This seems meaningless, it's a treaty organization, what does it mean to unofficially integrate? They're already being supplied by NATO countries, if they're not actually shielded by the treaty it doesn't change anything.
That's sad. Segregation held injustices and kept apart people who maybe could have been closer, but the one thing it ensured was a cohesive black community, and one which could provide for itself. If you can't use the whites only thing you have to build your own, and staff it, whatever it is. Forced integration has its own injustices, but the worst effect is probably just the degradation of the viability of black businesses.
And then if you do away with naive colorblind ideals and say no, the black community is separate, they shouldn't integrate, what is there left? Only to tell them it's not your fault you can't do anything, you were wronged, and pay them just to exist. Already the communities are disinvested, the families broken. You don't get real black pride just by saying the words over and over.
Real integration, assimilation even, with the accompanying erasure of culture is the only way through at this point (or TND, I know, you don't have to say it, and it's not going to happen).
All I know is it became impossible to date African American girls after Obama's second term instigated a shitty nu-Civil Rights Movement. A ton of black girls turned into self-proclaimed activists, which really meant they found any reason to browbeat white guys. The ones who didn't got bullied by their peers. It is what it is.
chuck schumer "if the senate held a secret ballot today, most republicans would likely vote against him."
yeah, that's the point, you fucking nigger. they're not being strong-armed by trump. they're being strong-armed by their VOTERS. their VOTERS want them to confirm kennedy, you absolutely dishonest agenigger faggot.
the speech here does sound like he fully expects kennedy to be confirmed here at least so that's nice.
unsurprisingly, they're trying to be dishonest about trump bringing down prices. let me assure you, prices in my local grocery and other places are actually lower. this nigger is straight up lying to you about this shit and hoping you don't notice.
all those trade wars he's 'threatening' have literally worked every single time. mexico AND canada completely cucked to both tariff demands. they are so fucking pathetic. and to say that corporation CEOs don't want tariffs? well fucking obviously they don't want tariffs. that's where they'll be losing lots of money they could've avoided losing by buying and building american.
he keeps trying so hard to say trump isn't trying hard enough to lower prices... at the confirmation of robert f. kennedy, for the HHS. he keeps saying trump isn't focused enough on fighting to lower costs, without mentioning that the dems have done everything humanly possible to make it impossible for him to do his job.
i don't really hate very many people, but i genuinely hate these people. this is absolutely fucking disgusting lying to the american peoples' faces. i hope chuck schumer gets the full brunt of an islamic truck of peace for his faggotry.
The federal government has no money. It was money stolen from the American taxpayer. The IRS should be destroyed, and then all parties involved should be in custody.
Every single corrupt financial transaction can be reversed. The physical objects, the paper money, the digital currency in a bank account. It all still exist and can be taken back. This isn't about cutting spending its about getting back to zero.
I mean exactly what I said. It's what Sweden did for the last 3050 years. Despite being officially neutral, their equipment complied with NATO standards and was mostly interchangeable, and there was an unofficial understanding that an attack on Sweden would prompt a military response from NATO.
When I was young, I thought the idea of a state sponsored war on Christianity was absurd. The easiest way to get black pilled on this subject today is to trace the USAID money. You see, much of USAID spending goes straight to manufactured consensus. And Church is ripe for this. Now, ignoring the dyke cunt that lectured Trump who was receiving millions in tax dollars, let's check out another.
Meet Reverand Brent Hawkes. A faggot sex creep and fake Christian. View attachment 6977133
Brent oversaw one of the first gay marriages in Canada, was named one of the "500 most influential gay men in the world" by the European gay magazine Mate; and in 2013 he was inducted into the Queer Hall of Fame.
He entered politics in the 90s and, you guessed it, ran on gay rights. In his later career, as seen below, he's known as a fixture at gay marriages and gay pride parades. View attachment 6977144
Brent Hawkes is part of the Metropolitan Community Church. Described as a LGBT-affirming mainline Protestant Christian denomination, they collect your tax dollars through USAID and install a weird sex pervert in your town/city to preach anything but Christian values.
Before you ask, yes, Brent Hawkes likes little boys. View attachment 6977149
Hawkes was a teacher in the 1970s, making him a sex pest super combo, and was seen by witnesses abusing minors. Unfortunately, despite multiple witnesses coming forward, enough time had passed that the charges were dropped.
Anyway, here is Brent Hawkes making news recently, leading his congregation to committing the only unforgivable sin: View attachment 6977158
You see, in the Bible, it's interpreted that the only unforgivable sin a person can commit is rejecting The Holy Spirit. And, of course, rejecting any part of The Holy Trinity is rejecting The Holy Spirit.
I’ll never understand how someone can be gay or pro gay and still claim to be Christian. There are multiple instances where the Bible clearly states not to have gay sex. Enough times to where you can’t just cherry pick around them. Even the New Testament mentions it pretty clearly.
I’ve looked at the semantics people use to try and reinterpret them and they still make zero sense.
Like let’s look at a few, and we’ll even leave out Leviticus because that’s always their scapegoat.
Corinthians 6:9-6:10
Or do you not know that wrongdoers will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor men who have sex with men nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.
Pretty damn clear that fags will not go to heaven.
Romans 1:26-1:27
Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error.
Not only are fags mentioned, but lesbians as well, just to keep score.
Timothy 1:8-1:11
We know that the law is good if one uses it properly. We also know that the law is made not for the righteous but for lawbreakers and rebels, the ungodly and sinful, the unholy and irreligious, for those who kill their fathers or mothers, for murderers, for the sexually immoral, for those practicing homosexuality, for slave traders and liars and perjurers—and for whatever else is contrary to the sound doctrine that conforms to the gospel concerning the glory of the blessed God, which he entrusted to me.
Probably the most damning and it goes out of its way to explain that the laws exist because the fags exist as well since normal people wouldn’t need to be told not to have gay sex.
I seriously cannot for the life of me understand how you can be a man of the church and ignore one of the most commonly reoccurring aspects of the faith.
The strawman is always “so do we stone the disobedient? Should we keep slaves?”
Neither Stoning nor slavery was upheld by Christian doctrine. They were the laws of the nations at the time. It’s like the people making these arguments can’t grasp historical context once the Bible is mentioned.
I’m not even religious. Why the hell am I a better fucking Christian than this “reverend”?
On the contrary, countries ripped apart by war often descend into civil war after the previous conflict ends unless they're occupied ala Japan being occupied by the US or Germany being split up and occupied by the Soviets and the US. For example, Imperial Russia's civil war after exiting WWI
Ackshually the Russian Civil War kicked off before Russia's formal exit from WW1 (as the Soviet Union), the first hostilities popping off as a reaction to the Bolsheviks' coup against the Provisional Government of Kerensky (the October Revolution). In the initial phase of German-Soviet negotiations, the Germans 'only' asked for the territories they were in control of, namely Russian Poland and the southern Baltics, like so:
However in an act of supreme retardation and/or 40D underwater backgammon in his capacity as a German spy charged with the mission of ruining Russia as hard as possible to Berlin's benefit, Lenin simultaneously ripped that shit up and disbanded the Russian army, the policy of so-called 'no war nor peace' as Trotsky (its other architect) called it. Naturally the Germans (and Austrians) proceeded to take over the northern Baltics, Ukraine & Belarus with hardly any resistance, so that the actual peace treaty which terminated German-Soviet hostilities (signed in 1918, months after the October Revolution) ended up looking more like this:
Keep in mind that back in 1917-18 Ukrainian nationalism was a much weaker, more ephemereal force than it is today, and a lot more people both inside and outside of Russia genuinely still thought of it as the 'Little Russia' in 'All the Russias', nothing more, compared to today; the anti-Bolshevik Whites got a huge boost initially from portraying themselves as the 'real' Russian nationalists who wanted to reverse the Reds selling out what they claimed to be a fundamental part of the Russian nation to outside enemies, both the Reds/Blacks (anarchists) and Whites fought the Ukrainians, and the Ukrainian army of this time period was so weak and unmotivated that once abandoned by the Germans, it didn't win a single major battle against any of the above (or Poland). Meanwhile the Entente Powers - Britain, France, etc. - regarded Ukraine as primarily a project of the Central Powers & their collaborators, which is why they didn't help the Ukrainians when the latter were getting roflstomped by literally every side in the Russian Civil War.
So when do we get around to cleaning out the colleges?
Not to PL here, but I've listened to multiple professors go on anti-trump rants, equating him to hitler and the holocaust. God the end of academia cannot come fast enough.
How can we get these communist professors out of schools?
So when do we get around to cleaning out the colleges?
Not to PL here, but I've listened to multiple professors go on anti-trump rants, equating him to hitler and the holocaust. God the end of academia cannot come fast enough.
How can we get these communist professors out of schools?
I thought that was the point of eliminating their funding and the DoE. Everyone is a communist and a liberal until they run out of other people's money.
