Kingdom Come Deliverance - Or how I stopped worrying about SJW and love Bohemia | Now with betrayal and a lot more niggers. "Historically accurate." BlackRock ruined the series.

Didn't Grummz source claim you can implicate him and have him executed? Not that it matters much, cause I'm sure that will fail whatever quest he's in and that may fuck up the playthrough, so you will be essentially forced to play nice with him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gravityqueen4life
I think in BG3's case the best course of action is just not to play. I have no idea why that game got so popular, it looks like rainbow vomit.
You have a bunch of pc players that are living under a rock for years. You know the kind that blindly think Blizzard, Bethesda, Bioware cant do anything wrong, and is the best thing since sliced bread. So with that mindset they all jumped on BG3 at release. Now when the BG3 woke slop have been revealed they dont have the decency to admit they wasted their money, so they will defend it at all costs. But if BG3 had been released in 2025 after that faggot Dragon Age game, BG3 would have bombed hard for its woke shit.
 
You have a bunch of pc players that are living under a rock for years. You know the kind that blindly think Blizzard, Bethesda, Bioware cant do anything wrong.
I'm exclusievely a PC player and I was fully aware of how pozzed these dev themes have become.
They'll pull every narrative trick in the book to make you feel bad about doing so, and hammer you on the head that doing everything the nigger asks you to do is always going to be the correct moral choice
I'm still curious how Henry ends up in Sigismund's military camp, where this nigger is supposedly located. Sigismund is the enemy. The only thing I can think of is Henry infiltrating it in disguise to carry out sabotage. If the game was based, Henry could blame all the bad shit happening on the nigger, who is allegedly hated by the whole camp anyway, except for one soyboy commander.
But it is more likely the nigger will aid Henry in the process and he will mastermind all sabotage actions and Henry will just carry out his grand plans as a lapdog.
 
What is the endgame of Blackrock, Statestreet pushing ESG? If they cant get the money back from devs?
Non shitpost answer, it's a value added product for iShares ETFs, the actual money comes from cleaning up and greenwashing investments in petrochemical companies
ESG is just the post 2015 name for European Union corporate responsibility reporting, all public companies have to do it, it's realignment with UN targets etc. etc. Blackrock just tried to position themselves as the definitive asset manager for "ESG focused" investing.
The Environmental part is far, far more weighed than the S of Social, and even for the latter the meme "DEI" is a subbranch of a subbranch, BlackRock sells "conscious capitalism" nonsense to take money from institutional investors and shove it on ExxonMobil and BP and Northrop Grumman while pretending they're helping society.

This doesn't apply to Warhorse anyway since they're privately held, they're subject to Embracer pressure, if any.

Edit on edit and vaguely related, the above EU requirements DO apply to CDPR since they're a public EU company, and the same online demographic that shitposts Vavra for "abandoning the cause" loves shitposting and misinfo about CDPR selling out to the ESG and such. But for anyone actually experienced in the field that goes and reads their public and open reports, they're nothingburgers supreme, and management openly gives no fucks aside from legal requirements.
 
Last edited:
You know the kind that blindly think Blizzard, Bethesda, Bioware cant do anything wrong, and is the best thing since sliced bread. So with that mindset they all jumped on BG3 at release.
It was more insidious than that.

During most early access there was little to none of the pozz, and even when the game release most of the woke faggotry was relegated to the late Act II, and especially Act III.

I am not sure if this was done intentionally, or was merely the end result of Larian hiring additional people, or something that WotC ordered them to do, but the end result was that the game most people played and recommended to others had little to do with the end product.

But what Larian did was give other woke developers a blueprint on how to successfully sell their games - obfuscate the pozz by placing it towards the end of the game, so you can maximize profits in the crucial first few weeks of release.

Imagine if no leaks had been shared, many here would have bought the game at launch fully expecting an experience similar to that of the first game, only to be greeted by the magical negro and surprise buttsex.

This doesn't apply to Warhorse anyway since they're privately held, they're subject to Embracer pressure, if any.
BlackRock has stock in Embracer, and Embracer leadership is predominantly Jewish. The original investor for the first game was a Czech coal baron that routinely donates money to right-wing Czech parties.
 
Last edited:
During most early access there was little to none of the pozz, and even when the game release most of the woke faggotry was relegated to the late Act II, and especially Act III.
What's the poz? Asking out of curiosity. Have it downloaded (yar har) still in early chapter 1 and it looks pretty pozzed already with the "Tiefling refuges" and so on. I am Dark Urge and behaving like a lunatic mind you, so those Teiflings are gonna have a bad time, but I always had the idea BG3 was very upfront with it's faggotry.

I also don't particularly care about spoilers, I've been tempted to just uninstal, so go nuts with examples.
 
I'm exclusievely a PC player and I was fully aware of how pozzed these dev themes have become.
Then you are not of that group then.

During most early access there was little to none of the pozz, and even when the game release most of the woke faggotry was relegated to the late Act II, and especially Act III.

But what Larian did was give other woke developers a blueprint on how to successfully sell their games - obfuscate the pozz by placing it towards the end of the game, so you can maximize profits in the crucial first few weeks of release.
When it comes to BG3 i was suspicious before it was released, after all there had been a lot of woke shit done in games for a while. Larian gave them the blueprint but it might be a bit late i think. We have had the KCD2 woke slop set the internet on fire, its just one of many to come. People are starting to notice more and more the woke bs, and put their preordering on hold. With Trump as president now. The game developer wokies are gonna seethe, and they will have a hard time hiding it.
 
What's the poz? Asking out of curiosity. Have it downloaded (yar har) still in early chapter 1 and it looks pretty pozzed already with the "Tiefling refuges" and so on. I am Dark Urge and behaving like a lunatic mind you, so those Teiflings are gonna have a bad time, but I always had the idea BG3 was very upfront with it's faggotry.

I also don't particularly care about spoilers, I've been tempted to just uninstal, so go nuts with examples.
The entire act 2 Is saving two dykes from le evil white man
 
And if by happenstance both of said dykes happened to have a horrible end, does the game just kind of shit itself and trots you over to act 3?
From what I remember, no. Killing the chick you're supposed to save can also lead to an alternative character development path for one of your companions.

People are going to shit on me for this opinion, but BG 3 being brought up in this context doesn't even match whatsoever. Not only do the "woke themes" fit a fantasy world better, the game lets you engage with the ideology and characters how you want to. Not only does it let you reject them, the game expects you to and has different outcomes for such.
 
Didn't Grummz source claim you can implicate him and have him executed? Not that it matters much, cause I'm sure that will fail whatever quest he's in and that may fuck up the playthrough, so you will be essentially forced to play nice with him.
Even if you can, it still pushes the narrative of "poor oppressed innocent black guy attacked by whypipo for no reason".
 
Back