African-American Appreciation Thread - Highlighting contributions from our most productive citizens

speed.jpg
 
This one is a treasure trove of content, including a few plot twists that are downright comedic.

I love body cam channels.

I saved this offline so let me know if this one gets deleted, I want to save Jersh the 70MB.


12 minutes in for the obligatory I CAN'T BREATHE scene.
 
Last edited:
Kiwibros, I think I've found a case of Peak Sheboonery.
View attachment 6981964
>steals over $1 MILLION from her employer
>her house is such a pigsty OPL would be proud
>lol fat
>her name is Paa’Shion T. Mhoon
>"I DINDU NUTHIN'" when confronted
>was caught googling "how to prove I didn't misappropriate funds"
God, the cops sound so soft and pathetic. They know they have to cuddle her because muh ray zism.

At least she didn't chimp out as I imagined it.
 
I love body cam channels.

I saved this offline so let me know if this one gets deleted, I want to save Jersh the 70MB.


12 minutes in for the obligatory I CAN'T BREATHE scene.
so the two main characters are fighting over dey weegs
what are the rest doing? is a fight between two black women like an MMO raid where you have to bring the whole party?
 
In this thread, we often discuss the problem of black criminality. We rarely discuss solutions though. Well, this guy has a FUCKING GENIUS plan to eliminate all crime! Just change the definition of crime!



Lest you think this is some rando in a pool hall, this is Benjamin Crump. He's a civil rights attorney with his own wikipedia page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_Crump

His idea is not new. If you're over 30 years old, you will remember when "racism" meant prejudice based on race. But then the Left has the (also fucking genius) idea to simply redefine it such that "it's not possible to be racist toward white people" and just like that, they had eliminated most racism!

GhHiVz9qnf5JF1S4nmuuUE4Gj3h0hB18q3S0WXzzPsk.jpg

So for example, murder is currently defined as "unlawful killing." We could define murder as "killing plus privilege" - that would mean a black person couldn't commit murder ...since after all they have no privilege!

You can dress this policy up in fancier academic language if you like:

PpvjrG5.jpg

And of course, Soros DA's all over the country already routinely behave as if this is the law already. Blacks are excused for all sorts of crime under the guise of "restorative justice." Juries in majority-black jurisdictions also implement this plan:

its legal to kill whites.jpg

It's pushed by black attorney's like Crump. They advocate for jury nullification any time a black man is charged with murdering a white person.

its okay to murder whites.png

So yeah, we might as well change the definitions. Nothing else has worked to reduce black crime.
 
In this thread, we often discuss the problem of black criminality. We rarely discuss solutions though. Well, this guy has a FUCKING GENIUS plan to eliminate all crime! Just change the definition of crime!

View attachment 6996172

Lest you think this is some rando in a pool hall, this is Benjamin Crump. He's a civil rights attorney with his own wikipedia page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_Crump

His idea is not new. If you're over 30 years old, you will remember when "racism" meant prejudice based on race. But then the Left has the (also fucking genius) idea to simply redefine it such that "it's not possible to be racist toward white people" and just like that, they had eliminated most racism!

View attachment 6996194

So for example, murder is currently defined as "unlawful killing." We could define murder as "killing plus privilege" - that would mean a black person couldn't commit murder ...since after all they have no privilege!

You can dress this policy up in fancier academic language if you like:

View attachment 6996198

And of course, Soros DA's all over the country already routinely behave as if this is the law already. Blacks are excused for all sorts of crime under the guise of "restorative justice." Juries in majority-black jurisdictions also implement this plan:

View attachment 6996196

It's pushed by black attorney's like Crump. They advocate for jury nullification any time a black man is charged with murdering a white person.

View attachment 6996203

So yeah, we might as well change the definitions. Nothing else has worked to reduce black crime.
this isn't new, the idea of 'just make it legal and it won't be a crime' is the mindset behind a lot of stupid policies
it's why canada permitted all drug use
"no unlawful drug use if all drug use is lawful" is a real neat modifier for your tabletop game, but it doesn't prevent the illness nor violent activity stemming FROM drug use which forced it to be criminalized

i think it's the result of peole who don't live in the physical world, they live in a magical land where their entire life is nice apartments, cushy offices, boutiques and rich coffee shops, and everything inbetween is just fast travel, the world is just papers and laws and definitions, and so they don't think of physical issues, only semantics and technicalities
they're secretaries in life
 
God, the cops sound so soft and pathetic. They know they have to cuddle her because muh ray zism.
Sometimes, frequently even, the best way to get a suspect to cooperate and confess is by being nice. You see it happen in interrogations all the time. Jim Rauch and several of the other KBI interrogations during the original To Catch a Predator stings are good examples.
 
violent activity stemming FROM drug use

Not to derail the thread but notice this: we don't really have a problem in society with alcoholics committing crime to support their alcoholism. I'm sure it happens rarely, but it's not a big issue.

The reason is, alcohol is cheap enough for even a jobless, homeless person to afford it. By contrast, drugs are expensive, and people do commit crimes to support their habit.

And society spends countless billions trying to help them ...and countless billions trying to enforce prohibition. None of it works. We are not better off, as far as I can tell.

There's an argument to be made that we would be better off not spending that money. Let private enterprise bring the price of crack down - let them sell that shit in wallmart. The addicts will stop stealing (because they're lazy, and stealing is hard work) and all that society has to do is scoop up their dead bodies when they meet their final reward.
 
So for example, murder is currently defined as "unlawful killing." We could define murder as "killing plus privilege" - that would mean a black person couldn't commit murder ...since after all they have no privilege!
Nigger murder suspect has bond reduced from $800k to $100.
"Nigger Privilege"
Archive
 
Well, this guy has a FUCKING GENIUS plan to eliminate all crime! Just change the definition of crime!
Like someone already said, that's already what we do. We change the definition of crimes, or alter them to make it seem like blacks aren't the main perpetrator. We've done this with mass shootings as well. It used to be three people shot, then the definition changed to three people killed and now it's four or five and the total amount of people injured doesn't matter. School shootings too. A school shooting requires more than one person to be shot. If it was a singular person, there would be no competition between blacks and whites because blacks have been bringing guns to school for years to shoot their rival gang members.
 
Not to derail the thread but notice this: we don't really have a problem in society with alcoholics committing crime to support their alcoholism.
The issue with drugs isn't just that addicts can't acquire it, the drugs themselves can make them violent
Alcohol doesn't commonly have the same effect, it's not as strongly or regularly addictive as crack cocaine, is much easier to detect on a person on the spot by just smelling their breath or at most giving them a breathalyser making the job of guards and cops easier in detecting who might be a potential nuisance, and it's completely harmless in small doses

Again, look at Canada, they let all their druggies shoot up and snort up all they want, sure it may have stopped a few from shanking one another for drug money, but it didn't stop the addicts who are already running around blasted off their minds doing it just because the funny nose powder told them to shank that guy

The closest thing we had to legal drugs in small amounts was when we were putting it in cola and medication, but that wasn't the pure stuff or enough to make people rage for another puff of the rock, nor was it culturally correlated to drug use which I also think is a big factor, many hoodlums do drugs just cause it's cool and hip in their eyes, it's why lean got popular
Also most people in America in that era were white but I just can't see the correlation there

I will however agree with you here- the 'war' on drugs is absurd, we ARE spending way too much money on it, especially considering how readily the CIA will then proceed to participate in the drug trade and distribute more of them
It's the definition of funding a war to then pretend to fight it
The reason for the war on drugs isn't to maintain the wellbeing of the citizens, it's to maintain control, but it's the sort of issue that can't be fixed now by just legalizing drugs for the citizens, at most we first need to take care of societal menaces
 
Last edited:
Back