What conspiracy theories do you believe in? - Put your tinfoil hats on

The real conspiracy is they want people to think that shit has something to it.
Disagree entirely. The cover-up of the UFOs and the adjacent phenomena is probably the most thorough and full-spectrum operation ever conducted on the American people, if not the entire Human Race. The USG, primarily, has spent the better part of eight decades denying that the phenomena is real and slandering anyone who suggests otherwise. They've destroyed the careers of people in the military and the Government who have said that it is real. They've literally driven people insane with targeted operations against them.

Whatever the phenomena is, it is most certainly real and the Government certainly does NOT want you to know about it.
 
Right now? None.

I used to believe in all kinds of crazy schizo boomer conspiritard shit. I used to believe chemtrails were real.
Chemtrails objectively are real, multiple states have passed laws banning them.
I believed in the whole Amero thing. Basically an attempt to create a North American version of the EU. Basically combining Canada and Mexico with the US. I know in the mid 2000's they were building what was known as at the time the NAFTA super highway. At least supposedly building. It was a big multilane highway that would run from Mexico up to Canada. The US dollar would be dropped and we would adopt the Amero or whatever they were going to call it.
Putting aside the attempt of creating a new currency, the merging of North American countries has been a real plan since the 90s but was postponed by NAFTA among other things.
Other than that I also used to follow all the NWO shit black helicopters the assassinations of JFK the attempted assassination of Reagan. How they wanted Bush to be president instead of him. All the typical schizo Boomer conspiritard shit. The militias that were out in the Western states and Midwest that would save us if the Government every tried to do any crazy shit. Then later on I found out the militias were mostly a bunch of obese Boomer LARPers that can't even cross the street without getting winded.
I would say the only bit of it that was true or somewhat true was some of the Amero stuff the black helicopters and the assassination of JFK at least.

I have held onto my belief that UFO's are real and alien abductions are a thing
Just to give you an idea of how much of a conspiritard I was I used to watch Alex Jones on YouTube and I even watched videos by Jordan Maxwell. lol
Why are you posting this? You are saying you "used to believe" in a bunch of things, implying you don't believe them anymore, but you don't say a reason for why you don't believe them.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: I'm a Silly
IF sufficiently-advanced science is indistinguishable from magic, then is it really so ludicrous to think these beings would present and act in ways that are incomprehensible to us, and whose behaviors and technology we would describe as magic?
I’ve thought about this quite a bit, Clarke’s third law.
In one hand I think that we at least know what science IS. Imagine some weird bring popping into existence, or landing a saucer in front of you. They could tell you it was just v advanced tech and you’d get the concept of what that is even if you have zero understanding of how it works. Try to explain a TV to a chimp and he’s no idea of what technology is at all.
And then on the other hand maybe that’s presumptuous and our grasp of technology is so rudimentary that we appear as pond slime to certain beings. I honestly don’t know.
Clarkes first law, also perhaps relevant
When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible, he is almost certainly right. When he states that something is impossible, he is very probably wrong.
 
Why are you posting this? You are saying you "used to believe" in a bunch of things, implying you don't believe them anymore, but you don't say a reason for why you don't believe them.
Because I can. Why should I have to explain why I don't believe in something anymore. The answer is simple. It's because it's either BS or mostly BS.
 
Disagree entirely. The cover-up of the UFOs and the adjacent phenomena is probably the most thorough and full-spectrum operation ever conducted on the American people, if not the entire Human Race. The USG, primarily, has spent the better part of eight decades denying that the phenomena is real and slandering anyone who suggests otherwise. They've destroyed the careers of people in the military and the Government who have said that it is real. They've literally driven people insane with targeted operations against them.

Whatever the phenomena is, it is most certainly real and the Government certainly does NOT want you to know about it.
UFO simply means 'Unidentified Flying Object'. It's not a cut and dry extraterrestrial term.
 
Whatever the phenomena is, it is most certainly real and the Government certainly does NOT want you to know about it.
Likely because they have no idea what it is and view anything they don't understand as an explicit threat, especially given the apparent behaviours observed.

Risky prediction: It'll turn out to be plasma. Ionised gas, when experiencing a sufficiently deep charge gradient, can spontaneously form relatively long-lived cell-like structures called "double layers". You don't even need very much of it to create the effect. These structures can take on a variety of shapes, can glow or appear solid, can be reflective or transparent to radar, can refract and distort light, and can display a whole range of apparently organised behaviours, including appearing to act under intelligent control due to the way they react to nearby magnetic fields. They can race in straight lines at high speeds, make "impossible" turns, and seemingly react to approaching aircraft or radar scans because they perturb the electromagnetic environment the double layer is moving through. In the past, this has also been described under the name ball lightning, which is likely the same phenomenon on a slightly smaller scale.

There's still a great deal we're only just figuring out about earth's electromagnetic environment, with all its whacky behaviours. There's going to be big, paradigm-shifting discoveries coming out of that field in the next decade or so, and one of those discoveries will be that many UFOs are a natural phenomenon that we've either just never really paid attention to before (because obviously only crazy people would actually believe in aliens, amiright?), or that governments tried to cover up because they thought it was a potential threat.
 
also coincidentally the site of this:

Screenshot_2025-01-15_18-11-55.png
 
Churchill had Dresden bombed as revenge for London, the capital of his beloved British Empire, being bombed. Churchill most likely had a whole arm instead of just a hand in that attack.
The "official story" is actually kind of worse. The Soviet Union asked for it and the U.S. and Britain carried it out. It was to keep the Eastern Front weak. You know, so the commies could swoop in and steal half the country and keep it.
 
Australian Aboriginals are a human subspecies, like Neanderthal man.
During American Colonial times, after racism was developed, the aim of the planters was to create an separate Mulatto race, who would be house slaves and concubines, and whose children would be assimilated, as with the Slavs in the Ottoman Empire. Unlike in Latin America, however, this failed, and the Mulattos were classified with the Negroes after the American Revolution.
 
Australian Aboriginals are a human subspecies, like Neanderthal man.
I actually believe this, too. People think you're being awful when you say it, but if these are different species:
1736991032373.png1736991044511.png

Then so are these:
1736991110913.png1736991156349.png

That isn't a value judgement or anything else. It's literally just this: Either a "species" is something that can interbred and have fertile offspring, or it's based on appearance. If it's the former, then all humans are the same species. If it's the latter, then the "human race" is composed of a handful of different subspecies and mixes.
 
Either a "species" is something that can interbred and have fertile offspring, or it's based on appearance. If it's the former, then all humans are the same species.

Interbreeding is almost always at the Genus level. (Horses and Zebras and Donkeys, or even Lions and Tigers and Panthers, can interbreed)
I'm pretty sure Abos are of the genus Homo, but there's no way they're the same species.
They have different adaptations than anybody else in the world, and they're not minor details.

Another one I'd consider a separate species are specialized humans that spend long periods in specific environments, like the Bajau Sea Nomads, which have unique adaptations to extended breath holding (larger spleens, better fine blood vessel constriction control, better blood ph control to combat CO², etc)

Birds that spend a few generations on isolated islands and develop slight beak shape differences are considered to all be different species, but humans spending millenia in unique circumstances? Definitely no changes. No siree, 100% the same humans, the genes are copy pastes. Guaranteed.
 
Psyop terror attack in the US is incoming.

Sarah Adams, a""""retired"""" glowie who was stationed in Libya and just happened to take a business trip to London on the morning of the Benghazi attacks;

""""Retired"""" glowie and seal Shawn Ryan has a 'Jane Doe' on who essentially describes the above;
""""Psychic"""" who 'predicted' the Trump assassination attempt;

Here is his earlier prediction;
 
With globalization, someone has to be running the entire world. It's not just a single someone, but a group consisting of multiple factions working as one to maintain dominance. This is taking it generally because if we're gonna get into the specifices, it's basically pointing fingers at the Jews, robots, aliens, reptiles, whatever all over again.
 
This is taking it generally because if we're gonna get into the specifices, it's basically pointing fingers at the Jews, robots, aliens, reptiles, whatever all over again.

So hear me out - reptilian alien Jews in robot bodies. It’s all of them at once?!

Thread tax - the TikTok drama is just another psychological experiment that’s no different than the one that forced Meta to appear before the DoJ.
 
Its in the benefit of the elite to keep the existence of aliens a secret, because it would take away their ability to use race bating against people.
Humanity would band together to make Spacism, and it would be glorious.
"It doesn't matter what age, race, sex, or creed... As long as you're not a batarian"
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mad Hunter
Australian Aboriginals are a human subspecies, like Neanderthal man.
During American Colonial times, after racism was developed, the aim of the planters was to create an separate Mulatto race, who would be house slaves and concubines, and whose children would be assimilated, as with the Slavs in the Ottoman Empire. Unlike in Latin America, however, this failed, and the Mulattos were classified with the Negroes after the American Revolution.
Their ancestry and way of life is recorded as far back as at least 50,000 years, so I agree with that, too. And Maoris are Polynesian subtypes that colonised New Zealand 800 years ago.

I have one of my own that just came to mind: Heracles was real, and he was an imposing giant of a man, whose father was a Hyperborean, or Philistine, who was worshipped as Zeus.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: NoReturn
Their ancestry and way of life is recorded as far back as at least 50,000 years, so I agree with that, too.

Oldest continuous civilisation. That's one of those things that is just nonsense. A lie that people go along with. It's just that people lived on the land for a long time. Like almost everywhere else on the planet. I don't know why it isn't considered condescending and patronising. "Yes you also had a civilisation, while we had Rome, you just didn't do anything new for 50,000+ years."

It's just silly it is predicated on the idea that everywhere else has had successive and multiple civilisations that are distinct.

It's part of the pretence it was one culture that they're trying to construct. When in reality it was hundreds if not thousands of cultures and a huge amount of genetic diversity from successive waves of immigration from the north across a vast distance.

I once read about a study into the DNA of the oldest remains and it found modern Aboriginals were not direct descendants. Of course that was a no-no area. So it was labelled contaminated samples, unreliable and an area of research that is a no-go for investigation. Maybe it was wrong, but the, "don't research in that area" makes me suspect there was something to it. Or they simply don't want to risk the chance it's correct. As well as populations being more closely linked to the not-so-ancient past from Paupa who presumable replaced people living in parts of Australia.

It's history and humans, it's complicated and messy. They'd just rather simple stories. Everything was peaceful and paradise for 50,000 years until the white man showed up. Don't question why that traditional bark canoe in the museum is made with metal rings.
 
Back