US Trump’s Bro-Whispering Could Cost Democrats Too Many Young Men - Struggling in the polls? Call for a draft!


Generation Z is poised to flex its growing political muscle in the 2024 presidential election, and in my surveys and focus groups with these voters, I’m seeing the strong potential for a turning point in American political alignment. Unlike other recent Republican presidential nominees, Donald Trump is making young men a central focus of his campaign. If effective, his effort could peel enough away from the Democratic Party to transform the country’s electoral math for years to come.

Recent data from the Harvard Youth Poll, a national survey I oversee for the Harvard Kennedy School Institute of Politics, reveals an increasing political rift between young men and women under 30, two groups critical to Democrats’ success in recent elections. Almost exactly equal shares of young men and young women say they will definitely vote in this election or have already done so. But since the spring of 2020, the share of young men identifying as registered Democrats has dropped by seven percentage points, while those identifying as Republicans have increased by seven points — a net shift of 14 points in just four years. Young women, during the same period, shifted two points away from the Republicans.

Take one young Pittsburgh man I met in a recent focus group. A college graduate working part-time as a bartender, he felt weighed down by hopelessness, adrift in a country where rising costs, stagnant wages and lack of affordable housing have made even the modest ambitions of other generations feel out of reach for him. “Hope is great,” he told me, “but I see nothing for the future.”

The young man’s experience reflects a broader crisis of confidence and purpose, rooted in economic insecurity and social disconnection. The Covid pandemic exacerbated the alienation, with many first-time voters spending thousands of hours isolated and online in their formative years.

While these struggles affect the whole country, they weigh especially on young men of all educational, racial and ethnic backgrounds. Nearly three-quarters of Gen Z men report feeling regularly stressed by an uncertain future, stirring painful memories of the Great Recession they witnessed as children. These feelings erode self-esteem and diminish their interest in personal relationships and long-term planning, leading many to describe their future as “bleak,” “unclear” and “scary.”

Today’s young men are lonelier than ever and have inherited a world rife with skepticism toward the institutions designed to promote and defend American ideals. Men under 30 are nearly twice as likely to be single as women their same age; Gen Z men are less likely to enroll in college or the work force than previous generations. They have higher rates of suicide and are less likely than their female peers to receive treatment for mental health maladies. Most young men in my polling say they fear for our country’s future, and nearly half doubt their cohort’s ability to meet our nation’s coming challenges.

Mr. Trump has tapped these anxieties by weaving a hypermasculine message of strength and defiance into his broader narrative that undermines confidence in democratic institutions. And it’s working. Aware that boasting about “killing” Roe v. Wade drove away young women, Mr. Trump zeroed in on capturing a larger share of the young male vote. In four years, he cut what was once a 19-percentage point Democratic margin among registered young male voters (50 percent Mr. Biden, 31 percent Mr. Trump) roughly in half (48 percent Ms. Harris, 38 percent Mr. Trump) in our poll.

His playbook? A master class in bro-whispering: championing crypto, securing the endorsement of Dave Portnoy — the unapologetically offensive founder of Barstool Sports — and giving U.F.C. President Dana White, who embodies the alpha-male archetype that appeals to many young men, a prime spot at the Republican National Convention. Mr. Trump has also cultivated relationships with simpatico comedians, pranksters, influencers and Silicon Valley billionaires like Elon Musk — all while his team bombards podcasts and social media with misinformation and memes to rally his troops.

This shift in support for Mr. Trump among men is neither organic nor unexpected. It’s what happens when a well-coordinated political operation invests tens of millions of dollars to amplify Mr. Trump’s narrative and weaken confidence in the party in power. Compared with when Mr. Trump ran in 2020, young male voters are now less likely to support government-backed climate change solutions (down 15 points, according to our poll) and affirmative action for qualified candidates (down eight points). They are more likely to question immigration policy (up 12 points), free trade (up 10 points) and whether government stimulus leads to economic growth (up seven points). They are also more likely to believe that religious values should play a more important role in government (up six points).

Is this rightward drift among young men simply a short-lived, Trump-inspired episode or a more permanent transformation? The answer lies partly in Ms. Harris’s ability to connect with and motivate young voters as the campaign nears its end.

To be sure, she is doing better than Mr. Biden. Among men 18 to 29, her favorable rating is 44 percent, seven percentage points higher than Mr. Biden’s and thirteen points higher than Mr. Trump’s. While Mr. Biden’s age and traditional political approach often created distance with younger voters, Ms. Harris’s ability to engage across digital platforms and tap into youth culture sets her apart. Our polling also shows that while Mr. Trump has made significant inroads with young men, more still find Ms. Harris more relatable and competent. Mr. Trump still holds a narrow advantage on the economy, patriotism and strength, but Ms. Harris’s connection with young men continues to grow, suggesting she has yet to reach her ceiling with this demographic.

But to win more votes from young men, Ms. Harris must address their fears head-on and present a bold vision that speaks to their desire for purpose and strength. Of course, a clear economic vision that charts a pathway to financial independence is paramount, but it may not be enough to counter Mr. Trump’s appeal on this issue in the closing days. Ms. Harris needs to go big.

Here’s one way. To reignite the hope of the emerging generation, Ms. Harris should make a sweeping national call to both military and civilian service — name it the Generation Z Compact to Rebuild and Renew America. Such a plan would offer a sense of identity, community and patriotism, while providing economic stability and skill-building — things many young men feel they are missing.

Young Americans have consistently voiced support for national service programs, yet political action has yet to catch up. A 2021 survey revealed that 71 percent of adults under 25 were open to participating in a service program. Even more striking, a poll conducted last year found that about 75 percent of young people backed mandatory national service. These numbers tell a clear story: Our youth’s appetite for civic engagement is strong and growing.

From President Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal Civilian Conservation Corps in 1933 to President John F. Kennedy’s Peace Corps in 1961 to President Bill Clinton’s AmeriCorps in 1993, national service has been a cornerstone of American resilience, transformation and progress. More than three decades after the last significant civic engagement initiative, Kamala Harris can frame national service as a pathway to rebuilding America’s strength from within, addressing growing concerns about military recruitment and bridging political divides with a renewed sense of shared responsibility.

Donald Trump has gained ground with Gen Z by systematically exploiting the fears and insecurities of young men, making them feel that their masculinity and future are under siege. Kamala Harris can counter that narrative by listening and recognizing their fears but also by offering something more profound: a vision of hope, strength and shared purpose.

John Della Volpe is the director of polling at the Harvard Kennedy School Institute of Politics. He is the author of “Fight: How Gen Z Is Channeling Their Fear and Passion to Save America.” He was a pollster for Joe Biden’s presidential campaign in 2020 and runs a research firm that conducted polls for a PAC supporting the Joe Biden and Kamala Harris campaigns.
 
Trump's path to victory has always been to mobilise (young) men because that's the voting block Democrats shit on. The fact that they are worried about that but do nothing to fix their rhetoric is hilarious and will be even more hilarious if that's what cost them their first female president again

It's also a needless self inflicted wound pushed be the cat lady tribe of the political left. Far left political movements did not have the problem of alienating men in the past. The slant to the right is a new phenomenon.
Look at the post history . Faggot tranny degenerate and woman-hater.
I don't give a shit that Trump won, but it's hilarious how many faggots and trannies simply hate women. Perfectly illustrates why women should stop having children. These faggots just have a hard on for hating women.
 
Look at the post history . Faggot tranny degenerate and woman-hater.
I don't give a shit that Trump won, but it's hilarious how many faggots and trannies simply hate women. Perfectly illustrates why women should stop having children. These faggots just have a hard on for hating women.
It was his childless cat lady comment wasn't it?
 
Look at the post history . Faggot tranny degenerate and woman-hater.
I don't give a shit that Trump won, but it's hilarious how many faggots and trannies simply hate women. Perfectly illustrates why women should stop having children. These faggots just have a hard on for hating women.

PROTIP: Woman aren't having kids with faggots and trannies.
 
You mean 'legalise deadbeat dad-ism'?

I'm sorry, I had no idea you were a fucking nigger.
To be fair democrats and the pro-abortion crowd basically set the stage for this:
If a man has no say in whether or not a woman carries a pregnancy to term, why should he then be considered responsible for someone else's choices that he ultimately has nothing to do with?

He has the legal rights of a sperm donor, so the law should consider him thus when it comes to liabilities
 
And courts have voided those in the past.. when it came to child support. No joke.. insane shit.
Family courts in this country are shit. They basically have license to act unilaterally in ways completely alien to any other legal tradition in our country, ostensibly for the dumbass reason of "for the best interests of the children awwww".

There have been cases where dudes got cheated on, their kid's actually the other guy's kid, but the courts have ordered child support from the victim anyway.

I grew up in foster care and I saw the system from the inside. It's shit. And I grew up in a relatively wealthy state. I can't imagine what it's like to go through in foster care in somewhere like Mississippi or somewhere like that.

Regardless, paternal rights conceptually exist. The courts are in desperate need of reform. But the baseline concept does exist.

That's really my only point.
 
PROTIP: Woman aren't having kids with faggots and trannies.
Men ensnare women into marriage and babies and THEN come out and troon out.
There are endless examples of this on KF, many of these men portray themselves as "conservative, faithful, masculine manly men" when they court women... then once the woman is sufficiently "trapped", the degenerate fetishism comes out.
It was his childless cat lady comment wasn't it?
No. The dude literally posts endlessly on woman hate thread, but also believes trannies are valid, men should be able to cross dress, that gays and faggots have the right to have surrogates, that troons should have rights to female spaces, low key defends troons. Is likely a troon who is hiding their troon identity. They like to hang out in MGTOW and incel type boards to complain about women and to groom men towards faggotry/troonism by dropping their subtle pro-faggot-men's-rights-troon-rights talking points.
 
Look at the post history . Faggot tranny degenerate and woman-hater.
I don't give a shit that Trump won, but it's hilarious how many faggots and trannies simply hate women. Perfectly illustrates why women should stop having children. These faggots just have a hard on for hating women.
Dear god nigga, seek therapy. Nobody would want to have kids with a bitch who clearly hates kids in the first place. The main reason for misoginy in the first place outside of incel retards unable to get laid is shitty mothers and particularly single mothers.
 
It is.
Getting a woman pregnant during sex isn't related to the woman's choice to carry that pregnancy to term, which she in no way requires the man's consent or input for.
She needs the man's consent to carry a pregnancy to term. Pregnancies don't usually exist with some male consent involved in the process. Idk maybe if she uses a tazer to zap the jizz out of his nuts or something.
 
She needs the man's consent to carry a pregnancy to term. Pregnancies don't usually exist with some male consent involved in the process. Idk maybe if she uses a tazer to zap the jizz out of his nuts or something.
You're being obtuse. The act of having sex and falling pregnant is unrelated to the choice to fulfill that pregnancy in a world with abortifacients.
 
In what way?
I get what you're saying. That rejecting a pregnancy is its own decision. And there substance to that argument. But you can't wholesale dismiss the fact that the pregnancy wouldn't exist at all without consensual male interaction. Claiming that an abortion is 100% divorced from the circumstances of the original conception is silly manchild nonsense.
 
But you can't wholesale dismiss the fact that the pregnancy wouldn't exist at all without consensual male interaction.
Would you feel differently if the man wrapped it up first? That seems to be a pretty clear indication that he does not desire to share his semen or become a father, no?

Should his wishes not be respected in that instance?
 
Would you feel differently if the man wrapped it up first? That seems to be a pretty clear indication that he does not desire to share his semen or become a father, no?

Should his wishes not be respected in that instance?
It's a substantially better argument, absolutely.
 
John Della Volpe is the director of polling at the Harvard Kennedy School Institute of Politics.
Volpe wrote this shit a few weeks before the election. Given his position and presumed expertise, he knew the numbers were heavily against Harris at this point and must have known an appeal for national service would in no appreciable way move those numbers enough to change the outcome on election day. He wrote this piece because (1) He knew it was unlikely to sway anyone on Harris' campaign to make it a major talking point and (2) Because it was a safe recommendation, one that wouldn't come back to bite him if they actually floated it and it flopped.

Thing is, reinvigorating the Peace Corps might work if they gave it a capitalist, this-is-how-the-world-works spin. Send young people out there in the world to teach people how commerce actually functions. Show them how to effectively exploit what little resources they have because teaching indigenous peoples the latest in progressive Marxist intersectionality doesn't build the dam they really need to keep the lights on. That's how you make a better world.
 
It's a substantially better argument, absolutely.
With this in mind, do you feel that the legal protections for a man who finds himself in such a scenario (where the rubber breaks and the woman decides to carry the baby to term, making him liable for a child he expressly did not want) sufficient?
 
Back