Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

View attachment 7004168
View attachment 7004176
View attachment 7004181

Lol, "three reasons: 1) and 2)."

 

[Sexy Senior Citizen]

Funny how he can only behave himself when the judge is around to give him asspats.

He's a tough guy on the internet, but he's very cowardly in real life.

 

[East_Clintwood]

As a general rule, settlement discussions are always kept confidential.

Actual settlement conferences are confidential. Sperging in random emails about how Null refuses to settle and then re-iterating his stance that he'll drop the case if Null removes everything about him, and puts in place a measure to automatically delete anything about him, however are not.

 

[obsdj]

As a general rule, settlement discussions are always kept confidential.

I just meant things like this, from ECF 196-4.

 

[LiquidChrisRespecter]

So, the Judge confirmed in November that he will be dragging Russtard kicking and screaming to trial if he doesn't get himself sanctioned into dismissal first since he's taken his sweet fucking time even getting this far.

Russ, a trial is your biggest opportunity to EXPLAIN. Let's get this moving, chop chop!

 

[Useful_Mistake]

 

[Throwing Romans]

View attachment 7004840

Boring housekeeping. Cmon Russ, where's my

spergout?

 

[obsdj]

View attachment 7004840

Bummer. But at least we know he saw it.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Bummer

Why?

 

[obsdj]

Why?

When I initially saw it, all it said was "Order on Motion for Short Form Discovery AND Order on Motion to Expedite" and my foolish human emotions got the better of me, thinking an order of significance was occurring.

Come to think of it though, shouldn't he have also rendered ECF 236 as moot (Russell's plightfiling), since it's a direct response to 232?

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Come to think of it though, shouldn't he have also rendered ECF 236 as moot (Russell's plightfiling), since it's a direct response to 232?

I don't see why. It pretty much remains as a response to the refiled motion at ECF 238. Declaring Russ' motion as moot and forcing him to refile it seems like a waste of Judicial resources, since nothing materially changed.

 

[Harvey Danger]

Something that should make every poster here feel a little better and Null feel better too. This Judge is suffering with this case. I can feel his despair and his desire to get this case moving along and over with. But that is not going to happen unless the judge actually does what he is supposed to.

That's the judge declaring his deathmarch to trial, on the record. He's not despairing, he's demanding a boring discovery phase. He didn't get it and he deserves to suffer.

It's funny that Greer's only contribution here was to argue in favor of a decision the judge made 30 seconds earlier, fail to explain his theory of damages, and tard stumble his way into an amended complaint allowance. The rest of the time he's forced to sit there while Hardin and the judge muse that his theory is so retarded, it'll probably get tossed in summary judgement.

 

[Terrifik]

Actual settlement conferences are confidential. Sperging in random emails about how Null refuses to settle and then re-iterating his stance that he'll drop the case if Null removes everything about him, and puts in place a measure to automatically delete anything about him, however are not.

which this whole point create trouble down line.
leading to more lawsuits / question of free speech on internet

 

[Bias Judge.]

Just wanted to pop in and say that your screenshots/snippets of the documents are MUCH appreciated for us non-lawfag lurkers who occasionally swing by to catch-up on the case. Your efforts do not go unnoticed. TYFYS !

 

[obsdj]

I don't see why. It pretty much remains as a response to the refiled motion at ECF 238. Declaring Russ' motion as moot and forcing him to refile it seems like a waste of Judicial resources, since nothing materially changed.

If that's the case, then I hope Greer withdraws and re-submits on his own because that would be funny.

 

[Napoleon III]

That's the judge declaring his deathmarch to trial, on the record. He's not despairing, he's demanding a boring discovery phase. He didn't get it and he deserves to suffer.

Keep in mind this scheduling conference happened after a punch of shit-flinging between Greer and Hardin because Greer couldn't even do the basic thing of the scheduling conference after Hardin basically begged the Judge to force Greer to do it.

I really hate to say this but Hardin is going to piss off the judge with this many filings. The fact that this is at 240 docket entries is incredibly retarded.

Possibly, although on the other hand maybe not. There are definitely parts of what Hardin is doing I don't fully understand. But I think Hardin knows to what level the judge will put up with Greer, and is using that to his advantage. It seems to be working based on how the judge actually granted Sanctions though we will see if that pattern continues.

 

[Kosher Dill]

I'm still hoping we get the audio of the scheduling conference too.
"We know he's disabled, Your Honor, just listen to him."

 

[obsdj]

It's worth asking now: What, exactly, does Greer think he can move for sanctions on against Hardin now? Previously (last month), he was harping on the "violation" of the SPO:

and engaging in this "don't sanction me and I won't sanction you" threat. But now that he has finally accepted that no such violation occurred, because he was being a retard and refusing to read the SPO, what does he think he can file sanctions on now, per today's email? What bogus grounds does he think he has at this point?

 

[Unkraut]

While trying to take in this flurry of new motions a question popped into my mind: how do actual attorneys, ones that aren't schizoposting from their phone out of a rented uber, keep track of such a clusterfuck of a case? Is there special management software that plots this web of motions and counter-motions, ECFs and their attached deadlines into a sort of timeline-flowchart? I wonder how Hardin manages to reference specific bullet points from ECFs that were added to the docket years ago without photographic memory.

 

[Bogliacci]

What, exactly, does Greer think he can move for sanctions on against Hardin now?

For not being a true neutral third party and settling with him.