Liz Fong-Jones / Elliot William Fong / @lizthegrey - 'Consent accident' enjoyer, ex-Google employee, nepotistic sex pest, Robert Z'Dar look-alike who wants authority over the Internet

Do people actually believe they r*ped someone? I looked into it and it seems like they got accused of purposefully having dog hair on them when they had sex with someone who was afraid of dogs. I understand hating them, but its dishonest to say they raped someone based on what is in the thread.
I absolutely think he RAPED someone. Maybe you could get me on a technicality that it was a mere sexual assault and he didn't go all Brando with the butter on some woman, but by his own words he was accused of assault and his main frustration was that she stopped contact with him but wasn't keeping quiet about it. Which despite his claims of her publicly smearing him, as far as I know whatever her side of the story is hasn't been revealed to the public at large, so all we have to go on is his innocuous dog hair explanation but simultaneously it is an act that he calls a mistake that he will regret for the rest of his life. The person we suspect it might have been has even dropped from the internet as a whole, so I suppose he must have been successful in girl talking her into keeping quiet somehow.
As much as we mock the "concent accident" term, I really don't know how else to interpret than "I am a rapist", especially when he views it as the inevitable in risky fetishes.
 
Becky claimed that she's having financial difficulties and started e-begging on Bluesky:
"Help I'm a poow wittwe wetawd, I can't make a money :("
*2 posts later*
"Ugh see I can't even afford to take my 3 heckin doggos to the vet"
Tf is wrong with these people. I do alright for myself and I'm sure as hell not going to get a dog because I know it's fucking expensive, I couldn't imagine actively choosing to own 3 while being a fucking bum with no source of income whatsoever. It's the same energy as "I can't afford to live in le capitalist dystopia" *has Netflix, Spotify, Hulu, gets Starbucks twice a day, goes through a disposable vape a day* etc. except it's worse because they have living beings relying on them.
 
Do people actually believe they r*ped someone? I looked into it and it seems like they got accused of purposefully having dog hair on them when they had sex with someone who was afraid of dogs. I understand hating them, but its dishonest to say they raped someone based on what is in the thread.
nigger this is not reddit, you can say raped you mongeloid double retard.
 
Something tells me in the wake of the pendulum swing Elliott's going to have a very hard time pulling off his little "girl talk" trick again to get what he wants.
Agreed, but until he starts to face actual consequences for trying, a lower success rate is of limited value. Don't forget that CF, HE, and many others continue to refuse to act as infrastructure, most banks won't touch Josh or anything related to him, etc etc. Josh may have found a solution for now, but it is still very much a small i internet, and it's hard to imagine a site like KF managing to start up in the current climate, since it would not have Josh's opportunity to overcome gradually increasing opposition a bit at a time.

LFJ still has tremendous power and influence in the industry, his intimidation campaign is mostly in secret and thus hard to hold him accountable for, and he's been successful enough in censoring receipts of his bizarre consent accident confession that even if cultural trends take down his troon shield, he may be able to continue to slither along in the shadows of the tech industry by claiming it was all made up. On the bright side, he must have made a lot of powerful industry enemies in private, even if they are afraid to speak out. Whisper networks can help, as will his burning the bridge with Google.

The trend is clearly reversing, but there is much damage to be undone to the Internet and society at large to even get back to where we were a decade ago. A lot of that goes beyond the culture war, such as the general trends of corporate control of open source, infrastructure, and centralization. Trends that people like LFJ once opposed before getting the taste of a few crumbs of that sweet, sweet authoritarianism for themselves. Fixing that will take time, and the new administration, hilarious shitlords though they are, are no friends to free speech or the internet either.
 
they're definitely friendlier to the Right. I'm only interested in *my* freedom of speech, I could give a shit about Progressives
I'm done with principled defense of Progressive speech too, after the past ten years. They can reap what they have sown. But I like section 230, and might want to criticize Israel some day, at least mildly. That friendliness to the Right may come with a demand to define it, and exclude the bits they don't like.
 
they're definitely friendlier to the Right. I'm only interested in *my* freedom of speech, I could give a shit about Progressives
If progressives got locked up for the vile things they say, then they'd stop saying them, and we'd have no way of knowing. Free speech is important, because it lets your enemies out themselves before they offend.
 
nigger this is not reddit, you can say raped you mongeloid double retard.
Gee, I don't know, man. Had it not been for that well-placed asterisk, I'd be pretty triggered right now.

Also, if a person is simultaneously a double nigger and a triple mongoloid, would those values multiply to make the individual a sextuple niggerloid? Or is it rather nigger squared to the third mongoloid power, giving an octuple mongonigger? Math isn't my strong suit.

More on-topic, yeah, No Dong raped someone, but as he considers himself one of the Moral Elect on The Right Side Of History™, he gets to call it by a different name.
 
Do people actually believe they r*ped someone? I looked into it and it seems like they got accused of purposefully having dog hair on them when they had sex with someone who was afraid of dogs. I understand hating them, but its dishonest to say they raped someone based on what is in the thread.
I agree. As much as I find the whole "dog hair" thing to be bizarre, there's no evidence that Dong raped someone.

AFAIK, there's never been any online posts from the alleged victim; just from Dong himself.

If anyone is gonna react and say they disagree or that I'm autistic, at least provide some evidence that goes beyond those tweets from Dong that we've all seen already.
 
I agree. As much as I find the whole "dog hair" thing to be bizarre, there's no evidence that Dong raped someone.

AFAIK, there's never been any online posts from the alleged victim; just from Dong himself.

If anyone is gonna react and say they disagree or that I'm autistic, at least provide some evidence that goes beyond those tweets from Dong that we've all seen already.
Let me get this straight, a lack of evidence to either support or refute his claims means that we should “believe all women?”

Lunacy.

What we know is that Elliot claimed someone accused him of sexual assault because they found dog hair on them, despite knowing that Jones is a dog owner. This literally makes no sense.
 
What we know is that Elliot claimed someone accused him of sexual assault because they found dog hair on them, despite knowing that Jones is a dog owner. This literally makes no sense.
And he called it specifically a "consent accident." He had sex with someone. They didn't consent. There's a word for that. I'm not going to take his self-serving excuses for what he did seriously but nobody admits to something like that unless it's true.
 
Imagine publicly announcing that you raped someone, acknowledge that that person is now mentally unwell (or worse off than prior to meeting them) and then trying to use pretty language to minimize what you did while also painting your victim as the problem.
The trans shield working in tandem with fuck you money is powerful, but no king rules forever.
 
Back