- Joined
- Nov 2, 2024
To answer this, you need to consider what a “study”, “paper”, “scholarly article”, etc. is. It’s a piece of writing about some form of research that was undertaken. That’s it. That research can be anything from:
- Reading other people’s research (review articles);
- Compiling massive amounts of data on several studies simultaneously (meta-analyses);
- Translating something;
- A mathematical proof;
- A description of an experiment (primary source, experimental data);
- Surveys of a certain group of people;
- Describing a weird frog or whatever the fuck you found in insane detail (and I mean “measuring a spider’s epigyne because sexual compatibility is one of the ways that you define a species” levels of autism);
- Describing some dead body you found in a bog;
- Talking about visiting a gay fisting bar in San Francisco;
This doesn’t mean that this study is bullshit - there may be some interesting insights into male behaviour demonstrated in it. That research can be correlated, compared, and contrasted with research done in other times and places. What it does mean is that someone extrapolating that data and making claims about all human men throughout time and space is either a liar or a retard.
There’s a good example of this in The Silence of the Lambs:
Clarice said:
Dr. Lecter said:
Clarice said:
Dr. Lecter implies that Buffalo Bill, still yet to be identified as Jame Gumb, is motivated by the desire to be a woman. Clarice is confused because “the literature” (the “studies”) say that “transsexuals are passive”. What’s going on?Dr. Lecter said:
Well, remember that this is during the 1990s. During this time period, the only people who were getting past the “medical gatekeeping” (as trannies call it) were HSTS-types. That is, gay men who were so gay that they believed it would be easier for them to function in society as a facsimile of a “straight woman”. That’s how it is today in Iran, a country that is one of the best in the world for “sex changes”: They get lots of practice because the state gives homosexuals the option of the the roof or the surgeon’s knife. It’s why Jammi Dodger’s Muslim in-laws got her sent there for her
Is Buffalo Bill an incredibly gay man? No. He’s a degenerate sex freak bisexual. He’s a textbook AGP based on actual AGPs like Ed Gein, Jerry Brudos, and Richard Speck. That’s why modern day AGP trannies write essays and make videos defending “her” actions. You know, before they get arrested for sexual assault a week after posting it. These trannies identify with Buffalo Bill because they’re like him. Bill was not the kind of person the medical establishment was interested in humouring and castrating. That’s Lecter’s point.
Clarice says, effectively, that Buffalo Bill’s profile (being violent) doesn’t conform to the profile of gay men (“transsexuals”), and she sees this as a contradiction because she’s confusing what Lecter is saying with how the medical establishment defines the word. Lecter says she’s close because she needs to look for men who were denied the sex change, not men who were permitted to get it done, which is what Clarice thinks he’s saying. And that is, in the end, how she does it. Gumb was rejected multiple times from gender clinics for being an obvious lunatic.
This wouldn’t work nowadays because trannies can do whatever they want. However, the point is that Clarice is getting confused because she doesn’t know to which cohort Dr. Lecter is referring. She is applying data on gay Thai ladyboys to Douglas Perry. Of course it’s not applicable.
I made a joke about this, once. I said that it was insane that even Canadians didn’t want to fuck trannies, because Canada is a country beholden to troonery. So when even Canadians reject troons, we can conclude that most public support for trannies is two-faced. In the same post, I discussed a paper called Hsu et al. and mentioned how they inaccurately described their own data in their paper.
That’s why looking into these things and reading the papers is so rewarding. You cut through all the bullshit and you realize how right you were about these lunatics. So whenever someone cites a “study”, ask them… what was the experiment? The survey? The conclusion? Most papers are free online - and if they’re not, you can be sure the other person is lying about reading it. If you want to really school them, find the paper on Sci-Hub and you’ll usually see how they lied about it by the time you’re done the abstract.
(And if you’re confused, just post it here. Here are two other relevant posts discussing these sorts of ideas.)
Anyway, Silence of the Lambs was a prophetic masterpiece. I’m not the first or most able to demonstrate this. They’re all real fucking creepy.
“A advertiser once tried to test me. I ate his liver with some hollandaise sauce and a nice Monster energy drink... Fed the rest to my dinner guest. Fly back to Lolcow Farms or Crystal Cafe, li’l’ pooner…”
Last edited:
. They will work as a gender specialist SLT and independently manage a caseload of trans and gender diverse service users in the delivery of high-quality voice exploration and modification therapy.
