Should incels be encouraged to fuck old women?

Ughubughughughughughghlug

Ughubughughughughughghlug

RIP Cats 4/20(blaze it)/25
kiwifarms.net
Joined
May 14, 2019
Your biggest problem with incels is that nobody wants them.
Most old widows are just delighted to talk to young men at all. They think all young men are handsome hunks.
Social consequences? There are none. You can't knock an old woman up on accident, it has no effect on marriage/family formation. The Oneida Community used to have the young boys train on the post-menopausal women to introduce them to free love.
South_Park_Nice__4fedd00c50250.webp

What does the incel get out of it? Well, they get all of the advantages that Benjamin Franklin listed:

i. Because as they have more Knowledge of the World and their Minds are better stor'd with Observations, their Conversation is more improving and more lastingly agreable.
Click to expand...
2. Because when Women cease to be handsome, they study to be good. To maintain their Influence over Men, they supply the Diminution of Beauty by an Augmentation of Utility. They learn to do a 1000 Services small and great, and are the most tender and useful of all Friends when you are sick. Thus they continue amiable. And hence there is hardly such a thing to be found as an old Woman who is not a good Woman.
Click to expand...
Absolutely. More agreeable people.
Edit: I would legit IRL take a young woman with Old Woman Personality over a young woman with Young Woman Personality.

3. Because there is no hazard of Children, which irregularly produc'd may be attended with much Inconvenience.
Click to expand...
4. Because thro' more Experience, they are more prudent and discreet in conducting an Intrigue to prevent Suspicion. The Commerce with them is therefore safer with regard to your Reputation. And with regard to theirs, if the Affair should happen to be known, considerate People might be rather inclin'd to excuse an old Woman who would kindly take care of a young Man, form his Manners by her good Counsels, and prevent his ruining his Health and Fortune among mercenary Prostitutes.
Click to expand...
6. Because the Sin is less. The debauching a Virgin may be her Ruin, and make her for Life unhappy.
Click to expand...
No social harm, even socially useful by socializing the incel.

5. Because in every Animal that walks upright, the Deficiency of the Fluids that fill the Muscles appears first in the highest Part: The Face first grows lank and wrinkled; then the Neck; then the Breast and Arms; the lower Parts continuing to the last as plump as ever: So that covering all above with a Basket, and regarding2 only what is below the Girdle, it is impossible of two Women to know an old from a young one. And as in the dark all Cats are grey, the Pleasure of corporal Enjoyment with an old Woman is at least equal, and frequently superior, every Knack being by Practice capable of Improvement.
Click to expand...
Any hole's a goal.

7. Because the Compunction is less. The having made a young Girl miserable may give you frequent bitter Reflections; none of which can attend the making an old Woman happy.
Click to expand...
Wise words.

Every Chad a polygynist
Every widow a polyandrist
 
Last edited:
  • Islamic Content
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Horrifying
Reactions: No. 7 cat, genericlurker777, cybertoaster and 22 others
David Brown said:
Franklin is a national treasure. Poor Richard's Almanac greatest hits should be required reading in school
Click to expand...
I got a nice illustrated hardcover of it for Christmas (I started collecting, besides my Bibles of the Old South, the works of the Founding Fathers). Haven't started it yet.

Works of the Founding Fathers:
George Washington's guide on etiquette/how to be a gentleman
- Don't remember its name, doesn't matter. It's actually mostly common sense stuff like "don't chew with your mouth open," "don't over talk," so it holds up. I find it funny because it's a little red book like how Mao had his Little Red Book.

The so-called "Jefferson Bible." Which is misunderstood, he never marketed it as a Bible, it was just a personal project of his that he labeled something like "the life and teachings of Jesus Christ." A collection of explicitly historical (no supernatural miracle stories, no legendary material) passages from the New Testament about Jesus in one collection. Even for an explicit Christian (as opposed to a deist like Jefferson) I don't think there's anything wrong or disrespectful in that.

Poor Richard's Almanac.

For James Madison I'll probably have to settle for something like The Federalist Papers. I don't care for an Adams or Hamilton book, both were damned Yankees and Adams was a tyrant in his brief time.

Edit: Not to mention "Three Whom God Should Not Made: Jews, Persians and Flies" by Saddam Hussein. I once had a dream where I went to the Saddam Hussein Museum of Alabama to get my copy signed by Saddam Hussein, who was a beautiful middle-aged black-haired woman, pale skin, massive tits, I wanted to bang her so hard. I don't know what happened that night in my squirrely head.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: Quandale Octavius Dingle, David Brown, Neo-Nazi Rich Evans and 2 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back