For one serving? I know Americans are lax with sauces but you would use a tablespoon of pesto for one. Remember you use the same weight of herbs (if genovese, basil) in oil, not to mention pecorino and nuts which are also oily... You definitely couldn´t eat 100g of oil in one sitting.
well if you don't set an expiry time then they stick around.
I definitely use way more than that, maybe 3 or so. But I usually also eat a lot of pasta when I eat pasta. I definitely want it to be more than just barely visible.
I think the point was in regards to the "signal messages of the group are private and not be shared" that they claimed for Kayla's nudes shared to establish that Aaron should have known the pictures were private, since they had this agreement in place.
Aaron's response:
Wait. If he gets massively fucked up again, we might get lucky and he'll release the messages where he sends a dick pic to Aaron and professes his forbidden love for the Toe.
I won't say Nick's depravity and scummy behavior is bottomless. Since I just got saying the other night he's left Aaron's kid's out of this (unlike the pedo Melton).
It is not really clear if "moving in" = "buying the house".
So Nick can share content of the sealed case now but bodycam footage was impossible because "sealed case" and its illegal to share anything?
I dunno, is he? All I read there is Aaron saying it's a bad idea to move into that house, and expressing regret that Nick moved the previous couple out of the house. I don't see any serious consideration. Unless he's trying to imply it's in the censored part.
The body cam would be part of the criminal case.
This is how I'm expecting the JFK assassination files to be when they're released: a half-redacted snippet without full context.
IIRC he used the sealing of the CPS case as an excuse why the bodycam footage could not be released.
Yeah, and he's also argued that the search warrant was totally invalid because it was COG's reuploaded copy of the cokestream the cops watched, and not one taken directly from one of his channels.
Oh you are absolutely right, I did not want to argue the validity of Nick's legal analysis. Just saying that he flip-flops around and used the CHIPS case as his cover to claim something was illegal to make public (to avoid publication of the bodycam footage without actually having to say he opposes it), only to now openly discuss stuff that would have been sealed with that case anyway.
I think we all need to take a step back and appreciate the irony of a middle-aged woman with purple hair turning out to be more mentally stable than a married man with five kids.
