US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hasn't the rates of exclusive homosexuals stayed about the same over time since we started tracking it?
I'm not including bisexuals or trannies here, only exclusively gay or lesbian individuals.
I know I had looked it up once to see if changed or had spikes like trannies do, or was predominantly young girls (an indicator of social contagion) or even a steady rise over time (which may indicate a developmental disorder like autism etc) but it looked to be steadily something like 1% lesbians and 2% gays as far as I could tell (these weren't the exact rates but I remember male gays being double that of female gays which I found surprising).

You are correct. I am too lazy to look it up right now, but if you look at any survey where people are asked to report past sexual contact with a person of the same sex, the number basically hasn't budged in decades. But if you look at surveys of people calling themselves "queer" or "LGBTQ+" the number has exploded.

All the increase comes from non-practicing bisexuals and unhappy fat girls calling themselves queer or nonbinary. The concept has become completely divorced from any actual sexual preference or behavior (and perhaps this was done deliberately, to inflate the numbers of an interest group that can be used to serve the establishment).
 
Democrats, influencers huddle for a new new media strategy
Semafor (archive.ph)
By Max Tani
2025-02-17 01:10:06GMT
The Scoop
After months of licking their wounds and reflecting on how they lost the internet, Democratic strategists and politically-aligned digital creators are privately planning their next steps.

Last week, Democratic operatives gathered at the Wharf in Washington, DC, at the offices of Laurene Powell Jobs’ investment company, Emerson Collective. According to three people with knowledge of the event, the activists and left-leaning media members were in town for a private meeting to discuss how the left’s well-funded digital media ecosystem failed in the 2024 election. The conference featured hourlong seminars on how to improve short and long form video, which included briefings from Courier Newsroom’s Tara McGowan and executives at Crooked Media, and how to better collaborate with influencers to push progressive messages out.

The summit was also an opportunity to connect several of the party’s prominent financial supporters with some of the liberal media organizations that are positioning themselves as vessels to help liberals regain digital ground they’ve lost to the right in recent years.

In the room were Ben Wessel, the director of State and Local Political Affairs for Emerson Collective and Laura Quinn, an executive with the liberal firm Catalist who often advises liberal donors on how to spend their money in progressive media. Michael Del Nin, Soros Fund Management’s leading investor, was also in attendance to talk about strategies around acquiring media companies. Peter Murray also spoke to the group about strategic media opportunities; his organization, Accelerate Change, bought Now This from Vox in 2023, and pivoted it into a more explicitly partisan influencer-driven short-form video company.

Know More
In the wake of their second loss to Donald Trump and the more explicit alignment between the president and the most popular podcasts in the country, Democrats have been on a monthslong party-wide effort to figure out how to regain credibility in digital, or at least develop their own network of friendly pundits and creators outside legacy media who can effectively deliver their message.

The private event at the Wharf was one of several efforts in recent days to shore up Democrats’ digital strategies post-inauguration. Earlier this week, dozens of lawmakers from the House and Senate Democratic caucuses participated in private briefings with Brian Tyler Cohen, a political influencer and the co-founder of Chorus, a Democratic digital group. The briefings laid out what Cohen described to Semafor as tips to help Democratic members better get their messages out on new media platforms. He presented the members with do’s and don’ts for short-form video and text, encouraging them to vastly increase the frequency of their posts and not overly workshop their online content. To make his point, Cohen noted that Elon Musk had posted or retweeted hundreds of posts that week alone. Cohen pointed to positive examples of congressional Democratic content that had performed well and resonated, such as a recent post in which Sen. Tim Kaine pushed back on Trump’s claims about how diversity efforts impacted air traffic safety. He also recommended a particular type of small microphone popular with online content creators that members and their staff should have for whenever they decide to post.

In the months since the election, Cohen’s group, Chorus, has repositioned itself and set up a digital quasi-assignment desk, where lawmakers on Capitol Hill and prominent Democrats elsewhere can connect directly on the backend with creators to facilitate one-on-one interviews or otherwise get their message out. Cohen told Semafor that after his briefing with Senate Democrats, several members, including Arizona Sen. Mark Kelly, created new accounts on Threads and Bluesky and began connecting directly with nontraditional digital creators for livestreams and interviews intended to be cut into short-form video.

“A lot of these members of Congress understand the moment that we’re in,” Cohen told Semafor. “They’re recognizing where we are and are very quick to embrace the fact that you have a solution to fixing it. We’ve had a number of electeds meet with creators. That’s to their credit — they’re kind of learning the lessons that this election cycle taught us.”

Max's View
In the months since the election, Democrats have been beating themselves up over how they went from online dominance in the Obama era to playing catch-up; the online right is resurgent, especially in the podcast space, where many Americans now get their information and news.

The initial shock of the presidential loss has been heightened by other frustrations among Democrats at their party’s superficially slow and unsatisfying response to Trump and Musk’s shock-and awe-changes to the federal government. Embarrassing visuals of older lawmakers who seem unable to effectively take the fight to the new administration online have gone viral and prompted dismay from prominent members of the party.

Rising cable television ratings on MSNBC — and increasing online web traffic and subscriber numbers among explicitly anti-Trump outlets — show there is clearly a growing interest in oppositional media. But it remains to be seen whether efforts by Democratic online partisans will be able to alter the playing field in a meaningful way. As Red Seat Ventures co-founder Chris Balfe told me in an interview this week, the online conservative media ecosystem is strong because it spent years developing an anti-establishment model sustained by strong audience interest, not propped up by one party as its political messaging arm.

Some of the Democratic political operatives gathered at the Wharf are the same players who operated with large budgets to spend on digital newsrooms and creators during recent election cycles — without much clear return on their donors’ big dollar investments. And the concepts the meeting addressed aren’t necessarily new: Democrats explicitly reached out to influencers and creators as part of their 2024 strategy, at times to the frustration of legacy media. But if these efforts moved the needle, it clearly was not at the presidential level.

Room for Disagreement
Still, some national Democrats clearly understand that even if helping to prop up a media ecosystem like the one on the right will take time, they need to update their own communication styles in the meantime. In recent weeks, Democratic senators and prominent members of Congress have begun appearing on random niche Twitch gaming streams to criticize Musk and have been churning out multiple TikTok-friendly front-facing vertical videos a week about the new administration. The Democratic National Committee chair race included pledges from the various candidates about supporting explicitly Democratic partisan media, and included a candidate forum moderated by influencers at Chorus.

Notable
Kamala Harris’ former digital chief argued to Semafor last year
that online messaging issues were symptomatic of a deeper cultural deficit that Democrats accrued in recent years.
 
When can I afford eggs?

Egg laying chickens take roughly 18 weeks to mature to the "point of lay"
View attachment 6985252
Trump was Inaugurated Jan 20th. 🇺🇸 Marked on this calendar, and 🐣 marked 18 weeks later.
View attachment 6985260
May 26th also happens to be Memorial Day this year.
View attachment 6985263

After May 26th, Memorial Day the egg prices will begin to be effected by Trump's direct policies. Add a few weeks for Trump's cabinet picks to be confirmed and for Trump to fire the chicken genociders.

Juneteenth might possibly see improvements.

Give it until The 4th of July before you complain again.

Did that answer your concern?

for eggs it seems like 18-32 weeks before new chicks are of egg laying age.
So at least 4 months minimum before egg prices go down (assuming they started raising new ones today)
 
So about that Rhode Island Judge. Turns out he is on the board of a NGO called Crossroads Rhode Island. This NGO gets money from Rhode Island and Rhode Island gets funding federal government (which was cut off).
If long term federal judges had to automatically recuse themselves anytime the state was a litigant, it would be a major issue. He should have at least issued an order explaining a lack of recusal given the case and his role as a director—given the political nature of the case—but I don't think it would rise to the level of being forced to recuse himself. If they received frozen funds directly, then I would agree more.

You can feel free to make an ethics complaint, though. If enough people raise it, the First Circuit will address it publically.

The Eleventh Circuit had to address complaints about two judges who said they wouldn't hire from certain leftist schools because of the law schools' conduct and culture. So a federal judge will see your complaint if you think it's serious enough to send one. Be the change you want to see in the world.
 
Yeah. I still remember that, "my culture isn't your costume" nonsense a lot of these fuckwits tried to push on the lot of us who just wanted to have fun with a thing.
As an American someone could dress up in a fat suit, wear red white and blue clothes, wear a burger hat, and hold a prop gun and I literally would not care. Of course no one else can have fun because we have to be super serious and sanitized.
Uh oh, here comes the gestapo. Never change, Germany.
 
Free speech needs boundaries. These boundaries are part of our constitution. Without those boundaries, a very small group of people can say whatever they want while everyone else is scared and intimidated.
Huh. That wording sounds awfully familiar. I wonder if certain groups of people in Germany can do whatever they want, whenever they want, while everyone else is either unable or unwilling to stop them. What a strange thing to say, I wonder who that actually applies to.

🤔 It's a big mystery. 🤔
 
I was thinking how funny it would be if, in the Democratic parties desperation to recover relevancy, they abandon their tentpole issues of trannies, DEI, unchecked immigration, etc. In response, the Republican party pulls their own George Soros and begin funding counter campaigns for these former Democrats supporters, making calls to action due to their former party being sexist/racist/transphobic and "abandoning" them.

Then I realized that's retarded because these people would be willing to do it for free anyways. The Demo party really is in the worst possible position from every side. I wouldn't even begin to know how to recover from this.
 
Back