Official Kiwi Farms Man-Hate Thread

[Lurker]

It's interesting how you minimize trannyfaggots to 'men in dresses' when it suits your singular focus on the muhburtion issue.

I mean if all you care about is muhburtion, to the exclusion of all other issues facing women's rights... why are you on Le Farms? In your worldview trannies aren't a problem, do you think that everything posted here is a lie or an exaggeration? Are you ok with men claiming to be women and the law taking them seriously?

They're just 'men in dresses', right?

I would like to know your reply.

idk, i think bodily autonomy is pretty fucking important and i think it's silly and self-destructive to vote against your self-interests because of less than 1% of the population

 

[Slideshow Bill]

I consider myself anti-feminist

But I'm sure you happily enjoy the rights and privileges feminism has granted women, like voting, driving, education, wearing pants, using public restrooms and more, right?

 

[Golden Apple]

idk, i think bodily autonomy is pretty fucking important and i think it's silly and self-destructive to vote against your self-interests because of less than 1% of the population

That 1% of the population and their supporters have done a lot more damage to women as individuals, and to women's rights in general than you willing to admit.

How can we fight for women's bodily autonomy if we can't even be defined as women and have to share that semantic space with men? The very foundation of our arguments and rights was pulled out from under us and you still think that doesn't matter?

My problem with your single issue opinion is that it doesn't take into account the reality of the situation that women face today. Reducing women's rights to just abortion ignores the damage that the LGBTQIA has caused to women's rights as a whole.

You don't want women reduced to their reproductive capacity, but don't think that faggots and surrogacy is an issue?

I can't process the single mindedness of your focus on abortion as the One Right to Rule Them All. As if we could just get abortion everything else would fall in place?

I can't understand how you blame republicans, when it was democratic inaction on the issue that lost it federally for women. For 50 years the democrats knew what the republicans were going to do and sat on their hands to the point that I'm convinced they were anti-abortion in their personal beliefs, as well.

But not all hope is lost. As long as it's up to the states, then women can do something and vote as a block to regain those rights. We shouldn't have to, but that's the reality of the situation.

 

[crazedaze]

Moids who never stop squealing about "masculine women" and "feminine men", yet pretend they hate trannyism.
Being a woman = feminine
Being a man = masculine
Fucking faggot retards.

 

[Lurker]

I can't understand how you blame republicans, when it was democratic inaction on the issue that lost it federally for women. For 50 years the democrats knew what the republicans were going to do and sat on their hands to the point that I'm convinced they were anti-abortion in their personal beliefs, as well.

oh i see, you feel personally attacked because i criticized your pet political party, my apologies

as for the rest of your post, you're caught up in the culture war and you're incapable of seeing the bigger picture. if you can't see how a woman's bodily autonomy is more fucking important than 'the trans menace', i don't know what i can tell you. you're caught up in the culture war.

 

[Silence of the Troons]

If you didn’t hate French Moids enough, here’s an article about how a Moid who hit the wall in the womb claims that 50 year old women are “unlovable”.

This is what he looks like:
View attachment 6932978
That is one rough looking 50 year old. Looks like he slammed right into the wall and takes it out on women his own age.

There’s always something funny about Haggots seething about women their own age. It’s like they’re in denial of the fact that they themselves are no longer spring chickens.

That article is from 2019. Three years later, it was revealed that he was in a relationship with a Japanese violinist, Akiko Suwanai. The kicker here is that in 2022, she was not 25, but 50 years old. I thought there was a shit ton of hot 25-year-olds lining up to get the attention of this moid? What happened Yann?

I still think she's way above his league so I hope she has dumped him or will dump him soon.

Haggots talk big about how women their age are all ugly hags and how they'll only settle for a 15-year-ol - I mean 25-year-old. They believe that if Leonardo DiCaprio can get a new 20 something model girlfriend every year, then so can they. That is, until they have to face the harsh reality that they are not Leonardo DiCaprio, part of the 1% and world famous actor as well as someone who's able to live off of his reputation as a former teenage heartthrob. Women in their 20s aren't interested in dating some no name haggot in his 50s (or in this case, some pretentious haggot author that hardly any people in their 20s care about) who has a shitty incel tier personality, is going bald, has a beer gut, and doesn't wash his ass.

Two more facts about this guy to make you hate him more:

1) He signed a petition in support of Roman Polanski after he was arrested in Switzerland in 2009.

In fact, he loves Polanski so much that when he published an excerpt from one of his books the same year, he did so under the headline "I love Polanski and I hate Switzerland" and accused Switzerland of being a whore and a skank [of a country]. All of this because Switzerland arrested his favorite sex offender.

2) He was the guy who accompanied Gérard Depardieu on his trip to Pyongyang in 2018 because he was supposed to make a documentary movie about him, but then ended up not finishing it – probably because Depardieu is seen acting like a sex-obsessed degenerate throughout his trip, including towards an underage girl, and it would've damaged his reputation if it had aired (these are the same clips that were shown on French TV in late 2023 and got Depardieu into hot water).

On December 7, 2023, a special edition of the TV magazine Complément d'enquête, subtitled La Chute de l'ogre [The Fall of the Ogre], highlighted the various accusations made against actor Gérard Depardieu and his inappropriate behavior during his trip to North Korea for the 70th anniversary of the North Korean regime, taken from an unfinished documentary by Yann Moix. Since September 2018, Yann Moix has been preparing a film dedicated to Depardieu entitled 70 (“seventy”), about the latter's tribulations in Pyongyang. This documentary, presented as “experimental”, has not been broadcast. Yann Moix distanced himself from these video extracts in December 2023, indicating that he had not authorized their broadcast.

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yann_Moix#Télévision_et_radio

 

[Inside your walls]

Moids who never stop squealing about "masculine women" and "feminine men", yet pretend they hate trannyism.

>Be me
>Autistic
>Groomed into a group whose fueled by a massive persecution complex
>Cry about being persecuted despite the government and the whole system fucking
everybody else over to prioritize me
>Have insane entitlement towards women and if they reject me I can
easily ruin their lives and livelihood
>Have groups of sycophants that are willing to also harass women that wronged me
and my group of people
>Constantly erode women's spaces while demanding that the spaces
for me and my group never gets breached
>Project myself onto attractive people because IRL I'm a dysgenic freak
>Brain fried by porn to the point it alternates my perception of reality, sexuality
and women
>Extremely misogynistic but will glaze other men to the point of blind worship
>Have a misogynistic view of womanhood and reduce it to shallow sexist
stereotypes, say constantly how you can't understand how women can view
stereotypes associated with their gender as bad because you enjoy them
>Insanely tribalistic towards my own group to the point I am willing to defend rapists, pedophiles and
other predators in my group when they face backlash for the sake of some autistic loyalty
>Always blame women for my own failures and setbacks
>Always say how women are the biggest threat to me despite men
being the ones to constantly brutalize me through my whole life
>Be a modern (fagosphere) moid
>Picture unrelated

 

[Kiwisee]

If only Incel Moids were half as persecuted as they think they are. They’d be sent off to go die in wars instead of murdering random children.

 

[Plantation Barbie]

Pastor drags a young pregnant woman before the church so he can publicly shame and berate her. Whatever happened to, "whoever is without sin cast the first stone?" And let's not forget that Christ himself was born from a teenage pregnancy. Would this man speak so harshly if the virgin Mary was standing there? Actually, he probably would.
And of course there is no mention of the baby daddy or the young woman's father. Because God fucking forbid we hold men accountable for their part in making broken households.

"We ain't going to condone your sin... Ain't no baby showers going on... No private baby shower either."

Further evidence that the religious right only cares about birth and not life. This pastor just said the quiet part out loud. The purpose of the baby shower is to celebrate the new life and to ensure the mother has everything she needs for its arrival. Even if that arrival is happening under less than ideal circumstances. Regardless of their family status, this child is still going to need diapers, clothing, bottles, a crib, car seat, stroller, etc. These are not luxury gifts for the mother, they are items that are essential for the child's safety and well-being.
Yes the mother made a massive fuck up. I'm not denying that. But this pastor is all too eager to condemn this unborn child for their mother's mistake. Which is in direct defiance of the very scripture he claims to live by. Then again, moids only love the bible when they can use it to stroke their own egos.

 

[12345]

I learned the other day from my father when he was just getting out of high school (1960's Canada) that bars were still segregated into a men's section and a woman's section. I wish it had stayed that way. Maybe we never would have had to come up with nail polish that reacts to drugs in drinks...

I mean I know we would still get there, but a girl can dream, right?

 

[Galaxolotl]

Pastor drags a young pregnant woman before the church so he can publicly shame and berate her. Whatever happened to, "whoever is without sin cast the first stone?" And let's not forget that Christ himself was born from a teenage pregnancy. Would this man speak so harshly if the virgin Mary was standing there? Actually, he probably would.
And of course there is no mention of the baby daddy or the young woman's father. Because God fucking forbid we hold men accountable for their part in making broken households.
View attachment 6935907

"We ain't going to condone your sin... Ain't no baby showers going on... No private baby shower either."

Further evidence that the religious right only cares about birth and not life. This pastor just said the quiet part out loud. The purpose of the baby shower is to celebrate the new life and to ensure the mother has everything she needs for its arrival. Even if that arrival is happening under less than ideal circumstances. Regardless of their family status, this child is still going to need diapers, clothing, bottles, a crib, car seat, stroller, etc. These are not luxury gifts for the mother, they are items that are essential for the child's safety and well-being.
Yes the mother made a massive fuck up. I'm not denying that. But this pastor is all too eager to condemn this unborn child for their mother's mistake. Which is in direct defiance of the very scripture he claims to live by. Then again, moids only love the bible when they can use it to stroke their own egos.

That girl's baby daddy is most likely a grown man in that church if not the pastor himself. Black churches are rampant with pedophiles to the point that it's often an open secret yet people still flock to these churches every Sunday. They teach these girls to just stay away from boys while leaving them vulnerable to adult men. Remember 60% of black girls are either molested or raped before the age of 18.

 

[2mm and 99 others]

Pastor drags a young pregnant woman before the church so he can publicly shame and berate her. Whatever happened to, "whoever is without sin cast the first stone?" And let's not forget that Christ himself was born from a teenage pregnancy. Would this man speak so harshly if the virgin Mary was standing there? Actually, he probably would.
And of course there is no mention of the baby daddy or the young woman's father. Because God fucking forbid we hold men accountable for their part in making broken households.
View attachment 6935907

"We ain't going to condone your sin... Ain't no baby showers going on... No private baby shower either."

Further evidence that the religious right only cares about birth and not life. This pastor just said the quiet part out loud. The purpose of the baby shower is to celebrate the new life and to ensure the mother has everything she needs for its arrival. Even if that arrival is happening under less than ideal circumstances. Regardless of their family status, this child is still going to need diapers, clothing, bottles, a crib, car seat, stroller, etc. These are not luxury gifts for the mother, they are items that are essential for the child's safety and well-being.
Yes the mother made a massive fuck up. I'm not denying that. But this pastor is all too eager to condemn this unborn child for their mother's mistake. Which is in direct defiance of the very scripture he claims to live by. Then again, moids only love the bible when they can use it to stroke their own egos.

Makes me wonder, if American religious blacks, just like their whitey counterparts, also suffer plummeting burfrates and face imminent EXTINCTION, but right until a single mother appears?

 

[Useful_Mistake]

I have never needed to have an abortion, but if I did I have a plethora of states to choose from. I also still have my bank account and my job, and even when Useful Mistake was tagged he tactfully told you guys "lol calm down".

you don't think it's unreasonable to have to travel to a different state to get a medical procedure? alright. also not sure what @Useful_Mistake has to do with what i said, but okay.

I don't know why I am mentioned, but the sole post I have made in this thread (aside from this one) was to comment on this when I was asked. I have given no orders or any otherwise direction on how this thread should act as far as I recall.

 

[Disgruntled Pupper]

you don't think it's unreasonable to have to travel to a different state to get a medical procedure?

No. If the women in Texas or wherever want to be so stupid, weak, and useless that they can't even form a coherent voting block to join states like Kansas, Iowa, Missouri, North Carolina or even Georgia, then that's their choice. And in fact, they serve a useful purpose as a warning to the rest of the country.

but a majority of women will be affected in some way by their bodily autonomy being removed,

The CDC's latest abortion data is from 2021 and there were only 625,978 of them. Meanwhile, half of women admit to being raped, 3/4ths have been sexually assaulted, and there isn't a single women alive who hasn't been verbally sexually harassed or creeped on. Who is doing these things to women? Penisniggers, especially minority penisniggers (which is why I brought up the spic penisniggers actually doing me harm RIGHT NOW) and including the 3 million (such a tiny amount!) trannies in this country (which is why 3/4ths of trannies in prison are in for sexual crimes). Can you, for once in your life, especially in this thread, try not being a duplicious Democrat shill?

I don't know why I am mentioned, but the sole post I have made in this thread (aside from this one) was to comment on this when I was asked. I have given no orders or any otherwise direction on how this thread should act as far as I recall.

Because @Lurker is a fucking idiot who, despite be an older fag than even me, has no disgression about bothering other users who technically shouldn't even be in this thread when having her "NO, THE REPUBLICAN RAPE SQUADS ARE TOTALLY GONNA COME AND TAKE ALL OUR RIGHTS AWAY AND SELL US TO THE INCELS THIS TIME SIS BELIEVE ME SIS" fits.

The only reason I brought you up is because Lurker and other certain users continue to pretent that we are seconds away from having our bank accounts and ability to work and protections for things like pregnancy taken away by the Rapist Cheeto when you, someone with far more legal knowledge than any of us, have already explained that the situation is a lot more complicated than that.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

The only reason I brought you up is because Lurker and other certain users continue to pretent that we are seconds away from having our bank accounts and ability to work and protections for things like pregnancy taken away by the Rapist Cheeto when you, someone with far more legal knowledge than any of us, have already explained that the situation is a lot more complicated than that.

Not necessarily. Both houses of Congress could chose to repeal anti-discrimination laws (though Congress hardly ever repeals anything), and likewise the Supreme Court could always come up with a fanciful interpretation of the 14th Amendment. That said, neither is likely to happen. Current 14th Amendment Jurisprudence is a higher sacred cow to the Supreme Court than even the First Amendment (which has been stretched beyond all reason)

 

[Disgruntled Pupper]

Not necessarily. Both houses of Congress could chose to repeal anti-discrimination laws (though Congress hardly ever repeals anything), and likewise the Supreme Court could always come up with a fanciful interpretation of the 14th Amendment. That said, neither is likely to happen. Current 14th Amendment Jurisprudence is a higher sacred cow to the Supreme Court than even the First Amendment (which has been stretched beyond all reason)

I really don't know what to say in response because I feel like we are in agreement. Congress and the supreme court could do a lot of things, but how realistic the likelihood of either actually doing anything, are diffrent issues. Regardless, Orange Hitler's powers are limited, and if he wants to take all women out of the workforce and force us into the red hoods he is going to have to have Congress repeal a lot of legislation and have the Supreme Court reverse a lot of previous ruleings and strike down a lot of new challenges.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Orange Hitler's powers are limited, and if he wants to take all women out of the workforce and force us into the red hoods he is going to have to have Congress repeal a lot of legislation and have the Supreme Court reverse a lot of previous ruleings and strike down a lot of new challenges.

He could always do a Roosevelt, and issue an ultimatum to the Supreme Court. Either they always rule in his favor, or Congress will make as many Supreme Court Justices as needed (and fill them with loyalists) to ensure that Supreme Court always rules his way. It's rare that a President has as much control over both houses to make such a threat a real one.

When you control all three branches a lot of things become easy, but not all things are likely. If nothing else, you can trust that any RINOs in the houses would do their best to oppose this.

That said, I'm not saying anything either way, just providing broader context.

 

[Moldy Fleshlight]

To break up people arguing, here's a personal tale of a dumb moid we recently fired. I'll call him Sam. Sam is by far the laziest fucking moid I've ever worked with. Sleazy, greasy, unwashed and would leave a lingering stench wherever he went, multiple abandoned bastard children, late 30s, alcoholic who would buy beer from our store every night, full of low cunning, and absolutely a loser but was one of our only options for a manager till I came along. But let me tell y'all why we fired him. Sam had a tendency to be a fuckin' creep to women they hired who he thought wouldn't say anything about it. Being a retarded subhuman, he guessed wrong, but none of the women were willing to go to HR until recently.

The final straw for Sam was this time when a youngish woman brought a paper application in. We don't really take those, but he took it anyways. To give to our boss, right? Fuck no. Motherfucker takes the application, grabs the girl's info and shit off it, and texts her and acts like a creep. So she comes in, shows the rest of the screen shots when he leaves, and we go from there to nail his ass for being fucking weird, as well as getting everyone else's statement so they finally, actually fired him instead of corporate being dickheads and being lazy about it. Who else does that shit, but a moid? As far as I know- and hope- he never did anything more extreme, but working with him was uncomfortable for the rest of the all female staff after we learned he did this shit and kept scaring off girls, so we're happy to be rid of him.

We still keep finding his lazy fuck ups weeks later. When I say this motherfucker couldn't even sweep a floor, I mean it. I saw it in action personally. We had to ban him to the public restroom because he fucked up the staff restroom after a single use- not that it mattered much because we still had to clean both of them every day. He was literally so incapable and stupid. Our boss bought walkie talkies specifically because of Sam, because the lazy fucker would go off and hide and we couldn't find him if we needed help with something. The moid was far more trouble than he was worth. I heard when he got fired, he had to walk home in the rain, because his car was broken down. I'd feel bad, but I really, really don't, knowing he was such a gross, annoying, harassing fucker.

 

[Lurker]

The CDC's latest abortion data is from 2021 and there were only 625,978 of them. Meanwhile, half of women admit to being raped, 3/4ths have been sexually assaulted, and there isn't a single women alive who hasn't been verbally sexually harassed or creeped on. Who is doing these things to women? Penisniggers, especially minority penisniggers (which is why I brought up the spic penisniggers actually doing me harm RIGHT NOW) and including the 3 million (such a tiny amount!) trannies in this country (which is why 3/4ths of trannies in prison are in for sexual crimes). Can you, for once in your life, especially in this thread, try not being a duplicious Democrat shill?

if you're incapable of understanding why your right to your own bodily autonomy might be more important than the trannies, then we're at an impasse. i can't imagine why you'd choose to lose your own rights in order to /maybe/ get rid of trannies, but i guess the hatred of men outweighs your sense of self-preservation.

the way i see it, it's about getting their foot in the door. once it's deemed that your body is no longer your own while pregnant, what would stop the powers that be from saying that your body isn't your own, period? you could argue that it's a slippery slope, maybe it is, but do you really trust the people in charge, who are mostly men? it's the whole boiling frog analogy.

i'm not dismissing trannies as an issue. like i have said multiple times, they are an issue, but they're an issue that i would /think/ resolves itself with time. bunch of degenerate men sterilizing themselves for a fetish and then 41%ing themselves. either way, they're removed from the genepool. i do recognize that this alone doesn't change the fact that the ideology would still exist, but i would like to think that the general populace would start to turn on the entire ideology, as it seems to be now. with enough public outcry and condemnation, the ideology would be crippled, and reforms would be made so that the medical establishment can't troon out children, or, frankly, anyone, ever again.

although i may not have experienced the joy of encountering a tranny, it's not like i don't get where you're coming from. any sane woman would be rightfully disturbed at the thought of a man being in any of their 'safe spaces'. any sane woman would recognize that these men in dresses are doing it as a fetish and that they get off to the idea of forcing everyone to suck their dicks. they're gross degenerate perverts at best and actual sexual predators at worst.

maybe if i had to deal with trannies i'd understand the urgency of other women to deal with the troon problem, even if it potentially means losing their rights along the way. after all, they'd just be able to vote to get those rights back, if they really wanted them back, right? but the pessimist in me feels like there may be a day in the not-too-distant future where women's right to vote will be revoked. you'll say 'lurker that's not going to happen, the odds of that are like practically zero', but as we've seen with the current government, if there's no checks or balances, what's to stop a very determined group of misogynists to completely bar women from society?

sorry if this post kind of meanders, just trying to get you to see where i'm coming from, even though you and i will probably never agree about whatever it is we are arguing about. which i think was 'which political party is worse for women?'

but we can all agree that men are the problem, fundamentally.

 

[MarvinTheParanoidAndroid]

idk, i think bodily autonomy is pretty fucking important and i think it's silly and self-destructive to vote against your self-interests because of less than 1% of the population

It's weird how much you keep trying to downplay what a problem trannies are. Real weird.