Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 14.4%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 56 12.0%
  • This Year

    Votes: 73 15.7%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 156 33.5%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 113 24.3%

  • Total voters
    465
One more lie spotted: "Greer also asked to have the witnesses excluded because they all live in different states"
This part combined with some statements he made about “everyone in the same room” makes me think …
It's almost like preparing evidence and witnesses is part of prosecuting a case, and Russ, for four years, has been failing to prosecute this case.
That he believes he can coach the witnesses to say whatever he wants and that he would have to be present at a deposition .

This guy is brain dead.
 
So I'm a stupid fucking retard, but didn't the 10th circuit remand to the district Court to dismiss with prejudice in the end, after the district Court had denied the dismissal? Or did I takeaway the wrong thing skimming through that.

I've got very little legal knowledge.
I think you've got it backwards. The first district judge dismissed everything. 10th upheld all the dismissals aside from contributory copyright infringement based on ludicrous time travel logic, sent that back to the district court (or maybe Russ's lawyers only appealed the copyright claims, that I don't specifically remember)

The first judge retired, new (current) judge takes over. Case pingpongs between Utah and Florida, lands back in Utah

For a while now it's looked like Russell is trying to bring back the harassment/stalking claims via plightsplaining to the magistrate because he seemingly has no evidence of contributory (or direct) copyright infringement

He has now been sanctioned for fees relating to discovery fuckery
 
At this point I'm sure the judge may figure out it's drivel without a redundant commentary from Hardin.

I'm sure he can. I'd still want to get my complaints about exactly how retarded Russell was written into the public record. Particularly noting the fact that nothing he complains about has anything at all to do with copyright infringement.
 
He also lied about Hardin publishing witnesses' contact info. In fact Hardin hasn't published anything - submitting an ECF is not publishing. What happens to those docs after the court uploads them to PACER is out of his hands.
Hardin joke got to him & he thinks hardin fully is ....
eventhough everyone keeps saying ... is not Hardin.
 
By the way, the part about "not wanting the witnesses to perjure themselves" is really something. It is Greer's official position that the only way to stop his own witnesses from committing perjury is to cut their mic! This is what we brought the case back from Florida for, Your Honors. It was just so important to hear from these perjury-prone non-eager witnesses.
 
For a while now it's looked like Russell is trying to bring back the harassment/stalking claims via plightsplaining to the magistrate because he seemingly has no evidence of contributory (or direct) copyright infringement
Russ is probably stupid enough to not realize that the appeal was for contributory copyright only (remember he’s used to pro se retard bullshit where he can basically amend at anytime for no penalty) and keeps trying to do his old standard of using plights to bring it back in. He’s even complained that he was going to appeal the harassment too, once he got money from somewhere to pay his lawyers.

But it’s more insidious than all this. He’s trying to get the judge to rule “well, he can’t prove shit about copyright, so let’s let him win on harassment”.
 
View attachment 6886726
13/30 pages are arguments, the rest are exhibits of articles about KF and random convos he had with people
Out of curiosity, if Greer is told to pay attorney's fees, but he doesn't have any money, is Hardin just not going to be paid for the work he did? Or is this a situation where Josh already paid Hardin and Greer is supposed to reimburse Josh?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Neo-Nazi Rich Evans
Out of curiosity, if Greer is told to pay attorney's fees, but he doesn't have any money, is Hardin just not going to be paid for the work he did? Or is this a situation where Josh already paid Hardin and Greer is supposed to reimburse Josh?
Josh is paying Mr. Hardin. The win would reimburse Josh, though likely not fully even if fully granted (as it is limited only to discovery issues)
 
Russ is probably stupid enough to not realize that the appeal was for contributory copyright only (remember he’s used to pro se retard bullshit where he can basically amend at anytime for no penalty) and keeps trying to do his old standard of using plights to bring it back in. He’s even complained that he was going to appeal the harassment too, once he got money from somewhere to pay his lawyers.

But it’s more insidious than all this. He’s trying to get the judge to rule “well, he can’t prove shit about copyright, so let’s let him win on harassment”.
Oh he's well aware of everything, he has admitted in a filing that he is indeed trying to resurrect claims that the appeals court already dismissed. You would think after such admission a judge would give him a stern warning to cut that shit out and stop wasting the court's time with irrelevant shit, but apparently they don't mind.
 
But yeah, interesting that he has his own brothers name misspelled.
Also that he doesn't know Nathan's address. Even more interesting, it appears none of the family will tell him Nathan's address.
Thunk provoking isn't it?

Russ is... retarded. Medically speaking. It doesn't have to make sense.
There is no evidence to suggest this.

He can't. He lost the ability when Null responded. If he wants this dismissed, he has to beg for Mr. Hardin's permission, or for a court to order dismissal, but the court is required to deny such a motion when the non-moving party is prejudiced (like by having spent tons of money already or the moving party waiting too long to file such a request). See, broadly, FRCP 41 (a) (1) (A) and Ohlander v. Larson, 114 F.3d 1531 (10th Cir. 1997)
This makes my heart sing.

ETA: God damn this mushmouthed faggot makes me MATI. The hubris and utter sperginess of his filings enrage me at times.
I feel you. I read page two a half dozen times. I understood what I was reading, but I just couldn't comprehend that Russell was actually submitting it. Finally progressed through the rest and...I try not to blaspheme. I really do, but JESUS TAP DANCING CHRIST ON A UNICYCLE what the actual fuck?

He also lied about Hardin publishing witnesses' contact info. In fact Hardin hasn't published anything - submitting an ECF is not publishing. What happens to those docs after the court uploads them to PACER is out of his hands.
That's Classic cow though. They all whine about people 'stalking their Private Facebook' and 'stealing photos from their 'Personal Instagram'.
How could Russell the paralegal possibly know that court filings are a matter of public record unless court ordered otherwise?

Finally, as this is now Mano a Mano, Greer v. District Judge, Greer should just storm into the judges chambers and piss in the judges morning coffee while hollering "How d'ya like them apples?" Guaranteed victory right there.
 
Back