US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
We should normalize allowing state lines to be redrawn with the will of the people. The California coast would be a lot more neutered if it was just a few city states seperate from the red countryside.

yes and no

the system we have is excellent at slowing this kind of thing down because the implications are so complex

on a federal level it's going to be a wash because the liberal areas retain population and therefore more representation in the house but the conservative areas get representation in the senate

the real issue is state government and state taxes. the major issue there is that if the rural counties of illinois and oregon join indiana and idaho respectively there will be less to zero brake on the insanity.

there are LDS components to interstate secession as well that need to be kept in check
 
Not really, Most of Illinois is red, but has to live under tyranny of blue Chicago cause Chicago has more people niggercattle, and so the red farmer counties have no real say in their governance. If I was them I'd secede too.
The only major blue holdouts are all of Chicago, Springfield, and Champaign-Urbana-Savoy. The rest, like you said, is blood red.
 
From Alex Jones

Excellent. AC/DC should play that video when they do it live.
:sighduck:Beautiful. Perfect. Glorious.
Brought a tear to my eye.

We should normalize allowing state lines to be redrawn with the will of the people. The California coast would be a lot more neutered if it was just a few city states seperate from the red countryside.
I would move to Jefferson in a fucking heartbeat and bring all my money and business with me. No question.

Not really, Most of Illinois is red, but has to live under tyranny of blue Chicago cause Chicago has more people niggercattle, and so the red farmer counties have no real say in their governance. If I was them I'd secede too.
The only major blue holdouts are all of Chicago, Springfield, and Champaign-Urbana-Savoy. The rest, like you said, is blood red.
Familiarity breeds contempt.
 
It's because trannies are the perfect Globohomo Golem. They accomplish multiple things at once. First, they get people addicted to never ending forever drugs. You're stuck on drugs for the rest of your life that are extremely profitable for pharmaceutical companies. These drugs are not cheap either. The procedures aren't cheap. To tranny max, you have to have a lot of money. That's why you see so many trannies in high paying tech jobs.

Second, it lowers the population because these people will not and most often, cannot reproduce. You successfully end family lineages and end nuclear families. These people are genetic dead ends. The real goal though that I don't think people talk about, is that the real goal is to end TWO family lines; not just one. They want to end the family line of the tranny, plus anyone they date. That's why the whole "It's straight if they're trans" is a thing. They're not killing one bird with one stone. They're trying to kill two. That's why these drugs basically castrate you, even if you're an MTF dating a female, you still can't reproduce.

Third, you create a population of people that are complete servitude oriented. These people cannot exist without their HRT, and as a Democrat, I can lord these drugs over their heads and get them to do anything I want. If I want them to vote for a candidate, I make a narrative that my candidate will give HRT and the other will ban it. It's an automatic narrative vocal base of psychotic slaves. It's like having an entire support network of drug addicts working for you. I will make them ruin every company to shove their narratives down everyone's throat. They're the perfect moral weapon because stupid people buy into the narrative of Live and Let Live. They're an army of perfect slaves using weaponized morality.

There's a fourth goal though, and I don't see anyone on this site ever talking about. Mostly because it hasn't really become a factor yet. This is a more long term goal of the trannydom. One that won't happen until trannyhood becomes a widely accepted thing. However, it's easily the most sinister and probably was a socially wargamed endgame for this whole endeavor.

Fourth, the eradication of inheritance. This is a bit of a stretch, but hear me out. How many of these trannies have good relationships with their parents? It's practically none, except the most psychotic of them. They all have terrible relationships with their parents and many are likely being written out of their wills in favor of their brothers and sisters. You often see trannies having little or no contact. The act of trooning out usually destroys the relationship. Even if they don't, they're trannies. Where is that inheritance going to go? You can't take money with you when you die. They have no kids. So where is it going? Look at the answers DINKs give. Basically nowhere, maybe a nephew or niece if you're lucky. Often to charity. Now imagine what would've happened if you had a long-term acceptance of trannydom. You'd have a sizeable and more importantly, very vocal, population of people who are basically communist slaves, who would happily cheer on for the removal of the concept of inheritance because they're either not going to have any themselves, or have no need for it. You would've seen a lot of push for how unfair inheritance is and how much it promotes inequality. Thankfully, we never got that far. But if you think that wasn't wargamed out, you're wrong. That was the next narrative coming.
There's one more thing, and it's more fundamental than all the others. And it's a well known one, thanks to my nigga Orwell:

“The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”​

And my nigga Voltaire:
Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.
And to Star Trek (episode Chain of Command, which is in part based on a similar 1984 scene) :
- Picard: What I didn't put in the report was that at the end, he gave me a choice - between a life of comfort... or more torture. All I had to do was to say that... I could see *five* lights, when in fact there were only four.
- Deanna Troi: You didn't say it?
- Picard: No. No. But I was going to. I would have told him anything. Anything at all. But more than that - I believed that I could see... five lights.

A large point of all the tranny shit is to make us, force us, berate us into rejecting an inherent, evident, observable, immutable truth we've known for as long as -and most likely even before- we've been human, in favor of a lie we must all participate in upholding. A lie that causes nothing but damage to absolutely everyone, individually and collectively, but uphold it we must.

Once that commanded disregard for your every sense and instinct is ingrained into the people (or at least they're too demoralized to go against it, even if they know it's wrong), they can sell you fucking any bullshit they want.

On the long run, trannies as a phenomenon are a civilization-killer.
 
It's because trannies are the perfect Globohomo Golem.
The first point should be that it allows them to deny reality for the sake of social justice. All of the bold faced lies they make rely on the same principle. Like how prices weren’t going up during Biden because he was the “right” choice, and you had campaign staffers of Kamala every say that if you can’t afford groceries you’re a chud who doesn’t buy on discount.

It’s very Orwellian. “Trans women are women” is a contradiction like “War is peace.” They’ll die on that hill because if they convince you to accept a blatant lie as truth then they can do anything to you.
 
So is Hitler an authoritarian or not?
Not comparing Trump to Hitler but plenty of more authoritarian forms of government than modern republican led US have either given or promoted arms ownership to the people or didn't regulate it at all.
The real difference here is that Nazi gun laws deliberately disarmed specific minorities or "enemies of the state" and empowered loyalists, no way the 2nd amendment (in the modern day) would be modified to go "yeah only white people has legal access to firearms now", because that directly goes against the purposes of having the right to bear arms in the first place.
 
From the TDS thread.
lmfao holy shit the guy that posted that video already made a weeping ai voice video saying he's quitting on tiktok. he's literally just complaining that the comments are negative so he's not posting on tiktok anymore. this is what the YourAnonCentral fag is trying to hype up.



Greetings, users of TikTok.

We regret to inform you of our departure from this social media platform. We simply cannot tolerate the negative voices any longer. We are consistently being criticized by the very voices we are attempting to help.

Hopefully, they are getting what they wish. And for everyone's sake, we hope they are planning to act since they claim Anonymous is not. You can see examples of such commenters in every video.

If these people change their attitudes and learn to appreciate our efforts, without spreading hostility, we may return. Challenging our perspectives, being skeptical, is much different than being hostile.

We will continue to work silently. Our DMs are always open, although we may not respond.
 
Back