he can still move to dismiss his own case i think he just cant unilaterally abandon it and he will still have to abide by any sanctions he gets slapped with before the case is dismissed
I thought that countdown started after Hardin gave Greer his number, so we're probably already into that bit. Actually wouldn't surprise me if Hardin sent Greer a figure the day after the sanctions were ordered since Hardin isn't a retard that only ever files things two hours after the deadline.
i understood that as a jab at the judge having to deal with rusty's "motion for re-emailing of document cuz ahm a fucking dumb retard ya honna" but it sure would be nice, between this case and acerthorn we're in the beginning stages of a roll this week
I assume that Russ saw Hardins Bill a few hours before he penned his "emergency plea to undo the thing that's already done! And Hardin needs Sanctions Tooooo!" Filing to the Vice Principal... I mean District Judge.
Yes, today's the last day Hardin could have sent over his number. We won't know if he sent it earlier, until someone says it on the record or Null announces it in thread (which he has no reason to do).
I'm assuming he sent it after that filing. If Russ saw a number before, he likely would have sperged about it in the filing or cited a specific number for the sanctions he wants to hit Hardin with. He doesn't have the restraint to not plightsperg for 14 days.
Mr. Hardin would have to give his approval, and he won't unless Null can squeeze Greer for everything he's got. Or so I assume, anyway.
Reminder, all the harassment claims in his complaint, or that he has referenced a specific date for, do not appear to have ever happened.
Even though it explains something to the retard, I’m going to reiterate that so many of the terms used in court have legal definitions even if they are not precise. Calling something copyright infringement when it is (or may be) allowed by fair use is fine. But continually calling something harassment when it doesn’t even remotely fit the legal definition of harassment inclines one toward malicious recalcitrance.
I wouldn't give him that much credit. The vast majority of people are too retarded to know the difference between harassment and "harassment," as evidenced by the public perception of this website.
I mean, people are entitled to their opinion, but a fair use of the work IS NOT infringing.
Calling something a harassment when you fully know other actors were responsible for it (FB and Reddit as he admitted in his 2017 police report), and when you know no subsequent "harassment" ever happened (he never followed up with police despite promising them to, and no further police reports were ever created) is indeed malicious. Fraudulent even.
Sure - I just mean that what exactly is fair use in a given situation is a disputed question that (can) rightly be brought to the courts. Fair use is a defense you can use, and you’re not defrauding the court by claiming what someone calls fair use actually isn’t.
We are a crowdsourced journalistic entity.
Not many people would insist a plaintiff continue to sue them, unless there were some pending legal issue to be resolved that one or more of the defendants wanted resolved. However, the defendant can refuse to stipulate to dismissal and insist that they will only agree to a dismissal with prejudice.
There are outer limits, e.g., Lenz v. Universal Music Corp., 801 F.3d 1126 (9th Cir. 2015), in which Universal Music Corporation was assessed fees for reckless abuse of DMCA notifications and was obligated to take fair use into account before issuing such.
If Null squeezes shitlips for all he's got, all he would end up with is a damp and sticky mess. Saliva, Sweat and Semen is about it.
May it shrivel and desiccate before blowing away as dust on the wind.
