US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • 🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.
General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
"Its impossible to arrest and detain 13 million illegals". I think the number is closer to 30 million myself. So let's do the math.

30 million people. 20% probably make up the criminal element. We take care of that 20%, the 80% will either self deport or can be delt with over time.
20% of 30 million illegals is 6 million.
6 million people over 4 years is 1.5 million.
1.5 million over 12 months is 125k.
We can build facilities to deal with them.

its even better if we use the "official" number of 13 million.
20% of 13 million is 2.6 million
2.6 million over 4 years is 650k
650k over 12 months is ~54k.
Way easier eh?
We don't need 20% gone, we need 100% gone. All of them are criminals, they entered the country illegally.
 

Hey you know that student-teacher ratio, the critical metric that determines how well a teacher can educate their class? The number that keeps climbing, even though everyone knows 15 to 1 isn't good, 20 to 1 is bad, and 30 to 1 is basically giving up on everyone getting a good education? The number public schools have been "helpless" to keep down since at least the 1990s?

GUESS WHO IS FIXING THE PROBLEM FOR YOU UNGRATEFUL BITCHES
 
We don't need 20% gone, we need 100% gone. All of them are criminals, they entered the country illegally.
I agree. But its the pareto principle.
The Pareto Principle, also known as the 80/20 rule, states that roughly 80% of consequences come from 20% of causes, highlighting an unequal relationship between inputs and outputs
Trump deports 20% of the illegals, it will resolve 80% of the issues they cause. The rest will most likely self-deport. Or will be less dangerous.
 
>fell for it twice


I do it for free. Troons are nothing compared to the MAGA cult. You're incredibly entertaining.
Pick one, gaylord.
ns-kennzeichen-scaled.jpg
View attachment 6937864View attachment 6937865

Petey "all options are on the table" Heggy down south with the boys at RAM RANCH
Every single day so far has been like opening a red, white and blue advent calendar and finding a miniature bottle of scotch or a nug. God Bless America, my niggers. :hulk:🇺🇸🦅🤗
oie_3223637yzr63eY3.jpg
btw that hoodie 🤌
 
Is it far too early to ask who the Dems could possibly run in 2028? The leadership apparatus of the Democrats seems to prevent any unvetted outsiders from rising to the top, so I can't really name anyone of note. If Trump were to die right now, you've got Vance, DeSantis, Rubio, Cruz, etcetera (Their capabilities and loyalty to America none withstanding) but who can you even name from the Democrats? I'm not overly familiar with the Democrats on a whole admittedly, but I was still able to pull some Republican names, but cannot do so for the Dems. Maybe Buttgieg? Sanders?
Null should run for president. It’d be funny.
 
Funny how centralization in many aspects has led to corruption, even in the field of education. I like how Trump is truly moving in the path of decentralization.
In danger of politisperging, Feral Historian did a good allegorical video through vidja about how the next stage of living is probably decentralisation, de-globalisation, and home production. And how communists get shit wrong, as always.
 
Hey you know that student-teacher ratio, the critical metric that determines how well a teacher can educate their class? The number that keeps climbing, even though everyone knows 15 to 1 isn't good, 20 to 1 is bad, and 30 to 1 is basically giving up on everyone getting a good education? The number public schools have been "helpless" to keep down since at least the 1990s?

GUESS WHO JUST FIXED THE PROBLEM FOR YOU UNGRATEFUL BITCHES
And mostly by cutting chaff that need special language support and barely speak english anyway.

They're literally just taking up spaces and resources.
 
It's because you can't read captions in real life with your eyeballs if you are there and not watching it through a screen (though I agree they always look spastic which is oftentimes a comedic tonal clash).
There was also some conversation on Twitter over the past few weeks about how a lot of deaf people don't read as proficiently as quickly as hearing people. Makes sense to me, being able to "hear" a sentence in your mind can be crucial to being able to understand what you're reading, especially if you're reading something transcribed from speech which has rhythm and emphasis that can't be conveyed in text.
 
Gavin Newsom. Prior to Kamala's coronation, he was considered the frontrunner. He's governor of California, Pelosi's nephew, and has some powerful connections. You can bet he'll claim everything Trump's doing for California for himself.
I also must admit that he's fairly attractive (don't @ me, I know he's evil but he still has that statesmanlike and attractive politician look), so he'll get the women vote who don't know anything about him. Honestly it's a blessing that California is so infamous, otherwise he'd be a strong candidate, assuming identity politics aren't as big of an issue by then.
 
Last edited:
Unfortunately the Supreme Court in Plyler v. Doe held that illegal immigrant children have a constitutional right to equal access to public schools. But I will note that it was a 5-4 decision from when the Court was more heavily left wing. If it came up again today, it would likely be at least 5-4 in the other direction.
Is there a chance this could be re-litigated? If it were required that public schools had to verify citizenship/legal resident status I would laugh and laugh and laugh and laugh.
 
Back