Culture U.S. Park Service Strikes Transgender References From Stonewall Website - The “T” was removed in references to L.G.B.T.Q.+ on the official site for the Greenwich Village monument, which marks a milestone in the fight for gay rights. Later, the Q+ also disappeared.

1739554016866.png

The National Park Service removed references to transgender people from its Stonewall National Monument web pages on Thursday, as the Trump administration continued its push for federal agencies to recognize only two genders: male and female, as assigned at birth.

The move to strike the word “transgender” from the website for the first Park Service historic site devoted to America’s gay rights movement elicited anger in the symbolic heart of New York City’s lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community.

“It is outrageous,” said Erik Bottcher, the city councilman who represents the Greenwich Village neighborhood that is home to the monument. “This is the latest attempt to erase the very existence of transgender people.”

He added: “The rebellion at Stonewall would not have happened without trans people. To attempt to erase their existence is utterly shameful.”

Dr. Carla Smith, the chief executive of the L.G.B.T. Community Center, said in a statement that the website changes were “factually inaccurate” and “an affront to our entire community,” and she urged the Park Service to “immediately restore accurate and inclusive language.”

The Stonewall Inn, a tavern on Christopher Street, has been considered a cradle of gay rights activism since a police raid there in 1969 touched off three days of protests that helped galvanize a long-marginalized population into a force for political and social change.

The 7.7-acre national monument — which includes the bar, Christopher Park across the street, and several other nearby streets and sidewalks — was established under President Barack Obama in 2016.

On Wednesday, according to a version of the Park Service website saved by the Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine, the introductory text on the monument’s main page said: “Before the 1960s, almost everything about living openly as a lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or queer (LGBTQ+) person was illegal.”

By Thursday afternoon, the word “transgender” and the letter T in the abbreviation had been removed from the page. By Thursday evening, the word “queer” and “Q+” had also been removed from the website.

A Park Service ranger at the monument’s visitor center said on Thursday afternoon that she had not been informed about the changes to the website and had just noticed that the “T” was missing. She declined to provide her name and would not comment further.

The Park Service’s public affairs department said the agency had taken the actions to carry out an executive order signed by President Trump on his first day in office that was described as “restoring biological truth to the federal government” and a second order signed by the acting secretary of the interior last month.

In addition to being part of the national monument, the Stonewall Inn is a New York State historic site. A plaque on the facade of the building identifies it as a place associated with “monumental change for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer” Americans.

Gov. Kathy Hochul, in a statement posted online, condemned the changes to the monument website as “cruel and petty.”

“Transgender people play a critical role in the fight for L.G.B.T.Q.+ rights, and New York will never allow their contributions to be erased,” she said.

The website changes included the virtual elimination of a page listing interpretive flags associated with the L.G.B.T.Q. movement, including the pink, blue and white one representing transgender people, and the times when the flags typically fly in Christopher Park.

On Thursday, the transgender pride flag still waved over the park.

Randy Wicker, an L.G.B.T. activist since 1958, was close to Marsha P. Johnson and Sylvia Rivera, two transgender women who are widely seen as mothers of the movement and as pivotal figures in the Stonewall uprising. The scrubbing of the monument website left him aghast.

“It’s frightening what is happening, the extent of it and the venom of it,” Mr. Wicker, 87, said, adding that “the idea that they would try to take transgender people out of the Stonewall National Monument — you can’t just erase history.”

Raquel Willis, a founder of the Gender Liberation Movement, a trans activist group, echoed that sentiment.

“The Stonewall riots happened because trans people, particularly of color, rose up against state violence,” she said. “You can’t tell the story without us.”

The changes to the monument website followed a series of other moves by the Trump administration to strip transgender people of federal recognition, including by altering other government websites. The effort began with the executive order by Mr. Trump that the Park Service cited on Thursday.

The measures have included moving to bar transgender people from identifying as they choose on documents like passports; imposing a national restriction on gender-affirming medical care for transgender youths; investigating schools with gender-neutral bathrooms; criminalizing teacher support for transgender students; and commanding federal prison officials to force an estimated 1,500 transgender women in custody to be housed with men.

Stacy Lentz, an owner of the Stonewall Inn and the chief executive of the nonprofit Stonewall Inn Gives Back Initiative, said she had learned about the website changes Thursday morning.

“I want to say that I’m shocked, but I am not shocked,” she said.

Still, it was almost incomprehensible to her that the anti-trans campaign had arrived at Stonewall.

“Coming into our home, into our place, and trying to erase folks who are instrumental to this movement is insanity,” she said.

The Park Service had not purged all references to transgender people from its website by Friday morning. A biographical page for Ms. Rivera that linked to the services’s Stonewall site described her as a transgender activist. One for Ms. Johnson called her a transgender woman of color.

It was unclear whether the entries would remain intact.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/13/nyregion/stonewall-transgender-parks-service.html (Archive)
 
The whole myth about the Stonewall riots being started by a "black trans woman" really got going first on Tumblr back in 2015.
1414121.png
Image source - I think there was a more popular post about it but I'm not finding it.
There was a movie being made about the riots that starred some young white men (an accurate depiction of the actual patrons of the Stonewall Inn). Still, there was a huge backlash against the movie "whitewashing" history and "erasing" the black trans woman. Marsha Johnson was actually a self-identified gay man who sometimes dressed in drag, and the first beer bottle was thrown either by one of the white men or by Stormé DeLarverie, a black butch lesbian.
But the tumblr hate campaign against the movie went viral and thus the myth that the gay rights movement owes its entire existence to trans women of color was born.
one of the first things I ever got canceled for was asking for a source of the story that Marsha Johnson "threw the first brick". good times, good times.
tumblr and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race
 
This is actually a bit bizarre as the drag king Stormy DeLarverie played a key part in the riot and the local pigs would regularly bust trans people there for not dressing according to their assigned sex at birth.
You know as well as I do that Sylvia Rivera and Marsha weren’t at the original riot, and Stormy was a lesbian all the time, drag king sometimes.

Lesbians and gays were the ones that “threw the first brick”, and the whole thing started because of the cops arresting a lesbian.

As hard as they try, trannies weren’t a key part.
 
You know as well as I do that Sylvia Rivera and Marsha weren’t at the original riot, and Stormy was a lesbian all the time, drag king sometimes.

Lesbians and gays were the ones that “threw the first brick”, and the whole thing started because of the cops arresting a lesbian.

As hard as they try, trannies weren’t a key part.
Tranny seething aside, it's both telling and ridiculous that fags and dykes are so eager to take credit for being the ones to throw bricks and start a riot in order to protect their sacred mob controlled boy trafficking bar.
 
Isn't the brick-throwing mythology of Marsha P. Johnson at the Stonewall riot a total farce?
So is Marshall P. Johnson being a transwoman. He said on video 3 days before his death that he was not, and that neither he nor Sylvia Rivera were there. He rolled up after it was nearly over, and Rivera was passed out on a park bench miles away the entire time.
 
I assume turning it into a national monument was the signature legislation of a NY Democrat who has never gotten anything else passed into law.
Designating places of nominal importance "Historic" and under US Park control is a good way to funnel grift and jobs through the local economy/politicians.

There's a train museum in Scranton that somehow got labeled a historic park, and has US Park people in charge of it..... just so they'd get Federal funds to spread around. Imagine you apply for a US park job hoping to help out conservation efforts, maybe plant some trees? And you get sent to polish a locomotive that didn't even spend it's working life on the railroad it ended up at.......
 
You know as well as I do that Sylvia Rivera and Marsha weren’t at the original riot, and Stormy was a lesbian all the time, drag king sometimes.

Lesbians and gays were the ones that “threw the first brick”, and the whole thing started because of the cops arresting a lesbian.

As hard as they try, trannies weren’t a key part.
She was also repeatedly arrested by the NYC police for being a male impersonator in public.

Not gonna convince me otherwise that the genderqueer/trans had nothing to do with Stonewall when it kicked off with a drag king being arrested.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Mourning_Cloak
Stonewall Inn was an undercover gay bar in NYC back when homosexual acts were illegal (and actively enforced against). Cops would raid suspected gay bars and arrest the patrons. The people at Stonewall resisted a raid, and the patrons & other gay people who heard about the pushback scuffled with the police outside the bar for several hours that night, preventing arrests. It was one of the first public resistances to the criminalization of homosexuality. I would actually agree that it's a historical site... for the LGB community.

Notice the letters above. The place was a meeting spot for gay people back when gay meant jail time. Not for modern gender trenders, autogynephiles, or special snowflake straight people that want to be associated with the gay community because it's hip right now.

Trans people try to insert themselves in the situation because cross dressing was a thing in the gay community back then. Cross dressing doesn't make you trans, it makes you a fag in a dress. Fuck right off, TQ and every other made-up garbage after the Q.
It was raided because there were underaged hustlers, dude.
 
I'm seeing a lot of murmurings in my "social media circles" about the rainbows getting ready to wind up this year's Pride Month to be a proper riot versus the corporate rainbow exhibitions it's been for the last several years. Plenty of talk about breaking out bricks and being vandalism-happy public nuisances.

Yeah, that'll go over well with winning you sympathy from the normies after how often you progs voted in their Democrat Party tormentors for the last four years. Fucking try your luck under a Trump-run FBI and DOJ that's not playing around for a second term.
 
Stonewall when the cops raid a bar for underage prostitution and they riot for taking away their catamites and it's a good thing bigot.
 
Wasn't there some mob-related blackmail going on too? I've not seen anything that indicates the Stonewall Inn was ever anything but a wretched hive of scum and villainy.
Wouldn't surprise me. Getting people to fuck underaged hookers and then blackmailing them with it seems to be a popular playbook, judging by Epstein.
 
“The rebellion at Stonewall would not have happened without trans people. To attempt to erase their existence is utterly shameful.”
Bullshit
Randy Wicker, an L.G.B.T. activist since 1958, was close to Marsha P. Johnson and Sylvia Rivera, two transgender women who are widely seen as mothers of the movement and as pivotal figures in the Stonewall uprising.
Bullshit. Johnson was a drag queen who rocked up late to the party, Rivera was off his tits on drugs in the park next door and apparently missed it all
“The Stonewall riots happened because trans people, particularly of color, rose up against state violence,” she said. “You can’t tell the story without us.”
Bullshit

OG Stonewall gays, such as Fred Sargent, who was actually there, have been saying for years that there were no troons at the Stonewall riot
 
the rainbows getting ready to wind up this year's Pride Month to be a proper riot
the rainbows
Which means trannies and a few deranged lgb and straight tranny ass kissers

ready to wind up this year's Pride Month to be a proper riot
The gender cult should totally turn Pride Month into tranny riot month which means hopefully many of them will get shot to death and Pride month will forever be tainted so that no company wants to support the rainbow nightmare anymore. Pride month and all other days these monsters invented need to disappear forever.

The ugly tranny+shitstain+rainbow+cripple flag also needs get killed.
 
Well, here's an article that says the cops at Stonewall weren't after gays but after the Mafia
https://web.archive.org/web/2012021...l-riots-a-gay-protest-against-mafia-bars.html (the original is passworded) (archive of the archive)

June 07, 2010​

Stonewall Riots: A Gay Protest Against Mafia Bars​

On the Friday night of June 27, 1969 the NYPD raided the Stonewall Inn, a gay bar on Christopher Street in Greenwich Village, and a firestorm of protest erupted that continued over the next several nights. The Stonewall riots are considered the birth of the modern gay rights movement, and over the following decades often has been characterized as a protest against police harassment. However, in actuality, the Stonewall Inn was raided pursuant to an investigation against its reputed mob owners, and the ensuing rage on the streets by its gay patrons was directed as much against the wise guys as the boys in blue. Of course, a few rowdy nights by some angry patrons were not going to chase the Mafia out of the lucrative gay bar racket which it had controlled for decades in New York City. Indeed, in 1986 the feds obtained a conviction against Matthew "Matty the Horse" Ianniello, the reputed Genovese capo who allegedly was behind the Stonewall Inn, for a skimming operation involving some of his gay bars.

n 2004 historian David Carter published Stonewall, and shattered the myth that the NYPD's raid was intended as harassment against the bar's gay clientel. Carter reviewed the 1969 police files concerning the raid and interviewed Seymour Pine who was the Deputy Inspector in charge, and Carter concluded that the cops were looking for bonds they believed had been stolen by a closeted Wall Street executive at the blackmailing behest of mobsters who operated out of the Stonewall Inn. Lucian K. Truscott IV, the writer who covered the events for the Village Voice in 1969, last year wrote a piece for The New York Times ("The Real Mob at Stonewall") in which he stated the following: "Deputy Inspector Pine had two stated reasons for the raid: the Stonewall was selling liquor without a license, which it was, and it was being used by a Mafia blackmail ring that was setting up gay patrons who worked on Wall Street, which also seems likely."

Although the protestors on the streets following the raid no doubt directed plenty of well-justified invective against the NYPD -- on numerous occasions in the past raids were done for no purpose other than harassing gays -- they also were targeting the Mafia. Indeed, a flyer that was distributed by the Homophile Youth Movement expressly states that "[t]he nights of Friday, June 27, 1969 and Saturday, June 28, 1969 will go down in history as the first time that thousands of Homosexual men and women went out into the streets to protest the intolerable situation which has existed in New York City for many years --- namely, the Mafia (or syndicate) control of this of this city's Gay bars," and "[w]hat is illegal about New York City's Gay bars today is the Mafia (or syndicate) stranglehold on them."


It's a very long article, so I'll stop here.
 
Last edited:
Back