Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 14.5%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 56 12.1%
  • This Year

    Votes: 73 15.8%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 155 33.5%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 112 24.2%

  • Total voters
    463
Of interest is the District Judge has not asked Null/Hardin to respond to Russ's emergency motion to the Vice Principal to undo the thing that was done.
I was actually skimming the local rules for the Utah District. If the District Court Judge is going to deny Greer's motion he doesn't have to ask for a response. But if he's going to allow Greer's motion then he would have to ask for a response from the other party. Seems to point to a denial, or at least hope.
 
I think? I may be misremembering the spans
Here you go:
Screenshot_20250128_021440_Firefox.jpg
 
kiwi farms has been dethroned, in spite of inspiring suicides and ruining lives. “simulation clicker” is apparently the worst the internet has to offer.

(i know nothing of this “simulation clicker,” other than what the paywall article provided and i can’t post here, just search Neal Agarwal, but hey, gotta be a win).
IMG_3634.jpeg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hardin's next argument should directly quote Russell from his latest hooker suit intervention:
...over hurt feelings. Yes, that’s what this case essentially boils down to...How petty. When did we begin to challenge laws over hurt feelings? In fact, case law precludes “hurt feelings” with tort claims except for outrageous conduct. Nothing in the Complaint showed outrageous behavior. So In what universe would a civil rights violation be found over hurt feelings?
 
Hardin's next argument should directly quote Russell from his latest hooker suit intervention:
The better play regarding that case will be if the District Judge asks for a response to the Emergency Motion to undo the thing that's already been done. Hardin can show that instead of prosecuting his own case Russ was filing voluminous motions seeking to intervene in a Federal case he was not a party to, and demanding the plaintiffs attorney be sanctioned.
 
I'm so glad a judge is the one having to deal directly with Russtard's shitfuckery for once. This man had to open this 2 page pile of droll, read it, close his eyes and sign deeply before telling himself "I can still hand-wave this away". I wish him many more plights-explaining and Motions To Undo The Thing That Was Already Done.

Sent from my Iphone
 
Disappointed at the lack of chewing but at least the judge was, for once, efficient.

I'd like to believe that the judge stayed himself and instead took to his chambers where he's quietly spending his hours with a penknife, carefully sculpting his gavel, embossing "RECALCITRANT" in it so that when he swings it down upon Greer the word is permanently stamped into his person such that all who look upon his unsightly visage cannot but see him for what he truly is.
 
I'd like to believe that the judge stayed himself and instead took to his chambers where he's quietly spending his hours with a penknife, carefully sculpting his gavel, embossing "RECALCITRANT" in it so that when he swings it down upon Greer the word is permanently stamped into his person such that all who look upon his unsightly visage cannot but see him for what he truly is.
I still believe the judge is on his deathmarch to trial, or a fully argued summary judgement. But now he's primed for a hefty sanction amount.

Reading more than is warranted into word choice, I think once Greer files his response to Hardin's un-stipulated amount, the judge is planning to rule on it very quickly. He views this as a straightforward matter, and isn't going to be distracted by plights. More importantly, he doesn't want the whole pre-trial process stalled out by this issue. Unless there's some rule for reducing awards or hitting a fixed ceiling for IFP cases, he's likely to award Hardin his reasonable costs and try to move along.

He might also be hoping that a stiff sanction amount will effectively end the case by Russ giving up. He hasn't openly indicated that level of frustration yet, but it's possible he's holding back while crafting the record to be appeal-proof. If Russ makes a truly deranged demand for sanctions against Hardin, the judge might get to that point.
 
I still believe the judge is on his deathmarch to trial, or a fully argued summary judgement. But now he's primed for a hefty sanction amount.

Reading more than is warranted into word choice, I think once Greer files his response to Hardin's un-stipulated amount, the judge is planning to rule on it very quickly. He views this as a straightforward matter, and isn't going to be distracted by plights. More importantly, he doesn't want the whole pre-trial process stalled out by this issue. Unless there's some rule for reducing awards or hitting a fixed ceiling for IFP cases, he's likely to award Hardin his reasonable costs and try to move along.

He might also be hoping that a stiff sanction amount will effectively end the case by Russ giving up. He hasn't openly indicated that level of frustration yet, but it's possible he's holding back while crafting the record to be appeal-proof. If Russ makes a truly deranged demand for sanctions against Hardin, the judge might get to that point.
Discovery Fuckery is generally the one thing that gets around the IFP tard shield.
 
Back