biguglyboy
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2019
I absolutely think he RAPED someone. Maybe you could get me on a technicality that it was a mere sexual assault and he didn't go all Brando with the butter on some woman, but by his own words he was accused of assault and his main frustration was that she stopped contact with him but wasn't keeping quiet about it. Which despite his claims of her publicly smearing him, as far as I know whatever her side of the story is hasn't been revealed to the public at large, so all we have to go on is his innocuous dog hair explanation but simultaneously it is an act that he calls a mistake that he will regret for the rest of his life. The person we suspect it might have been has even dropped from the internet as a whole, so I suppose he must have been successful in girl talking her into keeping quiet somehow.Do people actually believe they r*ped someone? I looked into it and it seems like they got accused of purposefully having dog hair on them when they had sex with someone who was afraid of dogs. I understand hating them, but its dishonest to say they raped someone based on what is in the thread.
As much as we mock the "concent accident" term, I really don't know how else to interpret than "I am a rapist", especially when he views it as the inevitable in risky fetishes.