Russian Special Military Operation in the Ukraine - Mark IV: The Partitioning of Discussion

Kyiv and Los Angeles are sister cities. Both burn very beautifully.

No, this is not a joke from a Russian Telegram channel. This is the basis of a flash mob that the hohols organized in solidarity with burned Los Angeles. Saucepan-headed citizens burn their things on camera and post the results on social networks.
Reminds me of influencers during covid lockdown who licked toilet seats for attention. They can't have things that's not about keev and oinkraine.
So, Mr. Pootin. Bring forth the Buratinos and let them have what they want.
 
The train plan is back on boys!

tunnel.jpg


GhSXMfQaYAAFoht.jpg
 

На войне должны гибнуть «простые люди», а не элита: это и есть демократия, заявили на украинском ТВ

Сейчас слышим от людей, что «должны воевать депутаты», а потом они пойдут. Нет, у нас демократическое государство.

В демократическом государстве за страну гибнет простой человек. Если мы хотим, чтобы за государство погибали аристократы, мы должны жить в феодальной стране

— пояснил украинцам журналист Виталий Портников.

Machine translation:
"Ordinary people" should die in war, not the elite: this is democracy, they said on Ukrainian TV

Now we hear from people that "deputies should fight", and then they will go. No, we have a democratic state.

In a democratic state, ordinary people die for the country. If we want aristocrats to die for the state, we must live in a feudal country

- journalist Vitaly Portnikov explained to Ukrainians.

Look at this rat, saying it with the smile like its a joke of sorts.
After visting his wikipedia page everything becomes much clearer though
1736918690219.png
 
View attachment 6859821
На войне должны гибнуть «простые люди», а не элита: это и есть демократия, заявили на украинском ТВ

Сейчас слышим от людей, что «должны воевать депутаты», а потом они пойдут. Нет, у нас демократическое государство.

В демократическом государстве за страну гибнет простой человек. Если мы хотим, чтобы за государство погибали аристократы, мы должны жить в феодальной стране

— пояснил украинцам журналист Виталий Портников.

Machine translation:
"Ordinary people" should die in war, not the elite: this is democracy, they said on Ukrainian TV

Now we hear from people that "deputies should fight", and then they will go. No, we have a democratic state.

In a democratic state, ordinary people die for the country. If we want aristocrats to die for the state, we must live in a feudal country

- journalist Vitaly Portnikov explained to Ukrainians.

Look at this rat, saying it with the smile like its a joke of sorts.
After visting his wikipedia page everything becomes much clearer though
What he leaves out that the Hohols already live in a feudal state lol!

Just look at how privileged they live, while regular hohols have to battle constant tax and energy price increases. And the front.

I guess it would be possible to train a falcon to attack from behind.
Good luck trying to do that without flying into the propellers and turn into a mist of blood and feathers.

I think we’re all forgetting about the real purpose of any hypothetical falcon anti drone program: Ukraine announcing an initiative to breed and train 10.000 falcons a year, fully funded by the government.

“Falcon” Money is promptly sent abroad to be stashed away in bank accounts for after the war.

Zelensky starts begging for money for their falcon program, more money is sent and stashed away.

In a year when people start asking “Hey whatever happened to those falcons?” They’ll have moved on to their next scam.
 
Last edited:
What he leaves out that the Hohols already live in a feudal state lol!
We all live in a feaudal state
1736931871593.jpeg

Good luck trying to do that without flying into the propellers and turn into a mist of blood and feathers
Nigga, the starting point of this convo is a video of a bird doing exactly that. We're not talking about airliner engines.
 
one well short of his declared territorial objectives
What territorial objectives would those be? The Russian governments never at any point made any territorial gains a part of their objectives.

Typical westie propaganda rag - make up some bullshit Russia never said or did, claim Russia never achieved said bullshit (that they never set out to achieve), declare victory over Putlermort. Lmao pathetic

It's like that "they didn't take Kweef in two days like they said they would" all over again.
 
In a democratic state, ordinary people die for the country. If we want aristocrats to die for the state, we must live in a feudal country
No, one of the perks of a democratic state is that the state maintains a constant, professional military so they don't have to press-gang armies of ordinary people into battle.

If it was a Feudal Country, the "Aristocrats" would be forced to uphold their part of the Feudal Contract by personally gathering, arming, and leading their own personal troops to the front.

This is one of those people that I'm sure hasn't contributed anything to society in a long time and is only alive because it's illegal to kill them.
 
No, one of the perks of a democratic state is that the state maintains a constant, professional military so they don't have to press-gang armies of ordinary people into battle.

If it was a Feudal Country, the "Aristocrats" would be forced to uphold their part of the Feudal Contract by personally gathering, arming, and leading their own personal troops to the front.

This is one of those people that I'm sure hasn't contributed anything to society in a long time and is only alive because it's illegal to kill them.
More precisely, the perk is that the standing State army (singular) is made up of peasant volunteers while the standing Noble armies (plural) can't exist anymore. In either of these scenarios, whether it's peasant citizen volunteers who train for war all day or it's nobles obligated by title to train for war all day, non-soldiers will still be "press-ganged" (ie conscripted) into battle when needed.
 
Last edited:
View attachment 6859821
На войне должны гибнуть «простые люди», а не элита: это и есть демократия, заявили на украинском ТВ

Сейчас слышим от людей, что «должны воевать депутаты», а потом они пойдут. Нет, у нас демократическое государство.

В демократическом государстве за страну гибнет простой человек. Если мы хотим, чтобы за государство погибали аристократы, мы должны жить в феодальной стране

— пояснил украинцам журналист Виталий Портников.

Machine translation:
"Ordinary people" should die in war, not the elite: this is democracy, they said on Ukrainian TV

Now we hear from people that "deputies should fight", and then they will go. No, we have a democratic state.

In a democratic state, ordinary people die for the country. If we want aristocrats to die for the state, we must live in a feudal country

- journalist Vitaly Portnikov explained to Ukrainians.

Look at this rat, saying it with the smile like its a joke of sorts.
After visting his wikipedia page everything becomes much clearer though
what with kikes always looking so fucked up like they've been forced underground for a lifetime
 
No, one of the perks of a democratic state is that the state maintains a constant, professional military so they don't have to press-gang armies of ordinary people into battle.
Completely incorrect. In the modern context, every state, regardless of it's status as a democracy or not, maintains a core of professional soldiers, with some states augmenting them with conscripts, but there is no real correlation between the conscription and democracy of the system.
And if you're bringing history into it, there were a plethora of examples of non democratic states which had permanent standing armies, paid by the ruler/state, the most famous example being Rome, from the Republic (which had dickall to do with democracy) well into the Eastern Roman era. Then you have a couple others I can name off the top of my head, Hungary under Matthias Corvinus, with its famous Black army, the various medieval mercenary armies which were some of the most trained and professional forces in their era, the Ottomans with their Janissaries, the French crown which established a permanent professional core during the later epochs of their war with England, the Achamenids with their immortals, arguably the Akkadian Empire under Sargon, the Macedonian army of Philip and Alexander, and a number of others.
And the democracies do not necessarily have permanent standing armies either, with the example of the most popular one, that being Athens, having a system where farmers and citizens were expected to take up arms and fight for their citystate.

On the contrary, one the Ukro-jew has a point with the democracy being a very good way to present to the masses that - since they have a stake in the leading of the state in the form of (impotent and easily manipulated) political power, they should fight to defend it. Keep in mind, one of the most important reasons for the success of Napoleonic France was the ability of France to levy disproportionately massive armies from its lower classes with ideological backing for said actions.
And I have also heard some convincing arguments that it was the ability of the Greeks to levy their (militarily untrained) lower class (which was rapidly expanding with the general shift in economy, political power and land ownership from the elites) which led to their victory over the Persians.
 


Кризис ЛС в ВСУ: из авиации в пехоту...

Солдат ВСУ жалуется, что одна из частей ВВС армии Зеленского просто обескровлена переводом в пехоту технического персонала.

"Вначале перевели 250 человек, ... сейчас еще 218 (судя по всему и его переводят, а потому истерика)"

Комментарий. Судя по сказанному это одна из трех бригад тактической авиации, у которой на вооружении были самолеты МиГ-29.

Аналог нашего авиаполка. 468 человек техперсонала, это значит, что "почти все". В принципе, с учетом того, что самолетов этого типа у ВСУ нет и новые поставки не предвидятся, и с учетом катастрофической нехватки "пехоты" на фронте, решение более чем логичное.

Причем, судя по тому, что я читаю в ВСУшных пабликах, ровно такая же ситуация сейчас у них и с танкистами, артиллеристами, ПВОшниками, и даже РЭБовцами.

Их тысячами списывают в пехоту (часто в штурмовики), пытаясь закрыть жесточайший ее дефицит.

Причем, без подготовки, что ... нам на руку.


————————————————

Crisis of the personnel in the Armed Forces of Ukraine: from aviation to infantry...

A soldier of the Armed Forces of Ukraine complains that one of the units of the Air Force of Zelensky's army is simply bled dry by the transfer of technical personnel to the infantry.

"At first, 250 people were transferred, ... now another 218 (apparently, they are also transferring him, and that's why there is hysteria)"

Comment. Judging by what was said, this is one of three tactical aviation brigades, which were armed with MiG-29 aircraft.

An analogue of our air regiment. 468 technical personnel, which means "almost everyone". In principle, given that the Armed Forces of Ukraine do not have this type of aircraft and new deliveries are not expected, and given the catastrophic shortage of "infantry" at the front, the decision is more than logical.

Moreover, judging by what I read in Ukrainian Armed Forces publics, they have exactly the same situation now with tankers, artillerymen, air defense personnel, and even electronic warfare personnel.

They are being written off in thousands to the infantry (often to assault detachments ), trying to cover the severe deficit.

Moreover, without training, which ... is to our advantage.
 
View attachment 6859821
На войне должны гибнуть «простые люди», а не элита: это и есть демократия, заявили на украинском ТВ

Сейчас слышим от людей, что «должны воевать депутаты», а потом они пойдут. Нет, у нас демократическое государство.

В демократическом государстве за страну гибнет простой человек. Если мы хотим, чтобы за государство погибали аристократы, мы должны жить в феодальной стране

— пояснил украинцам журналист Виталий Портников.

Machine translation:
"Ordinary people" should die in war, not the elite: this is democracy, they said on Ukrainian TV

Now we hear from people that "deputies should fight", and then they will go. No, we have a democratic state.

In a democratic state, ordinary people die for the country. If we want aristocrats to die for the state, we must live in a feudal country

- journalist Vitaly Portnikov explained to Ukrainians.

Look at this rat, saying it with the smile like its a joke of sorts.
After visting his wikipedia page everything becomes much clearer though
He is also a faggot
 
WWI might not have happened either.
which leads to Austro-hungray having all the scientists that lead to the nuke being invented and everyone dies in the great war some time in the 1950s.
I wouldn’t be shocked if China does the same with the movie industry.
they can't; censorship laws mean china can't really produce films about the sort of anti-social behavior the people in the west love. think Deadpool. China's attempt with "The Great Wall" flopped because it didn't have an IP backing it and the people that own all the IPs won't sell good ones to china in the first place, plus which ones could they possibly make that wouldn't violate Chinese belief in strong moral character. plus the second the chinks try, suddenly the kikes will pretend its 2007 again and release good shit with antiheroes and pornstar tier-females and jokes about minorities. Michael Bay already has the scripts written.
 
which leads to Austro-hungray having all the scientists that lead to the nuke being invented and everyone dies in the great war some time in the 1950s.

they can't; censorship laws mean china can't really produce films about the sort of anti-social behavior the people in the west love. think Deadpool. China's attempt with "The Great Wall" flopped because it didn't have an IP backing it and the people that own all the IPs won't sell good ones to china in the first place, plus which ones could they possibly make that wouldn't violate Chinese belief in strong moral character. plus the second the chinks try, suddenly the kikes will pretend its 2007 again and release good shit with antiheroes and pornstar tier-females and jokes about minorities. Michael Bay already has the scripts written.
I mean the more practical reason why Chinese "soft power" will never be as strong as America is because English is an ubiquitous language that 90% of the globe understands at some level, and Chinese is not. And for all it's oddities and drawbacks, English is just far easier to use as lingua franca compared to Chinese. You can't have soft power if your target audience don't understand you.
 
Good luck trying to do that without flying into the propellers and turn into a mist of blood and feathers.
Nigga, the starting point of this convo is a video of a bird doing exactly that. We're not talking about airliner engines.
Look, I’m not saying it’ll absolutely happen every time. Depends on a lot of things like the lay out of the drone and the size of its motors.

But most of the time, bird vs drone will end pretty fucking tragic for the bird.

Unless it’s a titanium falcon or something .

which leads to Austro-hungray having all the scientists that lead to the nuke being invented and everyone dies in the great war some time in the 1950s.

they can't; censorship laws mean china can't really produce films about the sort of anti-social behavior the people in the west love. think Deadpool. China's attempt with "The Great Wall" flopped because it didn't have an IP backing it and the people that own all the IPs won't sell good ones to china in the first place, plus which ones could they possibly make that wouldn't violate Chinese belief in strong moral character. plus the second the chinks try, suddenly the kikes will pretend its 2007 again and release good shit with antiheroes and pornstar tier-females and jokes about minorities. Michael Bay already has the scripts written.
Meh, Chinese moviemakers make some absolute bangers, that are just as good as anything Hollywood does.

Just check out a recent thriller called “No more bets” which has made big money also outside of China.

(And best of all, they’re somehow able to make a AAA movie without it costing 2-400 million dollars).

If you would have told someone that Jppp and Kpop would be big in Europe a decade ago, they would have laughed at you.

Similarly I think the era of big Chinese block busters is coming.

Especially since most countries are already used to subtitles. If you’re in Berlin or Istanbul and are going to the movies, don’t really care if it’s subtitled from English or from Chinese?
 
Last edited:
Back