US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I have a relative who's fat and a dumbass and didn't realize they were pregnant until five months in and while she's not a heavy drinker she is a regular one. Between that and the whole raising your kid with an iPad as well as being a doormat for her son it makes me question less "was I this dysfunctional at his age?"
Poor kid never had a chance.
 
I think consuming as a or providing alcohol to a visibly pregnant woman should be a felony ngl
as a positive side effect, fat chicks will clear out of bars once they no longer get served because its impossible to tell
Who are you to deny the unborn the enjoyment of a few cocktails to unwind after a long day of dodging abortions?
 
A ship might be able to, a nuclear reactor cant, if flow of water over the core is disrupted or even shifted, you will start dealing with immediate and long term knock on effects

this isent some ford ranger that can get rear ended and the boys just get a crowbar and bend it back into shape
It's like you think they can't use the thousands of tons of Jet-A on board to power emergency diesel generators for electrical power to ensure water is pumped through the primary system, and heat is removed by dumping the secondary steam overboard.
 
So are we not worried about the 100 ton nuclear reactor at sea that just got whacked by a Panamanian bulk carrier?
Well yeah, I sure hope the freighter's crew got out in time. That ship's fucked. The aircraft carrier? Nah.

A ship might be able to, a nuclear reactor cant, if flow of water over the core is disrupted or even shifted, you will start dealing with immediate and long term knock on effects

this isent some ford ranger that can get rear ended and the boys just get a crowbar and bend it back into shape
Yes, this is a situation where "that'll buff right out."

These are some of the biggest ships ever built. They carry the best-engineered and hardiest nuclear reactors ever built by human beings. Do you actually think a single collision with a smaller vessel is going to somehow impact coolant flow or physical conditions in a naval reactor buried deep within the absurdly thick and strong hull of one of the biggest ships on earth?
 
Nuclear reactors on carriers and subs are extremely secure, they're honestly the last thing you'll really worry about if either is damaged
Ok seems like alot of people dont get what im saying or the real issue

If i put your head in a football helmet and then hit the helmet with a ball peen hammer, even decently hard, the helmet will be just fine, your head wont "go anywhere" its firmly secure to your neck

BUT your fucking brain inside your head is going "FUCKING OW DUDE, DONT DO THAT"

is the metaphor starting to make sense? The carrier is the helmet, you are the nuclear reactor and the ball peen hammer is the other ship.

Im not worried about it "melting down" or falling off the ship or something, im worried when you wack something complicated like that hard you can fuck up alignments within the system you cant see or "secure down"

How do hydrodynamics within the core work when an external force applies a lateral 10g shove onto it? does that momentary lack of water of super heated components lead to excess heat in one area that melts a panel that will over time lead to a failure?

you see what im getting at? its a nuanced issue
 
Nuclear reactors are pretty safe when you build them properly and don't do what the Soviets did and completely fuck up your safety shutdown system.
You mean turning off redunancies and doing an experiment in the middle of the night with a less experienced team is bound to cause an issue?

Hearing what happened that night in Chernobyl was a WTF moment.
 
Problem is, now the doomer economy is in the toilet we are going to have them flood the thread with any such minor setback and be annoying as shit.
Some schizo black nigress in cali calls a press conference that says fuck Trump and the doomer will swam it like flies round shit and post it in the thread to fill the need to doom.
Hearing what happened that night in Chernobyl was a WTF moment.
It set back the adoption of nuke power by 30 years. The soviets were fucking shit up left and right trying to keep their failed system afloat. The people in charge of the reactor cared more about ass covering, and not being shot or sent to a gulag. Than running a reactor in a safe way.
You can claim they were the first people in space. But they will never mention the massive fuck ups they had along the way.
dnjfutnfh9v81.jpg
 
How do hydrodynamics within the core work when an external force applies a lateral 10g shove onto it? does that momentary lack of water of super heated components lead to excess heat in one area that melts a panel that will over time lead to a failure?
It wasn't a 10g lateral shove, and these are circumstances for which an accident analysis has already be performed. Of course the whole system will require a shake down, and with the conservative nature of the Navy, they will most likely elect to refuel the reactor now to gain access for detailed inspections.
 
For a return to attractive architecture, I would nominate Art Deco. It is already well established in our cities, including most of the famous buildings in New York. Further, it can be easily adapted to the character of other cities or regions, such as the cheerful beachfront of Miami.1000043191.webp
Niagara_Mohawk_Building_1.jpgartdeco_thumb-scaled.jpgArt-Deco-Walking-Tour-1.jpg



America is blessed with some of the most wondrous examples of mother nature and well integrated buildings that reflect an enhance their surroundings should also be considered. The log cabin is also a traditional symbol of classic American virtues and history and should make a come back.


stringio.jpglog-184343301-57afe0ea5f9b58b5c27535c1.jpgfrench-country-min.jpg
 
Last edited:
How do hydrodynamics within the core work when an external force applies a lateral 10g shove onto it? does that momentary lack of water of super heated components lead to excess heat in one area that melts a panel that will over time lead to a failure?
Go find out and report back before shitting up the board with retarded conjecture
 
Ok seems like alot of people dont get what im saying or the real issue

If i put your head in a football helmet and then hit the helmet with a ball peen hammer, even decently hard, the helmet will be just fine, your head wont "go anywhere" its firmly secure to your neck

BUT your fucking brain inside your head is going "FUCKING OW DUDE, DONT DO THAT"

is the metaphor starting to make sense? The carrier is the helmet, you are the nuclear reactor and the ball peen hammer is the other ship.

Im not worried about it "melting down" or falling off the ship or something, im worried when you wack something complicated like that hard you can fuck up alignments within the system you cant see or "secure down"

How do hydrodynamics within the core work when an external force applies a lateral 10g shove onto it? does that momentary lack of water of super heated components lead to excess heat in one area that melts a panel that will over time lead to a failure?

you see what im getting at? its a nuanced issue
Gaht dayum, son. How is it you manage to come into the thread for so long, type so much, say so little, and still manage to just be generally wrong about everything?
 
As reported last night, Trump has officially signed an action on reciprocal tariffs, targeting all countries around the globe that have higher tariffs than the US. It appears that Trump has picked reciprocal in place of a inform tariff on all exports. That's just the start however: what is more important is that as we cautioned earlier, the US also appears set to retaliate against Europe's VAT buffer which could very well cripple the continent's exporters.

Here are the details, as BBG notes, the president signed a measure directing the US Trade Representative and Commerce secretary to propose new levies on a country-by-country basis in an effort to rebalance trade relations, a sweeping process that could take weeks or months to complete, leaving doubt as to when the tarifffs would take effect.

“I’ve decided, for purposes of fairness, that I will charge a reciprocal tariff, meaning whatever countries charge the United States of America,” Trump said in the Oval Office with Howard Lutnick standing by his side. “In almost all cases, they’re charging us vastly more than we charge them but those days are over.”

President @realDonaldTrump announces RECIPROCAL TARRIFFS! 🇺🇸 pic.twitter.com/3gdw11RkC6
— Margo Martin (@MargoMartin47) February 13, 2025

Fresh import taxes would be customized for each country, and will be meant to offset not just their own tariffs on US goods but also non-tariff barriers the nations impose in the form of unfair subsidies, regulations, value-added taxes, exchange rates and other factors that act to limit US trade, said an official, who briefed reporters before the announcement.

The VAT response is notable because as we noted last night, the tariff differential for the EU, for example, with and without VAT is massive and rises from just 2% (without VAT) to a whopping 18% with! And judging by Trump's comments, which said that the EU is "absolutely brutal" on trade, the inclusion of VAT is precisely meant to punish Europe.

As we discussed in greater depth last night, the chart below shows the amount that each country's VAT exceeds the US sales tax. And so, if indeed Trump imposes a reciprocal tariff policy also accounted for foreign VATs, it could add another 10% to the average US effective tariff rate.

Needless to say, that could be catastrophic to exporters, and Deutsche Bank's George Saravelos agrees writing that if reciprocal tariffs are applied on a VAT basis, "European countries would be much higher on the list of impacted countries given high consumption taxes." Like Goldman, the DB strategist notes that the overall US tariff rate would increase by more than 10% (figures below).

Reciprocal tariffs amount to Trump’s broadest action to address US trade deficits and what he characterizes as unfair treatment of American exports around the globe. Trump has already imposed 10% tariffs on Chinese goods and plans to slap 25% duties on all US steel and aluminum imports next month.

There's more: Trump told reporters that he would enact import taxes on cars, semiconductors and pharmaceuticals in addition to the reciprocal tariffs.

The text of Trump’s directive on tariffs was not immediately provided by the White House. Trump cited barriers in the EU, including a VAT, as an example of what the US is looking to respond to, while the official said Trump has also singled out Japan and South Korea as nations that he believes are taking advantage of the US, and thus could be targeted in his latest push.

The president said that he is hoping to have a discussion with other nations about how existing policies have created an imbalanced trade environment, the official said. And he’s more than happy to lower tariffs if countries want to pare their levies or remove other trade barriers, the official added.

Reciprocal tariffs are expected to hit hard in less-developed economies where average duties on US products are higher, according to Bloomberg Economics. It differs from a universal levy on all imports, as Trump proposed during the 2024 presidential campaign. The official said Trump could divert back to a global tariff strategy later on.

Trump announced his move just hours before he was set to host Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, whose country stands to be affected by reciprocal tariffs more than many other major trading partners. Trump has repeatedly criticized India’s its high tariff barriers.

According to Bloomberg, "Trump’s brinkmanship has injected uncertainty into the global economy, with businesses and consumers waiting to see how Trump proceeds on decision that could disrupt the US’s trade relationships with the rest of the world." According to others, Trump is merely responding to a world where all countries have higher tariffs than the US!
 
Ok seems like alot of people dont get what im saying or the real issue
We get it. We're saying "you're wrong."

These are naval reactors. They are literally constructed to operate on large (or giant) ships at sea, in open waters, under any and all conditions encountered by the vessel. They are designed to continue functioning safely (at full power) even at extreme lists that would endanger the safety of the vessel itself. They do not "hiccup" at every bump in the night.

They are not civilian reactors. They do not occupy an acre of land per unit. They are compact, optimized, insulated and isolated in the most secure area of the ship. They beat the hell out of these things before they're installed on a ship.

There won't be a Chernobyl aboard this aircraft carrier, now or in five years, as a result of this collision. If there's anything more than superficial damage to the carrier, it'll be to the exterior bulkheads, equipment or storage. Nothing at all related to (or supporting) the reactor exists anywhere this impact could possibly have an effect.
 
Kamala for gov, Walz for Senate isn't "learning nothing" it's more like these 2 are 100% perfection as political candidates and to say anything approaching otherwise would be close to admitting someone was right when they said otherwise.

Redditors and even some irl libs I know on fb are part of this and can't wait for her to run again for pres, their perfect candidate in a "fair election".

Deep inside themselves they know she's bad just like they know troons are just male rapists but internal thoughtstop processes are quashing that crimethink just like they're supposed to.
 
Back