US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
As a lover of saying funny slurs and spicy topics and a skeptic of the chosen people myself.
You can also tell them by the fact they are one goddamn note.

Talking about race cars?
"kikes hate race cars and niggers can't drive."
Ice cream?
"ice cream is a jewish distraction"
Roads?
"hitler would have never let the roads get this bad."
Plain white t-shirts?
"You know what ELSE would be better plain white?"

It's just the reddit NPC chip put in upside down.

RCO013_1469407690.jpg
 
They are sick bastards.
I wonder if journalism changed to whatever the fuck this mess is today when you needed a degree to be a journalist?
IIRC, it used to be one of those careers where you could work your way up.
Or did it change when the New (Jew) Left infiltrated it?
Whatever it is, I share your feelings.
A bit late, but ...

Old-school journalists had mottos like "If your mother says she loves you, check it out" (i.e., get a second source) and "It's better to be second and right than first and wrong." What happened to that culture?

In the print era, newspapers had two sources of revenue: subscriptions and advertising. Advertising was by far the bigger of the two, but editors prided themselves on their independence from advertisers. Major newspapers wouldn't allow their advertising sales people to even go into the newsroom, for example.

It wasn't a golden age - there were plenty of journalistic fuckups and scandals. - but journalists thought of their job as telling people the truth. There was a separate section for editorials and opinion, and many papers made a point of running editorials with different viewpoints side by side.

Then the Internet came along. Newspapers struggled to figure out how to monetize content - in the early era, it was often far easier for readers to avoid paywalls or find mirrors of articles. But what was even worse for the papers' bottom line was that advertisers weren't willing to pay nearly as much for advertising. Businesses had better ways to reach potential customers now.

Newspapers needed to cut costs. In-depth reporting and fact checking is expensive, but opinion writing is cheap and can be cranked out quickly. Experienced journalists are paid more than new graduates. Oldtimers were shown the door, and the online papers were full of young millennials who saw their job as educating you about woke politics, not informing you about facts.

During this period, there was also a lot of consolidation in media, and instead of jobs all over the country - where old-time journalists would have been cultivating sources and building up knowledge of whatever field they specialized in - entry-level jobs often meant moving to NYC. And the only people who can afford to move to NYC for low pay are being financed by the Bank of Mom and Dad. So you got lots of articles written by young, rich kids, parroting the elite politics of their class, unpolluted by contact with the hoi polloi.

Additionally, the more readers used search engines to find stories instead of regularly returning to the same paper day after day, the more editors prioritized clickbait - asking reporters for a quick thousand words about whatever was trending on then-Twitter, and looking for controversial takes that would generate hate shares.
 
Well what happened to all that WE WILL RESIST U talk from the Democrat mayors and governors?
The actual adults came back in the room, that's what happened:
1737578676430.png
In a memo to Justice Department staff seen by Reuters, Trump's acting deputy attorney general, Emil Bove, wrote, "Federal law prohibits state and local actors from resisting, obstructing or otherwise failing to comply with lawful immigration-related commands and requests."
Pretty much telling them in no uncertain terms "FAFO".
 
>They don't really want to order anything. It's just about harassment
How the fuck do you even know that for a fact? Some of them could really be serious about it considering you're probably the only local bakery in that area. How the fuck are you even still running as a business if you're turning down orders because it may have something that might trigger you?

>therefore we denied all the request
<not because it's trump shit
You dumb bitch, you admitted it was because of exactly that in your first paragraph and now you're trying to fucking lie about it?

>Even though the criminal they voted for won, they still come for us like children with schoolyard insults.
ah yes, I'll take "shit that never fucking happened" for $800, Alex!
 
Didn't this fag just a few weeks before Trump was sworn in sign off 50 million dollars to put trump in indefinite legal battles instead of giving it to his state for rescue
That was before he realized he wasn't going to get infinity kajillion dollars for free from the Trump admin.

If Newsom was a smart man this wouldn't be a problem in the first place
 
To expand on what someone asked earlier, why was first term Trump so milquetoast, I will say this.

Trump believed politicians, like the business and media people Trump had worked with his entire life, were motivated and incentivized by money, power, or a job well done. These are tangible and can be transacted upon. Put simply, Trump knew how to grease palms and persuade people with things they want.

However, this only works with rational people who desire rational or at least material things. Trump did not find a system operated by rational actors in Washington DC. He found a quasi religious order that could not be bargained with. Republicans received money from elsewhere and were the closest to a greasy business associate looking for a little action Trump would find. But men like John McCain would throw away all their principles, irrationally, just to spite Trump (McCain campaigned on repealing Obamacare and to spite Trump voted NOT to repeal).

Democrats, also greedy money grubbers, had the religious Jacobinism that made their actions and motives totally incomprehensible to a man like Trump. Trump genuinely believed the system was staffed by rational actors and if you give them a cut of the action, like any business dealing, things can get done.
I mean he outlined why in his Joe Rogan interview, but yeah you kinda outline the deep state/ club better.
 
Good news, USPG! "Democratic infighting is rising as Trump takes center stage" (archive).

Democrats are finding themselves mired in infighting and schoolyard sniping just as President Trump begins his new term.

Former first lady Jill Biden and Rep. Nancy Pelosi’s (D-Calif.) daughter have taken shots at each other amid sore feelings over the pressure campaign that led former President Biden to drop his White House reelection bid.

At the same time, there are hurt feelings in former Vice President Kamala Harris’s orbit after Biden said he could have defeated Trump. Harris felt slighted, an ally to the former vice president said, and her aides took it personally.

“Who the hell does he think he is?” one Harris aide told The Hill, recalling the sentiment around the Harris bubble about Biden’s comments. “We’re in this mess because of him.”

Biden’s last-minute pardons of his family members have sparked intraparty criticism.

And in Congress, Democrats are battling in the House and Senate over their strategies after their campaign messaging fell flat with the public. Centrists and liberals are pointing fingers on issues such as immigration and transgender rights.

One longtime Democratic operative said the party is “spiraling” in the wake of Trump’s victory.

“In my political lifetime, this is as bad as it’s been for Democrats,” the operative conceded.

Democratic strategist Tim Hogan also acknowledged the friction.

“Now is the time when the fine line between soul-searching and finger-pointing begins to blur,” Hogan said. “Yes, everyone is frustrated, and rightfully so.

“No one likes being alive for their own autopsy,” he added.

The current mood in the Democratic Party differs from that seen under Trump’s first administration in 2017, when Democrats presented a unified front in opposition to Trump. Back then, the Democratic Party’s message centered on opposing the president at all costs. The so-called resistance movement was born as a result.

Now, after their bruising defeat in November, Democrats are divided on their approach to Trump.

There is a willingness by some to find common ground with the president, as some Democrats have said there were lessons to be learned in November.

“Fighting Trump on every turn has not proven to be successful,” said Democratic strategist Jamal Simmons, echoing what other Democrats have said about their rationale for a new approach with the GOP president.

But other Democrats say they are drawing a red line with Trump.

Some Democratic lawmakers — including Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) — didn’t even attend his inauguration ceremony.

“Let me make myself clear: I don’t celebrate rapists,” the congresswoman said in a video posted on her Instagram page.

Simmons, who worked for Harris until 2023, said he’s not concerned about Democrats’ differing opinions right now.

“It’s an inflection point,” he said of the place in which Democrats find themselves. “People have a right to hurt feelings. These are human beings and we don’t factor that in enough in our analysis.”

The coming months are expected to present even more challenges as the party starts to rebuild with a new party chair who will set out to take a different approach than the one used in the past few election cycles.

Democrats will also have to find candidates who can help them win back the House in 2026 — a priority for Democrats who have pledged to stop Trump in his final two years in office.

And for the first time in several cycles, the party will contend with a wide-open field for the next White House race in 2028, which is sure to present further discord and discomfort.

“It’s going to take a moment for Democrats to develop a coherent strategy to push back on the Trump administration,” said Rodell Mollineau, a Democratic strategist who served as a senior aide to the late Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.).

Mollineau said Democrats need to bide their time instead of acting impulsively and to focus on unified, alternative ways of engaging Trump and Republicans: “It can’t just be an opposition play,” he said.

“Some rallying cries will become obvious, and others will emerge as the details and repercussions of his agenda come to light,” Mollineau added. “I know there are many in the party who don’t want to wait, but patience and intentionality might be a better play than just throwing spaghetti at the wall to see what sticks.”

But, for now, even as Trump has returned to the Oval Office with a robust vision and a clear mandate, tension lingers among Democrats. This week, after witnessing the president take the oath of office and then issue a flurry of executive orders, a second operative fired arrows at his own colleagues.

“I’m just so mad at our party,” the operative said. “We suck. How could we let this happen again?”
You wanted this to happen, you tremendous faggots. Democrats got their of self-fulfilling prophecy, except the end result is them losing a ton of political power instead of some communist revolution. Fuck you, fuck your mother, fuck your family, and fuck you.
 
>They don't really want to order anything. It's just about harassment
How the fuck do you even know that for a fact? Some of them could really be serious about it considering you're probably the only local bakery in that area. How the fuck are you even still running as a business if you're turning down orders because it may have something that might trigger you?

>therefore we denied all the request
<not because it's trump shit
You dumb bitch, you admitted it was because of exactly that in your first paragraph and now you're trying to fucking lie about it?

>Even though the criminal they voted for won, they still come for us like children with schoolyard insults.
ah yes, I'll take "shit that never fucking happened" for $800, Alex!
Bake the fucking cake, bigot
 
How would the Feds collect income for their budget otherwise? Property and sales tax? I think those are income streams for the state and other local jurisdictions though.
If income tax gets removed it will lead to more money being available in the American people's wallets to spend, which will get taxed when they use it to buy food and other resources they need. It will increase the amount of money going around in the economy.

You can fix the budgeting deficit by getting rid of the Social Security ponzi scheme (which zoomers like me will never be able to receive) and the rest of the government gibs that lead to less people working. The more people on government welfare and gibs, the more the burden is on the taxpayers
 
Reddit grievances can be summed up with "WE NEED BROWN PEOPLE IN THIS COUNTRY TO SOOTHE MY WHITE GUILT". Pathetic. Redditors need to be sentenced to labor camps.
It's not even that, it's "I need to pretend I'm soothing my white guilt so that token white soybro that unironically believes this shit and runs our social group doesn't ostracize me". It's been Emperor's New Clothes for years now. Next to nobody actually believes this shit, but nobody wants to be the first to out themselves in polite company.
 
“Who the hell does he think he is?” one Harris aide told The Hill, recalling the sentiment around the Harris bubble about Biden’s comments. “We’re in this mess because of him.”

Funny, you weren't saying that while you were ball-washing him the first 3 years of his presidency.
 
Back