All this talk of taking his intellectual property to satisfy judgements. No. Take stake in brothel business along with naming rights. Name it Chuck's, formerly Sneed's...
Seriously though
That's also increadibly merciful. Hardin could have asked for three times that and probably gotten it. All moot anyway since Greer probably doesn't have 50 dollars, let alone 5000
There is this concept out there that if someone doesnt have the money or loses all the money, they dont owe the money and no one will come out for it. Whether it be FoodieBeauty or austingamble crippling tax debts, or in this instance with Geer potentially owing $5000 being "moot" because he's broke. Just because someone is broke today, does not mean they will be broke tomorrow.
First, 5 grand is not an unsurmountable amount of money for anyone, let alone a business man who owns multiple intellectual properties and LLC's. Its not like the judge is ordering 5 million.
The award should be as sky high as possible, and in this regard I'm kind of disappointed in Hardin for not going after the maximum, because these numbers are deterrents against others wanting to vexatiously litigate against the site or null directly. I can see the value in why he was modest in his approach, and not going for the maximum likely removes any real argument from Greer's rebuttal denying him that win of talking down the fees.
But going after the 5 grand even if at the moment Greer, or anyone, has absolutely nothing is absolutely worth it. Greer wont always have nothing. He eeks out a living, and garnishing those wages even for just $50 every 2 weeks for years, will grind on Greer that entire time. It removes $50 of luxury, maybe some chapstick for that drooling mouth, or his favorite bed time snack gets removed from the grocery list. Greer wants to open a brothel, but has trouble raising money. Having a negative debt on his credit gives him even more trouble even if the brothel is through an LLC. That mere $5,000 will be a thorn in Greer's side until it is cleared. Its not about taking money from someone who has nothing, its a claim against anything they might get in the future. Maybe he finds a winning lotto ticket, or gets a great job...well the joy of the first payment is gone because it belongs to null.