US MLK's family fears records set for release will contain FBI "smears" - The brewing controversy pits Trump's determination to release documents the government has kept secret for more than a half-century against the family's lingering pain over how J. Edgar Hoover's FBI spied on King and tried to intimidate and humiliate him.

1.png
The Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. gives a speech outside the UN on April 15, 1967, in New York City.
Photo: Santi Visalli/Getty Images

The Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.'s family is concerned that President Trump's order to release records about his assassination could revive the FBI's attempts to discredit him — efforts that sought to exploit his indiscretions and undermine his legacy, sources close to his relatives tell Axios.
  • The family requested a sneak preview of the records prior to their release. Trump declined, a White House official said, but not out of animus toward the family.
Why it matters: The brewing controversy pits Trump's determination to release documents the government has kept secret for more than a half-century against the family's lingering pain over how J. Edgar Hoover's FBI spied on King and tried to intimidate and humiliate him.
  • Last month, Trump ordered the release of all records the U.S. government still holds about King's assassination in 1968, as well as the assassinations of President Kennedy (1963) and Sen. Robert F. Kennedy (1968).
  • The FBI has released documents about King's private life previously, but the new disclosure could include more documents detailing alleged embarrassing interactions in hotel rooms, private homes and even King's house,
"We know J. Edgar Hoover tried to destroy Dr. King's legacy, and the family doesn't want that effort to prevail," a King family friend told Axios.
  • "Family members wanted an advanced viewing" of the documents, "and [Trump] said no," the White House official said, explaining that the president believes "these records don't belong to them. These are the public's records."
  • The president's abiding interest is disclosure about what the government knew about the assassinations, not salacious details about the leaders' sex lives, the official said, adding that the King family's concerns had been relayed to the White House.
  • "Everything will be revealed," Trump said last month after he announced his order to disclose information about the three 1960s assassinations that shaped a turbulent decade in American society and politics.
Zoom in: King's assassination at the Lorraine Motel in Memphis has long fueled conspiracy theories about potential government involvement, especially because of the FBI's hostility toward him.
  • In 1969, James Earl Ray, a career criminal, pleaded guilty to shooting King but later recanted his confession, saying he was part of a larger conspiracy.
  • Allegations of government complicity have persisted for decades, with civil rights leaders, investigative authors and Ray's attorneys citing the FBI, Memphis police, and Missouri State Penitentiary — from which Ray escaped a year before the killing — as potential conspirators.
Between the lines: The promise of complete disclosure alarmed the King family, who were hurt in 2019 by the release of FBI files that alleged sordid details about King's sex life, the family friend said.
  • "The assassination of our father is a deeply personal family loss that we have endured over the last 56 years. We hope to be provided the opportunity to review the files as a family prior to its public release," the family said in an Instagram post Jan. 24, the day after Trump's order.
  • "There are deep concerns" within the family, said a second source who has corresponded with one of King's two surviving adult children.
  • "They know the right wing wants to smear Dr. King, and one way to do it is by putting these smears in the public under the guise of transparency. If there are assassination records, release those. But smears are not assassination records."
The big picture: Trump's push to release the assassination records reflect his longtime suspicion of the FBI. He stewed when the FBI investigated him, and has associated the bureau with what many conservatives see as a "Deep State" bureaucracy that has manipulated the government.
  • So the King family and Trump share a common antagonist: the FBI.
King's pursuit of civil rights through nonviolence is his enduring legacy. But as his work unfolded in the 1960s, Hoover and others in the U.S. government sought to prevent the rise of what they feared would be a Black "messiah" who could unify African Americans.
  • Congress formally recognized King's iconic status by approving a federal holiday in his honor more than 15 years after he was killed in Memphis.
  • In the following decades, his legacy drew bipartisan admiration. More recently, however, far-right commentators such as Charlie Kirk, a Trump ally, began criticizing King.
Trump hasn't followed suit, but such criticism coincides with an increasing willingness among Republicans to attack affirmative action, diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs, and other initiatives designed to ensure fairness for historically disadvantaged groups.
  • Trump has banned DEI programs in the U.S. government. He signed a proclamation declaring February as Black History Month — but his DEI ban led federal agencies to cancel activities celebrating it.
Flashback: FBI documents released through the years have shown how King's success as a civil rights organizer was rattling the bureau in 1963.
  • "We must mark [King] now ... as the most dangerous Negro of the future in this Nation from the standpoint of communism, the Negro and national security," William Sullivan, then the FBI's director of intelligence, wrote in a memo two days after King delivered his famous "I Have a Dream" speech.
  • As attorney general, Robert Kennedy approved Hoover's request in 1963 to wiretap King amid concerns that King was associating with communists.
During its surveillance of King, the FBI stumbled upon recordings, from the bugged home of his lawyer Clarence Jones, that indicated King was involved in an extramarital affair, according to the 2020 documentary "MLK/FBI."
  • That led the FBI to expand its surveillance to include bugging King's home and hotel rooms. FBI agents reported that King was involved in several sexual liaisons, according to "MLK/FBI" and documents in the National Archives.
  • In November 1964, the FBI anonymously sent a package to King at his home with a copy of an electronic surveillance tape that included personal information and a note suggesting that he kill himself, documents in the National Archives show.
FBI files accessible in the Archives suggest the bureau has tape recordings or photos of King's private activities that have never been released.
  • A federal judge in 1977 ordered most recordings and reports on King's private life sealed until 2027. Under Trump's order, the documents would be released two years early, by March 9.
Sam Pollard, director of "MLK/FBI," tells Axios that there initially will be attention on "salacious stuff" when the records on King are released.
  • But Pollard said the release also is likely to include tapes that will give scholars insight on conversations King had with Jesse Jackson and other associates on their strategies and views on their civil rights movement.
  • "I don't think, personally, it's gonna hurt his reputation," said Pollard, who received a "cease and desist" order from King's family when he was working on his film but later reached an agreement with the family.
What we're watching: Under Trump's order, the government's long-withheld documents on former President Kennedy's assassination are supposed to be released imminently.
  • The records regarding Robert Kennedy's assassination are supposed to be released after King's records, sometime after March 9.
Article Link

Archive
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
  • Islamic Content
Reactions: Flaming Insignias, Elim Garak, AllieKat and 9 others
Click to expand...
His family is prolly worried about the stuff discussed in this (2019) article, becoming public:

1739740797339.png

TLDR, FBI got a thick folder detailing the type of porn and sex he was into. Also MLK cheated on his wife & shit.

The general public learning MLK was into rape porn, getting pissed on, orgies and whatnot might smear MLK's reputation as a moral, God-fearing family man.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: Maggots on a Train v2, VorpalAnvil-, Nancy and 23 others
Strix454 said:
His "I have a dream speech" was ghostwritten for him as was his book "letters from a birmingham jail". The more I looked into him over the years, the more depressing everything seemed. He was this empty guy kind of cast as "leader" for the cameras and was turned into a somebody through media attention.
If he had lived longer, he would have degenerated into the sort of ridiculous clown the Jesse Jackson later became.
Click to expand...
Don't forget Al Sharpton as well and chances some would have called him a sellout if MLK have did a speech similar to Bill Cosby's poundcake or more or less similar to that one from the Boondocks.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: AllieKat, ZazietheBeast, IAmNotAlpharius and 2 others
Nothing that gets released could smear MLK's legacy any worse than the Basketball-American community itself has. Whoever the man really is, whether he was an empty suit or a genuine civil rights leader, none of it changes the fact that Black Americans have done sweet fuck-all since his time except squander the opportunities offered to them, devolve into feral animals, and play the victim the entire time. Anything MLK accomplished has all been for nothing since Niggers are in a worse place now than they were during the Civil Rights Era due to their laziness, greed, low intelligence, low morals, and victimhood complex.
 
  • Winner
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Astyanax Skamandrios, cactus, Shark Fin Flippers and 11 others
I can undertstand the family's concerns, but don't care. No one is perfect. Unless he turned out be a total hypocrite on what he said, it doesn't matter.

His legacy is dead anyway. Affirmative action, colledge admittance, sentancing, politics, it all matters on the color of our skin, not your merit.

Who cares if the fact that he cheated on his wife is made public?
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: cactus, Elim Garak, AllieKat and 5 others
Town Drunk said:
I can undertstand the family's concerns, but don't care. No one is perfect. Unless he turned out be a total hypocrite on what he said, it doesn't matter.
Click to expand...
They're all concerned because under their modern standards, MLK's sex degeneracy means either he must be iconoclasted or they're huge hypocrites

Womanizer who cheated on his wife constantly. Pressured women to allow him and his cronies to fuck them and do various sexually humiliating and degrading things to them, women who were dedicated participants in his church and his civil rights activism, and women who were the wives of men who were similarly dedicated. Laughed with his cronies while they watched women getting sexually humiliated and degraded. All kinds of sexual coercion, stuff that was borderline rape, some if it went over the line into rape. Over the top sleazeball shit. They don't want none of it getting any attention because any normie exposed to it will respond what the actual fuck I got lied to about him big time
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Maggots on a Train v2, Althalus, Clotso Coof and 13 others
Strix454 said:
His "I have a dream speech" was ghostwritten for him as was his book "letters from a birmingham jail". The more I looked into him over the years, the more depressing everything seemed. He was this empty guy kind of cast as "leader" for the cameras and was turned into a somebody through media attention.
If he had lived longer, he would have degenerated into the sort of ridiculous clown the Jesse Jackson later became.
Click to expand...
That's a pretty common theme with all those Civil Rights Heroes. The whole thing was so incredibly forced and manufactured. Rosa Parks and her infamous bus sit-in was fabricated nearly whole-cloth. iirc she was already an activist chosen by a committee, of several black women who basically auditioned for the roll, with her being chosen because she looked the part and was the most articulate.(light skinned) The famous picture of her sitting on a bus was staged by her and some journalists.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Althalus, Clotso Coof, VorpalAnvil- and 10 others
ThatGuyWhoLikes The Chili said:
That's a pretty common theme with all those Civil Rights Heroes. The whole thing was so incredibly forced and manufactured. Rosa Parks and her infamous bus sit-in was fabricated nearly whole-cloth. iirc she was already an activist chosen by a committee, of several black women who basically auditioned for the roll, with her being chosen because she looked the part and was the most articulate.(light skinned) The famous picture of her sitting on a bus was staged by her and some journalists.
Click to expand...

Not only that, but there was another black chick who did all that before Parks. Her story didn't get pushed forward because (IIRC) she wasn't as clean and respectable as Parks, nor did she behave as civilized when told she needed to move.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Elim Garak, AllieKat, IAmNotAlpharius and 5 others
The Dude said:
Nothing that gets released could smear MLK's legacy any worse than the Basketball-American community itself has. Whoever the man really is, whether he was an empty suit or a genuine civil rights leader, none of it changes the fact that Black Americans have done sweet fuck-all since his time except squander the opportunities offered to them, devolve into feral animals, and play the victim the entire time. Anything MLK accomplished has all been for nothing since Niggers are in a worse place now than they were during the Civil Rights Era due to their laziness, greed, low intelligence, low morals, and victimhood complex.
Click to expand...
Yeah, and we could add then Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton contributed to this fucking mess.

Btw, no need to guess then NPCs and SJWs will view the Moynihan Report as racist.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: VorpalAnvil-, Elim Garak, AllieKat and 3 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back