Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 15.3%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 52 11.8%
  • This Year

    Votes: 71 16.2%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 148 33.7%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 101 23.0%

  • Total voters
    439
“Nathan” + clearly a getty images photo search of “business man” = profile photo of brother

edit: oops i mean “Nathann”
1737502615099.png
The link.

But yeah, interesting that he has his own brothers name misspelled.
 
I have a feeling that Hardin will be rather animated about the part where Greer suggests that the former should not be keeping HIS CLIENT in the loop and, more interestingly, that "private" correspondence is being leaked due to that relationship.

I just can't wait for Russ to try and show evidence of that.
 
As an aside, Russ spent much of his motion debunking the Judge's claim that Russ claimed his witnesses were eager, but the Judge never claimed that (in the punishment order). That's an extremely weird thing to lie about
Russ is... retarded. Medically speaking. It doesn't have to make sense.
 
Is he altering the name/face of people in the screenshots to protect their identity or something? Wouldent that mean the evidence (even though its worthless) is fake or altered?
He'd have to hire experts to confirm the authenticity of those messages, and what you said may or may not be an issue
 
Well, well, well.
I have no idea if it has any merit, but I hope if Greer does voluntarily dismiss that Null goes for the throat and requests all his fees and costs for the lawsuit being that it's now wasted multiple years. Sure he'd never see a drool covered dollar but that would be a really nice judgement.
 
I think this now allows, if not his Brother and Father, his PHONE to be subpoenaed. I mean, even if you’re being as forgiving as possible and not subpoenaing his relatives, those phone conversations could now be relevant. If I were the defense, I would want a copy of that phone to cross-reference conversations.
 
I think this now allows, if not his Brother and Father, his PHONE to be subpoenaed. I mean, even if you’re being as forgiving as possible and not subpoenaing his relatives, those phone conversations could now be relevant. If I were the defense, I would want a copy of that phone to cross-reference conversations.
Subpoena everything. Subpoena every hooker in Vegas. He's fucking around now.
 
Despite the fact Russhole has not only taken a great big shit all over the judge's decision to award discovery costs to Null, but smeared it all over the filing and then send it back to the court as a brand new filing, the judge will probably do nothing other than a little more hand-wringing and maybe another light smack on Russhole's pee-pee before letting this absolute joke of a case continue to grind on.

If it wasn't costing Null so much (even at mates rates), it'd be hilarious. Mildly repetitive, but hilarious nonetheless.
 
I have a feeling that Hardin will be rather animated about the part where Greer suggests that the former should not be keeping HIS CLIENT in the loop and, more interestingly, that "private" correspondence is being leaked due to that relationship.

I just can't wait for Russ to try and show evidence of that.
We're not allowed to reply unless asked for a response.
 
I have no idea if it has any merit, but I hope if Greer does voluntarily dismiss
He can't. He lost the ability when Null responded. If he wants this dismissed, he has to beg for Mr. Hardin's permission, or for a court to order dismissal, but the court is required to deny such a motion when the non-moving party is prejudiced (like by having spent tons of money already or the moving party waiting too long to file such a request). See, broadly, FRCP 41 (a) (1) (A) and Ohlander v. Larson, 114 F.3d 1531 (10th Cir. 1997)
 
It seems that everyone but the Judge agrees that Greer shouldn't be allowed to have witnesses.
my guess the greer/appeal would blame the judge for not allowing his evidnce in after he missed the deadline .
Which point being made allowing the evidence would "hurting no one" while ignoreing everything else.
 
Back