It is this post:
https://quora.com/What-are-all-the-...-I-have-tested-positive-for-cocaine-on-a-hair
[Archive]
It sure is revealing how despite claiming in
public that he became the resident expert upon thorough examination of 40 scientific papers, in
private DMs the sort of citation he'd lob at a fencesitter was some unvetted one-paragraph post from a boomer "Q&A" website.
He really didn't do any more research than a hungover Saturday afternoon of random googling, did he?
And that's why laboratories have decontamination protocols skelly you fucking disingenuous faggot. This is giving me heavy deja vu, I read this exact post when piecing together stuff for the eventual takedown of skelly's ridiculous glove cope.
(It is true that benzoylecgonine can be synthesised by boiling cocaine in water. BOILING it, simply mixing it would not work.)
Here is a patent I found on google pertaining to the synthesis of benzoylecgonine:
https://patents.google.com/patent/US5559123A/en
Skelly better find that medical glove and patent this because apparently all the complicated chemistry outlined in various patents pale in comparison to that magical glove and his daughter's scalp.
Assuming the person wasn't outright lying, it was likely accidental ingestion. They didn't share the cutoffs and the number they got so your guess is as good as mine.
1) Positive does not mean user and negative does not mean zero. There was a CUTOFF. It was at a very high 500pg/mg.
2) She was tested positive at over 5000pg/mg, that was TEN TIMES the cutoff. The other children presumably had levels below 500pg/mg. Once again, not zero, just below.
3) They have a decontamination protocols and they would have verified the test since it was a positive.
>Heat cocaine in wet pipe
Yeah, no. The child didn't test positive for anhydroecgonine methyl ester (ACME) which can only be found when crack cocaine is smoked. She did not smoke cocaine.
>Transfer/contamination
The cutoff figures for laboratory workers that handle this stuff is usually 300pg/mg. I have never had a result above that, or even above 150 for the matter. Let alone >5000pg/mg.
>exhaled cocaine smoke can contaminate every hair sample taken leading to a positive result in a non-user
Irrelevant, as none of his other children had a positive result.
>No respectable drug testing laboratory does hair testing
Do I even need to explain why I ignored this retarded post?
The hair sample collected from her would have been through a decontamination protocol that would have removed environmental exposure and the pulverised. She's the one with longer hair. They take entire strands to cut them up. There is simply no external contamination scenario where she would have yielded above 5000pg/mg unless there's been catastrophic oversight and negligence. The laboratory running these tests has a solid track record no matter how much skelly wants to cope and seethe about the magical glove that metabolises cocaine into benzoylecgonine. Apparently the glove was so hot it boiled the cocaine in water right on her head to make the metabolite.
