Waving goodbye: Washington lawmakers want to redesign state flag for a new era

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Original (Archive)

Three Democratic representatives have introduced a bill to establish a committee overseeing the redesign of the Washington state flag. House Bill 1938, sponsored by Representatives Strom Peterson (D-Edmonds), Julia Reed (D-Seattle) and Greg Nance (D-Kitsap), aims to create a flag that the lawmakers believe better reflects Washington’s unique identity and diverse population.

Critiques of the current flag​

Washington’s current state flag features a detailed portrait of George Washington on a dark green field.

According to the bill’s text, supporters of the change argue that the design is overly complex, difficult to reproduce, and does not effectively represent the state’s distinct character. Additionally, some believe the use of George Washington’s image lacks a direct connection to the state’s history and cultural diversity.

Proposed Changes​

House Bill 1938 proposes the formation of the Washington State Flag Redesign Committee, which would include members from the Washington State Arts Commission, state legislators, historians, designers, cultural leaders, tribal representatives, and citizens from various regions.

The committee’s mandate includes developing a new flag design that accurately reflects Washington’s shared history, resources, and diverse communities. The process emphasizes public engagement through outreach to schools, community organizations, tribes, public forums, and online surveys.

The final design will be selected by the committee and presented to voters in a statewide referendum.

Historical Context and Previous Redesign Efforts​

Washington’s state flag was officially adopted in 1923.

In 2001, the North American Vexillological Association ranked Washington’s flag 47th out of 72 U.S. state, U.S. territorial, and Canadian provincial flags due to its complicated seal.

In recent years, individuals have proposed alternative designs. For instance, a Bellingham graphic artist who previously designed the city’s flag and official seal initiated a campaign to modernize the state flag. His design aimed to create a more distinctive and meaningful symbol for Washington but was never adopted.

Washington is not alone in reconsidering its state flag design. States like Mississippi and Utah have recently undertaken successful redesign efforts to create flags that better represent their current identities and values.

Next Steps​

If House Bill 1938 is enacted, the Washington State Flag Redesign Committee will work toward adopting a new design by July 1, 2028. The proposed design will then be submitted to voters for approval in a general election, ensuring that any change to the state flag reflects the will of Washington’s citizens.

The bill will have its first public hearing on February 18 before the House State Government and Tribal Relations Committee, with a final committee vote set for three days later.
 
In recent years, individuals have proposed alternative designs. For instance, a Bellingham graphic artist who previously designed the city’s flag and official seal initiated a campaign to modernize the state flag. His design aimed to create a more distinctive and meaningful symbol for Washington but was never adopted.
This is what his flag looks like:

bradley lockhart washington flag.jpg

I definitely like it a lot more than the generic state seal on a solid color background. Turquoise, forest green, and white is a really eye-pleasing color combination, it's simplistic enough to be reproduced, and it's distinct enough to be recognizable from a distance. And there's a W for Washington built into the mountaintops, which is pretty neat.
 
This is what his flag looks like:

View attachment 6994919

I definitely like it a lot more than the generic state seal on a solid color background. Turquoise, forest green, and white is a really eye-pleasing color combination, it's simplistic enough to be reproduced, and it's distinct enough to be recognizable from a distance. And there's a W for Washington built into the mountaintops, which is pretty neat.
That's not actually a terrible redesign. Kinda surprising, a lot of state re-designs end up being too corporate-logo to be nice.
 
>Why does the state called Washington have George Washington on its flag?
I'm aware of the masonic attempts to deify Washington, but this is nonetheless really gay. People have already pointed out the Minnesota flag change.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pope Julius IV
This is what his flag looks like:

View attachment 6994919

I definitely like it a lot more than the generic state seal on a solid color background. Turquoise, forest green, and white is a really eye-pleasing color combination, it's simplistic enough to be reproduced, and it's distinct enough to be recognizable from a distance. And there's a W for Washington built into the mountaintops, which is pretty neat.
It's gonna be like with Minnesota where they had some pretty good designs to choose from and they went with the ugly Somali one.

My prediction:
new flag of washington.png
 
>Why does the state called Washington have George Washington on its flag?
I'm aware of the masonic attempts to deify Washington, but this is nonetheless really gay. People have already pointed out the Minnesota flag change.
Minnesota's flag is not bad. But its also not really distinct either. If they wanted to use the exact same design as Nepal, they should have just gone with that and left out the light blue part. Its not like State flags HAVE to be a square. Ohio remains supremely based with its Cavalry guidon design.
 
This is what his flag looks like:

View attachment 6994919

I definitely like it a lot more than the generic state seal on a solid color background. Turquoise, forest green, and white is a really eye-pleasing color combination, it's simplistic enough to be reproduced, and it's distinct enough to be recognizable from a distance. And there's a W for Washington built into the mountaintops, which is pretty neat.
There was a period of time when actually-good designs like this could've been considered without the culture wars stinking the potential discussion up.

I myself figure if Washington wanted to redesign the flag they can change Big G's look to being a mere silhouette/profile of his head amongst other things, but patriots nowadays would complain it's a deliberate snub to kick history out if he's removed entirely and I can't entirely disagree with them. It's a sincere pity.
 
This is what his flag looks like:

View attachment 6994919

I definitely like it a lot more than the generic state seal on a solid color background. Turquoise, forest green, and white is a really eye-pleasing color combination, it's simplistic enough to be reproduced, and it's distinct enough to be recognizable from a distance. And there's a W for Washington built into the mountaintops, which is pretty neat.
LMAO it looks like Pocatello. This has to be a troll.
Flag_of_Pocatello,_Idaho.svg.png

Flag nerds know.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: beautiful person
Seals on a state flags suck and that's half of them.

Generally the S-tier flags in the country are Texas and Colorado, Arizona and California are A-tier because how recognizable they are, stuff like Tennessee and New Mexico is B-tier, most of the seal flags range from C to D tier (including S. Carolina)...and after that you kind of get various degrees of shit. Maryland's is overly complicated and can't really be ranked, Hawaii's is the Union Jack with stripes, Minnesota sucks for being cucked, Mississippi is still cucked but isn't that bad, and Ohio is Ohio tier.
 
This is what his flag looks like:

View attachment 6994919

I definitely like it a lot more than the generic state seal on a solid color background. Turquoise, forest green, and white is a really eye-pleasing color combination, it's simplistic enough to be reproduced, and it's distinct enough to be recognizable from a distance. And there's a W for Washington built into the mountaintops, which is pretty neat.
It looks modern which has its pros and cons, but not very pozzed.
 
Turning a state flag into a brand logo is consoomer brained. Good state flags in order:

1. Alabama (classic)
2. Texas (it pains me to have to admit this)
3. DC (subtle, distinguishable)

Half of the other flags look like a logo for a company that wants to sell me life insurance, the other half wants to sell me margarine.

Disgusting
 
This is what his flag looks like:

View attachment 6994919

I definitely like it a lot more than the generic state seal on a solid color background. Turquoise, forest green, and white is a really eye-pleasing color combination, it's simplistic enough to be reproduced, and it's distinct enough to be recognizable from a distance. And there's a W for Washington built into the mountaintops, which is pretty neat.
1000012373.jpg
1000012374.png

I fucking hate modern vexillology

Bring back flags for real men
1000012375.png
 
Back