US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm hoping soon Trump turns his attention towards Marxist groups like Antifa or any of those rose emoji faggots and declares them terrorists. It would be a good exercise to engineer conditions to allow US SOF raid and eleminate/capture them. Anytime some soy filled cuck upvoted a PRC shill on reddit could be rationalized as sedition and conspiracy.
the Vermont border agent being killed should be a good enough reason to
 
Mexico has been a mess for most of its existence. During the early periods after they gained independence the went through heads of state so quickly that there are some months that had three separate people filling the role. Most of the 1800's were periods of short, but failed Republics, civil wars, brief periods of monarchy, and general chaos. What we consider Mexico today didn't exist as a stable government until 1934. Since then, the IRP (Institutional Revolutionary Party) has dominated national politics. If the name doesn't give it away, they were a leftist party though more recently they've been supplanted by the National Regeneration Movement (Morena) party which is even more left-wing. It doesn't matter how much work ethic your people have if your country has been implementing socialist policies.
Did you ever see the Mexican president who was in power for like 45 minutes.
 
In aviation news...

Airplane wing strikes tug vehicle at Chicago airport, leaving driver hospitalized
FOX News (archive.ph)
By Bonny Chu and Pilar Arias
2025-02-02 14:33:50GMT
The driver of an aircraft tug was sent to the hospital in critical condition after an incident at O’Hare International Airport in Chicago on Saturday, according to the Chicago Police Department.

The wing of the aircraft struck the tug vehicle as the plane was taxiing to the gate, police said.

The passenger plane was operated by American Airlines under American Eagle Flight 6181, the airline confirmed to Fox News Digital in a statement.

"Nothing is more important than the safety of our customers and team members, and we are reviewing this incident," American Airlines said.

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) also confirmed the tug was reportedly crossing the taxiway when it was hit by a Bombardier CRJ-200, which flew from Kalamazoo Battle Creek International Airport in Michigan.

Upon contact, the tug vehicle flipped over and pinned its 64-year-old male driver, whose name has not been released, according to the police. The driver was later taken to Lutheran General Hospital with head and lower body injuries but is now stable.

United Airlines also confirmed that the tug driver was one of its employees.

"We are ensuring he receives any necessary support and care," United Airlines said in a statement.

No other customers or crew members were injured in the incident, police said.

The FAA also stated that the passengers were deplaned safely and bussed to the terminal.

The investigation is ongoing.

The incident at the Chicago airport occurred just days after another one that led to the death of an American Airlines worker at Charlotte Douglas International Airport in North Carolina.

That incident, which occurred on Monday, involved an airline ramp vehicle, the airport told Fox News Digital in a statement, but no additional details were immediately given.

Some good news...

Security Official at Aid Agency Put on Leave After Denying Access to Musk Team
The New York Times (archive.ph)
By Edward Wong, Erica L. Green, and Karoun Demirjian
2025-02-02 19:13:19GMT
The top security official at the U.S. Agency for International Development was put on administrative leave on Saturday night after refusing to give representatives of Elon Musk access to internal systems, according to three U.S. officials with knowledge of the matter.

John Voorhees, U.S.A.I.D.’s director of security, is the latest senior official at the agency to be put on administrative leave. Last week, Trump administration appointees suspended about 60 senior officials and fired hundreds of contractors. There has been talk among current and former agency employees and lawmakers that the agency could be subsumed within the State Department in a drastically reduced form.

The deputy security official working under Mr. Voorhees was also put on leave, one U.S. official said.

U.S.A.I.D., which is funded by Congress and takes some guidance from the State Department, has otherwise operated independently. Mr. Voorhees could not immediately be reached for comment.

“USAID is a criminal organization,” Mr. Musk wrote on Sunday in a social media post that many aid workers saw as confirmation the agency would soon be absorbed into the State Department and that some viewed as a potential threat to their personal safety. “Time for it to die.”

U.S.A.I.D., which spent about $38.1 billion on health services, disaster relief, anti-poverty efforts and other foreign assistance programs in fiscal year 2023, makes up less than 1 percent of the federal budget.

Multiple people who identified themselves as representatives of Mr. Musk’s so-called Department of Government Efficiency were on site at U.S.A.I.D. last week, demanding access to the agency’s financial and personnel records, according to two U.S. officials with direct knowledge of the activity and the agency’s inner workings.

The cost-cutting effort led by Mr. Musk, the world’s richest man, is not a department but rather a task force that nevertheless has been granted unusual power. An executive order signed by President Trump gives its workers unfettered access to government agencies. But in theory, the employees would still need to get proper security clearances to access classified material.

The employees working for Mr. Musk’s task force who clashed with Mr. Voorhees were seeking to enter a secure area of the agency’s offices to get at classified material, two U.S. officials with knowledge of the incident said. It is not clear exactly what exchange took place between them and Mr. Voorhees.

Katie Miller, a spokeswoman for the Musk initiative, responded on Sunday to the reports of security officials being put on leave. “No classified material was accessed without proper security clearances,” she said on X. The clash involving Mr. Voorhees was first reported by CNN on Sunday.

A sense of despair was settling in on Sunday among employees remaining at U.S.A.I.D. as they learned of the new suspensions and braced for the potential of even more sweeping layoffs and a dismantling of the agency.

The U.S.A.I.D. website went dark on Saturday, and a smaller, scaled-back version of the aid agency’s online presence appeared on the State Department’s website — a possible indication of a looming loss of the agency’s independence that employees anticipated Mr. Trump would soon make official with an executive order. Spokespeople for the White House did not immediately return a request for comment.

Lawmakers and aid workers also learned that at least some of the signs at the agency’s headquarters had been removed.

The State Department and U.S.A.I.D. did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

The changes underway have jarred nonprofit organizations that are supported by U.S.A.I.D. Those groups were already reeling from the Trump administration’s decision to freeze nearly all foreign aid programs, a move that was slightly modified by a subsequent vague waiver for programs that administer lifesaving humanitarian aid.

“An abrupt collapse of the agency would put the rights of millions of people around the world at greater risk as a result,” Paul O’Brien, the executive director of Amnesty International, said in a statement. “What dismantling USAID doesn’t do is make anyone safer or more prosperous. Congress should immediately step in to challenge this.”
 
I'll be honest, I never knew this was a thing. In fact over the last few years I've known of landlords (both single housing managed by individuals and multi-unit managed by companies) who required their tenants to choose a specific ISP. Did this rule ever take effect? Personally I feel repealing it is a poor decision.
I'm wondering if its a state based thing. Where I am I cannot dictate what my tenants use though I do need to provide line access for cable services to the apartment, I can only dictate that they cannot physically install equipment (but Verizon doesn't care and will install anyway without landlord permission). The only place I know that does dictate what internet people can use is boarding/group homes and they can make people pay more to access it or the usage of cable in private areas.
 
West Virginia?
Perhaps. It is a state that came into existence when the original one it was part of overwhelmingly decided to secede (legislative vote of 88 to 55) and federal troops occupied the part that coincidentally later went on to become the Mountain State. Even more coincidental is that local politicians who disagreed with the secession of their original state were able to go the United States government and convince them to grant their new state statehood while the original one (now attempting to break away from the USA) kept saying they didn't agree to this.

From an interesting article on the subject;
Article IV, Section 3, states that “New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new State shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or Parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress.”

The referendum on October 24, 1861 approved the pursuit of statehood for West Virginia with the backing of the Restored state government. During the next year, West Virginia seemed headed for statehood even though the issue of slavery within the new state was unsettled. Congress approved the West Virginia statehood resolution and sent it to the White House for the President’s signature

In December 1862, President Abraham Lincoln asked his cabinet members about their opinions on the resolution’s constitutionality, and they appeared to be evenly split. Lincoln signed the bill in late December but he included some caveats in an opinion statement.

Lincoln argued that the absence of potential voters from eastern Virginia didn’t matter. “It is not the qualified voters, but the qualified voters, who choose to vote, that constitute the political power of the state,” he claimed. But Lincoln also voiced reservations. “The division of a State is dreaded as a precedent. But a measure made expedient by a war, is no precedent for times of peace. It is said that the admission of West-Virginia, is secession, and tolerated only because it is our secession. Well, if we call it by that name, there is still difference enough between secession against the constitution, and secession in favor of the constitution,” Lincoln concluded.

It sure is strange this was all justified legally after the fact once the Civil War ended.
 
The Liberal faggot party in Canada thought the country needed to triple in population and importing brown people from the worst places in the world (while avoiding importing White people from Europe, the US or South Africa) would turn them into loyal Canadians the moment they get off the plane. As anyone with an IQ above 80 could expect the majority of these imported people did their best to rape the country of any benefit they could snatch and be the most unproductive welfare queens possible.

You have Indians raiding food pantries, jerking off at children's parks and pools, smashing into busses because they're driving cargo trucks they're unqualified to operate and even take out massive student loans then flee back to India.
And this all started when!
 
Isn’t canadas socialized medicine system and things like grocery prices and welfare state system already feeling the burn due to mismanagement and that’s without tariffs. If trump fucks them over economically, that’s gonna crumble fast
Grocery store prices have been a problem for years. It's gotten to the point where "Canada is collapsing" threads comparing store prices are a regular occurrence on /pol/, and of course Canucks hate them because it exposes them as a failed state that they are. You wouldn't believe how expensive some basic necessities already are in that shithole, and now it's going to get worse.
Canadians already live like an occupied people. They are surrounded by indians who pack 20 people into a studio apartment and, because that's strictly a utilitarian thing so they don't have to sleep out in the streets, those indians just spill into the streets and inexplicably spawn garbage piles like they're a negative The Sims entity. This isn't even getting into the Chinese. Canadians are a very buck-broken people who will tolerate $450 weekly grocery bills until they starve to death.
If the entire nation starves to death and falls apart, that is also a win condition here. Makes it easier to annex them.
Get fucked you parasite. Man, this is a perfect photo.
This is a momentous occasion, I think this is the first time in history that Donald DENIED a jew money instead of blindly showering him in it!
 
Back