Article|
Archive
WASHINGTON — The Justice Department said Monday that it fired several career lawyers involved in prosecuting Donald Trump, escalating the president's campaign of retribution against his perceived enemies.
The employees worked on Special Counsel Jack Smith's investigation that led to now-dismissed indictments against Trump over his handling of classified documents and his efforts to overturn his 2020 election loss in the lead-up to the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.
“Today, Acting Attorney General James McHenry terminated the employment of a number of DOJ officials who played a significant role in prosecuting President Trump," a Justice Department official told NBC News. "In light of their actions, the Acting Attorney General does not trust these officials to assist in faithfully implementing the President’s agenda. This action is consistent with the mission of ending the weaponization of government."
Among those let go, an official familiar with the matter told NBC News, were career prosecutors Molly Gaston, J.P. Cooney, Anne McNamara and Mary Dohrmann.
Smith resigned earlier this month ahead of Trump's inauguration. Trump's re-election effectively ended the federal criminal cases against him due to the Justice Department's long-standing policies against prosecuting a sitting president.
Trump's New York hush money case, brought by Manhattan Attorney General Alvin Bragg, is the sole case criminal case against Trump to lead to a conviction. Trump was sentenced earlier this month to penalty-free unconditional discharge, making him the first convicted felon to assume the presidency.
The only pending trial, the election interference case brought by Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, was stymied indefinitely after Willis was booted from the case in December due to conflict of interest allegations.
Trump said throughout the 2024 campaign that all of the investigations were improper and politically motivated "witch hunts." He said that Democrats had "weaponized" the Justice Department and tried to use it to undermine his re-election bid.
Hours after his inauguration, Trump issued an executive order “ending the weaponization of the federal government,” that calls for a series
Former Attorney General Merrick Garland and Special Counsel Smith repeatedly denied that the investigations were politically motivated. They said that Trump's own actions resulted in the criminal probes of his role in the January 6th riot and his failure to return classified documents to the National Archives.
Former Justice Department officials and legal experts have long argued that Trump should not retaliate against career civil servants who were simply doing their job and, in some cases, assigned to the investigation. They said that retaliating against the career prosecutors who worked on the Trump cases would have a chilling effect on the DOJ workforce and undermine future investigations of improper acts by public officials.
“Firing prosecutors because of cases they were assigned to work on is just unacceptable,” said former U.S. Attorney Joyce Vance, an NBC News legal contributor. “It’s anti-rule of law, it’s anti-democracy.”
“He’s playing with the casino’s money, with house money,” one Justice Department official told NBC News. "Whatever the government has to pay out, if any rights are found to have been violated, it’ll pale in comparison. It’s a price he’s willing to have the government pay."
The letter sent to the employees who were fired specifically cited their role in investigating Trump. “You played a significant role in prosecuting President Trump,” the letter said, according to portions read to NBC News. “The proper functioning of government critically depends on the trust superior officials place in their subordinates. Given your significant role in prosecuting the president, I do not believe that the leadership of the department can trust you to assist in implement the president's agenda faithfully.”
The letter acknowledges that the employees may appeal this decision to the federal Merit Systems Protection Board, which adjudicates the discipline of federal employees.
Career civil servants can’t just be summarily fired — a legal process will unfold.
“Firing prosecutors because of cases they were assigned to work on is just unacceptable,” said former U.S. Attorney Joyce Vance, an NBC News legal contributor. “It’s anti-rule of law, it’s anti-democracy.”
Former DOJ lawyer Julie Zebrak, an expert in federal employment law, said career civil servants cannot be summarily fired.
“They have civil service rights. They have due process rights,” she said.
If the Justice Department is arguing that these lawyers are not performing properly, they must be subject to what’s known as progressive discipline, she said, including warnings and notice. They must be allowed to hire lawyers before they lose their jobs.
“There is a reason people say it’s so hard to fire federal employees,” she said.
if the US is so critical to the operashuns of the WHO, maybe the WHO shouldn't have pissed off the American president so much eh?
