Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 66 14.0%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 56 11.9%
  • This Year

    Votes: 74 15.7%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 160 34.0%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 114 24.3%

  • Total voters
    470
I'm trying to see it this way.

Hardins billing was more than reasonable. Having it knocked down to a grand is even more lenient. If he still refuses to pay after the court gave him a break he may turbo piss off the district judge and run out of favors.

Keep in mind Greer already told the magistrate what he thinks his sanction should be if anything, and this is 10x that amount. We are going to see him whine about this, I'm very certain as he's already made a habit of straight up telling the court they are wrong.
 
I'm trying to see it this way.

Hardins billing was more than reasonable. Having it knocked down to a grand is even more lenient. If he still refuses to pay after the court gave him a break he may turbo piss off the district judge and run out of favors.

Keep in mind Greer already told the magistrate what he thinks his sanction should be if anything, and this is 10x that amount. We are going to see him whine about this, I'm very certain as he's already made a habit of straight up telling the court they are wrong.
Hopefully the judge decides Greer owes Null $2,000 after not paying this $1,000 and another couple years tard sperging. That'll surely show Russ that the law is sick of his shenanigans. Gimpface will not learn his lesson because he's gotten away with it for years at this point. It's like letting your dog piss all over your carpet for four years, then smacking it with a newspaper, and expecting it to learn. You're the one who let it turn your home into a toilet. It's not the dog's fault.

It's over bros, the Watkins stole another webzone.
Dis a Q-zone now.
He didn't spell it trvst, so I do not.
 
So, Greer's Objection is granted it 'in part' looks like, which part?
Nothing. Legally not a single point is conceded, he is wrong 100% on everything he raised.

Ok, so now we cure it right? We cure exactly, specifically the damage caused as inevitably certified by the court, right?
No LMAO arbitrary symbolic amount that you know doesn't cure the damage because poor PS IFP retard.

And this comes after the Hardster had to work extra hours to produce the detailed costs table. Fuck you DJ, really.
 
Still, reducing $5K down to $1K is ridiculous, though I guess the judge is just taking into account that Greer is homeress or something.
🌈Maybe the judge is doing the same thing as Hardin? Go out of the way to be reasonable so his refusal becomes even more ridiculous. When this is finally put to bed the appeal court cannot say they didn't treat him with kid gloves.🌈
 
He did an itemised list of why Shitlips is extremely wrong and a dumbass, but an >80% discount for the absolutely fuckery he's been up to is a little steep.

Mr. Greer’s IFP status and the fact that this is this pro se litigant’s first sanction
Oh, okay. He just needs to start stacking sanctions. I'm sure that can be arranged.

Second, ordering monetary sanctions was a “lesser sanction” in comparison to excluding
Mr. Greer’s witnesses and evidence. If anything, exclusion of those items would be more likely
to have the effect of dismissing the case compared to a monetary fine.
If only he had any witnesses or evidence...
 
They're both retarded so it could be difficult to keep track.
I am sad that I have to inform you, that 2 screenshots with like 3 fucking lines is something that you should be able to read. My bad for expecting reading in a discussion forum.
So, Greer's Objection is granted it 'in part' looks like, which part?
The part about lowering the amount.
 
Hardins billing was more than reasonable. Having it knocked down to a grand is even more lenient. If he still refuses to pay after the court gave him a break he may turbo piss off the district judge and run out of favors.
Russ said he'd appeal it until he'd pay nothing. He's going to be emboldened by this, without a doubt.

It's annoying isn't it, Trump gets into office, and all these awful people, Rekieta, Torswats, Russel, get off with nothing but a clip to the ear. Every reaction has an equal and opposite reaction.
 
Dodging collections agencies for the rest of his life while trying to accrue capital for his brothel is a future I wish for Rusty.
You get your wish. It's his future, his present and his past. This is a man who's already been evicted for non-payment, been chased by a loan company, had his car repossessed, and had a costs order enforced against him - and that's just the cases we know about. Dodging creditors is his lifestyle.
 
Back