US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It has nothing to do with consumer protection, that's just a nice sounding name to stop people from looking into what they actually do.
They do promulgate regulations about banks and credit, like requiring banks to provide certain information when they deny you a mortgage. But a lot of those regulations are simultaneously promulgated by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve. Like, if you look at the Code of Federal Regulations, you'll see a copy+paste set of regulations that are in two different chapters but say the exact same thing.

As someone who knows more about CFPB regulations than 99% of people simply because I've actually looked into the CFR for work reasons, I can certainly say that there are areas in the regulatory codes where the CFPB is not needed simply because their work is duplicated by other agencies.
 
View attachment 6958148
Acktually, Jersh... It's helpful to a few people! So you're just wrong!
I actually do wanna know more about how bad the CFPB is, or how it's not as effective as some people have claimed.
Long story short: it is inconsistent.

Longer story: if you are an internet pariah like Dear Sneeder, Alex Jones, or (briefly) the Trump family, they will not help you. If you're an ordinary person, they're more likely to help. This flies in the face of what government should do. Government should be impartial with regards to the law and helping citizens who have not broken the law. Josh, for all his vulgarity, has not broken a single US law. However, because he went against the globalhomo zeitgeist, he was debanked and denied help from the government. This is not how it should work.
 
Longer story: if you are an internet pariah like Dear Sneeder, Alex Jones, or (briefly) the Trump family, they will not help you. If you're an ordinary person, they're more likely to help. This flies in the face of what government should do. Government should be impartial with regards to the law and helping citizens who have not broken the law. Josh, for all his vulgarity, has not broken a single US law. However, because he went against the globalhomo zeitgeist, he was debanked and denied help from the government. This is not how it should work.
Yeah that's pretty bad. Imagine if Bernie got hit with the same thing because he spoke against the party. People on the Left would be absolutely furious over this. This shouldn't happen to anyone regardless, so it seems like this is gonna be a net positive.
 
Fourth, the eradication of inheritance. This is a bit of a stretch, but hear me out

you missed a step

what was intended was the creation of family lawfare between parents and children

parents who refuse to allow their children to poison themselves and neuter/spay themselves: abusers. the children need to be supported in seeking freedom.

the pattern already exists in NYC and on the west coast - youth homeless shelters and services. this was in the works, set and ready to go under president hilary clinton, it would have been rolled out first in Oregon - youth dormitories for anyone mad at mom and dad. but mom and dad still have to fund you and we have lawyers ready to bring the case.

everything angry males say on the internet about why people can't get married - that men are afraid of losing all their money to a biased court system? it was about to come true. having children would have meant risking the state charging you for them to go get raped by elder troons in a dorm. and you'd be paying for your angry kid until their mid20s.

that was the endgame of pushing trans stuff
 
I'm anti-straw in general. You grip your drink with your big boy hands and put it to your mouth, going "AHHHHWWWyeahh" with each gulp. Old fashioned? I don't need a faggy straw. Margarita? No thanks, I can't gum the edge with a straw. Coke? I don't drink soda, but if I did, I would guzzle that shit and enjoy the syrup to the fullest without the plastic taste of a straw tainting it.

Bring back American masculinity. No dick-sucking lips of straws. Even bitches can take a big glup, pop off the top, chug that shit and slam on the table getting syrup specks everywhere while saying "Ughngff". If you use a straw, you might as well put a dick in your mouth and one in your ass, faggot.
Sorry, I legally have to use a silly faggy little bendy straw while kicking my feet on my hanna montana bed and blaring pop songs and reading a magazine about the latest fashion and how prince harry was impregnated by his wife.
 
I tried making it with AI, it didn't like being put in specific places so this is the best I got.
View attachment 6958245View attachment 6958250

I think you've got to prompt it better. See if you can get it to spit out something modeled after Randy from the Medicinal Fried Chicken episode of South Park.

medicinal-fried-chicken.jpg

Also, let this be a lesson to all future children that you should make sure to pick an inappropriate but silly screen name so that if the news media ever finds evidence of your teenaged shitposting, they'll all look completely ridiculous talking about it on television.
 
As states grow more politically polarized, the difference between good and bad governance is coming into sharper relief for voters. Enough people are noticing in Illinois that some counties want to secede from the Land of Lincoln and join a state that isn’t ruled by public unions and their political yes-men.
At first I thought this meant seceding from the Union, but seceding from their own State to create a new one? That is... weird.
 
look I'm enjoying all the winning as much as everyone but let's not go crazy here

normal people will never, ever, ever even know who chris chan is unless the TV tells them

well I really mean us Thunderdomers. Cuz yah...some part of this site are definitely not normal.

Really I just mean the sentiments we express here are far more mainstream then would be expected because unlike 99% of the internetz we can talk openly without fear of censorship or reprisal.

I would bet that if the internet was actually free and open like it is supposed to be then opinions like the ones you find in A&H would be far more widespread. But instead you see massive control and censorship everywhere so only the "correct" opinions are seen. Leading to the shit that has happened over the last 15 years.

I often wonder if in a hundred years will school children be learning about a hero named Moon and a villainous freak named Fong.
 
Back