose so much as explode on the way to the starting line.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
They can take his deposition in which he will lie voluminously even after watching video of something. To the extent his case is reliant on his own testimony, it's not going to hold up because Pat has zero credibility as a witness.
The only incident where the cops were objectively out of line was the time they were threatening to kick in his door despite being apparently of the belief it was another bogus call. However, all they did was look in to ensure what had been reported was not in fact happening, then left. "The cop was kind of a rude dick" isn't a civil rights violation.
So if there's any material factual dispute about what actually happened in that incident, and I don't know if there's still bodycam of it or what it shows, and it requires weighing the credibility of Pat versus the cops, Pat loses.
If he testifies, his social media is littered with literally tens of thousands of total lies about easily verifiable things, including things on video and in his previous court records. Never mind that even without social media, there's the incident during the Hoolie's lolsuit, where he got called out by the judge for trying to present fabricated evidence.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Oct 29, 2020
I initially read this as, "he will lie voluptuously" and I didn't even question it. If nothing else, Patrick is still a Fat Faggot with Bitch Tits after all.
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2022
There's just something about him that skeevs me out too, yeah. He seems to have very sadistic qualities in his speech, which itself isn't a sin, but you can tell he really relishes (attempting) to talk down to people he perceives as beneath him. If I was a black child I would be worried, because I think he would put me in the pepperoni slicer on 'slow'.
- Joined
- May 31, 2021
He puts them all in the grinder on slow as possible.
Before they are even dead, he makes sure they see him stuffing their ground lower appendages into casings.
They don’t have any doubt as to what is happening as they die.
Markorian
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2019
Keffals, Liz Fong Jones, Ethan Ralph, and every person in the zoosadism leaks could team up to gun down a cop that was guarding the Kiwifarms server itself, and there would still be people here defending them because "cop bad!". Cops fucking suck as a general rule, but guys, there's room for nuance.
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2020
Wrong as always, stalker. He'll head to the gym later, hang around the sauna.
Well Intentioned
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2018
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2019
No, child. There is not. Over 50 times did Titty Rick try to bait the police into forcefully entering his residence, violently overpowering him, calling him names, slapping his fat bitch tits while laughing about what a faggot he is, and then running a train on him/spit roasting him. He even attempted to coax similar behavior out of them by swinging the gayest punch he could muster at them, but they merely detained him briefly. If Patty Tomlinson, the pinnacle of conservative American masculine success, can't get his local cops to satisfy his desire for rough gay sex and suitable lawsuit fodder, does it sound as if he's got anything other than bad cops in his city? Felony Faucet Dick Teasing is no joke, stalker.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
I think at this point, any PD should have some training on issues like swatting, because it's become an epidemic recently. So far as I know, though, there is no "clearly established law" to that effect. It's possible the court interprets preexisting law about what police can do in response to 911 calls in general as establishing a duty of responsibility when answering a hoax call, but that sounds like an awful lot like expecting every officer to be a lawyer.
Hope v. Pelzer is the leading case on this kind of interpretation of "clearly established law." A District Court had thrown out a prisoner lawsuit alleging violation of civil rights by binding him on a "hitching post" in a stress position for some minor infraction. The court's reasoning was there was no "clearly established law" specifically addressing this form of torture.
Ultimately, the Supreme Court responded that it doesn't have to be exactly precise as to the details, but harsh physical punishment that amounted to torture is clearly established to be unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment. You can't just wiggle around that by coming up with some novel method of physical torture.
So basically plaintiff's counsel is going to have to argue that some level of responsibility applies to responding to 911 responses in general and the police violated that and should have known it was a violation ("clearly established").
I don't really see that flying since Pat's essentially arguing they should have established a special protocol just for him to respond to a situation apparently relatively novel to the MPD.
That said, it's already (partly) survived a motion to dismiss, discovery is expensive, and 1983 lawsuits have a small but nonzero chance of a plaintiff's victory that gets a ridiculous jury verdict, so offering a lowball settlement to give the squealing pig a nominal victory is a definite possibility.
If it goes to discovery, and it seems to be headed there, the next opportunity for a bite at the apple on a qualified immunity argument is probably at the summary judgment stage, if Fatty doesn't somehow get in discovery shenanigans that lead to terminating sanctions. Presumably, his lawyer knows he has a client who needs some tard wrangling and may wrangle him into compliance.