US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:

The questions awaiting RFK at his confirmation hearings​

archive | paywall | MSN (no paywall)

fe222ec331abe7c6589a6f63451310be8d148e15.webp

RFK Jr. gets his turn in the bright lights​


Robert F. Kennedy Jr., President Donald Trump's nominee for health secretary, after a meeting with Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont) on Wednesday. (Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post)
This morning is the first confirmation hearing for Robert F. Kennedy Jr., President Donald Trump’s nominee to lead the Department of Health and Human Services.
Kennedy is perhaps Trump’s most unorthodox Cabinet nominee. The longtime vaccine skeptic ran for president as a Democrat, then as an independent — and then dropped out and endorsed Trump in a pretty transparent bid to land a potential Trump administration role.

Several of Trump’s Cabinet nominees have faced intense scrutiny, but Kennedy is expected to contend with unique criticisms from both sides of the aisle. And when it comes to Republicans, the scrutiny could extend beyond the typical, more independent-minded senators.

Kennedy is set to have two confirmation hearings: the first at 10 a.m. today before the Senate Finance Committee and the second tomorrow before the Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. The Finance Committee will then decide whether he makes it to a Senate-wide vote.

🏛️ Follow Politics

Here are the tough questions that we think Kennedy is likely to face:

Vaccine skepticism​

Kennedy’s views on vaccines are poised to be front and center at both confirmation hearings.

The Post published an analysis yesterday that found Kennedy linked vaccines to autism in at least 36 public appearances since 2020, despite overwhelming scientific evidence to the contrary. Kennedy has argued he is not against vaccines but has broadly promised to give Americans more information to “make informed choices for themselves and their families.”

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-New York) said yesterday in a floor speech that “nobody should believe Mr. Kennedy’s 11th-hour conversion on vaccines.”
A Democratic group that works to elect scientists to office, 314 Action, launched $250,000 in digital ads Monday, lobbying eight Senate Republicans to oppose Kennedy and citing his role in stirring vaccine opposition before the 2019 Samoa measles outbreak. The targeted senators include Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky), a polio survivor who has already sent a warning shot at Kennedy over his vaccine beliefs, and Bill Cassidy (R-Louisiana), the doctor who chairs the committee that will host tomorrow’s confirmation hearing.

“Unlike some of these other [confirmation hearings] where you’re going in trying to make news or make noise, I think there are more than half a dozen Republicans who are on the fence,” Raiyan Syed, a national spokesman for 314 Action, told us.

“To have someone at the highest level of government spread misinformation about vaccines, it’s going to have a catastrophic impact on our communities, particularly children,” Syed added in a statement.
Kennedy will also probably face conflict-of-interest questions regarding his decision to keep his financial stake in major litigation against Merck over claims that the pharmaceutical company failed to properly warn consumers about risks from its HPV vaccine.

Along those lines, Caroline Kennedy, sent senators a letter yesterday warning of her cousin’s lax ethics, among other things.

Abortion​

Kennedy has faced intense opposition from antiabortion groups concerned about his prior comments on the procedure. Advancing American Freedom, a group founded by former vice president Mike Pence, has urged senators to vote against Kennedy’s nomination, while activist group Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America has said it has concerns.

But Kennedy sent mixed signals about his beliefs on abortion when he was campaigning for president.
Kennedy positioned himself as an advocate for abortion and said he did not believe there should be restrictions on the procedure. But during his 2024 run, he reversed course and said it should be restricted at a “certain point.”

Sen. James Lankford (R-Oklahoma), who is on the Finance Committee, told us he has questions for Kennedy about the abortion issue.
“HHS has been the major entity that deals with the life issues, so I want to know his perspective on that,” Lankford said.

Food and water issues​

Kennedy often spoke on the campaign trail about regulating companies to ensure food and water were safe and healthy.
In the past, Republicans have opposed strict restrictions on food companies, and Trump mocked Kennedy’s environmental pursuits as too extreme. Meanwhile, Democrats will probably question Kennedy’s beliefs that fluoride in drinking water is unsafe.

But Kennedy might find some support from the left when he talks about food. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont) has declined to share what questions he might have for Kennedy but said he aligned with Kennedy’s beliefs on reigning in the food industry.

“There may be some certain areas where we agree, such as curbing drug ads or improving the quality of food supply. … I can work with him on those issues,” Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Illinois) said Monday on the Senate floor. “But on the fundamentals … his leadership is troublesome. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is dangerously, dangerously unqualified and entirely irresponsible in his judgment.”

Loyalty to Trump​

Just like other nominees, Kennedy is likely to deal with questions about how willing he would be to go along with Trump’s whims.
Kennedy’s hearing is coming on the heels of the decision by the White House budget office to pause to all grants and loans disbursed by the federal government. The move has created widespread confusion and given Democrats in Congress a new rallying cry against Trump.


In one sign that the minority party is feeling more combative, 22 members of the Senate Democratic caucus voted yesterday to oppose Trump’s nomination of Sean Duffy to be transportation secretary, despite Duffy’s nomination enjoying broad support previously. Some of the Democrats said it was an act of rebellion against the funding freeze.
The top Democrat on the Finance Committee, Sen. Ron Wyden (Oregon), said yesterday on X that he was “working overtime right now to hold this rogue administration accountable” over the budget office bombshell.
 
The Post published an analysis yesterday that found Kennedy linked vaccines to autism in at least 36 public appearances since 2020, despite overwhelming scientific evidence to the contrary.
Nigger, 1 in 4 Californian kids is diagnosed with autism, it's either the shit they eat or the shit they inject onto them.

"eXpErTs SaY..." I fucking hate soyence.
 
Yes. Less than 1 million people likely read his book before he was selected for VP.
His book was a top 10 seller on Amazon the year it came out and was widely discussed. The only political memoir I remember getting that kind of attention was Dreams From My Father. Even if you didn't read the book, if you paid attention to politics at all, you heard about JD Vance before his VP selection.

Right now. What percentage of people in America know who George P. Bush is?
Well, just about everyone in Texas and Florida know who he is.
 
Nigger, 1 in 4 Californian kids is diagnosed with autism, it's either the shit they eat or the shit they inject onto them.

"eXpErTs SaY..." I fucking hate soyence.
The theory is plausible. Alzheimer’s and schizophrenia are linked to autoimmune conditions. If your immune system takes a dislike to grey matter, you’re fucked, for one. For two, they used powdered aluminum as an adjuvant, and aluminum is also linked to Alzheimer’s.

So like, maybe just space out the vaccinations instead of doing mega clusters of them, and don’t use powdered aluminum.
 
Can I just thank everyone in this thread for doing such a good job aggregating news? For a very long time one of my best friends has exclusively used /pol/ for news, and the doomer bullshit he sends me every day makes me appreciate how well informed all of you are.
/pol/ outside of the odd leak or blurb that isn't bullshit is it's own flavor of abject retardation in the same vein as the hard to find non-fed groyper types. Because they would rather walk away from the table with absolutely NOTHING of what they allegedly want, than to get SOMETHING of what they want.

Every. Single. Time.

They have absolutely no understanding of overton windows, cultural shifts, public perceptions and the reality that a leader has to work with a gaggle of stubborn retards deeply wedged in the system all looking out for number 1 themselves while being under the spotlight from a fickle crowd of onlookers and media mavens. So they have to be intelligent and patient to look for the weak links in the chain to depose people like the usual DNC suspects and have a response for everything besides "Me king now me do what me want."

They will live and die thinking if you "only" get 65 percent of your demands during tough times and stacked decks against you that you've utterly lost and caved and cucked and should change your name to grug-cuck because you're a cave cuck now. And everything has never been so over and you should just go home and curl up in your goon cave and die because 65% is lower than 100% which means you lost completely.

It's reddit chicken little bullshit through the lense of a little dark age edit.
 
I think the expectation is that the government retards will either quit or raise enough of a fuss to provide a predicate for their removal.
It's a reasonable idea, but given what I've seen in the professional sector they may just end up with staff tolerating it and doing the bare minimum, for example;
  • Finishing early or starting late (or both)
  • only spending part of the day in-office and the rest at home
  • taking more sick leave (one un-intended upside to remote work is it encourages presenteeism)
  • etc
Not to say it can't be done, and based on precedent the Trump admin are the ones to do it since they won't let obstinate staff get away with being sneaky. I don't know enough about American employment laws to know if those kinds of things are cause for dismissal, but you'd have a hard time doing it in Australia.

Regardless, I can't wait to hear about more empty suits being laid off.

There's logistical troubles involved as well with how you can accurately track time spent in the office; while access gates do keep logs the speds that are responsible for those records being kept are... speds. On top of that you have to deal with offsite days, tailgating, etc.

Again I would be PL'ing by saying too much, but the costs associated with managing a 100% (or any fixed target tbh) aren't insignificant, and they scale with the size of your staff.

All this to say, if the end goal is to save money I feel there is a more sensible path forward that involves leaning into remote work more heavily where possible. The 80/20 thing is honestly unavoidable as a workforce gets bigger, and useless floaters will find a way to stick around regardless of if it's in an office or on Zoom.
 
Back