California Newt
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2024
I don't know who Faustuna Kowalska is, but yes—with qualifications. Religious experiences are on a spectrum; it's not a binary between empty notional belief and full-on mystical union. The Orthodox layman, in the greatest depth of prayer he's capable of, is having just as authentic of a religious experience as the hesychast (to my understanding); the degree of contact is just different.It might be schizo babble, but it's literally one post above yours.
@California Newt Mind expanding on some portions of your post such as "Nobody is an atheist in the gooncave—not in deed, and not in experience" and the concept of a God that can be touched? It sounds like you are comparing the act of fapping and ga ga, spanking the monkey or doing the five-knuckle shuffle if you will, with a spiritual experience like those experienced by mystics the type of Faustina Kowalska.
Gooning is a kind of religious practice with its terminus in a form of western tantra, but which starts at simple masturbation. People forget the origin of the term "gooning": it didn't originally just mean edging, or masturbation—it specifically referred to a trance state achiveved through masturbation. An altered state of consciousness. Isn't it odd how that's been forgotten?
Even before you get to that point (the tantra) explicitly, you see stuff like penis mantras.
It's not even that odd for lower degrees of such a system to not notionally acknowledge the religiosity; you see the same kind of thing in freemasonry, for example: the stated purpose of the rituals is to alter you psychology so that you're more amenable to the deeper degrees, which from what I understand terminate in a form of Neoplatonism.
In gooning there are similar esoteric elements, but the deeper levels are an open secret rather than obscured by a complex, official degree system—they're hidden only by the masturbator's (or sex addict's) own incredulity and unwillingness (or inability) to look squarely at the whole picture.
God is a Person, yes. Phenomenologically, gods—spirits more generally—are experienced as persons. There's no such thing as an impersonal vice or virtue; these are qualities of persons. People experience the energies of virtue and vice as having personal fountainheads.Also, maybe I'm reading too much into your use of specific words, but does God have personhood in your view?
The concept of "impersonal forces" more generally also appears to be a notional philosophical construct and antipsychotic coping mechanism after the western world's abandonment of God (who held the world together), alien to base human phenomenological experience. Natural forces also have personal fountainheads, according to the human soul.
While men correctly understand all forces to have a personal fountainhead, they can divide these forces up arbitrarily and give them made-up names. For sexual forces, some of these names were Venus, Priapus, and Sobek. Actual spirits will take up these names and manipulate these forces in order to decieve men. Satan will masquerade as Venus, Priapus and Sobek—exciting sexual energies in the human body thtough various means, while slipping his own poison in—until his initiates are marinated enough to accept him undiluted (if "ironically" or "only as a fetish" at first). Judging from poppers hypno videos, that doesn't take long these days. It becomes purely about death and the dissolution of boundaries—energized by the immolation of your own soul.
Truth is a person: that's why you can have "fidelity" to Truth, which is the basis for honesty moreso than notional rational processes: if you try to use logic without fidelity to Truth, your attention filtering mechanism won't feed you the right premises to get you to the conclusion. This One (and I don't mean "One" in a Neoplatonic sense—I'm just capitalizing out of respect) isn't an arbitrary man-made division. That'd be impossible: Truth has no arbitrary boundaries.
In Christianity, this is Jesus Christ: "Every one that is of the truth heareth my voice."
Last edited: