Ukrainian Defensive War against the Russian Invasion - Mark IV: The Partitioning of Discussion

What does victory look like to you? Honest question. This is real world shit, not internet points. It is going to be give and take for peace. There will be cope and sneed on every side, but in the end the bloodshed will stop and life will resume. People will be able to rebuild, have families, and if all goes well, never fight eachother again.
Myself, I'm under no illusion Ukraine will get those territories back, not without an unpopular mass conscription and a genuine Lend Lease program.
The issues arise when the peace plan is just giving Russia a break so they can try again later.
And in such a servile tone too, goddamn Hesgeth is a faggot.
 
Myself, I'm under no illusion Ukraine will get those territories back, not without an unpopular mass conscription and a genuine Lend Lease program.
The issues arise when the peace plan is just giving Russia a break so they can try again later.
And in such a servile tone too, goddamn Hesgeth is a faggot.
Sending millions more to die because one guy sounds like a faggot is not a good reason not to make peace. My guy, eastern Europe as a whole is now fucked on a genetic scale on the level of one child policy China due to this war. Russia is not trying again. Their young men are fucking dead. Same with Ukraine. Once it stops it will not restart in Putin's lifetime; he will be dead and buried due to the generational crashout. Right now is the perfect time for peace.
 
Was that new hulls or upgrades to existing ones? (its really fucking hard to tell most times because only the milautist reporters will clarify the difference) I
recall there was talk to upgrade the last of the "desert storm" spec bradleys to the latest.
New hulls as replacements. The confusion is most understandable as U.S. Army is also having upgrades done to current existing Bradleys.

@No. 7 cat
Basically, this is looking like a reward for blundered, naked aggression born out of a strange MAGA worship of Russia.
It's not just that as an equally large part of it is the "fuck Obama and fuck Biden" mindset. As it is their fault for starting this particular mess and grafting off of it.
Coupled with over thirty plus years of fear mongering over eatern Europe nations trying and joining NATO that it will scare Russia into finally pushing the nuclear button. Hence the apparent cow-towing to Putin since he's the one with the nukes and not Zelensky who haves no nukes.
 
Last edited:
Trump's view on this war depend entirely on the day by day voices in his head. I wouldn't put much stock in stupid zigger talking points, even with "world peace" retards in close proximity.

More importantly, when are the Russians getting back Kherson?
lmao.jpg
 
You can see the effect in this thread too. When someone says something bad about Trump, they get downvoted and attacked with nonsense. Whether it is sensible or plainly obviously true does not matter whatsoever, the response is the same. It's identical to the way the vatniggers react to information that doesn't conform to their echo-chamber.
It's a MAGA echo-chamber because anyone who dares intrude with facts is heckled until they shut up, while bullshit information is affirmed and reinforced.
I am not interested in getting in an Internet slap-fight; God knows I've been in enough for one lifetime. But I have no idea what the hell you're talking about here. I have been in this thread for two years (happy anniversary!) and the ones before, and I have not seen MAGA cultism. Most discussions of Trump have been reasonably calibrated. Basically, he's known to be a wild card, there's concern he might abandon Ukraine, but there's also reasons to believe he might be tougher than Biden and his weak knees.

The Farms' userbase as a whole leans Trumpy, because of other issues (troonism, free speech, immigration, etc.). Most people are not single-issue and so Americans in this thread may have rolled the dice on Trump's Ukraine policy for the sake of these other issues. We're lucky there's at least hope. If Tucker Carlson had been the GOP candidate, we'd have been in an impossible dilemma.

But I'm not seeing anyone here worship Trump. We're closely following his actions, which remain unpredictable, with concern. So far, it's not been too bad. He's not let up sanctions, and he's not stopped weapons deliveries. Granted, that's a low bar, but considering how he was supposedly a Russian asset who would gift-wrap eastern Europe to Putin, it's reassuring.

Recent developments have been, speaking for myself and maybe others here, disappointing and somewhat frustrating. But I also think too much is being made of them. Hegseth should have not said what he did, but he walked it back. Trump runs his mouth and compliments Putin, but that's his negotiating style; he's not going to tweet "Putin is a war criminal and I hate Russians" just before a delicate meeting.

So no this is not an echo chamber. I've posted negative comments about Trump here, and not gotten hate for it. I'll say now that his talk of owning Gaza is retarded, and I see no good reason for picking a trade war with Canada and he should shut up about annexing it, and I'm still worried Putin may outplay him. We'll see if I get attacked. I did vote for him because, well, you know what the choices were.
 
What does victory look like to you?
Any win by anyone at this point will be entirely not have been worth it, the k/d alone has already determined this.
Assuming it doesn't all fall through and actually goes ahead I predict we all, ziggas and humans alike, shall be equally disappointed when it turns out more Webster-Ashburton than Guadalupe-Hidalgo.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Ghostse
Sending millions more to die because one guy sounds like a faggot is not a good reason not to make peace. My guy, eastern Europe as a whole is now fucked on a genetic scale on the level of one child policy China due to this war. Russia is not trying again. Their young men are fucking dead. Same with Ukraine. Once it stops it will not restart in Putin's lifetime; he will be dead and buried due to the generational crashout. Right now is the perfect time for peace.
You need to read up on the Vietnam war you piglet.
 
BREAKING:
@SecDef walks back his statement yesterday that a negotiated settlement is not likely to end with Ukraine in @NATO: "These negotiations are led by @realDonaldTrump. Everything is on the table. In his conversations with Vladimir Putin and Zelensky, what he decides to allow or not allow, is at the purview of the leader of the free world--President Trump. So I'm not going to stand at this podium and declare what President Trump will do or won't do, what will be in or what will be out, what concessions will be made or what concessions are not made."


So there's some waffling about what is really on the table for these talks. I doubt they really want to toss out anything since they know Putin is opposed to any decent peace deal.

Trump's comments strike me mostly as him pointing out that he's familiar with what Russia's stated concerns are (which I don't think Putin even really believes), which could let them save face if we did some kind of deal to have Russia leave in return for saying Ukraine wouldn't join NATO or whatever.

Since if Trump genuinely does want rights to some mineral rights, he'd have to have Russia leave some of those regions that actually have them. Then to let businesses access them there'd have to be security guarantees otherwise Russia could just start shit again and make it all worthless. So unless he wants to make it near impossible for Ukraine to pay anything back for what aid/weapons were sent over and give up on potential investment in the region, he'd sorta have to come up with a deal that'd be decent for Ukraine.

There is always the possibility that they really will just treat it as money that was tossed in a bonfire and try abandoning achieving anything long term. But something about that doesn't feel realistic to me given Trump's repeated comments over the years about how we should have tried getting the oil when going into the Middle East. He has the opportunity to do something similar with Ukraine and with a population that isn't a bunch of goat fuckers that would commit suicide for the chance of killing some of their enemies' kids (so it's more realistic they'd hold their end of the bargain).
 
Sending millions more to die because one guy sounds like a faggot is not a good reason not to make peace. My guy, eastern Europe as a whole is now fucked on a genetic scale on the level of one child policy China due to this war. Russia is not trying again. Their young men are fucking dead. Same with Ukraine. Once it stops it will not restart in Putin's lifetime; he will be dead and buried due to the generational crashout. Right now is the perfect time for peace.
you haven't been in this thread very much tourist. Russian troops were extremely diverse in many ways, some of which being:

  1. 50+ and up (not part of your obsession with birth rates)
  2. Poor individuals from outer oblasts and the Russian Boonies (these are not what race spergs consider white people, probably wouldn't even call them Russian if you showed them a picture)
  3. Foreigners (Hundreds of North Koreans, but foreign troops on Ukrainian side was a red line. Not to mention kidnapped Cubans, Indians, Africans, various Asiatic troops, Chechyans... the list goes on and on)
  4. Criminals (And not Misha the pickpocket. We're talking the murder-rapists and people who ate their victims, free to go back to civilian life after shooting Ukrainians on their soil, some of them went on to reoffend)
Russia will not be afraid to repeat this. They could even do it in different directions, it doesn't have to be Ukraine. You're looking at Russia potentially resuming action in less than 20 years. This kind of talk is what happened in 2014 when this kicked off. Lovely the peace didn't even last 10 years. And what did Ukraine do during that time? Not vote for the Russian oligarch stooge and elect an actual Ukrainian who has done his best to address corruption in his country, corruption created by Russian meddling?

If Trump truly lets Putin walk into this meeting and dictate anything it's an absolute joke. It'll be an embarassment and in 20 years they'll be writing Buffoon next to Trump's face in the pictures they take of the event.
 
The Telegraph seems somewhat doompilled today, and I’m inclined to agree.

View attachment 6978179
View attachment 6978181
View attachment 6978183
View attachment 6978184
Damn. How much was the Telegraph getting from USAID?

New hulls as replacements. The confusion is most understandable as U.S. Army is also having upgrades done to current existing Bradleys.
Well, time to update the chart.
Things the Bradley can't be killed by:
- Drones
- BMPs (any)
- MY NAME IS T-90 NOW, DAD
- DoD Budget Cuts

It's not just that as an equally large part of it is the "fuck Obama and fuck Biden" mindset. As it is their fault for starting this particular mess and grafting off of it.
This is the danger of the "fuck the other guy" mindset.

Trump surrendering his leverage before talks even start. Trump mouths worthless Russian propaganda. Every free country in the region has joined NATO, altho the value of that is less and less clear. I hope at least Trump won't try and force Ukraine out of Kursk in return for nothing but not carrying out some bullying threat. Suggests Russia should rejoin G7 (Newsweek) which implies lifting sanctions. Basically, this is looking like a reward for blundered, naked aggression born out of a strange MAGA worship of Russia. Hopefully this reading is completely wrong, but that would involve a cunning misdirection, something Putin can do, but Trump isn't remotely capable of doing. What I hear myself is that Ukrainians consider that a betrayal of them by the US is afoot. Again, hopefully wrong.
As I've said, I'm going to furious if Russia gets rewarded for invading yet another country.

But mentioning Russia not allowing Ukraine into NATO I think is a combo of a Trump non-statement + his current campaign of shitting on EU NATO members for refusing to fund their own defense, Expecting the US to just continue to protect them while shitting on the US + making the task of defending them harder.
Its harder to negotiate with someone you've pissed off by insulting them, so instead of Obama or Biden trying to make getting Russia ot the peace table all about them and how powerful they are, Trump makes it more about making the other person feel important.
... the Puffing up and "I'm so great" Trump saves until AFTER negotiations are done.

For the non-statement:
He says he doesn't think a country in Russia's position would let Ukraine into NATO: but Ukraine hadn't even put in an application yet. He is also implying that Russia/Ukraine aren't in the positions they were in at the start of the war. He is Putin an "out" if negotiations end with a roadmap to Ukraine joining NATO; Putin can say "Under the old Nazi Banderdite regime, A Ukraine that could attack Rusia with no way for Russia to hit back without triggering article 5 and this was unacceptable for us. Now we have those assurances that Ukraine cannot simply use the protection of other countries to kill Russians, so we see no reason to interfer in the internal politics of a neighbor who is having open and free elections which has always been a case"
(this is all complete rubbish, but the Russia people have believed dumber)

I'm very sure the G7 thing is more about holding out a carrot. I guess what I'm saying is follow the statement.
Russia was removed from the G8 for invading Ukraine in 2014. For Russia to be allowed back into the G8, that would mean they have to stop invading Ukraine. Trump also doesn't specify a time line, or conditions, just saying he'd like Russia in the G8 and its "common sense" they should be allowed back in.
(Also Newsweek is usually very heavy on Trump-seethe and there was little bit oozing out, but that was a fairly neutral article)

Zelensky imposed sanctions on opposition leader Poroshenko effectively opening the election season. Poroshenko had said he opposed elections given a mix of occupation in the east and south plus a population scattered. Poroshenko has also devoted his fortune to funding the fight, buying drones and supplies with his own money. Zelensky's poll rating is poor enough with Zaluzhyni (fmr Army boss now UK ambassador) on 27% and Zelensky on 16%.

"Who will win these elections? Poroshenko? Zelensky? I doubt it. One person will win them — Putin."
That ending quote is 100% accurate. Even if nothing changes, Putin leverages the chaos to his advantage.

I'm still holding out elections wait until peace is settled (until Russia violates yet another treaty) but if Zelensky is already starting typical Slav politics....
 
You people are melting down far too early. As I said already it will be interesting to see what concessions Russia will offer. Presumably no reasonable peace deal gives one party everything they want in this case. Just a casual guess Russia will try to preserve their land gains as a priority over severing Ukraine's western ties.
This is probably the most likely outcome.

Russians are dumb and arrogant, but they aren't stupid. Moscow has to know Ukraine has basically now become solidified as cultural enemies, a foe that is unlikely to forgive and forget. Flipping Kiev back to pro-Russian is exponentially less plausible now that it was back before 2022, much less before 2014.

Keeping some land gives Russia the cope condition of "well technically you didn't keep us out of your entire country :smug: " to claim victory with, and arguably one could make the argument Russian can exploit the newly captured regions for resources, etc.
Friendly reminder that Zelensky wanted Azov and other nationalist militias in the Donbas to disarm back in October 2019 due to his commitment to an agreement he signed with Russia, France and Germany:
This is what's retarded when ziggers act like Zelensky is the anti-Russian stooge, when he was arguably the peacenik candidate suppressing Ukraine's most anti-Russian elements.

He still gets credit for staying when the situation turned hot and trying to rectify his earlier mistakes, though.
Just two more weeks before Ukraine wins
Bruh we are like 1 week away from Year 3 of the Three-Day Special Military Operation.

:story:
 
Bruh we are like 1 week away from Year 3 of the Three-Day Special Military Operation.
Happy almost anniversary zisters!
Is it gonna be a public holiday after it's all over do we reckon? If I were zelennissskeeh I'd make it one, and declare it Banderaday or something for extra vatzigga seethe.
 
you haven't been in this thread very much tourist
Ree. I've been watching. All those groups you listed suggests a population collapse. You've proven my point. Where are the young men? Ill tell you, a lot are fucking dead.
This is probably the most likely outcome.

Russians are dumb and arrogant, but they aren't stupid. Moscow has to know Ukraine has basically now become solidified as cultural enemies, a foe that is unlikely to forgive and forget. Flipping Kiev back to pro-Russian is exponentially less plausible now that it was back before 2022, much less before 2014.

Keeping some land gives Russia the cope condition of "well technically you didn't keep us out of your entire country :smug: " to claim victory with, and arguably one could make the argument Russian can exploit the newly captured regions for resources, etc.
Highly likely. Russia gets the smug :smug: "we won something" trophy while Ukraine is solidified completely against ever joining Russia again, i.e. independence forever and western aligned.
 
Trump on Ukraine: "I don't see any way that a country in Russia's position could allow them to join NATO ... I believe that's the reason the war started."
View attachment 6978328
Not even the Putin claims this. I only ever saw this bullshit on western vatnigger shill accounts.
Like I said before, it seems like a lot of Americans don't even bother to learn WTF is actually going on and have just surface level takes like this, but I would expect president to know better, regardless of how busy he might be.
Yeah, Putin stated that as one of the reasons for the invasion, framing it as if his hand was forced and he's totally justified in doing so. We all know this.
But that's not the truth, it's simply an excuse, he never sought peaceful resolution with Ukraine, the real goal always was conquest. That has to be punished, no two ways about it.
How are these retarded talking points still around? Is there not a single person in the White House who can fucking think?
Just saw post with Poso's tweet... it's truly joever. You gonna bring that retard along, really?

All that said, Ukraine could always just say "No" if the terms are unreasonable, if they're confident that they can keep fighting. Let's not act is if they have no choice but to agree to whatever deal is proposed.
Just two more weeks before Ukraine wins
You do realize that this is an objectively bad attempt at a dig on Ukraine, right? "Two weeks" is entirely a meme mocking Putin's failed blyatzkrieg that ended up in WWI-style stalemate, you can't just turn it the other way around because Ukraine never made claims of imminent victory and its military didn't have reputation to squander the way Russia did during these events.
You need to work on your jokes, this was terrible

Happy almost anniversary zisters!
Is it gonna be a public holiday after it's all over do we reckon? If I were zelennissskeeh I'd make it one, and declare it Banderaday or something for extra vatzigga seethe.
Now that you mentioned it... Since Putin is obsessed with numbers, you could probably get a good deal if you offer him a treaty at the day of invasion, he wouldn't want to miss the opportunity to end it on the same day it started. He would probably sign anything at that point :sighduck:
 
Last edited:
I am not interested in getting in an Internet slap-fight; God knows I've been in enough for one lifetime. But I have no idea what the hell you're talking about here. I have been in this thread for two years (happy anniversary!) and the ones before, and I have not seen MAGA cultism. Most discussions of Trump have been reasonably calibrated. Basically, he's known to be a wild card, there's concern he might abandon Ukraine, but there's also reasons to believe he might be tougher than Biden and his weak knees.
@World in Scarlet has gotten a full blown case of TDS from his local Eurofag media. If you don't seethe about Trump 24x7 or if you doubt at all negative statements made about Trump, you are a Trump cultist. The fact there is push back on Orange Man Bad means this an echochamber, certainly not that people are fucking tired of 9 years of the same MSNPC lie-driven narrative on repeat constantly.

So no this is not an echo chamber. I've posted negative comments about Trump here, and not gotten hate for it. I'll say now that his talk of owning Gaza is retarded, and I see no good reason for picking a trade war with Canada and he should shut up about annexing it, and I'm still worried Putin may outplay him. We'll see if I get attacked. I did vote for him because, well, you know what the choices were.
Die liberal day of the Rake soon
Plenty of people have had reasonable concern about Trump's rhetoric, or are reasonable and consistent with their dislike of Trump. You very clearly don't have TDS.

What does victory look like to you?
I think a realistic end goal is the Donbros and Crimea are made "special administrative regions" that are part of Ukraine but Russia gets some sort of special economic consideration; Russian free trade zones or portions of pipeline tolls going directly to the local governments, something like that. Russia getting a long-term lease on the soviet facilities in Crimea to allow them more time to complete moving the BSF to Novorossiysk. Probably an agreement on allowing a reconstitution of the BSF with modern ships and without fuckery from Turkey.

I'd like some level of limits of forces that Russia can put X kilometers from the Ukrainian border to keep away any future "little green men" attempts, but I'm not that optimistic to think that's remotely realistic.

He still gets credit for staying when the situation turned hot and trying to rectify his earlier mistakes, though.
Agreed. Zelensky wasn't perfect and made the initial days worse, but he stuck it out and has been working to unfuck Ukraine's military since.

Just saw post with Poso's tweet... it's truly joever. You gonna bring that retard along, really?
The US is really, REALLY not sending our best to this thing.

You do realize that this is an objectively bad attempt at a dig on Ukraine, right? "Two weeks" is entirely a meme mocking Putin's failed blyatzkrieg and ending in in WWI-style stalemate, you can't just turn it the other way around because Ukraine never made claims of imminent victory and its military didn't have reputation to squander the way Russia did during these events.
You need to work on your jokes, this was terrible
Retardation and Vatnikism go hand in hand.

Now that you mentioned it... Since Putin is obsessed with numbers, you could probably get a good deal if you offer him a treaty at the day of invasion, he wouldn't want to miss the opportunity to end it on the same day it started. He would probably sign anything at that point :sighduck:
Anniversary? No no, my friend. Three days after the anniversary.
It always was a 3 day SMO, comrade. I just never said what YEAR.
 
Last edited:
Ree. I've been watching. All those groups you listed suggests a population collapse. You've proven my point. Where are the young men? Ill tell you, a lot are fucking dead.
You tard they haven't been fighting. it's why it was a huge deal the Muscovite reserves that got surprised during the kursk invasion were recorded. It was actual young Russian men that fit the bill. They were men who were not going to see the front lines. Instead men who aren't a factor in major Russian development are sacrificed, the minorities that make up healthy majorities of Russia's more obscure areas that don't have access to the capital of the more developed areas, the opportunities your average Muscovite will get, and have little opportunity to advance in life. These are people that won't be missed by the majority of Russia, and the ones that would care about their loss lack the ability to spread their stories.

The only point you've made evident is that you're a tard. I'll put it in words that might matter to you:

I have 100 fresh white crayons. If I start eating the white ones people will quickly realize something is amiss. Instead I eat the crayons from the massive pile I have access to. No one is keeping track of the heavily used crayons or the off color ones. Maybe I sneak one or two of the white ones but it's inconsequential. There are still a number of the white crayons, and anyone actually concerned can point at the 95ish left and say "see clearly we don't have an issue. Look at how many of our nice white crayons are left."
 
As I've said, I'm going to furious if Russia gets rewarded for invading yet another country.

But mentioning Russia not allowing Ukraine into NATO I think is a combo of a Trump non-statement + his current campaign of shitting on EU NATO members for refusing to fund their own defense, Expecting the US to just continue to protect them while shitting on the US + making the task of defending them harder.
Its harder to negotiate with someone you've pissed off by insulting them, so instead of Obama or Biden trying to make getting Russia ot the peace table all about them and how powerful they are, Trump makes it more about making the other person feel important.
... the Puffing up and "I'm so great" Trump saves until AFTER negotiations are done.

For the non-statement:
He says he doesn't think a country in Russia's position would let Ukraine into NATO: but Ukraine hadn't even put in an application yet. He is also implying that Russia/Ukraine aren't in the positions they were in at the start of the war. He is Putin an "out" if negotiations end with a roadmap to Ukraine joining NATO; Putin can say "Under the old Nazi Banderdite regime, A Ukraine that could attack Rusia with no way for Russia to hit back without triggering article 5 and this was unacceptable for us. Now we have those assurances that Ukraine cannot simply use the protection of other countries to kill Russians, so we see no reason to interfer in the internal politics of a neighbor who is having open and free elections which has always been a case"
(this is all complete rubbish, but the Russia people have believed dumber)

I'm very sure the G7 thing is more about holding out a carrot. I guess what I'm saying is follow the statement.
Russia was removed from the G8 for invading Ukraine in 2014. For Russia to be allowed back into the G8, that would mean they have to stop invading Ukraine. Trump also doesn't specify a time line, or conditions, just saying he'd like Russia in the G8 and its "common sense" they should be allowed back in.
(Also Newsweek is usually very heavy on Trump-seethe and there was little bit oozing out, but that was a fairly neutral article)
I feel pretty similar (as may have been noticed).

With any deal you want both sides feeling like they're coming out winners. So it makes sense to make plenty face saving statements and gestures possible to go ahead and let Russia/Putin feel they've achieved all their goals (or to at least say they have).

Something I have seen the past few days that I've thought deranged, is people generally seething that there's not more of a focus on virtue signaling over talking about actual military might. This one stood out to me.



This reporter had @SecDef on the ropes, what you didn't hear were these tough questions Hespeth just couldn't cope with:
REPORTER: So just to be clear—you think values don’t matter in war?
HEGSETH: Look, values are great, but you can’t exactly fight off the left with values.

REPORTER: Tell that to the French Resistance, who fought Nazis with nothing but belief before they had weapons. Or to Poland, where underground fighters kept their nation alive despite being occupied by the world’s biggest armies.
HEGSETH: I’m just saying, when it comes down to it, strength wins, not ideals.

REPORTER: Then explain how the U.S. lost in Vietnam, why the Soviets collapsed after Afghanistan, or how Afghanistan itself fought off three empires. Firepower alone doesn’t mean victory—ask Russia, stuck in Ukraine despite superior weapons.
HEGSETH: Well, military power still matters more than words.

REPORTER: And yet, words—values—are why people choose to fight in the first place. Ukraine didn't stand because of weapons; they stood because they refused to be ruled.
HEGSETH: So you’re saying values win wars?
REPORTER: I’m saying values make armies fight harder, longer, and with more purpose—without them, all the firepower in the world means nothing. Just ask the British Empire, the Soviets, or, soon enough, Putin.

You can tell a lot of these people despise the idea of militaries genuinely needing to be funded and that you can't just wish hard enough for a win and get it (as well you notice the historical ignorance regarding stuff like Vietnam or even Afghanistan). There's sort of this comic book movie logic at work where they can't envision letting the bad guy have his day even if it's just a symbolic one where they're still limping away in the end. It makes part of the conversation around the possible peace talks feel plain goofy since I'm not sure anything would satisfy some people unless Ukraine is effectively destroyed or Russia was (as you do have people on both extremes doing this nonsense).
 
Some of the guys are really getting demoralised in here.
Never make expectations in your head and then be surprised that expectations aren't met. Attain Chuddha Zen. Nothing ever happens until it does.
Absolutely, chill the fuck out for a minute and wait and see. It's not really like anyone can do anything about it anyway. Foreign policy and occasionally sticking his foot in his mouth are two topics I am more than willing to shit on Trump over but nothing has actually happened yet. I think there is a sizeable group which has fallen for all of the Steele dossier "Trump is an agent of Putin" shit and unironically believes it, ergo Trump doing things that Trump always does starts sounding alarm bells in their head. I get being concerned but holy shit, some people are having a full on fucking meltdown about it. Ripped straight from the media [or conversations with some of my shitlib boomer relatives] "did you hear what Trump SAID this week?" Trump says a lot of things and enjoys using hyperbole, when he's trying to negotiate with someone he talks about them like they cleaned his hotel room, sucked his dick and left a mint on his pillow. That's just how he fucking operates. How have we had ten years of political Trump [more if you consider Trump's involvement with the Tea Party and what-not] and people still refuse to get him?

Ukraine being allowed into NATO is the big sticking point for me. The only possible fucking way that any sort of 'partitioning' of Ukraine [allowing Russia to keep territory up to where their forces have been stalled out for like three fucking years] can be remotely workable is if Ukraine is in NATO and there's some form of NATO DMZ between the two. Otherwise Russia just builds back up and comes back for round two in fifteen to twenty years. Keep in mind that's not the outcome that I want, I'd like to see the fucking Kremlin turned to plateglass if you want my opinion, but any deal which does not involve Ukraine in NATO isn't going to pass muster at this point.

It does stick in my craw to some extent that a lot of Euros are getting offended and going "WELL I NEVER! WOW THE U.S IS SUCH A FAIRWEATHER FRIEND!" when Germany was still buying Russian natgas and the majority of NATO member states didn't bother to pony up that fucking 2% of their GDP despite being told several times that they needed to do so. One particular person who was more adamant about this than previous U.S presidents: Donald J. Trump, and he was correct. Poland and the UK and Greece [somehow] get an A in this regard, Germany gets a big fat F.
 
Back