Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[AnOminous]

The prosecutor would immediately shut down any question steering away from the case. You people keep forgetting this is not a civil case.

Anything reflecting on the credibility of a witness can be used to impeach. Nick is clearly an extremely biased witness who can't be trusted because a) he is a pathological liar; b) he openly detests the defendant; and c) he would benefit from harming the defendant.

The fact that he hates the defendant enough to commit felony level crimes against him clearly reflects on his motive. His testimony derives from his personal animus against the defendant from being his ex-gay lover and cucking him.

That's completely relevant.

 

[ye's Official KF Burner]

The prosecutor would immediately shut down any question steering away from the case. You people keep forgetting this is not a civil case.

A lot of court cases I've read up on in recent years have deviated from the standards when the judge lets it happen. Anything is possible.

 

[Desktop User2]

Anything reflecting on the credibility of a witness can be used to impeach. Nick is clearly an extremely biased witness who can't be trusted because a) he is a pathological liar; b) he openly detests the defendant; and c) he would benefit from harming the defendant.

The fact that he hates the defendant enough to commit felony level crimes against him clearly reflects on his motive. His testimony derives from his personal animus against the defendant from being his ex-gay lover and cucking him.

That's completely relevant.

Sure and you can establish that by their regular interactions not asking which edible panties were his preferred. The extremely personal questions that were suggested to which I responded to would be tossed and his lawyer would look like an asshole before the jury.

TBF I have no idea why the fuck would he be summoned to testify, maybe the prosecutor is also retarded; unless it was Aaron´s defense idea which would reach even a new level of stupidity.

 

[LiquidKid]

Another week, and he'll be mad that he can't eat my jizz

Where else will he get the mayo for his sandwich?

 

[AnOminous]

Sure and you can establish that by their regular interactions not asking which edible panties were his preferred. The extremely personal questions that were suggested to which I responded to would be tossed and his lawyer would look like an asshole before the jury.

Anything he's said in public is fair game. The only issue is whether it's more prejudicial than probative. So maybe some of the more salacious details would be shut down, but not the general existence of the Qover and that Nick rants insanely all day long about the guy swallowing his cum, nor the fact that he's publicly given at least half a dozen different completely contradictory and often unintelligible, incoherent lies about every single event in their shared lives.

 

[Mr. Manchester]

Any supposed harassment Nick suffered from Aaron.

I hope they go with this one so Aaron can counter with Nicks goo joke.

 

[Desktop User2]

Anything he's said in public is fair game. The only issue is whether it's more prejudicial than probative. So maybe some of the more salacious details would be shut down, but not the general existence of the Qover and that Nick rants insanely all day long about the guy swallowing his cum, nor the fact that he's publicly given at least half a dozen different completely contradictory and often unintelligible, incoherent lies about every single event in their shared lives.

Still dont understand why the prosecution would want the stupidest man in Universe anywhere near their case but hey ho...

 

[AnOminous]

Still dont understand why the prosecution would want the stupidest man in Universe anywhere near their case but hey ho...

It's kind of a mystery to me why they're even bothering to prosecute this bullshit at all, much less with a witless witness like Nick who couldn't tell a believable lie to save his worthless cucked life.

 

[Dammit Mandrake!]

Are we sure Nick Rekieta was ever a lawyer?

 

[Desktop User2]

It's kind of a mystery to me why they're even bothering to prosecute this bullshit at all, much less with a witless witness like Nick who couldn't tell a believable lie to save his worthless cucked life.

I dont know if we have the summon but it would be hilarious if it was requested by Aaron´s lawyer because of their goose chase about the hacking. Then we would be dealing with absolute dimwittery.

 

[Horrified Bystander]

Barnes was treating this like the Nick's livestreams are some ethereal realm where the law can not touch Nick.

This is where that retarded giant baby really annoys me. He acts as if they can’t get a warrant because it’s a copy of the video. It’s like saying that the cops can’t get a warrant because they told a judge they watched the security footage of someone robbing a bank but didn’t specify they watched a copy of the footage. Pure legalistic slap-dick bullshit.

 

[Dixieland Buckaroo]

Anything reflecting on the credibility of a witness can be used to impeach. Nick is clearly an extremely biased witness who can't be trusted because a) he is a pathological liar; b) he openly detests the defendant; and c) he would benefit from harming the defendant.

The fact that he hates the defendant enough to commit felony level crimes against him clearly reflects on his motive. His testimony derives from his personal animus against the defendant from being his ex-gay lover and cucking him.

That's completely relevant.

Yesh there's not a lot for the State to get out of Nick, but a whole lot Aaron's team could get out of Nick. Very odd, unless the subpoena was from the defense.

 

[AnOminous]

Yesh there's not a lot for the State to get out of Nick, but a whole lot Aaron's team could get out of Nick. Very odd, unless the subpoena was from the defense.

It's a weird choice because putting the subhuman piece of shit that is Cuckieta up against even a shitty member of the human race is going to make the other guy look better in comparison.

Even in just the last 24 hours, you have the cuck contradicting a previous lie about the baseball bat story.

It's like a bounty of riches for cross examination. You have more lies than you could possibly go through in a cross examination, and that's even if you leave the disgusting, degenerate sex shit on the ground.

 

[Strix454]

Yesh there's not a lot for the State to get out of Nick, but a whole lot Aaron's team could get out of Nick. Very odd, unless the subpoena was from the defense.

Is Kayla testifying? Because if she is not, there are several details in terms of the case that only Nick could really provide. But the problem is that he isn't going to be a good, sympathetic or credible witness. And he will end up fielding questions about Aaron's relationship with his wife that going to make him look a like cuck to the jury.

A woman in this situation is going to get jury sympathy. But Nick? None at all.

 

[Captain Manning]

I hope he does. About the only thing that could get Aaron acquitted at this point is this repulsive cocksucker disgusting the jury with what an absolute subhuman mess he is. I know if I were on a jury and this slimy little cuck was a witness against the accused I'd be looking for excuses for jury nullification.

Jury Foreman: "Your honor, we find the Defendant, Aaron Imholte, not guilty, on the basis that nobody... including and especially the victim and her husband... give a single solitary fuck that he showed a nude picture of the victim to Geno."

Judge: "I'll allow it."

Nick: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!


...

Well, probably not, but a guy can dream, can't he?

It's kind of a mystery to me why they're even bothering to prosecute this bullshit at all, much less with a witless witness like Nick who couldn't tell a believable lie to save his worthless cucked life.

Something something principle, I guess.

There's a theory making the rounds that the county attorney is a hard charging feminazi, but I don't know if I buy that given it's a Republican leaning county, and she was reelected in 2022 unopposed.

Course, Aaron isn't helping matters by being a fucking idiot, like he always is, and not just accepting the misdemeanor.

With the evidence they apparently do have on him, I wouldn't call her bluff in this case. It's possible he'll be convicted by a jury of the misdemeanor, but not the felony, and the end result would be little different than the plea deal, but that seems like an awful risk to take here.

 

[Dixieland Buckaroo]

Is Kayla testifying? Because if she is not, there are several details in terms of the case that only Nick could really provide. But the problem is that he isn't going to be a good, sympathetic or credible witness. And he will end up fielding questions about Aaron's relationship with his wife that going to make him look a like cuck to the jury.

A woman in this situation is going to get jury sympathy. But Nick? None at all.

Nick said he and Kayla got subpoenaed, at least from the Wil Herren vid I saw. Nick seemed to confirm:

I don't know that I agree Kayla will appear sympathetic. She will need to be at just the right level of drugged out to testify and appear human, and I think that's a very small window. We know Kayla has thought of herself as an actress, but that was before her last couple of braincells were cracked and gassed out of existence.

Aaron's lawyer 100% should hire a female attorney to do Kayla's (cross) examination.
Edit to add: Wil Herren vid with Nick chats, confirming the Kayla subpoena.

 

[Strix454]

Nick said he and Kayla got subpoenaed, at least from the chats I saw.

Kayla testifying and keeping Nick away from the case entirely would be the best way to do it. If she is going to testify, there isn't any reason whatsoever for him to testify that I can think of. What can he testify to:

"Yes your honor. I used the signal app to transfer a nude photo of my prudent wife to my wife's boyfriend"

"Yes your honor. My wife shared a nude photo with her boyfriend who shared it with one guy and I'm totally put out at the harm that its done to our loving marriage"

The whole case in that it involves a whole pack of drug user swingers airing out disputes in their sex lives is just disgusting and I still don't understand why the DA has not washed her hands of this a long time ago. This is more old-school Jerry Springer than it is courtroom stuff.

 

[Major]

We know Kayla has thought of herself as an actress,

This just goes to show how unhappy she was in the marriage, married to a closeted homosexual alcoholic, how desperate she was to be with someone other than Nick. I'm sure she was just as upset at Aaron leaving as Nick was.

 

[Windy Moors]

Nick takes the stand, Aaron's lawyer approaches for his opening question.

Aaron's lawyer: Mr Rekieta, faggot white bread ass niggas say what.
Nick: What?!

 

[Chazzed Up]

There's a theory making the rounds that the county attorney is a hard charging feminazi, but I don't know if I buy that given it's a Republican leaning county, and she was reelected in 2022 unopposed.

But does she squirt liquor out of her pussy?