Careercow Elon Reeve Musk - Tesla, SpaceX and Twitter owner + ex-paypal CEO. Manchild, sexual deviant, spergy autist with access to space travel

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Elon vs Donald, who will be triumphant?

  • Elon Musk

    Votes: 29 2.5%
  • Donald Trump

    Votes: 305 26.5%
  • Us, and the friends we made along the way

    Votes: 816 71.0%

  • Total voters
    1,150
He's really speedrunning the fuentes/kanye path isn't he?

No I don't mean retarded takes on hitler, I mean a quick path towards people hating your guts... and for no other reason than a need to act like a sperg.
I'm pretty sure he has had a more meaningful and impressive downturn than either of those two. He is the richest fucking man on the planet, for God sake.
 
He did what he needed to and the fact it was buried shows the message was sent. I'd love to play correspondence chess with him.
In don't now, I don't like that message, murder and mayhem of the crazy eyed variety isn't a good look - as was the case with the rote armee fraktion too - people didn't like them killing bystanders and all that. I think they did in one chauffeur for example. Ted in the shed was also just a deranged killer in the eyes of the public, because he didn't select targets in an agreeable manner for the public's eye. The people who should have been scared really weren't either and his methods failed often and endangered too many innocent people - think post office workers. Strikes and mass civil disobedience, sabotage - those are where it's at.
You have to show that there a many people and not single spazzes, who might just be trigger happy and may just use the good fight as an plausible excuse for their murder sprees. Again: It drivers people further from taking action, if anything.

Tho, I am also inclined to know what exactly goes through his head.
 
I'd be very surprised if we have humans on Mars within the next 100 years.
Not to be destroy anyones dreams here (kek! It's the Elon thread!) But if we can't even go to the moon with ease today with all the available tech. It legit looks very bleak and I'm not even talking about the /x/ "fake moonlanding" memes here. I do think we got tech to get rovers up if we really want to, but we simply lack human competence, which is why I think Elon and other tech giants think will be solved with AI and invests heavily into it (just like every other industry facing the competence crisis). AI won't solve shit. IDK if any STEM faggots are in this thread, but education and it's containing (non-pozzed) knowledge is being forgotten and literally rotting away with the boomers. AI can read a text and a book in a voice for you, but not understand it... humans are still the connection between numbers and the physical world to set up the context. This connection about numbers and the real world is being lost with the generation who grew up with phones and tablets.

If we can't even make stable software and hardware for everyday tasks (as well as being less convoluted), making stable systems for life-supporting projects is not feasible I think. The only way we can start "having humans on Mars today" is if we simply treat them like soviet space dogs a.k.a just fucking shooting them up and hope they make it.

In short: Mars? Now!? Fuhgeddaboudit!

It will inherently have exploitative mechanisms. Right now, people are locked out of certain services because of not having a smartphone or not wanting to download some bullshit app...but this time it's inside your own body. I hope you renew your heart's subscription before your credit card expires.
I'm very aware of this nature, and I honsetly think that technology has already peaked (if you look at productivity vs. computer usage). I will never trust a computer to be inside me if I can't even trust my desktop PC to open up an document. But to be a little cheeky about it, all tech isn't "digital" and there might be some stuff that we haven't discovered yet that might be a "one time implementation, run forever" thing, but again... I'm just dreaming and being naive on that part, I know it's very unlikely for this to exist.

I have no interest in going to other planets until we figure out our shit here on Earth first. We've got about a billion years before the increase in the sun's luminosity becomes a problem so plenty of time to address things here.
I came to the same conclision too. If we can't take care of this place first, then we won't be able to fix the next one (we will face the same issues there, assuming we find something that we can work with). It's peak nigger mentality to just leave a shithole hoping the next one isn't and then ruining it due to the same problem we got here.
 
I'm pretty sure he has had a more meaningful and impressive downturn than either of those two. He is the richest fucking man on the planet, for God sake.
No he isn't. Like bezos, he's new-money. They're not nobility, so their wealth gets reported on. There are other people who's wealth does not get reported on. Just because Forbes calls someone the wealthiest, doesn't mean it's true. I'm supposed to believe recent articles that report the Rothschilds as only having a billion per person, when back in 2015 they had hundreds of trillions?

As for him being new money, yeah, I know his dad had emerald mines. But I mean in relative terms in regards to his current financial peers.
 
A poor little retarded autistic boy was recorded stimming in public. Now he’s being called a Nazi for accidentally spazzing out a few romans and you’re laughing?
That was Vitamin K brother. Elon has no idea where the hell he even was during the past 24 hours.
 
No he isn't. Like bezos, he's new-money. They're not nobility, so their wealth gets reported on. There are other people who's wealth does not get reported on. Just because Forbes calls someone the wealthiest, doesn't mean it's true. I'm supposed to believe recent articles that report the Rothschilds as only having a billion per person, when back in 2015 they had hundreds of trillions?

As for him being new money, yeah, I know his dad had emerald mines. But I mean in relative terms in regards to his current financial peers.
What a strange thing to have such a strong objection to on the day he is officially in the back pocket of the man in charge of the most powerful country on Earth.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: cheese shaped mouse
I came to the same conclision too. If we can't take care of this place first, then we won't be able to fix the next one (we will face the same issues there, assuming we find something that we can work with). It's peak nigger mentality to just leave a shithole hoping the next one isn't and then ruining it due to the same problem we got here.
This is meaningless self-defeating thought akin to Peterson's "clean your room". Yeah you should fix your problems if you can. But europeans didn't solve their problems before traveling across the oceans and planting flags. As much as you should solve problems, you will never be without problems. You can have problems and also explore/set up colonies.

Well if you're talking about habitable places. I'm not even sure we can get people past the van Allen belts without frying them.

What a strange thing to have such a strong objection to on the day he is officially in the back pocket of the man in charge of the most powerful country on Earth.
I look at the way I see things going in the future and I look at it beyond the news of the day. You said it in your previous, excellent post " he has had a more meaningful and impressive downturn ". Which means we're currently at Peak Elon. There's a lot of potential for downhill from here. Though I'll be ready to eat my words if he manages to achieve some meaningful space goals.

I also say it, because old power doesn't need to do things so visibly. It's very risky (see the attack on trump's life) and also the risk of reputation. Doing things visibly is more of a necessity for people who try to rise in the hierarchy of the world, because they need the support of people outside the current structure to help push them up.
 
Last edited:
This is meaningless self-defeating thought akin to Peterson's "clean your room". Yeah you should fix your problems if you can. But europeans didn't solve their problems before traveling across the oceans and planting flags. As much as you should solve problems, you will never be without problems. You can have problems and also explore/set up colonies.
That led to bigger problems. Most people in Europe didn't reap the benefits of colonization as they all killed each other in the various wars or were forced to emigrate as indentured servants.

Well if you're talking about habitable places. I'm not even sure we can get people past the van Allen belts without frying them.
They're no problem if you pass through them quickly, the Apollo missions did so without issues. However, unless you've got a Planet Buster Maximus that can reignite Mars' core to get the dynamo going again you're going to be blasted by solar radiation and poisoned by the toxic perchlorate soil leading to painful death.

Venus would honestly be a better choice for human colonization due to the thick atmosphere and habitable temperatures in the upper atmosphere combined with its induced magnetosphere.
 
IMG_5156.jpeg
 
This is meaningless self-defeating thought akin to Peterson's "clean your room". Yeah you should fix your problems if you can.
I was more thinking of the babysit niggers and dealing with kikes 24/7 issues. You can't go to space and leave them to ruining the home planet, in case you have to go back, I would prefer if it's not in shambles. A lot of the Europeans did move back and forth before finally settling in the new world.
 
  • Political Sperging
Reactions: Trombonista
I'm not even sure we can get people past the van Allen belts without frying them.
NASA already did that in 1969.

The main problem with trying to live on Mars is that it has no magnetosphere; that means that the surface gets pounded with a lot more radiation than Earth does and it's incapable of retaining an atmosphere. Martians would be living in tunnels.
 
This is meaningless self-defeating thought akin to Peterson's "clean your room". Yeah you should fix your problems if you can. But europeans didn't solve their problems before traveling across the oceans and planting flags.
Which caused more problems and embiggened the old ones. The west basically forgot the empire building, they just spread technology (and disease) but never actually spread enlightenment, actually the opposite, think of how many ass backwards guys like the Taliban get boosted just to "keep winning". King Leopold also comes to mind readily. But yeah, I reluctantly agree, there's nothing to say against space travel. I'd rather have that than more military spending. It's true that the "clean your room" argument is flawed and we aren't even in a quagmire where it's either or, the powers that be just want more killing machines down here than idealistic strive towards the stars.
 
Old internet was honestly pretty boring, too. For every good thread on 4chan, there were 500 stupid threads like "if someone posts doubles ill post a pic of my dick" or something equally retarded. Old social media was just like today's only less monetized but just as boring. No one cares what some random person had for lunch. SomethingAwful had some okay articles back in the day but the forums, like 4chan, were 99% boring shit.
I have to disagree on that. It could be rose tinted glasses, but the Internet felt more fun to me back then. That's not to say it wasn't plagued with a lot of the slop it still has - gooners, political crap (I say in a thread about Musk and politics, I know), but it also had more variety to me. More communities you could bounce in and out of, and each one sort of had it's own culture. It felt less centralized to a few sites. Of course, that also meant posting videos was a pain in the ass, image quality was dogshit due to slower speeds, and things like that.

Now it's fewer sites, and a lot of them want your real name, and people posting monetized ragebait slop.
 
Back