Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 15.3%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 6 1.5%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 105 25.4%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 74 17.9%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 165 40.0%

  • Total voters
    413
About the CA, this interview about receiving the ATHENA award from the Woman´s Fund of Central Minnesota is pretty telling:

7:10 "Yes, I am a warrior. A warrior for victims rights"

She is focused on DV and women and children rights. Not keen on cameras in court.
Does not seen like man hating but pretty empathetic towards women; it explains why this is going to trial, probably.

Interesting.

People can nitpick at her politics. I'd argue they're very 2nd stage feminism vs 3rd (much worse).

Who in Central MN would argue with going after a right-wing problematic polyicule-member, molly-enjoyed, fired radio morning show host who recklessly sent a naked pic to a pathetic comedian while on a live stream with 400+ people watching?

That's an easy conviction.

@Potentially Criminal spent most of tonight (on his stream and then KC) arguing FOR Destiny's BPD "victims" of revenge porn. Same difference.
 
The prosecutor would immediately shut down any question steering away from the case. You people keep forgetting this is not a civil case.
As already stated his credibility is always relevant.

*bunch of stuff I agree with*
Imagine putting Nick under cross-examination and cutting him off with a few........."Sir, yes or no, please. You can explain things with the prosecutor...............Your honor, this is a non-responsive answer. Move to strike"..............he'll lose his fucking mind and start falling apart.

His ODD will be on full display, and he'll get even more upset because he can't string together thoughts and he'll know he's looking like a retard. He'll know that he's fucking things up and this is helping Aaron, which ratchets things up even more. Maybe Aaron looks him in the eye, maybe there's a smirk and he gets even more agitated. Then his "heat allergy" kicks in.

And just wait until Aaron's attorney brings up the issue of Nick blaming Aaron for the drug raid and his guilty plea. That will be fucking hilarious.

When he's up on the stand, he's not going to be able to hide behind the screen and take some hits off his vape or a swig of booze to even himself out.

TBF I have no idea why the fuck would he be summoned to testify, maybe the prosecutor is also retarded; unless it was Aaron´s defense idea which would reach even a new level of stupidity.
Very likely the prosecution has never sat down with him face to face yet and really interviewed him and prepped him for trial. They don't know his brain is fried and that he can't string thoughts together.

Yesh there's not a lot for the State to get out of Nick, but a whole lot Aaron's team could get out of Nick.
It's 3 v 1 on the answer of "We all agreed to keep things private"....Juries sometimes eat that shit up.

Very odd, unless the subpoena was from the defense.
No way in hell would I voluntarily subpoena Nick as Defense Counsel. That's like playing soccer with an IED. Also, he "went and picked it up" indicating, to me (a big retard, so I could be wrong) that he and Qayla drove out to St. Cloud to get them.

It's a weird choice because putting the subhuman piece of shit that is Cuckieta up against even a shitty member of the human race is going to make the other guy look better in comparison.
They've probably had the Defense Attorney telling them Nick is a huge turd and likely brushed him off because of course Defense Counsel always says stuff like that. Hell, I do it. They don't know what they don't know.

Wouldn't be the first time that interviewing your witnesses makes you realize your case is a stinker.


even though it was beyond retarded for Aaron to hope that distracting prosecutors with the cybercrime shit would magically get them to drop his own case
Most offices would bail once this started happening along with the issue of witnesses who lived 1,000 miles away are refusing to appear.
 
So, no cybercrime charges then? Care to elaborate?
No, I mean most prosecutors would have bailed on the revenge porn charges once the victim's husband, and one of your critical witnesses, starts harassing the Defendant and committing crimes against said Defendant.

As I've said before, there are real victims that need real help, and will not dick up a case.
 
While not the smartest idea, I can respect Aaron for taking this all the way. How the Rekietas behave in court is a huge unknown with the potential to overturn the entire case and I doubt they were prepared for this eventuality, thinking that he'd take the plea. I must imagine that Kayla would be a nervous wreck on the stand, she can't seem to act normal in even the most brief appearances on Nick's streams, and those were all before the drug use really kicked off. I think Nick on a good day could fool some jurors, Aaron would be prudent to needle him into letting the full cryptid out. Hard to say how the jurors will view them as a couple.

I think the jurors would have to really find Aaron distasteful to press for the full felony, though his past restraining orders (as bs as they are) won't help him. I know if I were in their shoes, the background of the case would make me roll my eyes. Just junkies doing junkie shit, and from a certain perspective, someone getting what they deserve for sending sexual images outside her marriage, and for failing to establish the consent of those images.
 
Last edited:
While not the smartest idea, I can respect Aaron for taking this all the way. How the Rekietas behave in court is a huge unknown with the potential to overturn the entire case and I doubt they were prepared for this eventuality, thinking that he'd take the plea. I must imagine that Kayla would be a nervous wreck on the stand, she can't seem to act normal in even the most brief appearances on Nick's streams, and those were all before the drug use really kicked off. I think Nick on a good day could fool some jurors, Aaron would be prudent to needle him into letting the full cryptid out.

The jurors would have to really find Aaron distasteful to press for the full felony. I know if I were in their shoes, the background of the case would make me roll my eyes. Just junkies doing junkie shit, and from a certain perspective, someone getting what they deserve for sending sexual images outside her marriage, and for failing to establish the consent of those images.

Respectfully, it's RETARDED for Aaron to take this to trial UNLESS he thinks the cybercrime issue is at play which @Potentially Criminal has just cryptically dismissed as an issue atp. (Btw, Sean speaks with Aaron - well documented.)

So, unless Aaron is biding for time in the cybercrime nonsense, he's just waiting for a better deal on the RP case. My deduction.

He's getting convicted. It's on tape.
 
Imagine putting Nick under cross-examination and cutting him off with a few........."Sir, yes or no, please. You can explain things with the prosecutor...............Your honor, this is a non-responsive answer. Move to strike"..............he'll lose his fucking mind and start falling apart.
With respect to the bolded part, and for the benefit of anybody here that is genuinely interested in learning about the law (remember we also have a lot of users that come from non-Common Law countries), this is because leading questions are permitted under cross, but not direct, no?
 
That is one ugly, psycho looking woman. The eyes are the window to the soul. This broads eyes 👀 say she's a full on unhinged psychopath bitch. Imagine just having a conversation with her face to face and she starts pulling the "im gonna kill you look".

Unnerving.
Stay away from theatre bitches, especially ones on drugs.
 
Edit ETA: Kayla is NOT an exhibitionist!
sheisnot.jpg
 
also thought she looked fine before Nick gave his "body destroyed" rant. It's disturbing to me he did that, and then we started to notice the changes in her appearance
And this is at the same time he was openly flirting with “hot” wine moms in his locals chats and showing Kayla pictures of Mandy’s tits saying how hot “she” is.

I too would just zonk out on pills watching StarTrek if the person I was financially anchored too did that.
 
Inside you there are two Nicks.

Nick #1: 😎🤘 Words have no meaning! I can say whatever I want and it's your fault if you take it the wrong way!
Nick #2: 🤓📋 Showing one's pale white ass to a paying audience is not exhibitionism. If you open the Merriam Webster dictionary, exhibitionism is strictly defined as "a perversion in which sexual gratification is obtained from the indecent exposure of one's genitals (as to a stranger)", and Kayla never posted her genitals, nor were the Locals members strangers to her, ergo she is not an exhibitionist and I don't know where you got such an absurd idea. Maybe you're the exhibitionist?
 
Last edited:
Aaron's team can as well. I'm not sure if there is any paperwork out there on how subpoenaed Nick.

There's nothing on MCRO so far, but if April's subpoena is anything to go by with issuance on February 10th, service on February 13th, and filing by the prosecutor on February 18th, some time lag is to be expected while they await return of a different county's service affidavit. Nick's and Kayla's should be popping up within the next week.

On a related note, since it has now been a full week since the Minnesota judge issued the certificates on February 11th for filing in a New York court as the next step, it seemed about time to check New York's MCRO equivalent out of morbid curiosity as to how Stearns County prosecutors would go about the procedural particulars through locally licensed counsel. Surprisingly, as of today there's still not a peep over there:

BisconteLocalSearch.jpg

BisconteCrimSearch.jpg

BisconteSupremeSearch.jpg


They may want to get their shit filed soon lest Aaron's attorney start wondering if the Minnesota filings were just a bluff in the course of plea negotiation brinkmanship going on lately. One thought at first was that perhaps the prosecutor used the Minnesota certificates as a mere shot across the bow to then contact the Biscontes and finally scare them into enough toothless assurances of voluntary compliance to feel somewhat safe in forgoing the absolutely critical New York filings. However, such a lazy gambit would appear unsuccessful after watching the Biscontes' cringeworthy interview clipped earlier today, where a retired judge relied on the Biscontes' very poor description of the fact pattern and case type when he recommended that they blow this whole thing off, and they sure as hell sounded inclined to go along with that advice:


As an aside, the New York searches appeared to format the names correctly since they did pull up a mildly amusing case where some C-list actor sued Flat Broke Geno™ in his capacity as a bartender (i.e. janitor when "cleaning up" at closing time) as he struggled to make ends meet despite already working for Compound Media at the time, because he allegedly was negligent in failing to cut off some hammered bar patron who assaulted said actor, making him the unfortunate pass-through to get the bar on the hook for respondeat superior liability. There's a shitload of PDFs on the court website for anyone curious about the tortured procedural history spanning four years until eventual dismissal, but two aspects in particular can add some insight on things to come in State Jilted Gay Lover ex rel Feminazi v. Imholte.

First, there is an amusing transcript of Geno's lengthy deposition that reveals quite a bit about his background and the back-and-forth with the plaintiff's ambulance chaser that can serve as something of a sneak preview into how Geno would fare as a key witness today. It's too long to read cover to cover at the moment but even a cursory skim makes him sound like a colossal pain in the ass, and there are so many instances of "I don't recall," "no recollection," etc. that he almost makes Hilary Clinton look forthright by comparison. And to any extent that he sounds more coherent in the transcript than what we're used to from his livestreams, bear in mind that it was almost a decade ago with untold billions of brain cells burned off by hard liquor and cocaine between then and now, so his testimony could only be expected to go worse than what you're reading. Anyway the whole thing's spoilered here for more intrepid souls to peruse and highlight later:

Bisconte Deposition Transcript (1).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (2).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (3).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (4).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (5).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (6).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (7).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (8).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (9).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (10).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (11).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (12).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (13).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (14).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (15).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (16).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (17).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (18).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (19).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (20).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (21).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (22).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (23).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (24).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (25).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (26).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (27).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (28).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (29).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (30).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (31).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (32).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (33).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (34).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (35).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (36).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (37).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (38).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (39).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (40).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (41).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (42).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (43).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (44).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (45).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (46).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (47).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (48).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (49).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (50).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (51).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (52).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (53).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (54).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (55).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (56).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (57).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (58).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (59).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (60).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (61).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (62).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (63).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (64).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (65).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (66).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (67).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (68).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (69).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (70).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (71).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (72).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (73).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (74).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (75).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (76).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (77).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (78).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (79).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (80).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (81).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (82).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (83).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (84).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (85).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (86).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (87).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (88).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (89).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (90).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (91).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (92).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (93).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (94).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (95).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (96).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (97).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (98).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (99).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (100).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (101).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (102).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (103).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (104).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (105).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (106).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (107).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (108).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (109).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (110).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (111).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (112).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (113).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (114).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (115).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (116).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (117).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (118).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (119).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (120).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (121).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (122).jpgBisconte Deposition Transcript (123).jpg

Heh:
Probably.jpg


Secondly and more importantly for present purposes, several filings reflect that historically Geno's itinerant lifestyle has made it a tremendous pain in the ass to even get him personally served with papers in the first place. So even though Minnesota's and New York's reciprocal statutes nominally could get him on the hook, as a practical matter the as-yet-unfiled Uniform Act proceeding in New York being more or less in the nature of a civil action, with ordinary due process rights to notice and hearing like any other, could ultimately still leave the prosecutors stuck with process servers' usual game of cat-and-mouse no different from GoodLawgic struggling to collect on junk debts to no avail:

BisconteService.jpg


Perhaps it was improvident for Nick to go to all the trouble of a police report legally declaring himself a cuck only to watch the whole house of cards fall asunder just because he pinned all his hopes on one penniless alcoholic dago who can simply look through the peephole on his front door and decide not to talk to strangers. Oopsies!

AdviceBrennan.jpg
 
Last edited:
He has no positive activity he can engage in.
He does, Scandinavian incel child.
Positive in:
- AIDS
- Aaron Imholte's DNA
- Herpes
- Unabashed homosexuality

At this point I'm convinced that April's appeal over Kayla was that she agreed to wear a strap-on.
Activities shared with his e-daddy Juju the cow, also known as Dax Herrera, a man who pretends to be a cow while he gets fucked in the butt by Hulagirl86 wearing a purple sparkly strap-on.

I was joking. :story:
You can see this was indeed Kayla, your honour, from the trashy trollop tattoos that are visible to you RIGHT NOW. *points to the zonked out pillhead*
 
We know thanks to Aaron that the dishwasher was too full of used whiskey glasses to hold actual dishes, so the paper plates do make some practical sense. But holy shit, what a white trash thing to do.
"Why would I clean a shower? The shower cleans itself" is probably the logic behind the Silent Hill Shower.
 
As already stated his credibility is always relevant.
I dont believe establishing who ate whose cum would be relevant to his credibility, which was what I responded to.
No, I mean most prosecutors would have bailed on the revenge porn charges once the victim's husband, and one of your critical witnesses, starts harassing the Defendant and committing crimes against said Defendant.
Given the felony charge, the CA probably sees Aaron as a serial harasser - which could be very likely true given his past actions and the ethos of the arrested development shock jocks.
 
Last edited:
My pet theory is that he is building 5000 replicas of the famed “art piece.”

View attachment 6996449

It’s an involved process. He’s got to order the tiny little flowerpots and metal flowers from Temu, scavenge shell casings from the local gun range, and then oversee “Lady Rackets” and the children as they painstakingly hot-glue them all together, burning their little fingertips in the process.

(This is a joke)

The sexual innuendo was what attracted him to this 'art'. This has motivated all his purchases and interests. The audience just though it was funny for a long time and never noticed the 'weird'. I'll admit to be one.

How many of those 5K grift people even remember Cuckieta?

A few dozen comments on his pity posts every month or other.

The original idea for the gift was that he'd have a dropshipper handle the mailings so that he would not have your physical address, but now that might be out of he is packing and shipping himself. Caution to any who desire to get whatever it is. Send it to a PO box or mail service.


Nick shares his wife, so nothing is sacred or 'intimate'.

Nick is just this side of: 'It didn't happen, and of if it is, it is a good thing'.

Since this faggot can never give an honest and straight answer to anything, the answer is yes.

Yes, he has live streamed while driving. He did so on June 10th.
Yes, he likely violated MN law in doing so.

Start here.
See @AnOminous catch him out here.

We were also able to track his route via road signs and figure where he was going, previously.

Reminds me of his recent "the best way to pass a drug test is to not do drugs" non answer

Cross-reference with 'It was true when I said it' and 'I still believe it, but I made decisions that went against my beliefs.'
 
So am I getting this right?
:really: >Aaron Imholte ate my goo
:really: >Aaron Imholte showed nude photos of April *sob* *smells fish* to total strangers at a restaurant
:really: >I/my wife sent nude photos to him

So he knew Aaron was a piece of shit that shares nude photos with just about anyone that would look in his direction, yet either him or his wife sent nude photos to the man anyway?

Make it make sense.
I hope everyone involved gets the shooting squad.
 
Back