- Joined
- Jan 14, 2023
Economic zone to loot and rape.View attachment 6907707
It hasn't even been a particularly successful economic zone since ~2011. More like a human rights NGO.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Economic zone to loot and rape.View attachment 6907707
It hasn't even been a particularly successful economic zone since ~2011. More like a human rights NGO.
yet the Canadians won't mail me shit because the Canada post is ON STRIKE. THE OFFICIAL POSTAL SYSTEM IS ON STRIKE. What kinda 3rd world nonsense is that? Imagine if that happened here in the usa?Economic zone to loot and rape.
you would think, but I think the bigger problem is that the Palestinians don't help themselves. so most of the rockets and tunnel material Hamas used, the IDF clarified that it was all dual use. so instead of using the cement to build homes or foundations they built tunnels and military bunkers. instead of using piping for water and agricultural infrastructure, they build rockets. instead of using fertilizer and sugar for cooking and growing crops, they built warheads. and the larger Palestinian community did nothing to stop these people. they actively supported them.The news footage of these hostage swaps is starting to make me MATI. You'll get western presenters talking as if this is a normal circumstance and not clearly morally asymmetrical. Prisoners guilty of murder or attempted murder being traded for women and (hopefully) the remaining children still being held in Gaza. Paraded out in front of massive banners like a cattle sale.
Four Israelis for 200 Palestinians, many of whom are guilty of planning, executing, and assisting attempted murders, bombings or other acts of terror. How will this help the situation, other than encourage Hamas to take as many hostages as possible in the next inevitable war?
Maybe I'm just naive, but if every 5-10 years I lost my home, half to three quarters of my living relatives and was at risk of being shot in the back for accepting a water bottle from an IDF soldier: I'd think about moving. Some soil and relics of an ancient religion isn't worth this much bloodshed.
I've been seeing a lot of takes like this recently. For this argument to work, you’d have to completely overlook the reality of the Israeli justice system. About a quarter of Palestinian prisoners in Israeli jails aren’t even facing charges or a trial—they’re just kept there indefinitely. On top of that, Israel is the only country with a military court system for juveniles, and there are reports about what they do to kids in that system.Four Israelis for 200 Palestinians, many of whom are guilty of planning, executing, and assisting attempted murders, bombings or other acts of terror.
With a name like yours, you should know that the people you call "[not] facing charges or a trial" are held under 'administrative detention' (this is mentioned in the article you posted, two paragraphs below where your image cuts off). Primarily, this is 'preventive', but it is also used if the agency Spooks do not want to share their secrets.About a quarter of Palestinian prisoners in Israeli jails aren’t even facing charges or a trial—they’re just kept there indefinitely.
I encourage you to look for a source of these claims (or similar) that are not "The Palestinian Authority for the Prevention of Israeli Child Sacrifices," or similarly credible.there are reports about what they do to kids in that system
The use of Administrative detention itself is a contentious topic, however, as you mention, most states that do employ it uphold habeas corpus in their constitutions - which isn't exclusive from administrative detention itself.but it is not a far-reaching deviation from other peers (USA, UK, EU) general administrative detention policies
According to figures provided by the IDF Spokesperson, from the beginning of 2015 to the end of July 2017, 3,909 administrative detention orders were issued. Of these, 2,441 (62.4%) were extensions of existing orders. Only 48 (1.2%) were cancelled by a military court. The remaining detention orders were approved, as follows:
Literally every credible human rights org corroborates this and all you retards can do is screech 'antisemite' in response.I encourage you to look for a source of these claims (or similar) that are not "The Palestinian Authority for the Prevention of Israeli Child Sacrifices," or similarly credible.
I think it has.Who's betting next census it will turn out the population of Gaza actually increased between the start and the end of the war?
It was logical that it would, 2% population growth every year in a population of 2.5 million translates to 50,000. Minus 40,000 (and this is assuming that these deaths are all war related which I'm skeptical of) and you get a net growth of 10,000. Even if no women got pregnant over the course of the war, there would already have been an expected 37,000 Gaza pregnancies at the start.I think it has.
Worst genocide everI think it has.
I thought Jews were good with numbersWorst genocide ever
We don't like minusesI thought Jews were good with numbers
I'm actually a very high-level Mossad agent (codename "MurderKiller"). I have over 300 confirmed viral bluesky skeets.There's that low-tier hasbara lmao.
This is very normal, even ignoring gitmo & friends. I suggest this paper (feel free to skip on page 19, paragraph 2) for the fact that a core application of administrative detention for terrorism prevention is bypassing typical due processes.Conversely, in Israel, a Palestinian can beimprisonedadministratively detained for up to 6 months - which can then be extended with the same military court that the order is issued under.
As I said before, it does not follow from this claim that the charges are inaccurate or illegitimate. The lack of habeas corpus is easy to defend, but you are trying to puggyback (motte & bailey) the separate, unsubstantiated, and practically unfalsifiable claim that the prisoners are wrongfully charged. You have not provided any evidence of this claim.Israel has been on record using administrative detention as quick and easy alternative in lieu of actual criminal trials.
"Literally every credible human rights org" and/or those you posted do not claim to have any evidence of systematic child torture *other than hearsay*. This is an extraordinary claim for which you have provided weak (and outdated) evidence.Literally every credible human rights org corroborates this
Of the terrorists set for the first phase, 83.4% of them were tried and convicted. 10.3% were on trial, 6.5% were admin detention. Among them all, 38.7% had at least 1 life sentence, 44.7% had at least 8 years. Majority of crimes are murder, attempted murder, and conspiracy or assistance to murder. The rest concern weapons/explosives and shootings. Only 4% are below eighteen, being 16-17. It isn’t arbitrary detention as much as you may want to believe. They make no secret of their affiliation with Hamas, PIJ, and Fatah for a minority. Just look at photos of them at their release posing with the Hamas symbol, flags, and making their victory sign. Numbers are from Israeli Ministry of Justice. Hasbara means “explanation” in Hebrew.Perhaps not the thread for this, but it is slow— if this clogs it up too much, I apologize to the readers.
I'm actually a very high-level Mossad agent (codename "MurderKiller"). I have over 300 confirmed viral bluesky skeets.
This is very normal, even ignoring gitmo & friends. I suggest this paper (feel free to skip on page 19, paragraph 2) for the fact that a core application of administrative detention for terrorism prevention is bypassing typical due processes.
As I said before, it does not follow from this claim that the charges are inaccurate or illegitimate. The lack of habeas corpus is easy to defend, but you are trying to puggyback (motte & bailey) the separate, unsubstantiated, and practically unfalsifiable claim that the prisoners are wrongfully charged. You have not provided any evidence of this claim.
"Literally every credible human rights org" and/or those you posted do not claim to have any evidence of systematic child torture *other than hearsay*. This is an extraordinary claim for which you have provided weak (and outdated) evidence.
This needs to be the first exhibit in the Museum of FAFO.