African-American Appreciation Thread - Highlighting contributions from our most productive citizens

something about AI crap just makes it not worth mentioning, probably the fact that it's so easy to produce that any ol asshole can do it, making bringing it up worthless because if we called attention to any piece of AI shit we saw, we'd be doing it all day long
I see a lot of nigger AI slop everyday but only bring up examples here that are truly, exceptionally retarded for whatever reason. In this case it was the ermine coat that really made the picture "shine", though VIKANG armor that looks worse than the costumes in The Thirteenth Warrior also stands out in some of these other examples.
Here's my question for the more knowledgeable primatologists in this thread.

Why is there almost zero sexual dimorphism between the two genders in that species?
What about DAT AZZ DOE?
 

Woman arrested after accidentally texting sheriff’s department instead of drug dealer

1737538894568.png
 
Here's my question for the more knowledgeable primatologists in this thread.

Why is there almost zero sexual dimorphism between the two genders in that species?
i think that's just a result of us not being them, so we can't see the sexual dymorphism, just like how not anyone can tell a male dog apart from a female dog without seeing their nuts
the fact that human beings are naturally programmed to tell our own people apart and struggle with other races is very normal, the outrage over thinking "all [race] look alike" being racist as all hell is just another excuse for people to get upset over someting, in reality every race thinks every other race they don't have regular contact with looks alike, we notice it because we're different to them, same way we notice other people's accents but not our own- it's perfectly fine to do and is not inherently indicative of hatred

then again
black women ARE pretty mannish
 
She's young, he's young, he's thin (not fat is always a plus), has a car (any car is better than no car), he presumably has a job, there's the "forbidden" aspect of miscegenation going on and she lives in a society that will make excuses for her at every turn. What do you expect to happen? The Patriarchy existed to protect women, not enslave them to men. That's gone, and it thankfully ain't never coming back.

Protect women from what, you dumb fuck? Oh yeah - men. Protection racket.

Anyway in a world where white people are reviled and subject to lethal and systemic racism (anyone doubts this, do your research on UK grooming gangs), it makes sense in terms of survival for whites to pick non-white mates.

It’s a subconscious way of increasing the chances that their offspring won’t be despised, victimised or treated unfairly, thus increasing fitness. Being visibly mixed race is a desirable and protective trait in a world that hates whites.

It’s a trade-off with their own offspring not sharing as many genes with them, and many other issues of which this thread will be aware. I see race mixing as a desperate subconscious survival mechanism for people who feel they have poor chances due to their race. It also applies to other types of race mixing but with different contexts.

White men with yellow fever: inferior men who white women won’t put up with, end up fetishising “submissive” orientals. Lucky to produce offspring at all.

South East Asian women: poor and desperate. Rich partner of any race increases their future offspring’s’ chances in life.

East Asian women with whites : they hate certain features of their own race - slitty eyes, wide faces and tanned skin - that breeding with whites may be able to cancel out. Looks are hyper important in their society so good looking (big eyed pale) children are at a marked advantage.

East Asian women breeding with blacks: black are promoted as cool and athletic over there and they aren’t yet familiar with TNB to know that this is propaganda. Think their offspring will also be cool and athletic.

Black women race mixing with anyone: just want validation because their own men hate and disparage them, especially their hair and skin colour. Any offspring will be less black, have lighter skin and less Afro hair, and thus less hated by their own. They will be “privileged” by this and therefore at a success (survival) advantage.

Black and Muslim men breeding with white women: an expression of hatred to whites, by conquering and owning their property (women). Reproductively, taking white women is using up the enemy’s fertility resources, thus decreasing their success and relatively increasing their own.

White women with Muslim men: got raped and abused by Muslims as a girl and called a dirty white whore, and is desperate to be made good by marriage. Wants approval and for her and her future offspring be relieved of her dirty white whoreness. Alternatively, taken in by an Arab love scam due to being insecure and desperate for love, and finds that you actually can’t escape Islam that easily.

Whites with Indians (pajeets): mutual perceived racial improvement: offspring and white parent escape the hate of being white, while the Indian half gets a coveted light skinned child (privileged in India).

Not familiar enough with Latinas or Native Americans to know the dynamics. But I’ve yet to see an example of race mixing without some kind of attempt by either party to improve their racial lot.
 
I like to share my most cherished clip... im proud of it because i snatched right before complete deletion from a relative "normie" site.
Sadly i don't find the news article when the Darwin award nominee wheeled out and talked(!) how precious the human life is...
 
I like to share my most cherished clip... im proud of it because i snatched right before complete deletion from a relative "normie" site.
Sadly i don't find the news article when the Darwin award nominee wheeled out and talked(!) how precious the human life is...
I still don't know how this dude lived.
 
i think that's just a result of us not being them, so we can't see the sexual dymorphism, just like how not anyone can tell a male dog apart from a female dog without seeing their nuts
I think you're right for the most part. The person you're replying to said, "almost zero sexual dimorphism" - and I think that's going too far. It seems to me that there's about as much male/female difference in blacks as there is with other apes - gorillas for example.

Yes, yes, I know that sounds like a horrible insult. But it's not meant that way. We are apes. I am an ape, and so are you.

There's substantially less dimorphism in apes than there is in most bird species. Birds often take it to the extreme, with the males and females not even looking like the same species. It's worth asking why that is. One hypothesis is that it's related to parasites. Birds have a bitch of a time dealing with parasites, because it's so easy for parasites to hide in feathers. The theory goes that males often advertise their health (and thus, resistance to parasites) with garish colors - colors they wouldn't have the energy to support if they were heavily infested.

It's also been noted among birds that dimorphism is inversely proportional to male reproductive investment. Males look more like females in species where males do a lot of work to care for the young.

Among mammals, it's often related to intra sex competition. Males look more different when they have to compete directly (as in, by fighting) other males.

The point is that there are likely several drivers of dimorphism, and some of them don't apply to apes, let alone humans.

All that said, there does appear to be more dimorphism among whites than among blacks. I can't quantify it. I just note, as others have, that white women are smaller than black women. What is driving this? I don't know, but I could give you a wild guess....

I'd say it's related to something called "neoteny" which is when an adult retains certain physical characteristics of a child. My guess is that it's a way of directing male effort/resources toward the care of both women and children.

The poster who brought this up seemed to suggest that black people were the aberration - that low dimorphism was odd. I think it's the other way around. I think black people are more normal, and whites are the aberration, as far as apes go.
 
there does appear to be more dimorphism among whites than among blacks. I can't quantify it.
Someone showed me a book or booklet a while ago that has everything about "objective beauty" down to the math of it. It's also in some of Ayn Rand's book apparently cause they're whole into the objective thing. I don't really buy into that but there may be a way to quantify it.
white women are smaller than black women. What is driving this? I don't know
The more petite and attractive black women probably move socially upward to marry outside of blacks. Leaving them with the runts which are more manly.

But regardless, you'll see less dimorphism in more gender inequal societies. Extra rivalrousness over the women or matriarchal societies both have disincentives for being more feminine. In a matriarchal society, if you're more feminine and attractive than the queen or elites or the main clique, it inspires jealousy and putting down or outright violence possibly, over time weeding out the more attractive ones. In highly patriarchal societies, social mobility for women is restricted, leading to attractive ones becoming even more rivalrous, probably higher exploitation and abuse as a result of that and so the uglier, more manlier women have an advantage. In societies with more equal treatment, women can express their femininity without fear etc and so they're more apparent and selected over the other ones.
 
Protect women from what, you dumb fuck? Oh yeah - men. Protection racket.
Oh the irony of you posting this in the African-American Appreciation thread! Like a nigger too stupid to grasp that you don't have a right to white spaces, white people, and their children. That if you want the nice things of the white man's world. You have to act white. You can't chimp out. Women truly are the niggers of the world.

Whites with Indians (pajeets): mutual perceived racial improvement: offspring and white parent escape the hate of being white, while the Indian half gets a coveted light skinned child (privileged in India).
Brown shit covered hands typed this.

In highly patriarchal societies, social mobility for women is restricted, leading to attractive ones becoming even more rivalrous, probably higher exploitation and abuse as a result of that and so the uglier, more manlier women have an advantage.
In a patriarchal society, attractive women have more mobility because they can always marry up/mate up. Plenty of good looking commoners became the wives, or mistresses of nobles. Their offspring had greater access to wealth and advancement as the illegitimate heirs of rulers, and later wealth merchants/guildsmen. Hell, even some of the popes kept mistresses. Higher status means smaller chances for abuse/exploitation. Whereas unattractive women would be compared to men, and thus be open to similar treatment.
 
Oh the irony of you posting this in the African-American Appreciation thread! Like a nigger too stupid to grasp that you don't have a right to white spaces, white people, and their children. That if you want the nice things of the white man's world. You have to act white. You can't chimp out. Women truly are the niggers of the world.


Brown shit covered hands typed this.


In a patriarchal society, attractive women have more mobility because they can always marry up/mate up. Plenty of good looking commoners became the wives, or mistresses of nobles. Their offspring had greater access to wealth and advancement as the illegitimate heirs of rulers, and later wealth merchants/guildsmen. Hell, even some of the popes kept mistresses. Higher status means smaller chances for abuse/exploitation. Whereas unattractive women would be compared to men, and thus be open to similar treatment.
i wish you people separated your various points into multiple posts if you're gonna make a few really good ones and a few fucking retarded ones, so i can vote accordingly
 
Back