Labels are used by them to easily categorize people so they can demean or discredit them. They are quick to call you a "noticer" when it's usually not subtle with how they're trying to be subversive nor is it clever. I don't know why peolpe get so bent out of shape when peolpe call it out just because they also see the pattern when again the things people do point out are obvious since the ilk that is pushing this knows they don't have to hide it anymore.
I really want to sit one of these people like Mack and ask them:
I'm a fan of Dragon Age Origins, and I think adding pronouns, gender surgery scars and a full character where her character arc is all about coming out as MtF to her mom, isn't what fans of original Dragon age would want, nor was it hinted at in any of the older games, and it's woke. would you have a problem with this line of thinking?
If I were to put Kingdom come through the same standard and say making an established character suddenly Bisexual with no hint of him being gay in the first place, and then adding a Black OC to tell me how much better they treat women after saying "we know our own history, there were no black people at this time or place" and then say it's woke, would I get the same response as above? or do they get a pass because you like the developers?
I liked dragon age at one point, and I'm still able to criticize it, I'm sure none of the BLM tranny writers were forced to add all the gay shit into Dragon age, they wanted to.
just like Vavra claims with KC2.
This is all rhetorical of course.
I already know the response you would get from a fence sitter like WAB is deleting the question, say I'm not a real fan, and then claim they're being targeted be people who specialize in killing games.