Snowden support threatens Tulsi Gabbard's Senate confirmation - Some Senate Republicans are zeroing in on Tulsi Gabbard's 2020 call for the U.S. to drop charges against Edward Snowden, a man many of them still consider a traitor.

Source: https://www.axios.com/2025/01/23/tulsi-gabbard-edward-snowden-trump-senate

Some Senate Republicans are zeroing in on Tulsi Gabbard's 2020 call for the U.S. to drop charges Edward Snowden, a man many of them still consider a traitor.

Why it matters: Gabbard is quickly becoming the most endangered Trump nominee.

"There's definitely a risk that she won't even survive the committee process," one Republican senator told Axios, speaking on the condition of anonymity.
Gabbard is Trump's nominee to be director of national intelligence.
Zoom in: Most of the concerns about Gabbard have so far been sparked by a trip she took to Syria, her references to U.S. bio labs in Ukraine and a history of questioning the findings of the U.S. intelligence community.

Now it's her stance on Snowden, a former NSA contractor who was charged in 2013 with leaking classified documents revealing global surveillance programs. He became a naturalized Russian citizen in 2022.

As a member of Congress, Gabbard sponsored a House resolution with former Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) "expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the Federal Government should drop all charges against Edward Snowden."

Only recently has this come to the attention of Republicans sitting on the Senate Intelligence Committee — and elsewhere in the conference, multiple sources familiar told Axios.
Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) told Axios she is concerned about the legislation, adding that "it's something that came up in my own review of [Gabbard's] record."
Between the lines: "There is not one GOP senator on record opposing Lt. Col. Gabbard's nomination," Gabbard spokesperson Alexa Henning told us in a statement.

Henning pointed to bipartisan senators on Intel "who have shown positive support for her nomination and qualifications."
The bottom line: Even if Gabbard were to fail to get the votes necessary to be recommended by the Intel committee, there would be ways for her nomination to still be considered on the floor.

Those processes would be more complicated — and in some cases, highly unlikely to succeed.
Gabbard's team has already written off Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), as we told you last week.
 
Honestly? After the J6ers being pardoned, the JFK files being released, the laptop glowie holocaust, and (I guess) DPR getting his sentence commuted if snowden and assange were full-fat pardoned I might actually start to have some hope again. The US would actually have some moral credibility and be an example to the world again. Don't hurt me in this way. It's too painful.
 
People are still so stupid that thinking simply because he lives in Russia that he's a traitor.
That argument is so stupid it hurts. Snowden was threatened by the United States, so he tried to flee to Turkey, only to be stopped in Russia. He now lives there because it's the only nation that accepts him, but that somehow makes him a traitor. What was he supposed to do, accept life imprisonment? Snowden didn't betray America; he was betrayed by America.
 
That argument is so stupid it hurts. Snowden was threatened by the United States, so he tried to flee to Turkey, only to be stopped in Russia. He now lives there because it's the only nation that accepts him, but that somehow makes him a traitor. What was he supposed to do, accept life imprisonment? Snowden didn't betray America; he was betrayed by America.
It hurts even worse when you see these arguments used by the same people who want Assange free and were on the FreeRoss train. They know how bad and anticitizen the government is, yet turn a blind eye to the info Snowden released.
 
It hurts even worse when you see these arguments used by the same people who want Assange free and were on the FreeRoss train. They know how bad and anticitizen the government is, yet turn a blind eye to the info Snowden released.
Supporting pardoning Ross Ulbricht and Julian Assange but opposing pardoning Edward Snowden is like being a vegan that eats bacon. How can you not see the contradiction?
 
I really, really hope that someone whispers flattering words into Trump's ear convincing him that Snowden needs a pardon, and maybe Tulsi can be a part of that dealmaking process regardless of her nomination status. If Ross can get off the hook so can Snowden, dammit, I want to believe.
It hurts even worse when you see these arguments used by the same people who want Assange free and were on the FreeRoss train. They know how bad and anticitizen the government is, yet turn a blind eye to the info Snowden released.
Do these people naturally exist, or are they the sort of Twitter / Bluesky / Reddit "people" who probably post out of Eglin airbase between the hours of 9 and 5 Central Time?
 
People are still so stupid that thinking simply because he lives in Russia that he's a traitor.
No, he's a traitor because he violated his oath of office, damaged US national security, and lied about US intelligence activities to get on TV. It's honestly embarrassing that so many people still take him seriously. I can only conclude it's because of the media blitz, the journalists and Hollywood movie that set him up as some kind of hero. Strange that this forum of all places would fall for that kind of thing, but Gell-Man amnesia is very powerful.

And he doesn't simply live in Russia, he's a naturalized citizen. He's sworn an oath of allegiance to the Russian Federation. We know he doesn't take that kind of thing very seriously, but it's something to be considered.

Snowden was threatened by the United States, so he tried to flee to Turkey, only to be stopped in Russia.
He's a criminal evading prosecution by hiding in a country without an extradition treaty. He's not unique in that regard. He can come home and make his case in court any time he wants, assuming he has fulfilled whatever military service obligation the Russians may have imposed on him when he obtained citizenship.
 
No, he's a traitor because he violated his oath of office, damaged US national security, and lied about US intelligence activities to get on TV. It's honestly embarrassing that so many people still take him seriously. I can only conclude it's because of the media blitz, the journalists and Hollywood movie that set him up as some kind of hero. Strange that this forum of all places would fall for that kind of thing, but Gell-Man amnesia is very powerful.

And he doesn't simply live in Russia, he's a naturalized citizen. He's sworn an oath of allegiance to the Russian Federation. We know he doesn't take that kind of thing very seriously, but it's something to be considered.


He's a criminal evading prosecution by hiding in a country without an extradition treaty. He's not unique in that regard. He can come home and make his case in court any time he wants, assuming he has fulfilled whatever military service obligation the Russians may have imposed on him when he obtained citizenship.
Ok glownigger
 
No, he's a traitor because he violated his oath of office, damaged US national security, and lied about US intelligence activities to get on TV. It's honestly embarrassing that so many people still take him seriously. I can only conclude it's because of the media blitz, the journalists and Hollywood movie that set him up as some kind of hero. Strange that this forum of all places would fall for that kind of thing, but Gell-Man amnesia is very powerful.

Your points invalid. All the 3 letter agencies have violated their oaths as public servants and to the citizens of this country for years. If your not a hypocrite you want them all locked up too.
 
Honestly? After the J6ers being pardoned, the JFK files being released, the laptop glowie holocaust, and (I guess) DPR getting his sentence commuted if snowden and assange were full-fat pardoned I might actually start to have some hope again. The US would actually have some moral credibility and be an example to the world again. Don't hurt me in this way. It's too painful.
It'd be so funny to watch the libs jump through hoops to call him evil because Trump pardoned him after spending a decade singing his praises and having him on their late night shows. I bet it'd make John Oliver stop fucking kids long enough to kill himself.
 
Back