US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • 🔧 Actively working on site again.
General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I wonder if the retarded left are realizing they are essentially trying to create a dictatorship by trying to block the Executive branch from functioning or using the powers it's legally allowed to have.
You are forcing our own government to make the choice between being usurped by untouchable judges and not be allowed to function or take drastic actions and ignore the courts.
Forcing a constitutional crisis just so you can claim that Trump is a dictator isn't a win, but the death of America itself.
I think on some level the Democrats are the situation as win win

1. If Trump wins in the court, then Democrats can go full tyrant king when they get the White House back

2. If Trump loses and he goes all Andrew Jackson, then Democrats have the fig leaf to try and impeach him if they win in 2026 and if he folds on loss, they still have the fig leaf to bootstrap a bullshit impeachment scheme on him...
 
WW3 is going to be about the german muslim caliphate threatening to nuke everybody isn't it? They're going to walk into France and try to use their nukes. Then the pajeets that control the UK will threaten to use their nukes on the muslims in Europe and their sympathizers.
Yeah... Yeah the thought has definitely crossed my mind. China is still the biggest threat, but as things change and the rape gangs grow that's going to be a very real problem.
I was listening to a video yesterday by Drachinifel, a WW2 naval autist, about the cruiser HMS Edinburgh bringing gold the commies took from the Romanovs back to Britain to pay for lend lease. The crew, not knowing about their new mission, watched two barges with armed soviet guards as well as British marines come alongside in port and they immediately felt like something evil was hanging over them. Apparently as they were loading the gold the red paint on the crates was coming off in the rain making it look like blood on the deck. Naturally the journey did not go well and that stolen gold lies at the bottom of the sea along with many sailors who died in both terror and heroism. And of course the rear admiral that said "Radio direction finder can't be right. If there was a sub out there we'd be able to see it" survived the whole ordeal. Commies and British aristocracy getting people killed for no good reason, truly a match made in hell.
Damm. I never heard that one. Land lease was no picnic that's for dam sure, especially this early on in the war. I'm going off my head, but between the U-boats and the air force something like 40 to 50 percent of the allied shipping didn't make it to supply the Russians. Merchant shipping was an unsung aspect of the war overall.
I don't think these talks are going well for the Ukraine.

View attachment 6981957
View attachment 6981959
Holy shit Vance looks like he wants to deck a motherfucker. If looks could kill...
Troons are no longer allowed to join the army:
View attachment 6982334
Source (Archive)
Same reason Mitch had that fall. USAID provided the Adrenochrome supply for the elites.

If that's unironically true holy crap. :story: ohh I really hope they pay for what they've done to those children. Remember how they found all those disappeared kids immediately in the first week?
 
Obama tweeted this for valentine's day...seriously, what happened to Michelle? she looks like an alien
View attachment 6982573
View attachment 6982574
If you want to be generous.....

1 The pictures were done spontaneously with Michelle being ambushed without make up and no photo filter on the grounds that and u edited spur of the moment photo post would "make us seem just like the rabble"

2 Michelle has stopped giving a fuck about her looks now that the DNC is looking at a lengthy wilderness years period and Obama's position as kingmaker is in serious doubt
 
1. If Trump wins in the court, then Democrats can go full tyrant king when they get the White House back.
Yeah, it’d be a shame if they opened the borders, funneled billions of tax dollars through USAID to other countries, used USAID to fund fake news media, used the court systems to punish their adversaries, tanked the economy, and destroyed merit based hiring with DEI programs,
 
Naw, just looks like age to me. Can't expect them to remain young, after all.
Being in the public figure must suck. I was in a dr office with 2 old ladies talking about how old celebs ages, and one said 'not cary grant, he never aged'. Oomph. Trump's older and worn out for sure some after getting shot.

Biden took the cake for going from mediocre to all out senile old rotten man though, so the left has to project it.
 
Crossposting because more people need to see this shit.

A german newspaper called the Wirtschafts Woche (Economics Weekly) has made a first article about the security conference and Vance's speech in particular.
Archive. (in original language)

Below is a translation from Google.
Notable mentions are:

Trump is demanding that NATO partners spend five percent of their GDP on defense, he is threatening allies such as Mexico, Canada and Europe with punitive tariffs ( just last weekend he announced tariffs of 25 percent on all steel and aluminum imports into the USA ), the US president wants to annex Danish Greenland and bring the Panama Canal and the Gaza Strip under US control. Trump has just imposed sanctions on the International Criminal Court. To do this, he basically wants to shelve all US development aid.

The speed, scope and determination of this flood of orders from Trump surprise even experienced observers of international politics.
TL: DR
"We are mad that USA won't be the only one supporting the NATO with proper military might."

Trump allegedly wants to freeze the conflict, reopen Russia's gas market in return and at the same time provide security guarantees for Kiev. It's the same old story again: is he really serious about all this?

"We could well be dealing with classic Trumpian negotiating tactics and maximum demands again,"

The EU and Germany remain caught off guard and in the dark. And this despite the fact that Kellogg's plans have been circulating since the US election campaign.
The Trump administration is making an effort to start negotiating a peacetreaty with some baseline variables to have something to work with.
EU and Germany mad because they feel left out even though they knew of those plans since Trumps campaign.

The MSC Index shows that only in one G7 country does the population believe in a safe and prosperous future - the USA. And "Make America Great Again" has always been what Trump was most interested in, apart from himself.
European leaders pleading "Won't anyone think of the Europeans" to the US government that's doing shit for the US. How about you faggots that have forsaken us do something for us. Absolute cunts.

Munich Security Conference
The Munich Panic Summit and the New American Toughness


Donald Trump sends his front row to the Munich Security Conference. The message: no consideration for German sensitivities. An extraordinary foreign policy week begins.

Donald Trump dominates the Munich Security Conference before it has even begun. The US President is not traveling to the MSC in Bavaria himself, but he is sending three of his most important representatives. Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and his special representative for Ukraine , Keith Kellogg, are coming to the Hotel Bayerischer Hof on Odeonsplatz.

The trio's presence can be interpreted in a diplomatic positive way: the new US administration's attention to the Europeans is unbroken. The largest US delegation in years was praised by the conference's chairman, Christoph Heusgen, on Monday. Those who are more pessimistic fear chaos is heading for the EU. Either way: "Trumpism will be 'front and center' on the MSC main stage this year," explains security expert Rafael Loss from the European Council on Foreign Relations. "Without regard to European and German sensitivities and long-established transatlantic decorum."

The foreign and security policy emergency of Trump's second term will unfold for the first time on an open European stage from Friday (February 14).

Vance and Co. are the ambassadors of a new American toughness. Trump is demanding that NATO partners spend five percent of their GDP on defense, he is threatening allies such as Mexico, Canada and Europe with punitive tariffs ( just last weekend he announced tariffs of 25 percent on all steel and aluminum imports into the USA ), the US president wants to annex Danish Greenland and bring the Panama Canal and the Gaza Strip under US control. Trump has just imposed sanctions on the International Criminal Court. To do this, he basically wants to shelve all US development aid.

The speed, scope and determination of this flood of orders from Trump surprise even experienced observers of international politics. And are probably part of the new calculations in the White House. Heads of state from all over the world arriving in Munich will have no choice but to argue with the USA about all these issues.

Peace treaty for Ukraine?
Especially since, according to media reports, special envoy Keith Kellogg is also planning to present a peace treaty for Ukraine at the conference. Trump allegedly wants to freeze the conflict, reopen Russia's gas market in return and at the same time provide security guarantees for Kiev. It's the same old story again: is he really serious about all this?

Or do Trump's people in Bavaria ultimately just want to "float a trial balloon," as the SPD's foreign policy spokesman Nils Schmid believes. "We could well be dealing with classic Trumpian negotiating tactics and maximum demands again," says Schmid. After all, key questions about a possible agreement remain completely unanswered to this day. "A quick solution to the Ukraine question is simply not that easy," says the SPD foreign policy expert.


Commentary by Max Biederbeck
Can an agreement even succeed? Will Kiev go along with it? Does Russia want to? Will the Europeans be at the table when negotiations take place? Nothing is clear. The EU and Germany remain caught off guard and in the dark. And this despite the fact that Kellogg's plans have been circulating since the US election campaign. "The USA and Trump reject a central role in securing a possible ceasefire in Ukraine and see the Europeans as having a duty," says security expert Claudia Major from the German Institute for International and Security Affairs (SWP).

There is growing concern in Berlin that this obligation will lead to a demand for a purely European peacekeeping force in Ukraine. Not only does the German government reject this, but a European solo effort would also be virtually impossible. The EU is "currently not in a military position to credibly take on this task without US contributions," explains Major. "Moreover, no European country has yet shown any serious willingness to send troops."

Here you will find content from Civey GmbH
Here you will find content from external providers that we embed for journalistic purposes to provide comprehensive information. If you allow this content, personal data will be transferred and possibly collected and processed across pages in accordance with the data protection regulations of the respective operators of the external platforms.

Further information (including links to the privacy policies of external platforms) can be found in our Privacy Policy and our Privacy Manager .


Risk USA
The fear of Trump's possible Ukraine plan alone shows how easily and ruthlessly he can shake up the international structure. It is therefore hardly surprising that the MSC Security Index, published on Monday, has measured a sharp rise in reservations among the G7 countries: not only towards Russia or China, but also towards the USA. In Canada and Germany in particular, respondents believe that a growing risk to the world is posed primarily by the United States.

A perception, the report says, that "could also be linked to the increased fear of trade wars or the use of nuclear weapons by an aggressor." Transatlantic friendship certainly feels different.

And that is only the short-term perspective: In the long term, the US under Trump is increasingly turning its attention towards China. This so-called "pivot to Asia" would have taken place under a Democratic presidency. But under Trump, the seemingly inevitable US withdrawal from Europe will be faster, more ruthless and more brutal. The Ukraine plan in Munich could be the starting signal for this.

A move that could backfire for Trump. The US's opponents have long since learned to exploit the president's short-term eagerness to make deals. There is a fear that "Russia will wear down Ukraine and divide the Western camp through tactical negotiations while continuing to fight. Support for Ukraine in Western countries could decline, as tactical negotiations create the illusion of a tangible end to the war ("peace")," writes Major in a recent working paper..

Trump's main opponent, Beijing, could also "benefit from the US withdrawal from international commitments and the alienation of long-standing partners by Washington," writes the MSC. The new renunciation of power by the USA will mean that "other actors will have to fill the gap" and there will be a growing polarization of the global community. This will make it more difficult worldwide to maintain the existing international legal order, "prevent arms races and violent conflicts, promote economic growth for all and address common threats posed by global warming.

The Munich Security Conference threatens to become a panic summit. Trump, meanwhile, is unlikely to be interested in the complicated relationships of international politics. The MSC Index shows that only in one G7 country does the population believe in a safe and prosperous future - the USA. And "Make America Great Again" has always been what Trump was most interested in, apart from himself.
 
At least when republicans in 2020 were claiming cheating, they could point to actual straight up proven fuckery, whether that be suspicious machine behavior/access or even fraud that was dismissed as small enough to not be material. All I've seen from them is nebulous "voting machines rigged" and "voter suppression" but nothing to really back it out.
Man, Republicans had an actual movie in a theater documenting how the left stole 2020. Wake me when those lefty faggots produce anything even remotely near the quality of 2000 mules.
 
I didn't watch it live or anything but if there's one thing I'm getting from the JD Vance speech it's that European leaders are frothing at the mouth someone openly defied them and they can't throw him in jail for it.

Seriously some of these reactions are totalitarian.
As a Eurofag, I love to see it.
 
Man, Republicans had an actual movie in a theater documenting how the left stole 2020. Wake me when those lefty faggots produce anything even remotely near the quality of 2000 mules.
If anything was the opposite. I remember Ivanna Trump saying she had mobilized a silly amount of poll watchers across the battleground state.

I am 100% certain if Democrat poll watchers had shown up as well the Republican watchers would have gladly let them spectate, too.
 
What are the chances the masses might actually be exposed to it?
Low, unless some Euro politicians sperg about it loud enough to make the news. But I can't see it happening just yet. Maaaaaybe in Germany since they have elections in a week or so, but again... I don't think so. Not this time. I hope Trump and Vance keep griefing, though.
 
Back