- Joined
- Dec 15, 2022
It's not over until it's over.he will be compensated for just one retarded and costly procedure he was forced to perform in vain out of at least several dozen by this point
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's not over until it's over.he will be compensated for just one retarded and costly procedure he was forced to perform in vain out of at least several dozen by this point
Then so should fraud on the court, witness tampering, refusing to litigate, not stating a claim, bringing forth a case in bad faith, refusing to participate in discovery, harassing and personally insulting opposing counsel.....Both settling, and refusing to do so is a legally acceptable use of process.
Pro Se and In Forma Pauperis were intended to help the poor stand up to the rich and powerful. They were meant for an honest, honorable people, not for turds like Acerthorn or Russell.Pro se in forma pauperis shitheads are the bane of the whole system.
Yes in theory and in the way the law is written. But in practice maybe not. A judge has all kinds of ways to fuck you over for doing something they don't want you to do.Both settling, and refusing to do so is a legally acceptable use of process.
Pro Se and In Forma Pauperis were intended to help the poor stand up to the rich and powerful. They were meant for an honest, honorable people, not for turds like Acerthorn or Russell.
My question for our local lawyers is: is it normal for the judge to clearly have a strong opinion on what should be happening, but no one knows what? Are normal cases big games of Magic 8-Ball, or is that just special for us?A judge has all kinds of ways to fuck you over for doing something they don't want you to do.
Jurisdiction isn't changing now that there's an actual schedule in place, if this case is dragging on to the end then it'll be going to a Utah court room.Even if jurisdiction is up for grabs again because of the fake witnesses, I don't think it's in Null's best interests for the same reasons I was wary of it going to Florida in the first place: it resets the bullshit clock.
From my understanding this cluster fuck is a weird aberration in the system and is clearly altering the landscape as it plods along.My question for our local lawyers is: is it normal for the judge to clearly have a strong opinion on what should be happening, but no one knows what? Are normal cases big games of Magic 8-Ball, or is that just special for us?
The small claims limit probably needs to be raised as well. It is 5k in most states, but generally uneconomical to involve a lawyer in a dispute worth less than about 10 or 15k.They could solve a lot of problems by rejecting in forma pauperis claims for plaintiffs in civil actions where the government is not in some way a party to the suit. If the paltry court fees stop someone from filing a lawsuit, that really tells you how much of a waste of everyone's time it must be. Small claims court still exist for common people with simple legal disputes and destitute people with legitimate cases have no problems finding an ambulance chaser who will work on contingency or even a lawyer who may take their case pro bono out of some personal interest.
There are a number of things tied to statutory dollar amounts that really need to be tied to inflation, even if they only change once every X years. Small claims court is one (and I daresay it has changed at some point, because $5,000 in 1790 is way more than $5k today), but there are others. It's not like the numbers don't exist and get tracked somewhere, it would be relatively easy to say "small claims court is for claims that are less than the 401(k) contribution limit from the year of the last census" or something.The small claims limit probably needs to be raised as well. It is 5k in most states, but generally uneconomical to involve a lawyer in a dispute worth less than about 10 or 15k.
If Judge Bennett resented Judge Campbell taking him off the case, then perhaps he actually likes Russell's saber rattling of "I HUMILATED that stupid bitch Tina Campbell so bad she had to recuse herself in shame!" Judge Bennett might also think she was wrong and is glad he's back on the case.The magistrate, Bennett, was on this case before Tena Campbell yanked her referral and dismissed the case. He has been involved in this case in some manner or capacity since Sep 29, 2020, before Tena Campbell withdrew the referral on Aug 10, 2021.
Somehow this guy ended up back on the case and has been back on it since.
They probably would go for it. The whole reason to shove those things into small claims is that they're too small to take a cut on. There's currently a gray area you just get a lot of tire-kicker type calls on that rarely ever go anywhereThe problem is that everyone who has the ability to make the change loves the status quo; lawyers certainly aren't going to fight to expand small claims court.
I'm aware, and to be clear I don't think it's a problem in itself that there are provisions in the law for people with no resources to access the legal system.. It's just that these laws weren't written with degenerate time vampires in mind. People like that would have been tarred and feathered and ran out of town on a rail in saner times.Pro Se and In Forma Pauperis were intended to help the poor stand up to the rich and powerful. They were meant for an honest, honorable people, not for turds like Acerthorn or Russell.
we used to be a high trust society.I'm aware. People like that would have been tarred and feathered and ran out of town on a rail in saner times. These laws weren't written with degenerate time vampires in mind.
The interesting thing is that there is a "Small Claims" version of copyright court.They probably would go for it. The whole reason to shove those things into small claims is that they're too small to take a cut on. There's currently a gray area you just get a lot of tire-kicker type calls on that rarely ever go anywhere
Yes, high trust and low ambiguity.we used to be a high trust society.
But like all small claims courts they have a limit. In this case $30k total and $15k per work.
Obviously Greer's copyrights are worth much more than that