Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 66 13.8%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 56 11.7%
  • This Year

    Votes: 74 15.4%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 165 34.4%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 119 24.8%

  • Total voters
    480
Status
Not open for further replies.
Mr. Greer states he would be “happy to
provide [Defendants] with a copy of the restraining order,” apparently conceding that he has
access to this single document
and that producing it is not inconvenient, expensive, or overly
burdensome to Mr. Greer.
Even the court sounds sceptical that this restraining order exists. Perhaps someone follows Russell's threads.
 
Mssrs. is technically the most correct and proper way to refer to a more than one man that is referred to as Mr. I don't think I've ever seen it used in a document before.
That makes sense. I grew up in Canada so I've never seen it used in any other way than the French salutation.

I swear I learn more shit on KiwiFarms than I do YouTube.
 
Mssrs. is technically the most correct and proper way to refer to a more than one man that is referred to as Mr. I don't think I've ever seen it used in a document before.

It is the abbreviation of Messrs. which is pronounced Messers.
Messrs. is commonly used in Commonweath countries to refer to two or more men by name. Mainly used in legal documentation, but I've also seen it used in the corporate world.

Mmes. (Mesdames) is the traditional female equivalent, but this appears to be losing ground to Mses. (which is exactly what it sounds like viz. the plural of Ms). I've always used Mmes, and probably will continue to do so.
 
Plural of Mr. Instead of saying Mister Hardin and Mister Moon, you could says Misters Hardin and Moon". Or use the abbreviation of Mssrs.
I always read it as "Massahs" like some kind of shackled, beaten-down, well-reared Southern slave from an old timey show. Makes me feel like I'm the nigger of the Court, which Josh very much often is. Brings everything to life for me.
 
Messrs. is commonly used in Commonweath countries to refer to two or more men by name. Mainly used in legal documentation, but I've also seen it used in the corporate world.

Mmes. (Mesdames) is the traditional female equivalent, but this appears to be losing ground to Mses. (which is exactly what it sounds like viz. the plural of Ms). I've always used Mmes, and probably will continue to do so.
To add to this - for a while French was the international lingua franca in Western Europe, especially for international relations + the educated classes. To some extent, this also applied to the United States since we interacted with Europe. This is not true any more and has not been for years, but every now and then you see (usually very dated and formal) style guides saying that French or French-based words are preferred in certain communications.

The biggest vestige of this is diplomatic credentials - those will often be written in French irrespective of whether the host country or ambassador's home country speaks it.
 
To add to this - for a while French was the international lingua franca in Western Europe, especially for international relations + the educated classes. To some extent, this also applied to the United States since we interacted with Europe. This is not true any more and has not been for years, but every now and then you see (usually very dated and formal) style guides saying that French or French-based words are preferred in certain communications.

The biggest vestige of this is diplomatic credentials - those will often be written in French irrespective of whether the host country or ambassador's home country speaks it.

With the United States, in our infancy we had very close ties with France. They were one of our earliest allies after declaring independence and helped us defeat the Red Coats. Also, many of our Founding Fathers were massive Francophiles, like Benjamin Franklin, and a lot of our early important buildings were based on classical French architecture.
 
Also in 4 days we get to find out whether or not Hardin and Greer came to an agreement regarding fees(lol no way they did).

That should be tomorrow -- it's 14 days from Jan. 28th, which was the original deadline for Hardin to send the numbers to Greer. Hardin is to file the affidavit and cost memorandum promptly with the court if they don't come to an agreement within those fourteen days. Then Greer gets seven days to file a response, and then the judge rolls the dice and decides for everybody.
 
I don’t have the restraining order because I had to delete documents to make space for my latest hooker lawsuit.
You mean you deleted evidence that related to your case after stating that it was beneficial to your case? That sounds like evidence tampering.

(On the off-chance he decided to try your strategy lmao)
 
Rate optimistic if you think Greer will actually produce a restraining order, perhaps even filed in the state mentioned (but filed in Puerto Rico will be fine I’m sure)

Rate dumb if you think Greer will submit the form he submitted ASKING for a restraining order (and neglect to mention he didn’t get one).

Rate horrifying if you think Greer will badly attempt to forge a restraining order.

Rate autistic if you think he’ll produce an hitherto unknown and genuine restraining order against a whore or horse or a bagel shop or something.

Rate political spergin if you think he’s just going to snap and file at least six or more pages (one nearly blank) of plightsperging.

Rate lunacy if you think he’ll just ignore it all until well after the deadline (at least 12 hours)
 
Yeah makes sense given that the AI can be gained only if a party is proven to be the cause of loss of evidence or a witness.
And good move to not wait for the Court to do the determination, builds good will and it's another chance to wave Russ's lies and bad faith in front of the Court, hopefully it doesn't go unnoticed.
It shows the court what the defense is having to go through dealing with the vast bad faith contortions of the pro se retard.

It's going to end up much worse for Russ than an Adverse Inference. His bills going to go up.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back