US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Putting Dems away? That's a win-win. I have yet to see an actual downside to asylums. Yes the occasional healthy person gets put away, but that happens with our prison system too and I don't see anyone advocating to shut down the prisons. A lot of you are just sensitive fags who care too much about subhuman life. A few troons or niggers dying is no worse than what we do to the animals we eat.
The left considers disagreeing with them to be a moral failing. If they could get an involuntary 72 hour hold for "Transphobia" it wouldn't be a moral failing anymore, they'd consider it a mental illness. They'd toss anyone who disagreed with them politically in the mental health system, permanently flagging you as having not a moral failing, but a mental health issue. You'd never get a security clearance. Be blocked from buying weapons. Working certain jobs.

Remember, one of the first things the Marxists did in the West was infiltrate and take over our mental health systems. There are no conservative shrinks. At best, there are center-left shrinks. The big book of mental illnesses doesn't even call Transsexuality a mental illness anymore. If asylums were still around they ABSOLUTELY would consider "racism" or "transphobia" or "disagreeing with the party" to be mental illnesses.

Remember, when they had control of the CDC they had put down racism as a pandemic or somesuch nonsense. If they had an asylum system you'd see every effective center-right or beyond influencer involuntarily committed and kept drugged out of their minds for years.
 
>a complete shut down of everything, which would end with millions dead and our country in ruins
>not doing this would end with millions dead and our country in ruins
:cringe:
All the fat, unskilled lefties doing nothing for an entire day would actually be the best day ever and we’d probably get good service at businesses and things would run efficiently. I’m in favor of this shut down
 
Can I just thank everyone in this thread for doing such a good job aggregating news? For a very long time one of my best friends has exclusively used /pol/ for news, and the doomer bullshit he sends me every day makes me appreciate how well informed all of you are.
/pol/ has been trash since 2014-15 (maybe even before that), I used to browse it a lot more at the time but even back then, it was crawling with feds and BBCposters. Every once in a while there was 1-2 decent threads but completely got overrun by spammers.

I'd imagine it's barely usable these days, and nothing has changed.
 
To be fair, this is a problem in all large organisations, and the remote work bludgers are the same retards who float around making smalltalk all day and take 2hr lunches when they do attend. I am very MATI at retards acting like office attendance mandates are in any way beneficial (they aren't, and if anyone had good proof they were, the jew media would be proclaiming it from on-high). Right now the driving force behind the push back to in-office work is equal parts slimy corpo trickery to keep their holdings in corporate real-estate firms and city foot-traffic dependent businesses viable, retard managerial types who can't handle not being able to loom over their peons and micromanage them, and spiteful boomers who hate that modern tech means the average suit can save god knows how much time and money by not having to commute to their wage cage.
If someone puts up their own private capital and makes the determination that you don’t need to show up to the office, cool for them.

When we’re talking about people who live off of tax money, they ought to be obstructed as much as humanly possible and all comforts and dignity should be denied

As a productive member of society, it shouldn’t be on me to elevate low level bureaucrats above my own living standard so they can lord themselves around
 
The big book of mental illnesses doesn't even call Transsexuality a mental illness anymore.
Untrue, the latest DSM (5-TR) still has Gender Dysphoria in it. If I'm remembering right, it has to be a recognised disorder so that the gender cabal's nice little insurance grift can keep paying out.
If someone puts up their own private capital and makes the determination that you don’t need to show up to the office, cool for them.

When we’re talking about people who live off of tax money, they ought to be obstructed as much as humanly possible and all comforts and dignity should be denied

As a productive member of society, it shouldn’t be on me to elevate low level bureaucrats above my own living standard so they can lord themselves around
Many smaller businesses have completely divested their office spaces and it's going great for them (I cannot divulge more specific info without a big PL, sorry). I agree that workers on the taxpayer teat deserve greater scrutiny, however what should be happening is the government firing the retards, shutting down office spaces and recouping the costs associated with them, not doubling down on keeping the tards adequately wrangled in a specific physical location.
 
Media coming out hard today against RFK Jr.

He and Tulsi are the ones I'm most worried about because they could do the most damage to the system, therefore the system will be fighting them relentlessly. Plus they could be the sacrifices where the RINOs say "we'll give you all your other picks, just not these two."

Hopefully Trump has a Plan B to keep Bobby around and give him some power to change things if the HHS position falls through.
 
Fatpacks kept posting retarded shit.
Fatpacks got told/threatened/browbeaten into a burger suit.
I do not recall who originally started threatening him to put on a burger suit but it sort of stuck.
I posted a Twitter screenshot about how black pillers and doomers need to be put in burger suits when we win. It became a meme
 
What did Milley do? Too much stuff happening at once
Committed treason numerous times and then put out a book bragging about it because he got addicted to being one of the left's Good Boys. A sensible nation would have him executed for high treason just based on his 2020/2021 actions when he informed a counterpart official of an adversarial nation that he would not only work to prevent Trump from having access to nukes but would alert the Chinese if Trump did launch a strike against them. This is treason as the US POTUS is endowed with that authority by the US citizenry and Milley opened us up to an attack. He and Pelosi coordinated to the same ends and would both swing from gallows in a normal timeline.
 
This shit makes MATI. I hope the next 4 years shows us Trump smashing all these fucking swamp creatures underfoot. The last administration allowing innocent Americans to suffer for petty political reasons is a fucking travesty. May those fuckers get tossed into the deepest depths of the eternal lake of fire.
If Trump delivers in NC, that state is gonna turn ruby red, it'll be a lost cause for the dems. Now he is actually assisting everyone affected in California by the fires - don't rule out most of the state flipping red (the handful of blue strongholds left).

1738153951161.png

1738154016363.png



Spittin' FACTS.
 
The NPC meme must've scared someone because I distinctly recall accounts and posts being deleted on Twitter just for mentioning it. I think it happened on other social media sites too.
There's a picture floating around somewhere of a Reddit thread in which they compare brain scans showing Reddit posters missing large chunks of their brain for various reasons. They hate it because it's literally them.
 
Untrue, the latest DSM (5-TR) still has Gender Dysphoria in it. If I'm remembering right, it has to be a recognised disorder so that the gender cabal's nice little insurance grift can keep paying out.

Many smaller businesses have completely divested their office spaces and it's going great for them (I cannot divulge more specific info without a big PL, sorry). I agree that workers on the taxpayer teat deserve greater scrutiny, however what should be happening is the government firing the retards, shutting down office spaces and recouping the costs associated with them, not doubling down on keeping the tards adequately wrangled in a specific physical location.
I think the expectation is that the government retards will either quit or raise enough of a fuss to provide a predicate for their removal.

Public sector unions were a mistake
 
Don Graves made it official that Jews were not white but Jewish four days before getting shit-canned. This gave them access to "economic inclusion" programs before Trump slashed them all. This, of course, is seen as antisemitic on reddit.
Screenshot 2025-01-29 073107.png
Screenshot 2025-01-29 073134.png
Screenshot 2025-01-29 073243.png
Screenshot 2025-01-29 074108.png
Screenshot 2025-01-29 074253.png
Screenshot 2025-01-29 074610.png
 

The questions awaiting RFK at his confirmation hearings​

archive | paywall | MSN (no paywall)

fe222ec331abe7c6589a6f63451310be8d148e15.webp

RFK Jr. gets his turn in the bright lights​


Robert F. Kennedy Jr., President Donald Trump's nominee for health secretary, after a meeting with Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont) on Wednesday. (Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post)
This morning is the first confirmation hearing for Robert F. Kennedy Jr., President Donald Trump’s nominee to lead the Department of Health and Human Services.
Kennedy is perhaps Trump’s most unorthodox Cabinet nominee. The longtime vaccine skeptic ran for president as a Democrat, then as an independent — and then dropped out and endorsed Trump in a pretty transparent bid to land a potential Trump administration role.

Several of Trump’s Cabinet nominees have faced intense scrutiny, but Kennedy is expected to contend with unique criticisms from both sides of the aisle. And when it comes to Republicans, the scrutiny could extend beyond the typical, more independent-minded senators.

Kennedy is set to have two confirmation hearings: the first at 10 a.m. today before the Senate Finance Committee and the second tomorrow before the Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. The Finance Committee will then decide whether he makes it to a Senate-wide vote.

🏛️ Follow Politics

Here are the tough questions that we think Kennedy is likely to face:

Vaccine skepticism​

Kennedy’s views on vaccines are poised to be front and center at both confirmation hearings.

The Post published an analysis yesterday that found Kennedy linked vaccines to autism in at least 36 public appearances since 2020, despite overwhelming scientific evidence to the contrary. Kennedy has argued he is not against vaccines but has broadly promised to give Americans more information to “make informed choices for themselves and their families.”

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-New York) said yesterday in a floor speech that “nobody should believe Mr. Kennedy’s 11th-hour conversion on vaccines.”
A Democratic group that works to elect scientists to office, 314 Action, launched $250,000 in digital ads Monday, lobbying eight Senate Republicans to oppose Kennedy and citing his role in stirring vaccine opposition before the 2019 Samoa measles outbreak. The targeted senators include Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky), a polio survivor who has already sent a warning shot at Kennedy over his vaccine beliefs, and Bill Cassidy (R-Louisiana), the doctor who chairs the committee that will host tomorrow’s confirmation hearing.

“Unlike some of these other [confirmation hearings] where you’re going in trying to make news or make noise, I think there are more than half a dozen Republicans who are on the fence,” Raiyan Syed, a national spokesman for 314 Action, told us.

“To have someone at the highest level of government spread misinformation about vaccines, it’s going to have a catastrophic impact on our communities, particularly children,” Syed added in a statement.
Kennedy will also probably face conflict-of-interest questions regarding his decision to keep his financial stake in major litigation against Merck over claims that the pharmaceutical company failed to properly warn consumers about risks from its HPV vaccine.

Along those lines, Caroline Kennedy, sent senators a letter yesterday warning of her cousin’s lax ethics, among other things.

Abortion​

Kennedy has faced intense opposition from antiabortion groups concerned about his prior comments on the procedure. Advancing American Freedom, a group founded by former vice president Mike Pence, has urged senators to vote against Kennedy’s nomination, while activist group Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America has said it has concerns.

But Kennedy sent mixed signals about his beliefs on abortion when he was campaigning for president.
Kennedy positioned himself as an advocate for abortion and said he did not believe there should be restrictions on the procedure. But during his 2024 run, he reversed course and said it should be restricted at a “certain point.”

Sen. James Lankford (R-Oklahoma), who is on the Finance Committee, told us he has questions for Kennedy about the abortion issue.
“HHS has been the major entity that deals with the life issues, so I want to know his perspective on that,” Lankford said.

Food and water issues​

Kennedy often spoke on the campaign trail about regulating companies to ensure food and water were safe and healthy.
In the past, Republicans have opposed strict restrictions on food companies, and Trump mocked Kennedy’s environmental pursuits as too extreme. Meanwhile, Democrats will probably question Kennedy’s beliefs that fluoride in drinking water is unsafe.

But Kennedy might find some support from the left when he talks about food. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont) has declined to share what questions he might have for Kennedy but said he aligned with Kennedy’s beliefs on reigning in the food industry.

“There may be some certain areas where we agree, such as curbing drug ads or improving the quality of food supply. … I can work with him on those issues,” Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Illinois) said Monday on the Senate floor. “But on the fundamentals … his leadership is troublesome. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is dangerously, dangerously unqualified and entirely irresponsible in his judgment.”

Loyalty to Trump​

Just like other nominees, Kennedy is likely to deal with questions about how willing he would be to go along with Trump’s whims.
Kennedy’s hearing is coming on the heels of the decision by the White House budget office to pause to all grants and loans disbursed by the federal government. The move has created widespread confusion and given Democrats in Congress a new rallying cry against Trump.


In one sign that the minority party is feeling more combative, 22 members of the Senate Democratic caucus voted yesterday to oppose Trump’s nomination of Sean Duffy to be transportation secretary, despite Duffy’s nomination enjoying broad support previously. Some of the Democrats said it was an act of rebellion against the funding freeze.
The top Democrat on the Finance Committee, Sen. Ron Wyden (Oregon), said yesterday on X that he was “working overtime right now to hold this rogue administration accountable” over the budget office bombshell.
 
Back