Fourth, the eradication of inheritance. This is a bit of a stretch, but hear me out. How many of these trannies have good relationships with their parents? It's practically none, except the most psychotic of them. They all have terrible relationships with their parents and many are likely being written out of their wills in favor of their brothers and sisters. You often see trannies having little or no contact. The act of trooning out usually destroys the relationship. Even if they don't, they're trannies. Where is that inheritance going to go? You can't take money with you when you die. They have no kids. So where is it going? Look at the answers DINKs give. Basically nowhere, maybe a nephew or niece if you're lucky. Often to charity. Now imagine what would've happened if you had a long-term acceptance of trannydom. You'd have a sizeable and more importantly, very vocal, population of people who are basically communist slaves, who would happily cheer on for the removal of the concept of inheritance because they're either not going to have any themselves, or have no need for it. You would've seen a lot of push for how unfair inheritance is and how much it promotes inequality. Thankfully, we never got that far. But if you think that wasn't wargamed out, you're wrong. That was the next narrative coming.
Don't forget that troonery is also an important weapon in the fight to destroy the idea of the family as a unit with biological bonds. Think about:
"Love makes a family" "Families come in all shapes and sizes" "My wife might have carried my children but I transitioned and I'm a woman now so I'm their mother, because "mother" can mean anything!" "Parents don't have a right to control their children. Children have rights and if a parent denies their agency it's child abuse." "Children with abusive families can be welcomed by new, glitter families!"
What can be achieved by weakening or destroying all narratives related to biological bonds? We're seeing it already.
1. It makes it easier to push surrogacy. Since there's no inherent or sacred "link" between a mother and a child, it's all just an idea, then it's not wrong or weird for gay men to hire women to gestate babies for them.
2. It makes it easier to push biomedical and transhumanism experimentation, since gestating a baby is really a thing that anyone can do, and shouldn't transwomen have the chance to be mothers too? The ultimate aim was probably artificial wombs.
3. It will eventually make it easier for governments to take children away from parents who are "abusive," with an ever-widening definition of "abuse" that includes any actions that don't align with government propaganda. Families aren't real, remember, and love makes a family, and bigots obviously don't love their children. So it's
not horrific for the local team of government HR ladies to come and take someone's children because he questioned the necessity of a drag queen show. They're just protecting the kids from abuse!
The end goal here isn't to steal children (that's just a bonus), it's to keep people 100% in line and crush all dissent, since the government now has the power to easily take your kids if you do anything but clap and smile for the regime.
