US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's probably driven by understanding how pointless it is to foot the defense bill for countries whose leaders are destroying them through importing floods of shitskin invaders who hate Europeans and their way of life.
Im also saying, our trillionish a year defense spending makes a compelling excuse when we wonder why we pay taxes and everything is still shit.

If you’re a European and 2% of your budget is too much, then why are you so fucking poor?
 
Trump Targets $128 Billion California High-Speed Rail Project
Bloomberg (archive.ph)
By Maxwell Adler
2025-02-20 20:51:58GMT
The Trump administration has launched a review of California’s high-speed rail project, adding to long-standing doubts about whether the venture, plagued by cost overruns and delays, will ever be completed.

The Federal Railroad Administration will investigate the project through a compliance and performance review, Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy announced on Thursday. In 2008, the California High-Speed Rail Authority estimated the initiative would cost $33 billion and begin service by 2020, and voters approved $9 billion of bonds for the project. However, only 119 miles of the planned 776-mile railroad has commenced construction so far. Meanwhile, the current cost estimate ranges from $89 billion to $128 billion, according to the authority.

“For too long, taxpayers have subsidized the massively over-budget and delayed California High-Speed Rail project,” Duffy said in a press release. The investigation will determine whether taxpayer money should remain committed to the program, the release said.

The project has long been treated as a political football, with it fate contingent on which administration is occupying the White House. During his first term, President Donald Trump terminated a federal agreement with the state, canceling nearly $1 billion in funding for the project. Then, the Biden administration awarded $3 billion for the rail line in 2023.

“It is the worst-managed project I think I’ve ever seen,” Trump said at a news conference earlier this month referencing the rail.

Earlier this month, an inspector general report found the project is unlikely to reach its target of shuttling the first phase passengers by 2033. Additionally, the Central Valley segment — which connects Merced to Bakersfield — has a funding gap of $6.5 billion, the report said.

Thursday’s action drew sharp rebuke from California Democrats who support the railroad. State Senator Scott Wiener accused Trump of trying to destroy the project.

“High-Speed Rail — or as I call it, a modern, integrated rail system for California — is essential for the future of our state,” Wiener said in a statement. “It’s an embarrassment that California does not have a modern statewide rail system — Trump wants to prolong that embarrassment instead of doing something to help.”
DOGE Staffer Behind Racist Posts Reinstated at Social Security
Bloomberg (archive.ph)
By Emily Birnbaum, Jake Bleiberg, and Dana Hull
2025-02-21 00:40:20GMT
The staffer with billionaire Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency who resigned after a report that linked him to racism and eugenics has been reinstated at the Social Security Administration, according to people familiar with the move.

Marko Elez, who reportedly advocated for a “eugenic immigration policy” and argued against mixed-race relationships in posts on X, received support from Musk, President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance after his departure earlier this month. Vance argued he didn’t think “stupid social media activity should ruin a kid’s life.”

Before resigning from DOGE, Elez, an engineer who has worked for SpaceX and social-media platform X, had an office in Treasury and an email address with the agency, Bloomberg News previously reported.

Elez did not respond to repeated calls, emails and text messages this week.

He joins other DOGE staffers at the 58,000-employee agency that oversees the nation’s old-age and disability entitlement programs. Its acting commissioner is Leland Dudek, who earlier was removed from his Social Security Administration job for sending information to Musk’s team.

Dudek has said the DOGE team is following the law and has read-only access to the systems, which include information on the nearly 70 million Americans who receive Social Security benefits.

Elez was listed Tuesday on a roster of DOGE employees with a government email address associated with the Executive Office of the President, according to a record seen by Bloomberg News.

Neither the White House nor the Social Security Administration responded to requests for comment.

In his online comments under a pseudonym, Elez within the last year advocated for rolling back the Civil Rights Act, according to a Wall Street Journal report. “Normalize Indian hate,” one post said. “Just for the record, I was racist before it was cool,” another said. “You could not pay me to marry outside of my ethnicity,” he wrote in a third post.

Elez has since deleted the posts.
DOJ Wants Nonprofits to Post Bond in Fight Over Funding Freeze
Bloomberg (archive.ph)
By Zoe Tillman
2025-02-20 21:43:16GMT
The Trump administration is pursuing what one judge questioned as an unusual tactic in its fight to cut spending: demanding that nonprofits suing to block a funding freeze post a bond so that the US government can recoup the money later if it prevails.

The US Justice Department asked for the bond in a court battle with nonprofits seeking a prolonged halt to efforts by the administration to freeze government grants, loans and financial assistance. US District Judge Loren AliKhan, who has temporarily blocked the government plan, said Thursday she’d never seen such a request and expressed skepticism that it was justified.

At a hearing Thursday, Justice Department lawyer Daniel Schwei declined to propose a specific amount of money for the nonprofits to put up in a bond. But he argued the request was a reasonable way to cover costs to American taxpayers if AliKhan sided with the challengers but was reversed by a higher court.

The plaintiffs, which include membership associations for nonprofit organizations across the country, said the bond request is retaliation by the Trump administration intended to scare off future lawsuits. A lawyer for the groups told the judge Thursday there was no harm to the government if it had to keep paying out grants and awards that had already been approved.

The government is facing dozens of lawsuits over President Donald Trump’s actions since he took office last month to remake the federal government, cut spending and crack down on immigration.

The Office of Management and Budget issued a memo in January directing federal agencies to pause federal grants, loans and assistance as part of a review of whether the spending aligned with Trump’s policies. Although the memo was swiftly rescinded, the White House said it would continue to pause funding and the plaintiffs alleged ongoing problems accessing money, so the litigation continued.

Several groups sued, including the nonprofits, who said they rely on government funding to operate, and that even a short delay in payments risked killing off programs and “could deprive people and communities of their life-saving services.”

AliKhan hasn’t decided whether to impose a longer-term preliminary injunction requested by the nonprofits. But if she grants the request, Schwei argued OMB would be harmed if it couldn’t direct funding where the administration preferred.

Schwei offered one past example of the executive branch asking for bond: A case he handled during Trump’s first term over efforts by the US government to ban the social media platform TikTok based on national security concerns about its Chinese parent company ByteDance Ltd. DOJ argued at the time that if a judge halted the ban, ByteDance should post a bond at least equal to the value of the user information it would continue to have access to.

A judge granted ByteDance’s injunction request in 2020 but denied the government’s bond request, finding “no risk” that the US government would “suffer monetary harm.”

The case is National Council of Nonprofits v. Office of Management of Budget, 25-cv-239, US District Court, District of Columbia.
Judge Says Trump Administration Didn’t Follow His Funding Order
Bloomberg (archive.ph)
By Erik Larson
2025-02-21 00:17:03GMT
A federal judge said the Trump administration failed to comply with his order to resume federal payments to foreign assistance programs administered by the US Agency for International Development, but he declined to hold the government in contempt as requested by groups that sued.

The ruling Thursday by US District Judge Amir Ali in Washington comes in one of several lawsuits challenging President Donald Trump’s executive orders aimed at slashing potentially trillions of dollars in government spending even though it’s already approved by Congress.

Two nonprofits accused the government of “brazen defiance” of a Feb. 13 temporary restraining order that was supposed to restart the flow of USAID funds while the judge considered a longer-lasting injunction against the spending freeze. But the government said the order gave it some leeway to continue to enforce terms of thousands of its agreements with aid recipients, which may allow termination of funding anyway.

Ali disagreed, saying the government was clearly not in compliance.

The judge found that the administration had “continued their blanket suspension of funds” even after he blocked the government from doing so. “But the court finds that contempt is not warranted on the current record and given defendants’ explicit recognition that ‘prompt compliance with the order’ is required,” Ali said in his written ruling.

A White House spokesperson didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

Democrats and other Trump critics have expressed growing concern about what will happen if the president defies court orders he disagrees with. That worry was amplified after a judge in a different spending-freeze case ruled the Trump administration violated a TRO by failing to restart the flow of billions of dollars in funds for federal grants, loans and other domestic financial assistance, in a suit brought by Democratic state officials.

Earlier this month, Trump posted on social media that, “He who saves his country violates no law,” further inflaming Democrats and other critics.

The contempt ruling was issued in a suit brought by the AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition and the Journalism Development Network, which receive funding from USAID. The beleaguered federal agency emerged as a major target of Elon Musk’s so-called government efficiency team, which aims to dramatically reshape and shrink the government.

On Tuesday, the US Justice Department filed a report with Ali saying the government was in compliance with his order even though it had still decided to cancel the vast majority of foreign assistance payments. The TRO “clearly and unambiguously” allowed the government “to enforce their rights under the terms of contracts and grants, including by terminating them,” the department said in the filing.

The nonprofits responded by filing a contempt motion. They accused the government of making a disingenuous claim that the State Department had reviewed thousands of contracts and proceeded to cancel them as allowed under the TRO.

“The report makes the remarkable assertion that defendants have reviewed thousands of affected State Department and USAID grants, contracts, and cooperative agreements, and concludes that — despite this Court’s unambiguous order — terminating nearly all foreign assistance funding was legal,” the nonprofits said in their filing.

The case is AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition v. US Deptartment of State, 25-cv-00400, US District Court, District of Columbia (Washington).
Facing pressure from Trump, Costa Rica and Honduras join Panama as stopovers for foreign deportees
Associated Press (archive.ph)
By Megan Janetsky and Javier Córdoba
2025-02-21 01:42:24GMT
SAN JOSÉ, Costa Rica (AP) — A group of families and children hailing from Uzbekistan, China, Afghanistan, Russia and more countries climbed down the stairs of an airplane in Costa Rica’s capital Thursday, the first flight of deportees from other nations Costa Rica agreed to hold in detention facilities for the Trump administration while it organized the return back to their countries.

The flight of 135 deportees, half of them minors, added Costa Rica to a growing list of Latin American nations to serve as a stopover for migrants as U.S. President Donald Trump ’s administration seeks to step up deportations.

While Costa Rica joins Panama in holding deportees from mostly Asian origin until their repatriation can be arranged or they can seek protection somewhere, Honduras on Thursday also facilitated a handoff of deportees between the U.S. and Venezuela from a flight coming from Guantanamo Bay.

The migrants arriving in Costa Rica will be bused to a rural holding facility near the Panama border, where they will be detained up to six weeks and be flown back to their countries of origin, said Omer Badilla, Costa Rica’s deputy minister of the interior and police. The U.S. government will cover the costs.

The arrangement is part of a deal the Trump administration struck with Costa Rica during U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s visit earlier this month. It comes as Trump has pressured countries across the region to help facilitate deportations at times under the threat of steep tariffs or sanctions.

Costa Rican President Rodrigo Chaves told reporters Wednesday that his country is helping its “economically powerful brother from the north.”

Similar agreements have been reached with other Latin American nations, but the concept of using third countries as deportation layovers has drawn strong criticism from human rights advocates. Beyond the conditions of their detention in Costa Rica, concerns revolve around international protections for asylum seekers and whether these deportees will be appropriately screened before being returned to their countries or sent to yet another country.

Panama this week became the first such country to accept 299 deportees from other nations, with the government holding them in hotel rooms guarded by police. About one-third of those who refused to voluntarily return to their countries were sent to a remote camp in Darien province bordering Colombia on Wednesday. The rest were awaiting commercial flights back home.

“We’ve thrown out the possibility of a hotel, precisely to avoid a situation similar to that in Panama,” Badilla, the Costa Rican official, told The Associated Press.

Honduras said Thursday it also acted as a brief stopover for a deportation flight of Venezuelans coming from Guantanamo Bay in what it described as a “humanitarian bridge” since there are no direct flights between the U.S. and Venezuela.

A U.S. flight carrying 170 Venezuelans landed Thursday in a joint U.S.-Honduran military base in central Honduras, and within hours were transferred to a Venezuelan aircraft. An official with Honduras’ foreign ministry said this was not a routine arrangement, but that the Central American nation remains open to facilitating more transfers between the two adversaries.

Badilla said that Thursday’s deportation flight from San Diego is largely made up of families, including 65 children, two pregnant women and an elderly woman. He said Costa Rica was told by the Trump administration that most of the deportees have agreed to voluntarily return to their countries.

If they refuse, Costa Rica is open to offering deportees refuge or will work with the U.N.'s International Organization for Migration, IOM, to facilitate travel to another third country.

“Costa Rica is a country that guarantees human rights,” he said. “We are going to guarantee that they are returned to safe countries. We cannot leave that to chance because of an ethical and moral commitment of our country.”

In the meantime, migrants will be detained in the border facility, where they will be accompanied by U.N. officials, the Red Cross and other aid-focused government entities to “guarantee their rights,” Badilla said.

The facility being used to hold migrants, a former factory, has faced criticisms for its conditions in the past.

During a visit by the AP in October 2023, migrants were fenced off in cramped facilities and said they felt like “prisoners.” Many slept in tents on the ground, where some said liquid from portable toilets leaked. Badilla said that facilities have since been improved, but the government has denied journalists access to the building.

The facility will also be processing a “reverse flow” of migrants from Venezuela, Colombia and Ecuador that previously sought asylum in the U.S. and now want to return home. Badilla said Costa Rica has seen between 50 and 75 migrants headed south entering the country a day.

IOM said in a statement to the AP that “we do not have direct involvement in the detention or restriction of movement of individuals” and that it was providing humanitarian support and supporting voluntary returns to their countries and “identifying safe alternatives for others.”
 
How did this 3rd Trump term even start? Is it just something the MSM pulled out of their ass to fear monger?
they can't comprehend the notion that Trump may want to retire and have fresh blood take over. They did put a senile old man on the throne and were trying to do it again, after all.

But honestly I'm okay with the whole third term thing clogging the airwaves so the media doesn't have the capacity to go after Vance or who ever else will be the next President.

It won't be Musk as that guy needs a wrangler.
 
Is Trump's Europe policy driven by personal resentment because he sees Europeans as looking down on Americans ?
Recall, Trump is a business man first. He things in a 'tit for tat' way. I do this for you, you do that for me. And since WW2, Europe has been drinking from America's teat and not giving anything back but insults.
 
This is intentional. This is engineered behavior.
The funniest fucking thing is its Trump's own people doing it. Isn't ironic that the exact moment someone like Kash Patel is in position to actually punish left wing fed posting for the first time in 50 years this happens. This is the final stage of the lefts end. The less insane ones get to decide if they are grabbing a gun to fight in the shortest war ever or finally admitting they don't actually think Trump is Hitler.

The left doing this is actually the best possible outcome. 100% of these are bots or trash people who will never offer society anything of value. Normally it wouldn't be ethical to put them down like rabid dogs they want to try violence, at least just do it already. This wouldn't be possible if the left wing media and CIA didn't spent the last decade using every speck of cutting edge science and big data manipulation to essentially edge the left on trump being mega-ultra-super-hitler whos totally going to hitler them any day now. Just keep slow jerking and seething its gonna happen!

Never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake.
 
It's driven because they're parasitical. They leach off American tax dollars. They expect us to pay and die for them. They consider the Russians a threat and in the past three years of war on their door step not once they did bother to re-arm themselves. Any and all plans they make can be summed up with "America will handle it".

They screw us on trade, they're weak military and frankly what their actual values are is anti American.

Fuck them.
it'll be hilarious if Russia, the US, and China become allies-at-arms-distance while everyone else get's relegated to third world status, who only serve to be ignored or annexed depending on how much raw resources they have.
 
good, i hope they continue not to follow the judges' orders. they're not doing what a judge is actually supposed to do, they're attempting to execute from the bench. not even legislate.
notice how, even though he said this, he still declined to do anything about it
but he declined to hold the government in contempt as requested by groups that sued.
Probably because as @The Big O implied, Team Trump made sure that Operation Swamp Drain was as legally airtight as could be.
 
Recall, Trump is a business man first. He things in a 'tit for tat' way. I do this for you, you do that for me. And since WW2, Europe has been drinking from America's teat and not giving anything back but insults.
Trump is a New York businessman.

It’s a clear difference, and one of the keys is that you either provide the goods/money or you don’t. And if you don’t, you don’t get to shit on everything. What’s pissing him off more than America paying for everything is American being shat upon for paying for everything.

He even offers ways for them to save face and they can’t take it because they’re too busy shitting the place up. Fuck ‘em.
 
DOJ Wants Nonprofits to Post Bond in Fight Over Funding Freeze
Hey, what a brilliant idea. You wanna waste taxpayer time with worthless lawsuits? Then you need to put up some money. So when the government wins, and they will; the American taxpayer gets his dollar back for all the bullshit.

"We're gonna cut off funding, and we're gonna make the NGO's pay for it!" - Donald John Trump, 2025
 
Back