Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 64 14.7%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 6 1.4%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 109 25.1%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 79 18.2%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 177 40.7%

  • Total voters
    435
The press release announces this 2016 paper about problems with the washing procedures used on hair samples. The paper is available on Scihub:

https://www.wellesu.com/10.1021/acs.analchem.5b03979
It say that some contamination solvents currently (2016) used can wash external contamination "into" the hair. But they only show that it is "possible" to get over the international cutoff level ( 5ng/10mg hair) this way, and they used contamination levels "higher than in real case scenarios".


I don't know how to translate the 5ng value into the "over 5000" units that Nick's daughter tested for. But since the child's numbers were far above any cutoff, this paper probably doesn't help Nick much.

For cocaine, the proposed cut-off value that has been suggested is 0.5 ng/mg. Nonetheless, according to the most recent recommendations of the Society of Hair Testing, the simple use of cut-off levels is insufficient because external contamination can occur at any level. Moreover, it is stated that standardized wash procedures that will effectively remove any trace of external contamination without actively removing the drugs incorporated into the hair are not currently available and as such the possible role of external contamination must be considered when interpreting hair testing findings.
0.5ng/mg=500pg/mg. This is the typical cutoff value used by courts in America.
Prior to imaging, blank and user hairs from volunteers were contaminated by rubbing cocaine salt powder on the hair for a few minutes or by soaking them for 5 minutes or 5 hours in a 1mg/mL solution of cocaine base or HCl-salt. Washing was performed by shaking the hair for one minute in the described washing solution. All hairs were air dried after washing and before cutting, embedding or mounting them. The effects of different washing solvents (methanol water, dichloromethane, isopropanol, acetonitrile and dichloromethane/water alternately), were tested on contaminated as well as cocaine user hair. Washing solvents were also tested on hairs from different cocaine users. Blank (negative) hairs were tested using the same method.
They contaminated samples and had cocaine users' hair as a control. The decontamination process did lower cocaine levels found in intentionally contaminated hair, while not having much of an impact regarding actual users' hair samples.
Before I go on, they are referencing the word "detectable". All of these fancy mass spectroscopy methods can detect tiny, inconsequential amounts of matter. Amounts so small it's humanly incomprehensible.

Here is the killshot:
Indeed, in our contaminated hair samples, most ratios were indeed below this cut-off. Some publications however found BE/cocaine ratios in users hair below this cut-off 24. Consequently, using this cutoff ratio will induce false negative results.
They concluded that 500pg/mg at cutoff was "about right", though in typical science fashion -- they didn't outright state that. However, they did find "FALSE NEGATIVE" results. My honest answer to that is "good for you". If you're someone that uses cocaine maybe once in a blue moon at a party or musical rave, your hair results might as well fall below 500pg/mg, that doesn't mean you're not a user, that simply means you're deemed inconsequential.
Obviously there's no protocol that can completely erase the contaminated cocaine from these hair samples. That's why a cutoff is used in the first place. We'd rather let false negatives (of the cutoff) slip.

Does anyone realise one thing?
None of the samples had a level of >5000pg/mg, or more than ten times the cutoff.
Basically the paper Skelly cited unequivocally indicated the effectiveness of decontamination protocols in removing external contamination. The hair was contaminated carefully in a laboratory environment using proper research and reference grade chemicals, not a cop from Denny's wearing a magical glove that had some trace amounts of cocaine on it. Maybe if we see the bodycam footage, we might also see the cop opening a bottle of cocaine, dumping it in a bucket of boiling water and immersing the 8-year-old's head in it for FIVE HOURS as one of the patents I found indicated.
Or none of that ever happened and skelly is full of fucking shit.
You cited a paper that contradicts your ridiculous cope. If anything, all of his children might have yielded a positive result, it's just false negatives because it all fell under the cutoff.

Oh, it gets better. Not only does Balldo's whole narrative stem from this Quora clown's rant about sweaty hair, the second cracksmoker on the cracky knoll that Nick echoed on the Mayr copestream, and even the unmitigated audacity to say that "no respectable drug testing laboratory does hair testing." No, just for good measure, there's also said Quora clown's dismissed self-represented lolsuits stemming from similar schizo quackery, stripper wife, and felony drug conviction for manufacturing ecstasy, which collectively have made him a newsworthy local lolcow all his own:
This guy is a quack and he's fucking nuts. Of course he'll suggest that burning cocaine in a wet pipe can possibly produce benzoylecgonine.
Benzoylecgonine can be found in sewers and natural bodies of water, which means nature is totally able to metabolise it from cocaine. We don't know how that happens, but it does happen, and frankly we don't care why and how nature does it because it's irrelevant and inconsequential. 90% of cash in circulation has some trace amounts of drugs on it.
The difference? You won't ever see >5000pg/mg levels.
This is the doctor whose Quora post Nick Rekieta is citing
Cool, Skelly. Call him as your EXPERT WITNESS then and challenge the courts! Let's listen to him explaining how a magical glove and wet pipe that produced so much benzoylecgonine, it deserves a patent.
Parents like to tell their children that they have superpowers to make them feel special. I'd rather fly or walk on water than being able to metabolise cocaine on my scalp upon contact.

This isn't news. He's been saying this for a while.

As a gist, there's two metabolites from Cocaine. One is produced from "hydrolyzing" formed any time cocaine is exposed to moisture. The other is a product of metabolizing, which means it was ingested by a human.

He's been implying for months that the results only found the hydrolites and not the metabolites. However, he's never actually said this directly because he's a nigger and he's also probably lying so that when docs leak that show she tested positive for both he can just do the boring, tired, old schtick of "i never said that" to imply it was merely a misunderstanding and not his dumb nigger ass lying through omission for the millionth fucking time.
There's two major and a bunch of minor metabolites. His daughter tested positive for one of the major metabolite benzoylecgonine at ten times the cutoff. Skelly wanted compliments because "a bunch of metabolites weren't there".
1736915277654.png
We can infer that she was tested at ten times the cutoff for this one only. Skelly admitted that she was tested positive for BE. Otherwise, we're left with some minor metabolites that suggests something far more grim, like cocaethylene that occurs when cocaine interacts with alcohol and AEME from smoking it.
GC-MS is usually configured to find only a few metabolites at a time.

(concentration range 0.3-5.96 ng/mg of hair)
300-5960 pg/mg, huh NICK. HUH??!
300 is below cutoff.
5960?
That's >5000pg/mg for you, very cool Balldo, very cool.
It's no wonder he refuses to share his "sources". One's from a quack convicted doctor that tried to make MDMA and the other two directly contradicts what he's claiming.
 
Last edited:
Phentermine is the generic name for Adipex and is still widely prescribed for weight loss. Many weight loss clinics take advantage of FDA loopholes to make their own for sale (compounding) during shortages, etc. There was a huge rush of these clinics popping up when the FDA declared a shortage of Ozempic a couple years ago and allowed local pharmacists to make it on their own. Modern day pill mills.
This is what this quack was running. When the authorities looked into his apparently improper use of this drug, they found him in possession of what seems like an incomplete Ecstasy cook.

"Cooking Ecstasy?
Keenan's bad decisions began when federal investigators looked into his use of phentermine, an amphetamine used in his prescription weight-loss drugs.

Acting on a tip from a convicted cocaine dealer, drug agents raided Keenan's homes and office. They found a chemical precursor to the drug Ecstasy baking in an oven, and 'cookbooks' on how to make it."
Bloomington man with a colorful past vows to keep fighting after judge tosses his pollution lawsuit (archive)

(Incidentally the news story is wrong. Phentermine is not an amphetamine despite being described as similar in effect to an amphetamine.)
 
Last edited:
Does anyone realise one thing?
None of the samples had a level of >5000pg/mg, or more than ten times the cutoff.

They also don't have a pool of 9 y/o cocaine users to empirically determine cutoff/dosing. Nick's other retard stance is that his daughter would need to be a daily user for that level. There are papers that show children exposed to cocaine in the home tested at levels similar to their regular use parents.
 
Last edited:
Well, something just a few short hours ago got him overstimulated enough for one of the bigger and more rapid-fire tweetstorms in quite a while. Perhaps another stimmy shimmy, or just risky whisky this time?

11425Tweetstorm.jpg
[Bulk Archive]

Almost all of it's just more jilted flailing about his ex-boyfriend as usual, but a few bonus shots fired at the pastor and thinly veiled threats to relegate the prosecution's confidential-ish discovery disclosures to monetized Gloatstream™ content were a tad intriguing:

Clippocalypse.jpg
[XC] [A]

Something about that rings a bell like old news but it's getting hard to separate speculation from fact when looking back that far. Is it a new allegation that this entire chain of events was all set off by some cow-tipper sending some clipper's work product directly to the pastor? If so, who are the prime suspects?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well, something just a few hours ago got him overstimulated enough for one of the bigger and more rapid-fire tweetstorms in quite a while. Perhaps another stimmy shimmy, or just risky whisky this time?

View attachment 6859808
[Bulk Archive]

Almost all of it's just more jilted flailing about his ex-boyfriend as usual, but a few bonus shots fired at the pastor and thinly veiled threats to relegate the prosecution's confidential-ish discovery disclosures to monetized Gloatstream™ content were a tad intriguing:

View attachment 6859831
[XC] [A]

Something about that rings a bell like old news but it's getting hard to separate speculation from fact when looking back that far. Is it a new allegation that this entire chain of events was all set off by some cow-tipper sending some clipper's work product directly to the pastor? If so, who are the prime suspects?
It doesn’t necessarily have to be from a cow tipper. It could have been someone at his church/in his homeschool co-op watching clips of his show and taking it to the Pastor as a mandated reporter, which has also been speculated.
 
Well, something just a few short hours ago got him overstimulated enough for one of the bigger and more rapid-fire tweetstorms in quite a while. Perhaps another stimmy shimmy, or just risky whisky this time?

View attachment 6859808
[Bulk Archive]

Almost all of it's just more jilted flailing about his ex-boyfriend as usual, but a few bonus shots fired at the pastor and thinly veiled threats to relegate the prosecution's confidential-ish discovery disclosures to monetized Gloatstream™ content were a tad intriguing:

View attachment 6859831
[XC] [A]

Something about that rings a bell like old news but it's getting hard to separate speculation from fact when looking back that far. Is it a new allegation that this entire chain of events was all set off by some cow-tipper sending some clipper's work product directly to the pastor? If so, who are the prime suspects?
What lies?

Nick's a cocaine addict. He even admitted he has a "habit" (something he denied at first)

From what I understand, the allegations were that Nick was obviously high on stream and therefore had cocaine in his house with his kids (he did), was driving intoxicated with his kids in the car (since he was an alcoholic drug addict that was up late using and didn't have time to sober up before driving his kids, this is very likely), and was neglecting his kids (based on first-hand witnesses, the police report, Nick's admitted fat phobia, and Nick refusing to make his daughter a quesadilla the other day, is also likely true)

Again, what allegations were made that turned out to be lies? He's clearly guilty and is going to plead as such.
 
Well, something just a few short hours ago got him overstimulated enough for one of the bigger and more rapid-fire tweetstorms in quite a while.

One of the more interesting tweets is the one where he claims that Aaron is mad at Nick only because "his wife left him" and supposedly blames Nick for it. Nick then promises a "bombshell" about why April left Aaron.

You can see that is already starting to position himself to deny or pretend away all the swinging and cucking. April left Aaron because Aaron is a monster. Nick and Kayla were just helping out a woman in trouble.

As for the CPS stuff, he is still moving in the predictable direction of claiming that he was entirely exonerated for everything associated with that. And he will sustain that story via the sealed records in family court and the unreleased bodycam footage from the search warrant.

Not that any of it matters because Nick is an internet pariah and nothing he says is going to change the perception of him that currently exists.
 
What lies?

Nick's a cocaine addict. He even admitted he has a "habit" (something he denied at first)

From what I understand, the allegations were that Nick was obviously high on stream and therefore had cocaine in his house with his kids (he did), was driving intoxicated with his kids in the car (since he was an alcoholic drug addict that was up late using and didn't have time to sober up before driving his kids, this is very likely), and was neglecting his kids (based on first-hand witnesses, the police report, Nick's admitted fat phobia, and Nick refusing to make his daughter a quesadilla the other day, is also likely true)

Again, what allegations were made that turned out to be lies? He's clearly guilty and is going to plead as such.
You don't understand, nerd. The former nanny, Kayla's sister and the teacher just perceived reality differently and when they confided in the pastor he was butthurt and it's all just a massive misunderstanding.

Even for Balldo, to type all that out and to not realise how it sounds is batshit crazy.

Nick should have taken the L early and admitted he had a booze and drug problem and thank people for intervening. He has accumulated way more Ls trying to defend the absurd position of "I wasn't a drug addict, I was just having fun. It was fun not to pay my mortgage in order to buy cocaine and then need to sell my second house. As for the teacher, former nanny, Kayla's sister and pastor, they didn't see what they thought they saw, even though by my own admission I was drinking heavily and doing a mountain of cocaine, everything was really fine"

No able minded person could possibly buy the story he sells.
 
Well, something just a few short hours ago got him overstimulated enough for one of the bigger and more rapid-fire tweetstorms in quite a while. Perhaps another stimmy shimmy, or just risky whisky this time?

View attachment 6859808
[Bulk Archive]
"Self-awareness is something I've been working on" - Rekieta
Now that's a big :optimistic: if I've ever seen one.
 
One of the more interesting tweets is the one where he claims that Aaron is mad at Nick only because "his wife left him" and supposedly blames Nick for it. Nick then promises a "bombshell" about why April left Aaron.

You can see that is already starting to position himself to deny or pretend away all the swinging and cucking. April left Aaron because Aaron is a monster. Nick and Kayla were just helping out a woman in trouble.
He has repeatedly admitted the sex with April already. Yes, he is going to say Aaron was a monster and orchestrated his downfall, not realising, weirdly, that nobody likes Aaron.

From what I can see, Aaron decided not to chase after April and initated the divorce. Kayla's text to Aaron admits he got out of the situation. Aaron is a complete loser, but he walked his merry way out of that fucked up situation.
 
It doesn’t necessarily have to be from a cow tipper. It could have been someone at his church/in his homeschool co-op watching clips of his show and taking it to the Pastor as a mandated reporter, which has also been speculated.
The fact is Nick insulted that whole congregation repeatedly and most of what he said was almost certainly lies. Now he's crying like a little bitch it blew back on him. This is yet another thing people told him was a bad fucking idea that would turn out badly. Maybe don't shit where you eat you stupid fuck.
 
Is it a new allegation that this entire chain of events was all set off by some cow-tipper sending some clipper's work product directly to the pastor?
He's a lying liar who lies. The chain of events is set out in the affidavit for search warrant. 5 people associated with the church went to the pastor with concerns. Nothing to do with clippers.

In Nick's world, he refuted this with his idiotic "KCHHS investigated and found nothing so Sheriff investigation of churchgoer claims isn't valid" BS.

Nick revoked Elissa's permissions to clip him because reasons. He's apparently trying to justify this by reimagining the reason his kids were taken away.

Also, in the tweet storm he claims KCHHS returned his kids quickly after investigating and determining they weren't in danger. More lies. They made him attend rehab. He was drug tested continuously. He was forced to move to his parents house for a month. Children were allowed to visit in August but custody was not returned until the latest possible day before other, nastier and more permanent provisions kicked in. It was no sooner than 6 months after they were removed.

Nick is like those dickhead alcoholic dads that drink drive with a 6-month old baby. Instead of saying they fucked up, Nick doubles down with "the kid was never in danger. The prosecutor said there were no victims on the witness list so there was never any danger. I have the letter!"

Is it a new allegation that this entire chain of events was all set off by some cow-tipper sending some clipper's work product directly to the pastor?
He's a lying liar who lies. The chain of events is set out in the affidavit for search warrant. 5 people associated with the church went to the pastor with concerns. Nothing to do with clippers.

In Nick's world, he refuted this with his idiotic "KCHHS investigated and found nothing so Sheriff investigation of churchgoer claims isn't valid" BS.

Nick revoked Elissa's permissions to clip him because reasons. He's apparently trying to justify this by reimagining the reason his kids were taken away.

Also, in the tweet storm he claims KCHHS returned his kids quickly after investigating and determining they weren't in danger. More lies. They made him attend rehab. He was drug tested continuously. He was forced to move to his parents house for a month. Children were allowed to visit in August but custody was not returned until the latest possible day before other, nastier and more permanent provisions kicked in. It was no sooner than 6 months after they were removed.

Nick is like those dickhead alcoholic dads that drink drive with a 6-month old baby. Instead of saying they fucked up, Nick doubles down with "the kid was never in danger. The prosecutor said there were no victims on the witness list so there was never any danger. I have the letter!"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
No, Aaron's current lawyer for the dissemination charge is Todd Peterson. His previous lawyer for everything else was that other guy. Saying "my lawyer" is ambiguous. Hopefully when he says "my lawyer" he's talking about the other guy Kolb, rather than exposing attorney-client privileged communications he has had with Todd, who is currently representing him in an active case.

Aaron is extremely stupid, though, so I'm assuming he's talking about Todd.

FWIW his show tonight threw out a direct response to the Farms that, mercifully, it was not Todd and was a general practitioner that sounds like almost certainly Kolb in this instance, so at least he's capable of learning enough to keep their work compartmentalized with no privilege waiver issue this time around:

2:24:22 notice that this trying to get me cancelled from boxing thing came 2:24:27 after he was informed that that investigation is still going and I saw that Kiwi Farms was like 2:24:34 Aaron's breaking his lawyer confidentiality I wasn't talking to my defense lawyer I was talking to a lawyer 2:24:40 I go to like if I need contract something like that I have a friend and he's an attorney but he's clued into 2:24:45 stuff locally and he's like yeah that shit's still going on don't don't [ __ ] around with those guys you know there's 2:24:51 a chance that um down the road there could be you know you might not they 2:24:57 might not be allowed to be around you so there is that um and then yeah and then 2:25:04 there's the uh the PDF stuff as well
 
Last edited:
Dr Robert Bob Keenan (far right, cutoff in 1st photo) With his brother seated (with no hand, on the left) along with their family friend (up thee middle) who cares for Doug (the handless fella)
What a troop to be selling weight loss drugs... Almost looks like a scam, don't it.
Don't zoom in on his brothers toes. Don't do it..... don't look at his toe nails.
also, this, from an article on the Dr. he was pretty important for a moment.

The good Dr was almost the head of the FDA under Bush lol ...... lol Look at him, it's perfect.
No shock Bush needed a drug dealer in the WH. i'm sure George just needed some weightloss advice.

"Keenan was earning millions of dollars a year, according to court documents. He lived lavishly and married an Iranian woman who worked as a stripper. Keenan made influential friends and was a candidate for a top job in the George W. Bush administration, possibly as head of the Food and Drug Administration.
Keenan was "brilliant, a really smart guy and a delightful conversationalist," said Denver lawyer James Prochnow, a former White House staff attorney who helped with the vetting."

They were tipped off by a coke dealer. of course. "Acting on a tip from a convicted cocaine dealer, drug agents raided Keenan's homes and office. They found a chemical precursor to the drug Ecstasy baking in an oven, and "cookbooks" on how to make it."

Both photos are from the same article.

So Barnes is attached to Trump, this guy's attached to Bush...

Those ankles scream FDA leadership.

 

Attachments

  • 4NWXFLEBRCA7FVJN7OQISL7LOA.jpg
    4NWXFLEBRCA7FVJN7OQISL7LOA.jpg
    177.9 KB · Views: 36
  • Screenshot (5519).png
    Screenshot (5519).png
    600.3 KB · Views: 37
  • Screenshot (5520).png
    Screenshot (5520).png
    290.4 KB · Views: 38
So what number of kids constitute 23.3% of 85? 19.805? Where was this .805 of a kid? He must have been missing much of his body. And if it's 90 kids, it's 20.97. I suppose that kid would only be missing .03 of his body, that might be survivable.
Y'all.

21/90 =.233333333333333333etc

21 kids.
 
I wonder if Balldo has ever considered DMT? The ingredients are all legal and mostly organic, like plants and stuff. It’s very easy to make at home and it doesn’t produce a bunch of bad exhaust and pollution you have to hide like meth. You can pretty much just make it at home. Maybe it’s not enough of a party type drug? It would be funny if he had a dmt schizo blue alien spirit world whatifalthist ark. You think his theology is crazy now, dmt would send it to Xenu hahaha.
 
Nick should have taken the L early and admitted he had a booze and drug problem and thank people for intervening. He has accumulated way more Ls trying to defend the absurd position of "I wasn't a drug addict, I was just having fun. It was fun not to pay my mortgage in order to buy cocaine and then need to sell my second house. As for the teacher, former nanny, Kayla's sister and pastor, they didn't see what they thought they saw, even though by my own admission I was drinking heavily and doing a mountain of cocaine, everything was really fine"
The parasocial leeches that still believe him are having issues similar to Nick and think that as long as he can get away with it, they are fine too.
Deep down even they understand the facts for what they are, they are simply predisposed to not think about it logically from the viewpoint of a non-degenerate.

Nick attracted a very colorful viewership in his later streaming career. Normal humans do not listen to a drunk retard ranting about topics, Dunning-Krugering himself into the deluded belief that he is an expert who can preach to his audience and that people are actually there for it.

I could never watch Nick consistently, especially the longer streams, because he was always a know-it-all retard faggot who talked over better qualified panel guests and made frequent statements that were proven wrong shortly after, and he just pretended that "he did not say that".

Nick thought people were there for him, but they were there for the novelty of Lawtube and live commentary by a panel of "experts", half of whom turned out to be fucking retards or Jewish Shyster money lender types. Once the novelty had worn off it became pretty obvious to the non-retarded viewer who the decently competent law professionals were and the viewers who valued that moved on from Nick, leaving him with the degenerates.
 
Back