US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There are two ways to resettle them, strategically, in liberal districts to offset liberal votes, but this will cause the community to fragment, or they could be imported to a culturally homogeneous area, like a wider Chinatown, the problem being their trades are mostly applicable to red states. Importing them to a rural purple state would be the best move, the question would be which one
Minnesota, Kansas, Nebraska, Illinois.
 
. I don't think the Dems realized what terrible candidates both of them were, though, but they still thought they had enough in the tank to get them ver the finish line so they could continue to break the country from the inside while enriching themselves.

The Elites knew how bad she was, They NEVER wanted her. The evidence points to Pelosi, Schumer and Obama all wanting a primary instead of Biden or especially Kamala running. IIRC Biden was supposed to be a transitory president and said as such. The Democratic Elites knew his mental faculties were declining from the start and Pelosi, Schumer and Obama all started pressuring him to drop out and endorse a primary since the very beginning of the election year. When Biden shocked them by refusing to step down, the various Democrats factions enacted some semblance of a plan put to oust Biden and produce a blitz primary (a Kiwi pointed this out after the debate and its eerily similar to Kamala's campaign. Especially Oprah's prominence) while increasing pressure on him to quit.

The Elites worked with CNN to give Trump the cleanest debate he ever had, and knowing Biden would lose and already had the legacy media prepped to bury him, hence the pre-drafted NYT article placing doubt on him that released 30 minutes into the debate and The View and other talking heads doubting him that night and the morning after. It was only a wake up call for rest of the Democrat plebs. When Biden still refused, they gave him the coup de grace and had one of his aides announce his resignation via Twitter without the rest of his administration knowing.

What they didn't know was that Kamala was Biden's useful idiot, not theirs. Biden chose Kamala on purpose because she was the weakest, least influential, least popular and least experienced VP picks that he was given. Even Willie Brown had no faith in her as VP due to her inexperience. (I had a more damning secondary source, but this clip works.) It's also no secret that his admin hated her and her admin since the very beginning. We thought she was forced on him, but she was his fail safe in case they wouldn't let him run.

Biden knew she wasn't going to win, that's why he ENDORSED her out of spite after the twitter fiasco. They were both supposed to agree to a primary which is why the democrats started haphazardly scrambling to rally behind her and why Obama took so long to endorse her. He still wanted the primary, but I suspect Michele actually likes Kamala and wanted her to win.

Edit: Added clip link and fixed minor errors.
 
Last edited:
>works for 22 years
>"i don't know what I'm able to do"

I would LOVE to know what this fucking retard was doing as a job if after 22 years he doesn't have anything to show for it.
View attachment 6981202
View attachment 6981208
View attachment 6981210

Sounds like we didn't lose much here.
yeah tbh I sorta feel for some of these people, a lot of them were doing a job that existed strictly for the federal government's purposes and really don't have a big list of skills beyond that, and now their resume is going to read "I was a fucking leech, then Elon Musk noticed I was useless"
 
What's more whoah momma, helical or YAG?
I don't know. I'm an amateur shortwave listener. I'd say helical is more "whoa mama" because I think that's used for radio astronomy and more serious satellite communication setups.

Also, good morning, USPG! I saw an article that DOGE is now at the IRS. I hope they get rid of the assholes that audited me for no fucking reason. The true litmus test of whether the Democrats have lost their fucking minds is if they will attack Republicans for cleaning house at the IRS.

No one likes the IRS.
 
>works for 22 years
>"i don't know what I'm able to do"

I would LOVE to know what this fucking retard was doing as a job if after 22 years he doesn't have anything to show for it.
View attachment 6981202
View attachment 6981208
View attachment 6981210

Sounds like we didn't lose much here.
yeah tbh I sorta feel for some of these people, a lot of them were doing a job that existed strictly for the federal government's purposes and really don't have a big list of skills beyond that, and now their resume is going to read "I was a fucking leech, then Elon Musk noticed I was useless"
The kinda bad part is that these people did have a necessary job... in government. The man who does all meetings is actually a vital role to -reduce- waste. Many of these departments are so large that someone in the position to supervise and keep everyone on track is actually a vital role to increase efficiency.

The problem is that if the work they are doing is going towards absolute shit then it should be cut..,. and unfortunately for them those jobs do not exist outside government.
 
Basic thesis is modern architecture is so bloody boring because construction methods have changed. A lot of early 20thcentury architecture rests on the reality that construction is an imperfect process, so adjustments will have to be made in the process, therefore much of the detail exists to hide and exploit those imperfections to create a greater whole. Then he talks about how shitty the UN building is.
IMO he's technically right but its still a bit of a dumb take because it doesn't really take shit like siding, veneers, etc, into account and how we use them today.
If you really think about it I guess you could make an argument for it, since we're able to highly optimize the cost of our buildings while still being very precise with construction, but how much does a strip of injection molded plastic to be used as decorative trim really cost? how much money does it take for me to injection mold a greek-revival styled cover for a wooden support pillar? how much would that cost? Its not like its gonna fuck with the structural integrity of the building, that's what the frame is for.

Obviously its not the same, but the whole point im trying to make here is that If you wanted to make your building look more "traditional", I don't think you'd need to break the bank in order to get good results, particularly with modern manufacturing/building techniques.
The ultimate reason, if you ask me, is because its just not in "style" to do so.
And as an additional point, a lot of home construction is still imperfect, which is why things like edge trims on corners still exist despite the alleged efficiency of modernism. Turns out your average Mexico illegal contractor likely isn't able to build to the level of perfection that modernism calls for. IMO the elimination of ornamentation was always an excuse- first as a stylistic choice, then to reduce costs, and finally to excuse why we couldn't go back (aka that the craftsmen of the era had all retired and so it was too expensive).

Another point is that a lot of post-war domestic architecture (like Mcmansions) are essentially traditional architectural elements and finishes/veneers stretched over a modernist plan- before the 20th century, a lot of architecture could not attain the open spans that we have today, so things like open-concept homes weren't possible and the pre-HVAC era necessitated the need for taller spaces and windows in order for natural ventilation to occur. This essentially has always produced an architecture that needed to make sense from a load-bearing point of view- i.e. you couldn't randomly sprinkle windows on a wall like you can today- but this also produced architecture that visually made sense and which always had an emphasis on the vertical. Modern home construction and air conditioned paces have on the other hand produced spaces that prioritize the horizontal over the vertical, reduced the size and proportion of fenestrations (HVAC, screens, and artificial lighting), and allowed for unusual/unnatural configurations of architectural elements to have occurred- which is why many modern Mcmansions look a little 'off'.

yeah tbh I sorta feel for some of these people, a lot of them were doing a job that existed strictly for the federal government's purposes and really don't have a big list of skills beyond that, and now their resume is going to read "I was a fucking leech, then Elon Musk noticed I was useless"
TBH I would not be surprised if a lot of that skillset was essentially the equivalent of being a human paperweight. The failure to upskill these workers or replace them is a real issue with the government (not just the US).
 
J.D. Vance will hold a speech at the Munich Security Conference at 14:30 CET, 3 and a half hours from now. Here is the agenda.
Vance's main topic was about protecting free speech and shitting on EU bureaucrats and (WEF) politicians, he mentioned:
  • EU must increase military budget because America can't babysit Europe forever.
  • That EU's biggest threats are internal enemies.
  • A British guy getting arrested for praying at an abortion clinic, German guy being arrested for being an anti-feminist online and the Scottish goverment sending letters telling people to snitch on people praying privately at home.
  • That politicians must respect opposing views and not jail/supress them. He further made similarities between communist speech suppressions and EU speech laws/rulings.
  • That you can't legislate innovation.
  • About the Romanian election that was canceled because of 'Russian intereference'. Vance then said that if a democracy can't survive an ad campaing from a foreign nation then it isn't a good/stable democracy.
  • People aren't cogs in a global economy.
  • Supressing peoples thoughts and speech doesn't achieve anything and will destroy democracy.
  • Car of peace mentioned, then started shitting on EU bureaucrats and that they must respect opposing views.
  • Called out the fact that nobody voted for mass unvetted immigration.
  • That the EU should stop having meltdowns about Musk.
Maybe forgot some stuff but these are (for me) the main highlights. As an European I am very happy with Vance. Off topic, but now a chinaman is speaking and I shit you not, he said: "China launched a global peace group, thus China is very good and peaceful for the world."
 
Trump describes some unfair trade practices:

Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Announces “Fair and Reciprocal Plan” on Trade​

February 13, 2025

THE “FAIR AND RECIPROCAL PLAN”: Today, President Donald J. Trump signed a Presidential Memorandum ordering the development of a comprehensive plan for restoring fairness in U.S. trade relationships and countering non-reciprocal trading arrangements.
  • The “Fair and Reciprocal Plan” will seek to correct longstanding imbalances in international trade and ensure fairness across the board.
  • Gone are the days of America being taken advantage of: this plan will put the American worker first, improve our competitiveness in every area of industry, reduce our trade deficit, and bolster our economic and national security.
AMERICA WILL NO LONGER TOLERATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES: The United States is one of the most open economies in the world, yet our trading partners keep their markets closed to our exports. This lack of reciprocity is unfair and contributes to our large and persistent annual trade deficit.
  • There are endless examples where our trading partners do not give the United States reciprocal treatment.
    • The U.S. tariff on ethanol is a mere 2.5%. Yet Brazil charges the U.S. ethanol exports a tariff of 18%. As a result, in 2024, the U.S. imported over $200 million in ethanol from Brazil while the U.S. exported only $52 million in ethanol to Brazil.
    • The U.S. average applied Most Favored Nation (MFN) tariff on agricultural goods is 5%. But India’s average applied MFN tariff is 39%. India also charges a 100% tariff on U.S. motorcycles, while we only charge a 2.4% tariff on Indian motorcycles.
    • The European Union can export all the shellfish it wants to America. But the EU bans shellfish exports from 48 of our states, despite committing in 2020 to expedite approvals for shellfish exports. As a result, in 2023, the U.S. imported $274 million in shellfish from the EU but exported only $38 million.
    • The EU also imposes a 10% tariff on imported cars. Yet the U.S. only imposes a 2.5% tariff.
    • A 2019 report found that across 132 countries and more than 600,000 product lines, United States exporters face higher tariffs more than two-thirds of the time.
  • This lack of reciprocity is one source of America’s large and persistent annual trade deficit in goods: closed markets abroad reduce U.S. exports and open markets at home result in significant imports, both of which undercut American competitiveness.
    • The United States has run a trade deficit of goods every year since 1975. In 2024, our trade deficit in goods exceeded $1 trillion.
    • Thanks to the proliferation of non-reciprocal barriers in just the last few years, the U.S. now runs a trade deficit in agriculture, worth around $40 billion in 2024.
  • Though America has no such thing, and only America should be allowed to tax American firms, trading partners hand American companies a bill for something called a digital service tax.
    • Canada and France use these taxes to each collect over $500 million per year from American companies.
    • Overall, these non-reciprocal taxes cost America’s firms over $2 billion per year.
    • Reciprocal tariffs will bring back fairness and prosperity to the distorted international trade system and stop Americans from being taken advantage of.
THE ART OF THE INTERNATIONAL DEAL: President Trump continues to deliver on his mandate given to him by the American People to put America First when it comes to trade.
  • As President Trump said in the Presidential Memorandum on American First Trade Policy on his first day in office, trade policy is a critical component of our economic security and national security.
  • In his first term, President Trump successfully ended the outdated and unfair NAFTA, replacing it with the historic USMCA to deliver one of the largest wins for American workers.
  • When our national security was threatened by a global oversupply of steel and aluminum, President Trump took swift action to protect America’s national security by implementing tariffs on imports of these goods.
  • In response to China’s intellectual property theft, forced technology transfer, and other unreasonable behavior, President Trump acted with conviction to impose tariffs on imports from China, using that leverage to reach a historic bilateral economic agreement.
Just last week, President Trump leveraged tariffs to force Canada and Mexico to make long-overdue changes at our northern and southern borders, ensuring the safety and security of American citizens.
Source (Archive)
 
When Biden shocked them by refusing to step down, the various Democrats factions enacted some semblance of a plan put to oust Biden and produce a blitz primary (a Kiwi pointed this out after the debate and its eerily similar to Kamala's campaign. Especially Oprah's prominence) while increasing pressure on him to quit.
There's a significant implication given by people who ought to know that they were threatening to invoke the 25th if he did not drop out, hence the Friday announcement of him remaining as the party nominee and then over the weekend, after a meeting with Pelosi and the rest, he changed his tune and endorsed Kamala. Presumably as a 'fuck you' as he believed he would be the only one who could beat Trump, and that he believed he was fit for presidency again.
Also, it doesn't do to forget the fact that Jill fucking wore red to vote.
 
Back