I hate Schumer so much, I’m glad Trump called him a pussy during his dinner roast.
You think you hate Schumer, but you don't hate him enough.
I keep hearing about egg prices, limits on egg purchases, and empty egg shelves but when practically the exact same thing happened a few years ago it was never talked about by the media(or it was downplayed).
Breaking News: Democrats provide evidence Trump is capable of controlling Bird Flu with his tweets.
I think the reason trump is talking about administering Gaza and relocating the people is largely a pressure tactic in regards to Hamas holdouts and threatening to remove their human shields/clear the way to implode their tunnel networks.
Otherwise the only possible benefit I see to occupying some sand next to Israel is that it’s close to Iran and we could be less reliant on Israel for that.
Agree on the first. Its not a serious statement, its an unreasonable position you say you're taking to open negotiations to put the other party on the backfoot.
for the second:
Lets establish, right out the gate, getting involved in the Mideast is fucking retarded, the US should have never gone in before, shouldn't go in again, even if Trump is serious it would be a fucking disater waiting to happen.
HOWEVER
If you ignore the gigantic downsides of being now directly involved in mideast retard wars forever,
There is massive economic advantage to that region that was never able to realized due to it being occupied by violent inbred retarded sandniggers. There is an excelent port, and with thousands of acres of now-empty land you could build port facilities, factories, etc. The weather is great for manufacturing, there is incredible access to resources both in the region and via import due to close proximity to Suez. And that's before we get into the tourist aspects with the beaches and close location to the Holyland.
If you ignore that occupying it would suck the US into mideast bloodwars for a hundred years and just focus on the economic potential, its a great idea.
LSU tried to fire one such professor just a couple weeks ago. Then a judge ordered them to allow the guy back in to keep teaching.
Gonna be 100%: that professor is a faggot, but he wasn't saying anything that shouldn't be protected free speech. Except his forbidding recording in his class.
But also that faggot would be the first in line to pillory anyone with opposite beliefs to his own, so I think he should be fired and die pennyless sucking cock for dick in a NO alley.
Back in high school, I learned my church had been teaching for a long while that same-sex attraction was not a sin because human attraction is natural since we as a people have to get along with each other. Homosexual acts are sinful in the same way that other acts of sexual immorality is sinful in that it abuses the act of procreation reserved for the lawfully-wedded husband and wife. Paul said that it would be wonderful for all men to live chaste lives so they could focus on Christ's ministry, however, he recognizes that there are people who just cannot keep their libido under control, so he encourages those men to marry ASAP. So gays are not prohibited from coming unto Christ, it's just going to be harder for them to live the law of chastity for the rest of their lives and many of them do not have the willpower to keep it in their pants, so that's why you have a lot of self-loathing gays who happen to still be religious.
I don't know how many gays converted to Christianity back then and were able to live chaste, though I assume it was easier to do back then because society wasn't 100% accepting of them regardless and men were still expected to get married and have children, and also they didn't have a labeling symbol to gather together under like the rainbow.
This is pretty much my opinion, except I do think that same-sex attraction is a sin (but a sin of thought is different from a sin of deed). I also really feel from a governmental perspective what people do in their private lives shouldn't be the business of government.
There is also, back in the medieval period, an issue with...
Sort of as the Afghanis don't believe just because two guys are buttfucking that doesn't make them
gay because they aren't in love, there was a lot of manlove that wasn't viewed as "homosexual" because there was no lingering attachment.
Even making that statement is buying into their concept though. The Bible does not say to kill fags, just that they will not go to heaven and that they’re sinners. It also goes on to talk about the lusts that try to tempt men and include homosexuality as one of them.
They want people to assume the Bible wants you to kill all fags because then they seem reasonable by comparison.
Sodom and Gomorrah were not destroyed just because of gay people. They were destroyed because they such great hives of sin that they couldn’t be saved no matter what.
Leviticus 20:13
Hard to move fast in a shadow war with the US
But the US is cucked and gay and NATO equipment is all useless wunderwaffen. How can mighty stonk Russia be stopped with 5x the men in golf carts for three years?
